mån 2013-11-18 klockan 04:26 +0100 skrev punto...@libero.it:
> Il 18/11/2013 04:13, David Airlie ha scritto:
> > Hi owners,
> >
> > I tried to rebuild root after glew update, but it failed due to hadoop
> > changes,
> >
> > Not sure if hadoop needs a build in rawhide for the current f20 build or
On 11/18/2013 01:23 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I reviewed a package notion, which is a new window
manager(new to fedorian), it installs desktop file to
/usr/share/xsession.
Interesting, when I looking into more "window manager" in Fedora, I found that:
openbox installs desktop f
Quoting Richard W.M. Jones (2013-11-16 10:13:33)
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:34:00AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> > wrote:
> > > == Scope ==
> > > Proposal owners:
> > > * Modify javapackages-tools package to automatically generate
> > > "
- Original Message -
> From: punto...@libero.it
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, 18 November, 2013 1:54:06 PM
> Subject: Re: root rebuild failed after glew update
>
> Il 18/11/2013 04:40, Christopher Meng ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, punto...@liber
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-11-18
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We're into Final validation already,
so that's the main topic. I'm
Il 18/11/2013 04:40, Christopher Meng ha scritto:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
Hadoop has nothing to do with glew ...
can you please add the part, of the build.log, where fails to compile?
regards
gil
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=479029
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
> hi
> Hadoop has nothing to do with glew ...
> can you please add the part, of the build.log, where fails to compile?
> regards
> gil
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=479029:
Checking for libhdfs ... no
Checking for
Il 18/11/2013 04:13, David Airlie ha scritto:
Hi owners,
I tried to rebuild root after glew update, but it failed due to hadoop changes,
Not sure if hadoop needs a build in rawhide for the current f20 build or
something else.
Dave.
hi
Hadoop has nothing to do with glew ...
can you please add
Hi,
Yesterday I reviewed a package notion, which is a new window
manager(new to fedorian), it installs desktop file to
/usr/share/xsession.
Interesting, when I looking into more "window manager" in Fedora, I found that:
openbox installs desktop file to /usr/share/xsessions
pekwm installs desktop
Hi owners,
I tried to rebuild root after glew update, but it failed due to hadoop changes,
Not sure if hadoop needs a build in rawhide for the current f20 build or
something else.
Dave.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 07:14 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> While this has been amusing, a lot of useful detail may be lost in the
> furor. There are some good philosophy questions about what GUI's
> should support for replacing command line tools (the gnome
> installation tool), hooks for gettin
- Original Message -
> From: "Miro Hrončok"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, 18 November, 2013 10:54:38 AM
> Subject: Re: glew 1.10 in rawhide
>
> If you haven't done it yet, skip openscad and opencsg, I've rebuilt
> those once I read your email.
>
If you haven't done it yet, skip openscad and opencsg, I've rebuilt
those once I read your email.
Po 18. listopad 2013, 01:39:00 CET, David Airlie napsal:
Actually I feel guilty now, I'll do a mass rebuild in rawhide.
amanith-0.3-26.fc20.src.rpm
avogadro-1.0.3-20.fc21.src.rpm
blender-2.69-1.f
Actually I feel guilty now, I'll do a mass rebuild in rawhide.
amanith-0.3-26.fc20.src.rpm
avogadro-1.0.3-20.fc21.src.rpm
blender-2.69-1.fc21.src.rpm
bzflag-2.4.2-7.fc20.src.rpm
calligra-2.7.4-2.fc21.src.rpm
cegui06-0.6.2-15.fc20.src.rpm
cegui-0.7.9-5.fc20.src.rpm
compat-SFML16-1.6-3.fc21.src.rpm
sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani:
> Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64
> however fails with
> Transaction check error:
> file /usr/share/applications/xflr5.desktop from install of
> xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64 conflicts with file from
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:33:09PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 05:33 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:11PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Oh, hey, look. That place is rapidly becoming the 'crap, we don't know
> > > where to put this' dumpin
If you don't want to do mass rebuild, maybe you should send this email
directly to the owners of glew dependent packages, so they don't miss
it. Especially when the traffic on devel is so high.
