The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
547
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
61
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
37
, and I also figured we could chat about Test
Day result tracking. Any other agenda topics welcome!
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20131021
The current proposed agenda is included
On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:19:30AM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 10/16/2013 11:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Need to clarify if the DNF bindings will exist for both python2 and
python3 or just python3. This could affect releng,
On 20/10/13 22:01, Pete Travis wrote:
*snip*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
lists, how to get sponsored. Just waiting might be a solution, but
probably not the fastest one.
Matthias
--
I don't agree with this. The sponsorship process is
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 09:12 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Oh also -- I've been assuming that the DNF python2 bindings will be
compatible with the yum API. Is that the case?
Sort of. The problem is that while yum has some sort of API, there is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:12:40 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com escribió:
On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:19:30AM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 10/16/2013 11:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
*
On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple message would
suffice to let know about the status. Is
there a better way to address this concern to avoid repeating it in the future?
Some numbers FYI:
* We have 117 sponsors
On 21. 10. 2013 at 15:47:20, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 09:12 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 18. 10. 2013 at 09:35:36, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Oh also -- I've been assuming that the DNF python2 bindings will be
compatible with the yum API. Is that the case?
Sort of. The
-- snip --
Some of them will be rewritten to Py3 but for example createrepo has
now a C implementation and we are planning for that one to be the
default.
we can not change to createreo_c without making sure it has feature
parity first. While some releng tools call createreo and can be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021206
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
Hello All!
Unfortunately fedora create maillist doesn't give me a lot of
related links, so I'd like to ask here. I want to create two
additional maillists dedicated to the particular Fedora Language SIGs
- one for Erlang, and another one for Golang. Could please anyone help
me - where should I
File a ticket in the infrastructure trac and it will get done
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:31:28 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
- one for Erlang, and another one for Golang. Could please anyone
help me - where should I start?
Open a ticket with fedora infra,
saying what you need.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Tickets
--
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 14:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
can't find any criteria currently that covers application icons (though do
mention it if such a thing exists)...
At issue here are gtk3
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 04:01:15 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags
mentions only %optflags to be required for packages but I noticed that
%configure sets LDFLAGS to a value different than
Compose started at Mon Oct 21 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-File-Contents:
ba3abe6143d1055ccb81d741a481a190 Test-File-Contents-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Op 10/20/13 8:59 PM schreef Piergiorgio Sartor
piergiorgio.sar...@nexgo.de:
Does the tools converts the complete RAID-10, including
the LVM volumes to bcache?
I will look into the blocks tool for F21, but for now I leave answering
the question to Gabriel.
Some times ago I asked, in my setup,
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple message
would suffice to let know about the status. Is
there a better way to address this concern to
On 10/21/2013 03:28 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com
mailto:msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple
message would
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/21/2013 03:28 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.commailto:
msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:42:37AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling the community
is fragmented too much. With some people avoiding mailing-lists like
the plague, some people
lib389 implements a python library for 389-ds administrative operations.
This review is the push of DSadmin (
https://github.com/richm/dsadmin ) into lib389 with few adaptation fixes.
On 2013-10-16, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
To finish usr-move, I'm going to change quota package in that way.
/sbin/quotacheck, /sbin/quotaoff, and /sbin/quotaon files will be moved
under /usr.
Thanks all for the comments.
This change is implemented in quota-4.01-11.fc21.
-- Petr
On 10/20/2013 01:11 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 20, 2013, at 4:38 AM, Gene Czarcinski g...@czarc.net wrote:
Before 20.25.1, if you had an existing swap on a regular partition or a logical
volume and you specified --noformat, that swap specification was added to
fstab. With 20.25.1, this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:49:29PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Elio Maldonado emald...@redhat.com wrote:
No one in the NSS team was consulted on this. I usually monitor the FESCO
meetings announcements but
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
5 packages were orphaned
obexftp [devel,f20] was orphaned by rathann
Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/obexftp
On Oct 21, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Gene Czarcinski g...@czarc.net wrote:
If I specifically specify an existing regular partition or logical volume as
swap and specify --noformat in the kickstart file, then the way it has been
working is that such swap specifications are added to fstab.
# F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #4.5
# Date: 2013-10-21
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Apologies for the extremely late notice, but we'll be doing a quick
blocker review meeting following the QA meeting today, in 20 minutes'
time,
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Beta.
