On 09/04/2013 08:07 PM, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
I have this problem.
It is just that I decided to some extent I decided i will ignore.
It is irritating to constantly have to adjust on every boot.
I think we need to work on it for sure.
The only problem is I personally cant take it up as my hands
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Thursday, September 5, 2013, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>> I can sponsor you, assuming that you'll be following the "co-maintain
>> to get sponsored" process and Christopher will offer help with
>> aoetools if needed.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 06:27 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
>
>> I was at Starbucks where I guess it was too light. When I got back I
>> could read the screen and under the user name it told me to reboot to
>> install updates. Though I didn't use the comman
On Thursday, September 5, 2013, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> I can sponsor you, assuming that you'll be following the "co-maintain
> to get sponsored" process and Christopher will offer help with
> aoetools if needed.
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_
I can sponsor you, assuming that you'll be following the "co-maintain
to get sponsored" process and Christopher will offer help with
aoetools if needed.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer
Christopher, are you ok with this?
- Ken
On
On 09/04/2013 06:27 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
I was at Starbucks where I guess it was too light. When I got back I
could read the screen and under the user name it told me to reboot to
install updates. Though I didn't use the command, I hope I can
remember it for when I need it again; perhaps I'
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 04:33 PM, richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone had the problem where the screen dims very close to black
>> the moment Fedora start or finishes booting after the bios has booted up?
>>
> Yes, I have a bunch of laptop
Hi.
I have been talking to Christopher Meng about helping him maintain the aoetools
package in Fedora in a co-maintainer role.
He is an experienced Fedora packager, and I am an upstream maintainer for the
aoetools. It would help me work with the primary packager if I could commit to
my own br
On 09/04/2013 04:33 PM, richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone had the problem where the screen dims very close to black
the moment Fedora start or finishes booting after the bios has booted up?
Yes, I have a bunch of laptops with a similar issue. The fix for me was
to add "video.use_b
On 05/09/2013, at 9:32, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> richard.vicker...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> Has anyone had the problem where the screen dims very close to black the
>> moment Fedora start or finishes booting after the bios has booted up?
>
> Laptop?
>
> Your laptop probably has an ambient li
richard.vicker...@gmail.com writes:
Has anyone had the problem where the screen dims very close to black the
moment Fedora start or finishes booting after the bios has booted up?
Laptop?
Your laptop probably has an ambient light sensor, and the screen brightness
gets autoadjusted based on
On Mon, 02 Sep, 2013 at 15:44:46 GMT, Kalev Lember wrote:
> There's a separate koji build target for the 3.9.91 builds and the
> magical invocation is 'fedpkg build --target f20-gnome'. We're also
> going to use the same spreadsheet system as previously, so if you want
> builds to be included in th
Has anyone had the problem where the screen dims very close to black the moment Fedora start or finishes booting after the bios has booted up?Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the TELUS network.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-09-04/fedora-meeting-1.2013-09-04-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1
The following packages are now blocked in F20+ as decided on today's
FESCo meeting:
libgssglue spacewalk-web
Please fix any resulting dependency issues.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Summary of changes:
97fa6d4... Update to 0.32 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Le mardi 03 septembre 2013 à 15:37 -0400, Jay Greguske a écrit :
> On 09/03/2013 12:29 PM, Michael scherer wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:48:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:10:32 -0400
> >> Jay Greguske wrote:
> >>
> >>> If we had SELinux policy enabled on the bui
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-09-04)
===
Meeting started by notting at 18:00:44 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-09-04/fesco.2013-09-04-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
commit 97fa6d43654328723790e703938e1a64a2de017c
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Sep 4 21:06:30 2013 +0100
Update to 0.32
- New upstream release 0.32
- Don't include cached results
- Fix handling module beginning with v and pragma with version
- Recognize "use paren
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-ExtractUse:
ecb7c7c7c7f1eaafa277797eaadd5c29 Module-ExtractUse-0.32.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
commit d445108900fd212424a832abae65f8fba114e08d
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Sep 4 21:03:48 2013 +0100
Update to 2.03
- New upstream release 2.03:
- Fix typo in docs (CPAN RT#88394)
- Require perl 5.8.8, for <:encoding
- Updated IANA
- A bit more DESCRIPTI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/04/2013 03:48 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mardi 03 septembre 2013 à 15:37 -0400, Jay Greguske a écrit :
>> On 09/03/2013 12:29 PM, Michael scherer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:48:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 03 Sep 201
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, September 4th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status Update
3) Aarch64 - Status Update
- Koji
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47500
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47500/0001-Ticket-47500-start-dirsrv-restart-dirsrv-stop-disrv-.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 06:49:21PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > > this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
[...]
