On 8 November 2013 00:11, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be awfully convenient to have a single place for all these related
tasks.
Trying to design a GUI for all users who would find something
convenient isn't possible. Sooner or later you have to limit scope of
you get a
On 8 November 2013 01:04, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
which claims to be a (the?) tool to create some necessary database, how does
this fit in (if at all)?
As I understand it, it's a libappstream-kind-thing that takes the xml
files as inputs and exposes a GObject API. gnome-software
Hi,
dnf-0.4.7 is built for rawhide [1]. F20 version is going to have to wait
a few of days because we are missing a dependency there.
There's a couple of bugfixes in 0.4.7 but the main thing is that we are
slowly starting with forming the API [2]. More in the blog post [3] and
the release
2013/11/7 Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com:
Ok, so I guess the solution would be for the launcher to do something like
this:
gnome-terminal --geometry 80x37 --disable-factory --role=bitchx
--class=bitchx --name bitchX IRC --title BitchX IRC
Isn't the Terminal attribute of desktop
On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:10:19 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Well, a Shell Function would be more readable, for example. It would
accept normal arguments to fill in variables -- instead of global RPM
macros, which are substituted in the entire spec file.
Uhm, how can one this be done? Shell
tor 2013-11-07 klockan 09:14 + skrev Peter Robinson:
I don't see many people forcing things through, I believe that the
vast majority of contributors either like the change or aren't
bothered by it.
Just so that my silence is not counted as approval. I disapprove.
Mattias
Compose started at Fri Nov 8 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
Hi everyone.
Just as a reminder, meeting time in roughly 1 1/2 hours from now.
See you there!
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:55:12PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
wrote:
On Thu, 07.11.13 20:09, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
Is there a technical reason why we can't use their packaging format,
interpreting it
On 08.11.2013 13:47, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:10:19 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Well, a Shell Function would be more readable, for example. It would
accept normal arguments to fill in variables -- instead of global RPM
macros, which are substituted in the entire spec file.
On 8 November 2013 00:11, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
HI
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Honestly, I don't think Software is really aimed at your use case, and
you may as well just keep using yum. It's meant to be a cool way to find
Michael scherer wrote:
SELinux is still pretty RH/Fedora specific,
even if Debian and gentoo support it in theory ( in practice, Debian didn't
seems to
support it that well ).
Millions of Android devices now have SELinux. Android 4.3 enabled SELinux and
defaults to Permissive. Android 4.4
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:45:46PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm still slightly out of sync with the fedora.next stuff (REALLY picked
a bad time to go on vacation), but it does seem to me that a decent
amount of 'mature
perl-SOAP-Lite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP)
On i386:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP)
On armhfp:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-3.fc20.noarch
Hi
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 8 November 2013 00:11, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
It would be awfully convenient to have a single place for all these
related tasks.
Trying to design a GUI for all users who would find something
convenient isn't possible. Sooner or
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:04:39 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
$ file screenshot-soundconverter.png
screenshot-soundconverter.png: PNG image data, 502 x 534, 8-bit/color RGBA,
non-interlaced
ScreenshotSizeWidthMin=624
ScreenshotSizeHeightMin=351
503 is smaller than 624 and the screenshot
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 14:06 +0200, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
2013/11/7 Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com:
Ok, so I guess the solution would be for the launcher to do something like
this:
gnome-terminal --geometry 80x37 --disable-factory --role=bitchx
--class=bitchx --name bitchX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora Base Design Working Group (2013-11-08)
==
Meeting started by pknirsch at 15:00:59 UTC. The full logs
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 08:37 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Michael scherer wrote:
SELinux is still pretty RH/Fedora specific,
even if Debian and gentoo support it in theory ( in practice, Debian didn't
seems to
support it that well ).
Millions of Android devices now have SELinux.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2013 08:19 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Hi everyone.
Just as a reminder, meeting time in roughly 1 1/2 hours from now.
See you there!