Thursday, October 24, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
On 21 October 2013 07:52, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:42:37AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling the community
is fragmented too
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling the community
is fragmented too much. With some people avoiding mailing-lists like
the plague, some people
On 10/21/2013 04:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The intended usage of test list has always been a problem. Once in a
while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
work on a change actively. Is it only for Test releases or also for
Rawhide? Its description is vague. Is
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:08:09 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling the
community is fragmented
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Good idea. What items could we move to announce that would be more
useful for folks that don't have as much time/energy to skim the main
list?
I'm assuming you're referring to the devel-announce list, and not the
general
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Elio Maldonado Batiz
emald...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/18/2013 06:54 PM, Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
On 10/18/2013 12:55 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eric H. Christensen
spa...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Information on
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:08:09PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I have this same feeling. I think we need to fix it; do you have any
thoughts or ideas as to how?
If people hate email lists in general (or the number of messages posted
to them), it cannot be fixed.
Hmmm; I don't know if
On 10/21/2013 06:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling the community
is fragmented too much. With some people avoiding
On 21 October 2013 11:08, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:00:59AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Don't we have this same conversation every two years? With pretty much
the
same questions and feeling of disconnectedness? We fix a couple of
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:23:29 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
The intended usage of test list has always been a problem. Once in a
while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
work on a change actively. Is it only for Test releases or also for
Rawhide? Its
On 10/21/2013 05:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
So, discussing Test Updates for stable dist releases belongs onto which
list?
According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA
release test topic ( like update testing ) belongs on the user list.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA release
test topic ( like update testing ) belongs on the user list.
If that's true then the updates-testing mail for N and N-1 need to go to the
user list.
--
devel mailing list
On 10/21/2013 05:44 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA
release
test topic ( like update testing ) belongs on the user list.
If that's true then the updates-testing mail for N and N-1 need to go
to
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of devel list.
There's too much traffic on that list. 792 messages so far in October.
This is way down from the peak 5-7 years ago.
What is the reason? More people avoiding
On 21 October 2013 11:48, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of devel
list.
There's too much traffic on that list. 792 messages so far in October.
This is way
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:16:53 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/21/2013 06:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:52:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
A few years ago we've been much better at talking about things and
coming to a conclusion. Nowadays I have the feeling the
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:57:06 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I am not saying shut-up but I am saying that I am confused by what you
mean. First you seem to advocate more lists,
That could be a misunderstanding. Have I've phrased something very poorly.
Then please tell and give me a chance
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021385
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:47:12 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 10/21/2013 05:44 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA
release
test topic ( like update testing ) belongs on the user list.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:02:57 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 10/17/2013 05:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple message
would suffice to let know about the status. Is
there a better way to address this concern to avoid repeating
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:38:18 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the following page wrong?
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html
I see 59 people on that list.
(many have more than 1 review they have filed)
Not sure where the 191 number comes from?
Hello
My name is pierre jourdain from france , i'm a student at Université de
Picardie Jules Verne in Saint Quentin (INSSET) in embedeed electronics
and computing .
My experiences in computing things are relate to space
systems securisation and communications .
I'm using fedora since fedora 7
Le 21/10/2013 22:34,
pierre%notspam%jourdain3[at_nospam]gmailnot_spam/com a écrit :
Hello
My name is pierre jourdain from france , i'm a student at Université de
Picardie Jules Verne in Saint Quentin (INSSET) in embedeed electronics
and computing .
My experiences in computing things are relate
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
No, the intent was very much to change what the resulting desktop
prioritizes. Quite a few FESCo members would be rather disappointed
if the new
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/434/0001-Ticket-434-admin-serv-logs-filling-with-admserv_host.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
any ideas?
thanks
regards
Messaggio originale
Oggetto:Broken dependencies: tika
Data: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:01:15 + (UTC)
Mittente: build...@fedoraproject.org
A: tika-ow...@fedoraproject.org
tika has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
Am 13.10.2013 22:04, schrieb Till Maas:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
i get somehow tired to report bugs for several packages,
refresh them at each release because maintainers
ignore guidelines all the time
some of them responded and fixed their packages
Il 21/10/2013 23:32, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
any ideas?
thanks
regards
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6085254
Messaggio originale
Oggetto:Broken dependencies: tika
Data: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:01:15 + (UTC)
Mittente:
On 10/21/2013 07:48 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of devel list.
