Quoting Jerry James (2013-11-18 16:54:28)
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
I believe OpenJDK maintainers will agree that automatically detecting if
java or
java-headless is supposed to be required is not really feasible. There's too
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Quoting Toshio Kuratomi (2013-11-18 17:08:12)
On Nov 15, 2013 4:09 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com
wrote:
Quoting Jaroslav Reznik (2013-11-15 12:28:11)
* (optional) Mass-change spec files that have
Several packages are using git for patch management. eg:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libguestfs.git/tree/libguestfs.spec?h=f20#n22
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qemu.git/tree/
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 10:22 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
For (2) I would suggest a lightweight technique where git-managed
patches are marked in the spec file using:
### GIT-MANAGED-PATCHES ###
### END-GIT-MANGED-PATCHES ###
and a simple script that replaces everything between
2013/11/19 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
Several packages are using git for patch management. eg:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libguestfs.git/tree/libguestfs.spec?h=f20#n22
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:28:47PM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 10:22 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
For (2) I would suggest a lightweight technique where git-managed
patches are marked in the spec file using:
### GIT-MANAGED-PATCHES ###
###
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:32:58PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2013/11/19 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
Several packages are using git for patch management. eg:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
2013/11/19 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
Peter, is the comment in the spec file wrong? It refers to two github
repos:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
Oops, thanks for pointing me on this. Yes, that's just leftover and
should be removed. And the
2013/11/19 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
2013/11/19 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
Peter, is the comment in the spec file wrong? It refers to two github
repos:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
Oops, thanks for pointing me on this. Yes, that's
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
Several packages are using git for patch management. eg:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libguestfs.git/tree/libguestfs.spec?h=f20#n22
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:22:42AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Several packages are using git for patch management. eg:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libguestfs.git/tree/libguestfs.spec?h=f20#n22
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
- I didn't explicitly mention it last time, but you can find the output
of the script for your package at:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sourcecheck-20131117/$packagename-dl.txt
That should be
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 10:32 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:28:47PM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
Or maybe we could start using %autosetup ?
http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Autosetup
'%autosetup -S git' for sure, not plain %autosetup.
Git correctly
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:42:00PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2013/11/19 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
2013/11/19 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
Peter, is the comment in the spec file wrong? It refers to two github
repos:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:46:46AM +0100, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
git init
git config user.email %{name}-ow...@fedoraproject.org
git config user.name %{name}
git add .
git commit -a -q -m %{version} baseline
git am %{patches}
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:51:01AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Yep, I've done the same thing for all the packages I maintain in Fedora
and RHEL too. It makes maintaining RPMs soo much easier, particularly
when you have lots of patches to manage. The script I use is
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:19:35AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at
the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as seen on pkgdb1:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:51:01AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Yep, I've done the same thing for all the packages I maintain in Fedora
and RHEL too. It makes maintaining RPMs soo much easier, particularly
when you have lots of
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:30:46 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
Hi,
I would like to finally fix this bug in Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985610
Basically, our libev package diverges from upstream in two ways:
1. we install the header files in /usr/include/libev/
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:14:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:51:01AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Yep, I've done the same thing for all the packages I maintain in Fedora
and RHEL too. It makes
Greetings,
this is a reminder that Fedora 20 Final Change Deadline is in one
week - 2013-11-26, see the Schedule [1]. Be aware of that period
between Beta release and Final release is one week shorter as
approved by FESCo [2] to avoid holidays. Make sure to submit and
get karma for your updates in
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 13:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:30:46 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
1. we install the header files in /usr/include/libev/ whereas upstream
installs them in /usr/include/
That's a common way to resolve such a conflict:
Compose started at Tue Nov 19 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977266
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.04-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.04-1.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977266
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.04-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.04-1.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977266
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |MODIFIED
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
We have to learn fedpkg to do all the magic ;-) Something like
add remote git tree with exploded tree:
fedpkg exploded-tree add ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/foo.git
This is all great, but the problem is that co-maintainers and
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tk-Pod:
3cbd1b44b83a129ec7ac0a33f6913fa8 Tk-Pod-0.9942.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032056
--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Bundled admesh is one of the issues in this version we have to take care of:
https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r/issues/1525
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
commit 94bbe49dbeea28fdbaa3653300ee62f028eb169a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 19 14:29:21 2013 +0100
0.9942 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Tk-Pod.spec | 102 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 89
Summary of changes:
94bbe49... 0.9942 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/19/2013 02:01 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 13:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:30:46 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
1. we install the header files in /usr/include/libev/ whereas upstream
installs them in /usr/include/
That's a common
commit e778f67cdd5cfc95296023732b4d10e64286aff1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 19 14:29:21 2013 +0100
0.9942 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Tk-Pod.spec | 102 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 89
My apologies for the last minute agenda. We'll be holding our initial
WG meeting today at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. We'll
cover the various items below. I will try and keep the meeting under
1 hour.