Ne 17. listopad 2013, 21:48:31 CET, David Airlie napsal:
Hi,
I bumped glew in 1.10 in rawhide, I ha
On 17.11.2013 22:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 22:12, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect desktop-file-ins
Am 17.11.2013 22:12, schrieb Sandro Mani:
> On 17.11.2013 22:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 17.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Sandro Mani:
>>> On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
> There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I main
On 17.11.2013 22:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain, i.e.
|desktop-file-install
--dir=%{buildroot}%{_d
Am 17.11.2013 22:02, schrieb Sandro Mani:
> On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
>>> There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain,
>>> i.e.
>>>
>>> |desktop-file-install
>>> --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/application
On 17.11.2013 22:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain, i.e.
|desktop-file-install
--dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{SOURCE1}
which caused the .desktop file to ge
Am 17.11.2013 21:47, schrieb Sandro Mani:
> There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I maintain, i.e.
>
> |desktop-file-install
> --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{SOURCE1}
>
> which caused the .desktop file to get installed to
>
> /usr/share/ap
Hi,
I bumped glew in 1.10 in rawhide, I haven't rebuilt all the dependencies but I
can if anyone wants, but I thought I'd give
a headsup to the maintainers so they can rebuild their packages.
Dave.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
Hi,
There was an incorrect desktop-file-install call in a package I
maintain, i.e.
|desktop-file-install
--dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{SOURCE1}
which caused the .desktop file to get installed to
/usr/share/applications/%{name}.desktop/%{name}.desktop
I fixed
- Original Message -
> From: "Manuel Faux"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 3:33:40 PM
> Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
>
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 07:58:48 -0500
> Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Manuel Fau
Great! I appreciate any and all input.
Regards,
Jeff
On 11/16/2013 08:06 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
This package is in my plan, I will help do an *informal* review.
--
Jeff Backus
jeff.bac...@gmail.com
http://github.com/jsbackus
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
Compose started at Sun Nov 17 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16
On 17.11.2013 14:14, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
While this has been amusing, a lot of useful detail may be lost in the
furor. There are some good philosophy questions about what GUI's
should support for replacing command line tools (the gnome
...
So step back, and let's think "how can we make
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:25:17 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Manuel Faux wrote:
> > I little bit more feedback would be welcome.
> >
> > You don't agree to give the option to manually download the file at
> > all, or don't you agree with NOT packing the file
> > to /usr/lib/jvm/...?
> >
> > By not
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 07:58:48 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Manuel Faux"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:40:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:39:06 -0500
> > Aleksan
On 17 November 2013 04:33, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:11PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Oh, hey, look. That place is rapidly becoming the 'crap, we don't know
>> where to put this' dumping ground for GNOME 3, isn't it?
>
> It has been there since 3.0 AFAIK, so rapidly
Compose started at Sun Nov 17 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
- Original Message -
> From: "Manuel Faux"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:40:25 PM
> Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
>
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:39:06 -0500
> Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Manuel Fau
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 04:39:06 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Manuel Faux"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:50:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
> >
> > On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:46:51 -0500
> > Aleksa
While this has been amusing, a lot of useful detail may be lost in the
furor. There are some good philosophy questions about what GUI's
should support for replacing command line tools (the gnome
installation tool), hooks for getting command line tools to pop up as
GUI icons and behavior correctly,
- Original Message -
> From: "Manuel Faux"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:50:33 AM
> Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
>
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:46:51 -0500
> Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I didn't see that Equinox satisfies the OS
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:46:51 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >
> > I didn't see that Equinox satisfies the OSGi 5 part, since I didn't
> > use this package anymore, as soon I recognized that NetBeans does
> > not build with it.
>
> Is this still true? I know that jtulach(one of the netbean
38 matches
Mail list logo
