Re: Clang error: unknown target CPU 'pentium-m'

2013-09-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Sergio Pascual wrote: > I imaging that -march=native is returning the arch of the builder, that is > not supported. How can I make this work? -march=native is NOT allowed in distribution packages. It means to compile binaries which only run on the machine it is compiled on. (-mtune=native would

Re: [HEADSUP] Atlas changed libraries

2013-09-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Susi Lehtola wrote: > FPC maintains packaging guidelines. If you think that BLAS/LAPACK > packages should have their own guideline, then file a proposition to > the FPC. FESCO is still there if the matter needs to be escalated from > the FPC. https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/352 Kevin

Re: [HEADSUP] Atlas changed libraries

2013-09-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Susi Lehtola wrote: > Yes, but everyone knows that if you want ATLAS, the link command is > -L%{_libdir} -llapack -lf77blas -latlas "Everyone knows"? I think pretty much everyone expects to link their stuff with -llapack -lblas and get the most efficient implementation out there, especially whe

Re: dbh and/or DBH

2013-09-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 09:24:11PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all. > > Are the dbh package (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dbh.git/) and > the DBH from http://sourceforge.net/projects/dbh/files/dbh/5.0.7/ same > software ? Yes. It l

Re: LVM thinp expectations in anaconda 20

2013-09-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:04:08AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> For an LV to take advantage of thinp snapshots needs to be a virtual >> size LV drawn from the thin pool, correct? So it is a virtual size LV >> in any case, it's just that t

Re: LVM thinp expectations in anaconda 20

2013-09-30 Thread Alasdair G Kergon
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:04:08AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > For an LV to take advantage of thinp snapshots needs to be a virtual > size LV drawn from the thin pool, correct? So it is a virtual size LV > in any case, it's just that the installer isn't going to let users > specify total LV virtua

Re: LVM thinp expectations in anaconda 20

2013-09-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:55:43AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> I still can't choose a Desired Capacity that's larger than free space >> in the VG. Ergo, I can't create a virtual size LV. Is this expected? > > At this stage, yes. It mi

Re: what left in mass rebuild x264/ffmpeg for F20

2013-09-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.09.2013 05:28, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > Hi, checking whatrequires ffmpeg-libs and x264-libs, and can't install > on F20 vm is : > > mythtv > acoustid-fingerprinter > bino > bombono-dvd > chromaprint-tools > dvbcut > ffmpegthumbnailer > ffmpegthumbs > gstreamer1-libav > k3b-extras-freeworl

[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

2013-09-30 Thread nobody
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours === 1 packages were orphaned python-zope-interface [EL-5,devel,f18,f19,f20] was orphaned by fschwarz Zope 3 Interface Infrastructure https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/nam

Re: bcache-tools and bcache support in other linux packages

2013-09-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Rolf Fokkens wrote: > Hi > > It was brought to my attention that there's a confusing typo in the > message below regarding the planning of bcache support for anaconda. The > claim that it is planned for F20 is not true, it is planned for F21: > > https://fedorahost

[perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix] Update to 0.1.16 Drop upstreamed patch

2013-09-30 Thread Yanko Kaneti
commit 54e49a8b9fba2d99dfefb8fe4d1cc19646cf7e07 Author: Yanko Kaneti Date: Mon Sep 30 18:05:45 2013 +0300 Update to 0.1.16 Drop upstreamed patch .gitignore |1 + ...atest-suffix-list-and-fixup-test-01-accor.patch | 36

File Mozilla-PublicSuffix-v0.1.16.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by yaneti

2013-09-30 Thread Yanko Kaneti
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mozilla-PublicSuffix: 0277aaecfd7501a82d0cd49faf7f1c63 Mozilla-PublicSuffix-v0.1.16.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fe

Re: bcache-tools and bcache support in other linux packages

2013-09-30 Thread Rolf Fokkens
Hi It was brought to my attention that there's a confusing typo in the message below regarding the planning of bcache support for anaconda. The claim that it is planned for F20 is not true, it is planned for F21: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1145 Sorry for any confusion, Rolf Op 26-09

Re: what left in mass rebuild x264/ffmpeg for F20

2013-09-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Seg, 2013-09-30 at 07:09 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 04:28:16 +0100, >Sérgio Basto wrote: > >Hi, checking whatrequires ffmpeg-libs and x264-libs, and can't install > >on F20 vm is : > > That's rpmfusion stuff. Sorry, wrong mailing list ... I wanted to send to

[perl-Tree-Simple/f20] Upstream update.

2013-09-30 Thread corsepiu
Summary of changes: b5cc9c0... Upstream update. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: are you annoyed by frequent password prompts?

2013-09-30 Thread Frank Murphy
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:10:48 +0200 drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel J Walsh > wrote: > > Random crap from the internet not a good idea. > > Since firefox can out and crab stuff to install, and I would > > never no. > > No one is that insane ;) This is all about signed p

Re: are you annoyed by frequent password prompts?

