On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 09:52 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> Didn't we have a mass rebuild due to a C++ ABI change 1 or 2 years
>> ago?
>
> Standard C++ does not specify an ABI. Compilers get to handle that
> themselves.
>
Correct (which c
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 14:12 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 19 December 2013 04:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21 (built yesterday) seems to have gone from
> > libgnome-bluetooth.so.12 to libgnome-bluetooth.so.13 and dropped
> > libgnome-bluetooth-applet.so.0 entirely.
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-12-23
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We have a meeting slot on 12-23 - it's two days before Christmas, but
lots of keen cookies expressed
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> Didn't we have a mass rebuild due to a C++ ABI change 1 or 2 years ago?
>
> The latest C++ ABI change was with g++ 3.4 (April 18, 2004). g++ 4.0 kept
> the 3.4 ABI and so did all 4.x releases.
He's probably talking abo
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Didn't we have a mass rebuild due to a C++ ABI change 1 or 2 years ago?
The latest C++ ABI change was with g++ 3.4 (April 18, 2004). g++ 4.0 kept
the 3.4 ABI and so did all 4.x releases.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
On 12/19/2013 05:53 AM, Tim Niemueller wrote:
Hi Fedorians.
Today I tried to install a first lab machine with F-20. Unfortunately,
my beloved kickstart returned quite a few problems with missing
packages, several of which I maintain. Examples of such packages are
xavante, lua-wsapi, or graphviz.
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> In case of 3 you would never update an container you would replace it
> with a new container ( or App image rather ) which contains the
> update/upgrade and delete the old container or in case of Gnome with a
> new "App image" If I understood Alexander correctly at th
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Sorry, but that is not accidental comment.
>
> First of all, we are working with git. I have local clone of git repository
> and I am free to commit whatever I consider to be committed. And I assume
> that you know that you can later edit/squas
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:42:11PM +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> # setup
>
> ERROR - No tool descriptions found in /etc/setuptool.d or
> /usr/share/setuptool/setuptool.d.
>
Kushal and I did some debugging on this this morning and determined that
it's the error message being a bit inaccurate. The to
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 13:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Some closed end of life bugs don't seem to be re-openable by the
> reporter. Bugzilla admins say this should work, but there's been some
> in person reports where it doesn't. Our end of life message tells
> reporters to re-open and set to the
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 21:40 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Individual that tells that truth and shed's light how RH operates.
>
> Since you are not aware of it Red Hat invented the position of Fedora
> QA
> Community Manager ( I dont know who but I would very much like to
> meet
> that
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 22:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> The EOL process does not improve the user or contributor experience
> et
> all it's entire existence does quite the opposite.
>
> If we could go with out it we would.
Bugzilla is much less useful when it cannot be kept clean. R
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
606
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
120
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
96
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
606
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
120
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
62
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-12-19 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-12-19 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2013-12-19 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2013-12-19 1
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 19:54 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Admittedly, the FedUp page says "Be sure to get the latest release,
> this may involve enabling updates-testing (yum
> --enablerepo=updates-testing install fedup in the command line)."
>
> I think this is silly. Maybe using the updates
*mkproject* and *tw* are becoming obsolete in favour of another single
merger project that reduces packaging and syndication efforts: *codemiscs* .
*Obsoleted, yet practically orphaned:*
* mkproject - command line project generator <
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mkproject>
* t
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 09:52 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Didn't we have a mass rebuild due to a C++ ABI change 1 or 2 years
> ago?
Standard C++ does not specify an ABI. Compilers get to handle that
themselves.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing
On fim 19.des 2013 14:40, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:05 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
In case of 3 you would never update an container you would replace it with a
new container ( or App image rather ) which contains the update/upgrade and
delete the old container or i
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Are there files inside of /etc/setuptool.d ? Does rpm -V setuptool tell you
> any files are missing?
Nope :(
>
> $ rpm -qpl setuptool-1.19.11-7.fc20.x86_64.rpm |grep setuptool.d
> /etc/setuptool.d
> /etc/setuptool.d/98netconfig
> /etc/se
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-12-18)
===
Meeting started by abadger1999 at 18:02:28 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-12-18/fesco.2013-12-18-18.02.log.html
.
Meeting summar
This morning I ran "yum upgrade", as customary. Three packages
updated: asymptote, python-rhsm, and yum. Now my GNOME icons are
scrambled. Of the 3 packages, only 1 has a desktop file: asymptote.
It does not use these scriptlets:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_C
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:43:40AM -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
>
> ERROR - No tool descriptions found in /etc/setuptool.d or
> /usr/share/setuptool/setuptool.d.
>
> Are we going to deprecate the package ?
>
>
> Not that I'm awar
Hi,
I just update libzip to new version 0.11.2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libzip-0.11.2-1.fc20
From abi-compliance-checker, no ABI change
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/compat_reports/libzip/1.11.1_to_1.11.2/compat_report.html
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> You can, for example, use C++, which is a stable standard (a new version was
> published 2 years ago, but almost all C++98 code compiles unchanged as
> C++11), and Qt, which keeps a stable API and ABI throughout a major version
> (the interval
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:05 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> In case of 3 you would never update an container you would replace it with a
> new container ( or App image rather ) which contains the update/upgrade and
> delete the old container or in case of Gnome with a new "App image" If I
>
On 19 December 2013 04:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
> gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21 (built yesterday) seems to have gone from
> libgnome-bluetooth.so.12 to libgnome-bluetooth.so.13 and dropped
> libgnome-bluetooth-applet.so.0 entirely.
Yup, I guess that's my fault. I run mclazy to update the GNOME
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Yep, it's that time again, folks. I see errors in my daily update
> indicating an unannounced API/ABI bump.
>
> gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21 (built yesterday) seems to have gone from
> libgnome-bluetooth.so.12 to libgnome-bluetooth.so.13 a
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Yep, it's that time again, folks. I see errors in my daily update
> indicating an unannounced API/ABI bump.
>
> gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21 (built yesterday) seems to have gone from
> libgnome-bluetooth.so.12 to libgnome-bluetooth.so.13
Hi Fedorians.
Today I tried to install a first lab machine with F-20. Unfortunately,
my beloved kickstart returned quite a few problems with missing
packages, several of which I maintain. Examples of such packages are
xavante, lua-wsapi, or graphviz.
I have looked in Koji and they have been built
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> ERROR - No tool descriptions found in /etc/setuptool.d or
> /usr/share/setuptool/setuptool.d.
>
> Are we going to deprecate the package ?
Not that I'm aware of -- I wonder if you're hitting some sort of side
effect of
https://fedoraproject.or
On 12/19/2013 01:15 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I need to prepare SRPM on machine where I have limited access and cannot
install rpmbuild.
You could compile rpm from sources and use that.
> It's Debian based.
I think Debian has a working rpmbuild, but it obviously doesn't help if
you aren't all
Hi all,
I just installed setuptools on Fedora 20 and got this.
# setup
ERROR - No tool descriptions found in /etc/setuptool.d or
/usr/share/setuptool/setuptool.d.
Are we going to deprecate the package ?
Kushal
--
http://fedoraproject.org
http://kushaldas.in
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
33 matches
Mail list logo
