Hi
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:17:00PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> > In the last few days, I have been running cppcheck on quite a few
> programs
> > including systemd, transmission, libvirt, ndjbdns etc and cppcheck has
> > found real and
On 12/27/2013 05:24 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Is anyone interested in taking on python-boto, please?
I can, although I won't be able to do anything beyond clicking the
button for a couple weeks.
--Andy
Thanks! I can push new rele
Sigh. Yes, another of these.
On 2013-12-18, tracker was bumped to 0.7.0:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=485698
the sonames of libtracker-extract, libtracker-miner and
libtracker-sparql were bumped to 0.18.so.0 (from 0.16.so.0) without
announcement, and without all dependent
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Is anyone interested in taking on python-boto, please?
I can, although I won't be able to do anything beyond clicking the
button for a couple weeks.
--Andy
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [pkgdb] python-boto ownership
Le vendredi 27 décembre 2013 à 15:06 -0700, Philip Prindeville a écrit :
> I’m seeing the following after an update (via yum) from F19 to F20:
>
>
> time->Tue Dec 24 16:05:44 2013
> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1387926344.492:5867): arch=c03e syscall=1
> success=no exit=-13 a0=6 a1=7f4e5e7afbb
I’m seeing the following after an update (via yum) from F19 to F20:
time->Tue Dec 24 16:05:44 2013
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1387926344.492:5867): arch=c03e syscall=1 success=no
exit=-13 a0=6 a1=7f4e5e7afbb0 a2=20 a3=7fff44c2c550 items=0 ppid=686 pid=693
auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0
I will be updating hdf5 to 1.8.12 shortly in rawhide and rebuilding dependent
packages:
Field3D-1.3.2-14.fc21.src.rpm
R-hdf5-1.6.9-22.fc20.src.rpm
ViTables-2.1-7.fc21.src.rpm
cgnslib-3.2-3.fc20.src.rpm
gdl-0.9.4-1.fc21.src.rpm
hdf5-1.8.11-6.fc21.src.rpm
jhdf5-2.9-3.fc20.src.rpm
matio-1.5.1-4.fc2
Is anyone interested in taking on python-boto, please?
Original Message
Subject: [pkgdb] python-boto ownership changed
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:19:48 +
From: Fedora PackageDB
To: or...@cora.nwra.com
Package python-boto in Fedora 18 was orphaned by robert
To make changes
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 11:20:47 -0500
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report <
> rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > Compose finisheded at Fri Dec 27 11:26:21 UTC 2013
> >
>
> Seems to be a typo here
Indeed. Fixed in git.
kevin
signature.asc
Descrip
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report <
rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Compose finisheded at Fri Dec 27 11:26:21 UTC 2013
>
Seems to be a typo here
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
I've added libevdev to the ABI tracker for this reason:
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libevdev.html
Adam Williamson wrote:
Time for another PSA...
It appears libevdev 0.6 breaks the library's ABI without bumping the
soname (and without an announcement here or anywhere else I can find,
b
Compose started at Fri Dec 27 05:15:04 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[LuxRender]
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libImath-2_0.so.10
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc21.i686 requires libIlmThread-2_0.so.10
LuxRender-1.0-16.fc2
12 matches
Mail list logo