Thanks regards, Phil
I can not make the meeting, I am at a conference in Washington DC.
-BEGIN
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
565
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
79
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
55
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
565
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
79
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
40
Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) said:
Meeting started by pknirsch at 15:00:59 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-08/fedora_base_design_working_group.2013-11-08-15.00.log.html
Apologies for not making the meeting. Some comments
*
#432: Test day results app should be more navigable: create an event, export
results, view all events
+---
Reporter: adamwill| Owner: jskladan
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:51 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
* LINK: http://fpaste.org/52688/38392758/ (pknirsch, 16:19:54)
* Base definition: installer, compose tools, minimal install (for some
definition there), and functionality the majority products want to
use (pknirsch,
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Michael scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:55:12PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
wrote:
On Thu, 07.11.13 20:09, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
Is there a
Forgot one thing - the installer question.
I think it already came up tangentially in some of the workstation prd
discussions, but I think we should at least be open to the idea that the
different products need to be able to define their own install
experience.
That would imply that the
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com wrote:
The next update of the PRD will be posted to the fedora-desktop list as that
is the designated 'home' of the working group and product and we want to
avoid cluttering up the general
Fedora-devel list with
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com
wrote:
The next update of the PRD will be posted to the fedora-desktop list as that
is the designated 'home' of the working group and product
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com
wrote:
The next update of the PRD will be posted to the
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2013 04:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Josh Boyer
jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz
wrote:
Hello, On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Christian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2013 04:19 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/08/2013 04:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Josh Boyer
jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz
wrote:
Le vendredi 08 novembre 2013 à 21:24 +0100, Miloslav Trmač a écrit :
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Michael scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:55:12PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
wrote:
On
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 14:06 +0200, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
2013/11/7 Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com:
Ok, so I guess the solution would be for the launcher to do something
like this:
gnome-terminal --geometry 80x37 --disable-factory --role=bitchx
Christian Schaller wrote:
The next update of the PRD will be posted to the fedora-desktop list as
that is the designated 'home' of the working group and product and we want
to avoid cluttering up the general Fedora-devel list with product specific
further discussion.
In other words, you want
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 01:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christian Schaller wrote:
The next update of the PRD will be posted to the fedora-desktop list as
that is the designated 'home' of the working group and product and we want
to avoid cluttering up the general Fedora-devel list with
- Original Message -
snip
But they hardcode the terminal application to gnome-terminal, which is
unacceptable!
Just don't use GNOME? More seriously, this is the bug with the instructions
on how to write the terminal chooser patch for glib:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:58:05 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 14:06 +0200, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
2013/11/7 Christian Schaller cscha...@redhat.com:
Ok, so I guess the solution would be for the launcher to do
something like
On 11/09/2013 01:14 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 01:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christian Schaller wrote:
The next update of the PRD will be posted to the fedora-desktop list as
that is the designated 'home' of the working group and product and we want
to avoid cluttering
Le samedi 09 novembre 2013 à 01:21 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
On 11/09/2013 01:14 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 01:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christian Schaller wrote:
The next update of the PRD will be posted to the fedora-desktop list as
that is the designated
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-11-11
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! (I'm being all organized and sending
this out on Friday, yay me.)
The Retrospective page for Fedora 20 QA is now up (a bit late, but not
as late as last time...):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_QA_Retrospective
We use the retrospective page to track things that went well and things
that didn't go so well during the Fedora 20 validation process, and
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
Hello there,
would someone please review package in $subj, bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028521 ?
Thanks!
Cheers
Jan
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ctstream-9-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024821
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ctstream-9-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006003
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028653
Bug ID: 1028653
Summary: Freshclam cannot notify clamd of database updates due
to permission denied
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: amavisd-new
Severity:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47589
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47589/0001-Ticket-47589-Winsync-replica-initialization-and-incr.patch
Bug description: Cherry-picking the fix for Ticket #47492 - PassSync
removes User must change password flag on the Windows side
56 matches
Mail list logo