> Here is the ticket:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1172
> Is the part about just replying to the meeting announcement to get
> something discussed ob
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-09-05 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-09-05 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-09-05 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-09-05 1
On 09/02/2013 05:44 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> The GNOME 3.9.91 release is coming as well, with a bit unfortunate
> timing wrt. Fedora freezes. In any case, we'll handle the GNOME 3.9.91
> builds together and file them as a single megaupdate in Bodhi.
GNOME 3.9.91 builds are now done and made it in
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:39:07AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 08:22 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:29:20PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
> > > this e-mail, file a new ticket
If something goes wrong with systemd, suspicion goes up exponentially
(*Jokingly* ;-)
--
Later,
Lukas "lzap" Zapletal
irc: lzap #theforeman
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 03:41 PM, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
>>
>> I mean we have a really sharp crew here.
>> Why not?
>
>
> We have sharp crew, but they have a lot of other work to do. So thinking
> about how to offload some developer work with others m
On 09/04/2013 04:29 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
Are we able to evaluate, how much slower this is?
Just few seconds. I would say 15 seconds slower. I mean in current Copr, which
does VM+mockchain.
OBS is actually little bit faster because it does not use mock.
And if you use PreinstallImages
(h
commit 6a5a61203663d535faf78fb03c71cf2e0c4a3b17
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Sep 4 15:21:44 2013 +0100
Update to 1.14
- New upstream release 1.14
- Updated inaccurate test prereq
- Update buildreqs for tests
- Drop perl(Capture::Tiny) and perl(Test::Script)
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:55:36 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I could change perl-Alien-ROOT from noarch to architecture
> > specific, but that's cheating and more seriously it just shifts the
> > problem in the reverese dependency hierarchy to next level (i.e. I
> > would get broken dependency
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:04:10AM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> Compare it to Copr and OBS approach, when package is build in VM and
> after that backend will retrieve the results from VM. So on builder
> (of OBS and COPR) is no sensitive information at all.
Are we able to evaluate, how much slo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/04/2013 08:44 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just got a broken-dependency e-mail:
>
> perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On
> armhfp: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core
>
> Indeed root/roo
Hello,
I've just got a broken-dependency e-mail:
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core
Indeed root/root-core has been excluded from ARM with commit e2dd5b2818.
The problem is perl-Alien-ROOT is noarc
Hi,
I have been using Fedora since Fedora Core 1 release. However, today I
decided to stop "lurking" and instead do something useful.
So, I have packaged "pudb" which is a full-screen console-based Python
debugger. I would appreciate a review so that I (and others) can do "yum
install python-pudb
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 08:22 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:29:20PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
> > this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
>
> I would like to request some
On 09/03/2013 09:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:33:10PM -0400, Jay Greguske wrote:
> >koji already uses VMs for x86.
>Not for RPM builds.
I think we're talking about different things here. It happens that some of
the x86 builders are VMs, but they're not taken down and
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 08:54 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 03:41 PM, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
> > I mean we have a really sharp crew here.
> > Why not?
>
> We have sharp crew, but they have a lot of other work to do. So thinking
> about how to offload some developer work with
> other
41 matches
Mail list logo