There's too much traffic on that list. 792 messages so far in October.
This is way down from the peak 5-7 years
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021161
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Isn't time_t always 32-bit on 32-bit x86 architecture? This is what you get
from kernel and glibc.
The -Duse64bitint is just to define perl's internal integer type to occupy
64-bits (i.e.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021378
Bug ID: 1021378
Summary: perl-Capture-Tiny-0.23 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Capture-Tiny
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021383
Bug ID: 1021383
Summary: perl-POE-Test-Loops-1.354 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-POE-Test-Loops
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021385
Bug ID: 1021385
Summary: perl-Software-License-0.103006 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Software-License
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Software-License:
caed1a42a645a98e816344f3a1c8c947 Software-License-0.103006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 94058413e6f30bb97ca5143848fffa23d956cf19
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 21 09:24:16 2013 +0100
Update to 0.103006 release (rhbz #1021385)
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
perl-Software-License.spec |7 +--
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021385
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
Summary of changes:
9405841... Update to 0.103006 release (rhbz #1021385) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2509d75652c985b88f910a1207d34fd3a6977eae
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 21 10:20:39 2013 +0100
Add Module::Load BR
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
perl-Software-License.spec |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021422
Bug ID: 1021422
Summary: Insufficient validation of PID file contents
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: perl-File-Pid
Severity: low
Assignee: iarn...@gmail.com
Summary of changes:
2509d75... Add Module::Load BR (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021385
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Software-License-0.103006-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Software-License-0.103006-1.fc20
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021385
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Gnome2:
efbbdb5c506dfae22233d8564a632ce8 Gnome2-1.044.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9af781ef16021cbbf61e120e5161504412cdcf03
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 21 12:48:57 2013 +0200
1.044 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...3-Do-not-create-blib-lib-Gnome2-explictly.patch | 30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021206
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bugfix release suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Summary of changes:
9af781e... 1.044 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7c272a52146cbb69f70ee25758fd23fe18915487
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 21 12:48:57 2013 +0200
1.044 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...3-Do-not-create-blib-lib-Gnome2-explictly.patch | 30
commit 5ec8aa639a3bd9637c33caa3463c41f54c57cab8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Oct 21 12:48:57 2013 +0200
1.044 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...3-Do-not-create-blib-lib-Gnome2-explictly.patch | 30
commit ee29560c72b79df4d202284e150ee3d77576aa84
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Oct 21 11:59:50 2013 +0100
Fix EL-5 support and tidy up buildreqs
- Update patch for building with old Test::More versions
- Update core buildreqs for completeness
...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021206
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gnome2-1.044-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gnome2-1.044-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021206
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gnome2-1.044-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gnome2-1.044-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021206
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gnome2-1.044-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gnome2-1.044-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
The lightweight tag 'perl-Software-License-0.103006-2.fc21' was created
pointing to:
ee29560... Fix EL-5 support and tidy up buildreqs
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Kwalitee:
7e6c1f69251b27f671a77b5136e3ecc9 Test-Kwalitee-1.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
commit 62578ba23dfc6df780f6ddc7c1232452be1efa89
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Oct 21 12:26:02 2013 +0100
Update to 1.17
- New upstream release 1.17
- Now printing even more diagnostics on error (as much as we have
available)
- Package new CONTRIBUTING
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Kwalitee-1.17-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
62578ba... Update to 1.17
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8b1f3e96fb5bf261ba6d04781433977ad43971f9
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Oct 21 13:42:59 2013 +0100
Update to 0.21
- New upstream release 0.21
- Require Test::Pod 1.41 for Pod tests, fixing test failures due to the
use
of the 'Ltext|scheme'
Summary of changes:
8b1f3e9... Update to 0.21 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-File-Contents-0.21-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
8b1f3e9... Update to 0.21
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-File-Contents-0.21-1.fc20' was created pointing
to:
8b1f3e9... Update to 0.21
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914295
--- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org ---
Here's the upstream bug for MIME::Lite 3.029:
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=79944
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
commit 0df766617a7b76f707036d56fe536012f168fa87
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 22 13:16:44 2013 +0900
Fix a bogus date in changelog
perl-MIME-Lite.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MIME-Lite.spec
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