== Status ==
- wiki page
- trac instance
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:01:06 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
This one is weird:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/672153
In order to make the perl-EV package not use a bundled libev source,
you build a libev-source subpackage that perl-EV adds as BuildRequires.
In other words, perl-EV now
This is definitely worth formalizing.
On 11/19/2013 10:22 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Several packages are using git for patch management. eg:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
We have to learn fedpkg to do all the magic ;-) Something like
add remote git tree with exploded tree:
fedpkg exploded-tree add
* Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com [2013-11-19 03:35]:
Quoting Jerry James (2013-11-18 16:54:28)
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
I believe OpenJDK maintainers will agree that automatically detecting if
java or
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-Typemap:
a7175a06e27939a83b1b781e91c13ad0 ExtUtils-Typemap-1.00.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit bd91bc96e61a21e404b4c289a2e993afdf716899
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Tue Nov 19 17:03:53 2013 +0100
Initial import (#1032055)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ExtUtils-Typemap.spec | 53
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031270
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031270
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.035-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.035-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031270
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.035-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.035-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962125
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.035-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.035-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
Summary of changes:
bd91bc9... Initial import (#1032055) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
bd91bc9... Initial import (#1032055) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
bd91bc9... Initial import (#1032055) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Quoting Toshio Kuratomi (2013-11-19 10:49:57)
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Quoting Toshio Kuratomi (2013-11-18 17:08:12)
On Nov 15, 2013 4:09 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com
wrote:
Quoting Jaroslav Reznik (2013-11-15
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Coro:
edad4fbd0458e95b3f1734b09852d273 Coro-6.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 19.11.2013 17:15, schrieb Stanislav Ochotnicky:
I mean (and sorry that I wasn't clear), why the choice to make java-headless
the special case? Especially if (as it appears from the reply to Jerry
James), most packages in Fedora will only need the headless version.
(So the headless version
commit b5215cc6286b3f54b0f9d1d6e0a40ddcfdb99b23
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 19 17:22:50 2013 +0100
6.33 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Coro.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031988
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bug-fixing release suitable for F≥20.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Summary of changes:
b5215cc... 6.33 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I'm looking at packaing mpt-status (get status info from LSI MPT SAS
RAID controllers) for Fedora and EPEL. However, to build, it needs some
include files from the kernel source, specifically from the
drivers/message/fusion directory. I've built an RPM using an extra
tarball of all the .h files
Hi,
Is kernel-headers enough ?
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel-headers
Dridi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
I'm looking at packaing mpt-status (get status info from LSI MPT SAS
RAID controllers) for Fedora and EPEL. However, to build, it
Once upon a time, Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
Is kernel-headers enough ?
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel-headers
I should have mentioned that neither kernel-headers nor kernel-devel has
the necessary headers.
--
Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net
--
On 11/19/2013 09:44 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I was recently adding a couple of changes to slapi-nis, and when I went
to run its self-tests, some of the tests that modify the plugin entry
started failing with LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM. I tracked the denial
down to validation
Maybe this should be added to an existing package. I forgot to mention
that during a review I was told not to have multiple sources.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
Is
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2013-11-20
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time again! Tomorrow (2013-11-20) we'll be having another
Blocker Review Meeting for Fedora 20. We currently have 6 proposed
blockers
On 19.11.2013 16:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
We have to learn fedpkg to do all the magic ;-) Something like
add remote git tree with exploded tree:
fedpkg
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:47:12AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
I'm looking at packaing mpt-status (get status info from LSI MPT SAS
RAID controllers) for Fedora and EPEL. However, to build, it needs some
include files from the kernel source, specifically from the
drivers/message/fusion
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:27:20PM +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 19.11.2013 16:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
We have to learn fedpkg to do all the magic ;-) Something
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2013-11-19)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 16:04:20 UTC. The full logs are available
at
Sorry to disagree, but segregation is standard practice and is far better then
polluting /usr/include.
Also, I have a package which has separate patches which I'm uncertain if
upstream has adopted.