2013-09-30 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Hello, On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > In FESCo ticket #1115, it was decided to modify the privilege escalation > policy in order to allow local, active, admin user to update/remove/etc > signed software without requiring a password. > In FESCo ticket #1117, it was decided

Re: The final push for the application installer in Fedora 20

2013-09-30 Thread Richard Hughes
On 30 September 2013 12:56, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: > AppData is focusing alot about application AppData and AppStream are focussed on applications primarily, but we do currently have some experimental support for icons and input sources. The format of those in the metadata might change a

Re: The final push for the application installer in Fedora 20

2013-09-30 Thread Brendan Jones
On 09/30/2013 08:42 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: vlc is not part of fedora, cause of patent related stuff, not a legal expert, but I dont think fedora cant contain somethng there links to these kind of applications If you create a new kind of application metadata, would it not be a good id

Re: The final push for the application installer in Fedora 20

2013-09-30 Thread Richard Hughes
On 30 September 2013 12:00, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Could you highlight how much of a "cross-distro effort" this really is? You can use gnome-software from git master on Fedora and SUSE now, as I've spent quite a bit of last week with the SUSE rel-eng people making their metadata validate. I've

[Bug 1013535] perl-GStreamer-0.19 is available

2013-09-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013535 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: what left in mass rebuild x264/ffmpeg for F20

2013-09-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 04:28:16 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, checking whatrequires ffmpeg-libs and x264-libs, and can't install on F20 vm is : That's rpmfusion stuff. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: The final push for the application installer in Fedora 20

2013-09-30 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
AppData is focusing alot about application, what about content : icons, themes, backgrounds Tim On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:24:45 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > In GNOME Software, we show a list of applications for each category > > that

F-20 Branched report: 20130930 changes

2013-09-30 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Sep 30 09:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [bwm-ng] bwm-ng-0.6

Re: The final push for the application installer in Fedora 20

2013-09-30 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:24:45 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > In GNOME Software, we show a list of applications for each category > that we think are frikin’ awesome. Some have AppData[1], and some > don’t. For the ones that don’t yet have AppData it leaves the > responsibility of writing the long d

Re: The final push for the application installer in Fedora 20

2013-09-30 Thread Richard Hughes
On 30 September 2013 07:42, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: > vlc is not part of fedora, cause of patent related stuff, not a legal > expert, but I dont think fedora cant contain somethng there links to these > kind of applications Agreed. > If you create a new kind of application metadata, would

Re: Hello! Also, packaging baresip for Fedora

2013-09-30 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:35:33 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: > > On Sunday 29 September 2013 21:22:24 Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > > I went ahead and generated a patch to the Makefile that uses the > > package version for the library version. > > That's wrong, as library versions represent API/ABI cha

Re: Hello! Also, packaging baresip for Fedora

2013-09-30 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 12:38:25 -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > [...] what the upstream Makefile > currently produces. I wasn't sure how invasive I should be in terms > of patching the upstream build process. The build output is "silent" using '@' command invocations in the Makefile. Patching

Re: The final push for the application installer in Fedora 20

2013-09-30 Thread Richard Hughes
On 30 September 2013 09:10, Brendan Jones wrote: > I've submitted a patch for rosegarden submitted upstream. Brilliant, thanks. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/co

Taking owner ship of mod_scgi: re-review, and rutorrent review swap

2013-09-30 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi, mod_scgi was orphaned quite a while back since it wouldn't build on new releases, with the new apache. I found a set of patches in the suse rpm that fix the build. I'd like to get mod_scgi back into the repos. It's required by most rtorrent front ends, like rutorrent that I've just submitted f

Re: The final push for the application installer in Fedora 20

2013-09-30 Thread Brendan Jones
On 09/27/2013 12:24 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: In GNOME Software, we show a list of applications for each category that we think are frikin’ awesome. Some have AppData[1], and some don’t. For the ones that don’t yet have AppData it leaves the responsibility of writing the long description to the L

Re: Hello! Also, packaging baresip for Fedora

2013-09-30 Thread Oron Peled
On Sunday 29 September 2013 21:22:24 Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > I went ahead and generated a patch to the Makefile that uses the > package version for the library version. That's wrong, as library versions represent API/ABI changes and the numbering has different *semantics* than package versi

Re: [linux-sunxi] Announcing Fedora 19 ARM remix for Allwinner SOCs release 2

2013-09-30 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/30/2013 03:20 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't know about the command line option. This looks like the problem Kernel command line: console=tty0 root=/dev/mmcblk0p3 ro rootwait loglevel=5 panic=10 console=ttyS0,115200 disp.screen0_output_mode=EDID:1280x720 p60 hdmi.a

Re: [HEADSUP] Atlas changed libraries

2013-09-30 Thread Susi Lehtola
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:03:14 +0300 Susi Lehtola wrote: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:57:21 +0200 > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Susi Lehtola wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:04:31 +0200 > > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > >> Susi Lehtola wrote: > > >> > If you link to -lblas, you're shooting yourself

Re: [HEADSUP] Atlas changed libraries

2013-09-30 Thread Susi Lehtola
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:57:21 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Susi Lehtola wrote: > > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:04:31 +0200 > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Susi Lehtola wrote: > >> > If you link to -lblas, you're shooting yourself in the leg in the first > >> > place, since that's the reference implemen

bcache, udev rules and calling blkid

2013-09-30 Thread Rolf Fokkens
Hi, On bugzilla there was a brief discussion on how to reduce the number of blkid calls during udev rules processing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004693 The general idea was to rely on earlier calls to blkid instead of having later rules calling blkid themselves. Specificall