The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
603
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
117
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
93
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
603
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
117
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
59
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
done https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7
Thanks Dennis, for setting all this up! Where does this leave us now? Can
people start submitting builds already, or are we still missing some
infrastructure pieces?
-Jeff
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
604
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
118
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
94
On 14/12/13 04:35, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
To prevent this from happening in the future, I wrote a little git
pre-commit hook to help out, which I figured I'd share with you all:
On 12/15/2013 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:42:11PM -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
To prevent this from happening in the future, I wrote a little git
pre-commit hook to help out, which I figured I'd share with you all:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
It would be nice also to check that the sources file contains the
Sources listed in the spec file, since I often bump the version number
and forget to upload the new sources.
Yeah. I actually have a little shell
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
Does it handle %autosetup use as well?
Now it does. :-)
-T.C.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from
git/cvs)
Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache
for koji to find them later. I'm not sure how it could get this
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 01:47 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from
git/cvs)
Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache
for
On 12/16/2013 09:47 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from
git/cvs)
Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache
for koji to find
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 06:31:56PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 22:12:09 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
TBH I don't think that's necessarily a bug. As long as B-devel
Requires C-devel, and if A isn't directly including headers from
C-devel, it seems fine for A not to
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 09:29:52PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Jos Vos j...@xos.nl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:19:30AM +0200, חץ בן חמו wrote:
Could someone please add them to the boot menu please? I've been
searching for ages for those options
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The kernel package uses a custom-defined ApplyPatch macro, for example.
It still uses %{patches} though, so it would pass.
-T.C.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 16.12.2013 01:58, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
i am at bulding up an RHEL7 virtual machine for 2014-project-evaluation
which looks so far very promising - RHEL6 is not what i would want because
my main-target is Fedora and there are too much differences (systemd,
Apache
Dne 16.12.2013 09:47, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
There are some cases when we need it (sources taken as a snapshot from
git/cvs)
Huh? The sources have to be either in git or in the lookaside cache
for koji to find
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
I mean the upstream source check. It may not work if you use generated
source files [1].
No way am I doing an upstream source check in a git pre-commit hook!
I'm not waiting for v8 to be downloaded and hashed every time
Dne 15.12.2013 11:55, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:57:00AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
* It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit
BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
It prevents even local commits if I am not wrong.
Yeah, to only do it when commits are pushed would mean to do it as a
pre-receive hook on the dist-git server, which makes things
significantly more complicated.
Plus
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:39:16AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 15.12.2013 11:55, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:57:00AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
* It might be interesting to have some script, which
This is mostly a bugfix release, solving issues with mock in F20 (bz#1028332)
and several other check problems. Thanks goes again to Alec for tirelessly
working on improving f-r. Feel free to test the updates[1,2,3,4]
News:
- Added framework for moving plugins out of the fedora-review
source
Compose started at Mon Dec 16 05:15:06 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
9 packages were orphaned
jbosscache-support [devel,f18,f19,f20] was orphaned by madsa
JBossCache support package
Anyone being familiar with sunpinyin please help with this re-review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1043504
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Next Steps ==
- I suggest copying first two paragrahps for our so called PRD from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_PRD as was discussed two weeks ago.
- PRD - based on discussion on env-and-stacks mailing list
(some
In /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession:
# This Xsession.d implementation, is intended to obsolte and replace the
# various mechanisms present in the 'case' statement which follows, and to
# eventually be able to easily remove all hard coded window manager specific
# content from this script. See bug
- Original Message -
From: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
To: Fedora Environment and Stacks Working Group mailing list
env-and-sta...@lists.fedoraproject.org, Development
discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 11:12:15 AM
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:35:03AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
In /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession:
# This Xsession.d implementation, is intended to obsolte and replace the
# various mechanisms present in the 'case' statement which follows, and to
I think this in turn was obsoleted by using
On 12/16/2013 10:21 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:35:03AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
In /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession:
# This Xsession.d implementation, is intended to obsolte and replace the
# various mechanisms present in the 'case' statement which follows, and to
I
On 12/13/2013 03:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 12/13/2013 12:49 PM, Stephen Herr wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm Stephen Herr (sherr).
I noticed that the koan package is orphaned in Fedora and that it has
one or
two fairly important bugs. I'm a developer on the Satellite / Spacewalk
projects and
On 12/16/2013 12:22 PM, Stephen Herr wrote:
On 12/13/2013 03:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 12/13/2013 12:49 PM, Stephen Herr wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm Stephen Herr (sherr).
I noticed that the koan package is orphaned in Fedora and that it has one or
two fairly important bugs. I'm a developer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043149
Panu Matilainen pmati...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Warnings:
417033144b2fc373830a3547e9f96fab Test-Warnings-0.013.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 95673349e9017edd450808e76947dd5a70622d50
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Dec 16 12:17:56 2013 +
Update to 0.013
- New upstream release 0.013
- Update configure_requires checking in Makefile.PL
perl-Test-Warnings.spec | 10 +++---
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018592
Bug 1018592 depends on bug 927585, which changed state.
Bug 927585 Summary: perl-PDL-2.006 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927585
What|Removed |Added
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Warnings-0.013-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
9567334... Update to 0.013
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018592
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PDL:
ea343d3569ce02dbeadf1f58d700656f PDL-2.007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e17aa7b250f269f38250415841431bfd3121d3b0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 16 14:16:29 2013 +0100
2.007 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-PDL.spec | 15 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
e17aa7b... 2.007 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041304
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
2.007 is not better.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041304
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
No distribution seems delivering PDL = 2.4.11 for PPC64. One can disable
Slatec with WITH_SLATEC=0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018592
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041304
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 5e0c631c55bb5c3628076c3404efe10379f31bf6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 16 16:58:08 2013 +0100
Disable Slatec on PPC64
PDL-2.7.0-Disable-PDL-Slatec.patch | 31 +++
perl-PDL.spec | 17 -
2 files
Summary of changes:
5e0c631... Disable Slatec on PPC64 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041304
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041304
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038511
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.017-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036594
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.017-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038511
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.017-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036594
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.017-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043690
Bug ID: 1043690
Summary: perl-DBIx-DBSchema-0.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBIx-DBSchema
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043692
Bug ID: 1043692
Summary: perl-Test-Email-0.07 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Email
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043784
Bug ID: 1043784
Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el7
Component: stompclt
Assignee: massimo.pala...@gmail.com
Reporter:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47631/0001-Ticket-47631-objectclass-may-must-lists-skip-rest-of.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47606
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47606/0001-Ticket-47606-replica-init-bulk-import-errors-should-.3.patch
Responding to the comment by Rich
(https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47606#comment:13),
389 Project wrote:
Thanks for your
58 matches
Mail list logo