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/libev-4.15.patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:05:13AM -0700, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/19/2013 09:44 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
The language in the ticket description's pretty firm that this isn't
going to be changed, and while I can _probably_ work around it on my
end, I figured I'd ask here before going down
On 11/19/2013 11:06 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:05:13AM -0700, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 11/19/2013 09:44 AM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
The language in the ticket description's pretty firm that this isn't
going to be changed, and while I can _probably_ work around it on
On 19.11.2013 19:32, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:27:20PM +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
What about intermediate step: optional fNN-upstream branch in
addition to fNN, containing relevant upstream revision as git
submodule (preferably referencing fedorahosted mirror, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2013 11:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.11.2013 17:15, schrieb Stanislav Ochotnicky:
I mean (and sorry that I wasn't clear), why the choice to make
java-headless the special case? Especially if (as it appears
from the reply to Jerry
#435: bugzilla sync operations are not using the correct config items
--+-
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: critical |
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:58PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2013 11:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.11.2013 17:15, schrieb Stanislav Ochotnicky:
I mean (and sorry that I wasn't clear), why the choice to make
java-headless
Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:47:12AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
I'm looking at packaing mpt-status (get status info from LSI MPT SAS
RAID controllers) for Fedora and EPEL. However, to build, it needs some
include files from the
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:27:20PM +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 19.11.2013 16:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
We have to learn fedpkg to do all the magic ;-) Something
On Nov 19, 2013 12:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:31:20PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org said:
If the headers describe a stable interface that should be used by
userland then it's a kernel bug that they're not being exported. If they
don't, you shouldn't use
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:46:29PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
* PRD (mmaslano, 16:19:29)
* LINK: http://piratepad.net/PwUiH4MEPR (abadger1999, 17:04:53)
* ACTION: everyone to send one general thing they want the WG to
enable and one specific thing they'd personally want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2013 02:47 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Nov 19, 2013 12:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
mailto:sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed
After a bit more of a delay than we were anticipating, blockerbugs
0.4 has been released and deployed to production!
https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/
New features and enhancements:
- Spin requests
* add updates and/or koji builds to the request
- API Support
* get latest
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:05:20PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Maybe this should be added to an existing package. I forgot to mention
that during a review I was told not to have multiple sources.
nod The main reason is so that the two packages can evolve independent of
each other. You
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47599
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47599/0001-Ticket-47599-Reduce-lock-scope-in-retro-changelog-pl.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Am 19.11.2013 20:29, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:58PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/19/2013 11:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what about having a java-1.7.0-openjdk meta-package obsoleting
the existing one and pulling *both* but decide if Fedora packages
if
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:32:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:27:20PM +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 19.11.2013 16:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:43 -0500, Tim St Clair wrote:
Sorry to disagree, but segregation is standard practice and is far better
then polluting /usr/include.
I actually agree with that.
Upstream libev doesn't, though.
And with our current package in Fedora, we are creating a situation
where
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 14:38 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:01:06 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
This one is weird:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/672153
In order to make the perl-EV package not use a bundled libev source,
you build a libev-source subpackage
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Build:
6210376a3b126cab2d4a40279e7c35c6 Module-Build-0.4201.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6cfb7504a6efd502647126e22cd406a84ffaf908
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 19 09:35:18 2013 +0100
0.4201 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Build.spec |9 ++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Moose-More:
e4826b1719bf17976a1d899419ccb3c5 Test-Moose-More-0.022.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4acde7e92a5b65235cb637a67812595c9067d86c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 19 09:40:07 2013 +0100
0.022 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...Test-Simple-0.98_04-describes-inheritance.patch | 53
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030919
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030913
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
commit f898b33a1b061ae1ebcdc2ef3bdae7724847009b
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 19 10:03:25 2013 +0100
Add licence statement from the upstream ticket. Resolves: rhbz#1030808
perl-Text-ParseWords.spec | 13 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031988
Bug ID: 1031988
Summary: perl-Coro-6.33 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Coro
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031990
Bug ID: 1031990
Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.038 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031268
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 3777aa3f23749ce37c52650909e5fe6d12ee96f1
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 19 12:44:39 2013 +0100
According to guidelines must be email statement added as new source.
license.email | 57 +
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914307
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Summary of changes:
b9822ab... New upstream release 1.04 (#977266) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
1dc5ee6... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
ce3161d... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
b9822ab... New upstream release 1.04 (#977266) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
