Compose started at Mon Feb 10 08:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC)
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires rdesktop
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires perl-Gtk2
nodejs-semver (Semantic versioner for npm) changed license in version
2.x+ from MIT to BSD.
Michal
https://github.com/isaacs/node-semver/commit/aac3fc45dcd512451dd3df7d3b62c518bd2e7646
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What is bundling in the sense of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries?
In my opinion, the page deals with source package contents.
But there are other things a package can do bundle things in the
binary packages, by copying code and data from installed packages in the
- Original Message -
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 04:26 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:54:30PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
What is the underlying problem here anyway?
I've never been hugely convinced there is one, but the problem people
*claim* there is is
- Original Message -
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:33:31AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
There is a kind of magic trick for this: if you set a bug to be against
Rawhide and give it the FutureFeature keyword (which is our 'official
way' of identifying RFEs), it won't ever be re-based to
- Original Message -
From: mat...@fedoraproject.org
if someone has a clever way
to automatically identify the most important candidates from the thousands,
that would be very useful.
What about having the ability to vote for bugs? I've seen it used effectively
and in other
On 10.02.2014 04:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain
packages with pbuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf
- debhelper
commit 1a1b86a6f37aa291dcfc48088a37f51d4a9aace8
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 10 13:04:53 2014 +0100
Fix the dep list
perl-Capture-Tiny.spec |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Capture-Tiny.spec b/perl-Capture-Tiny.spec
Hi all,
I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during
the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then
in F-20.
Although there will be some exceptions I believe that for most of them this
is caused by some packages still not having a proper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062881
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Capture-Tiny-0.24-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Capture-Tiny-0.24-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058220
Cheers,
- --
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058220
Cheers,
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
#vission statement
Proposal: Fedora is the preferred platform for software development and
deployment in any language or application stack.
#irc-channel
fedora-stacks got +6 (bkabrda, hhorak, pkovar, driden, tjanez,
- Original Message -
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
#vission statement
Proposal: Fedora is the preferred platform for software development and
deployment in any language or application stack.
#irc-channel
fedora-stacks got +6
commit ce3231809ea29d2d7db8def3dc69212dfafe9d5c
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Mon Feb 10 15:34:26 2014 +0100
Doesn't follow clipper/polyclipping version and is not neeeded as a
depenedny anymore
.gitignore |3 -
dead.package
Package perl-Math-Clipper in Fedora devel has been retired by churchyard
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Math-Clipper
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Math-Clipper in Fedora devel was orphaned by churchyard
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Math-Clipper
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
2) Can someone maybe write a script which automatically detects
this situation and files bugs with a description text aimed at not
only getting the issue fixed, but also educating the packager?
I wrote a script to detect
On 02/10/2014 03:32 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
#vission statement
Proposal: Fedora is the preferred platform for software development and
deployment in any language or application stack.
- Original Message -
On 02/10/2014 03:32 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
#vission statement
Proposal: Fedora is the preferred platform for software development and
deployment
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
3 packages were orphaned
bzr-gtk [EL-6] was orphaned by lbazan
Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi all,
I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during
the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then
in F-20.
Although there will be some exceptions I believe that for most of them
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Igor Gnatenko
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi all,
I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during
the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:54:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
What is bundling in the sense of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries?
In my opinion, the page deals with source package contents.
But there are other things a package can do bundle things in the
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:46:20 +0200
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
wrote:
2) Can someone maybe write a script which automatically detects
this situation and files bugs with a description text aimed at not
only
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-qpid_proton has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid_proton)
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
perl(qpid::proton::ExceptionHandling)
On i386:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.i686 requires
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:36:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This is the one I have run in the past:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py
Would folks be ok with running it weekly or something?
and on which path? The entire f19-updates-testing to
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:42:47 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:36:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This is the one I have run in the past:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py
Would folks be ok with running it
Hi
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Would folks be ok with running it weekly or something?
and on which path? The entire f19-updates-testing to rawhide?
IMO, yes and yes
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
fbf9e44... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
5d50b9f... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
1eafccf... Update to 0.61 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On a default Fedora installation, every system call incurs a fair
amount of overhead due to syscall auditing. This happens despite the
fact that syscalls aren't actually audited, except as part of AVC
denials.
The overhead is something like 20-40ns per syscall, and the total time
to do a simple
On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:05:38 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On a default Fedora installation, every system call incurs a fair
amount of overhead due to syscall auditing. This happens despite the
fact that syscalls aren't actually audited, except as part of AVC
denials.
The overhead
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:05:38 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On a default Fedora installation, every system call incurs a fair
amount of overhead due to syscall auditing. This happens despite the
fact that syscalls
On Monday, February 10, 2014 12:10:27 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:05:38 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On a default Fedora installation, every system call incurs a fair
amount of overhead due
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:55:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:42:47 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
For f19 and f20 updates, yes... in an advisory manner.
But not for rawhide since it has no bodhi
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2014 12:10:27 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:05:38 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On a default
On Monday, February 10, 2014 12:41:08 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
There are, indeed, many ways for me to fix this on my machine. I'm
suggesting that Fedora change the default so that no one has
experiences this overhead by default.
There are 3 levels of audit performance degradation.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2014 12:41:08 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
There are, indeed, many ways for me to fix this on my machine. I'm
suggesting that Fedora change the default so that no one has
experiences this overhead
Hi,
On 02/10/2014 08:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Would folks be ok with running it weekly or something?
and on which path? The entire f19-updates-testing to rawhide?
IMO, yes and yes
+1
Thanks Regards,
Hans
--
devel
I don't know if we've talked about it much on list but most of the QA
stuff (autoqa, blockerbugs-dev, taskotron, qadevel) is managed with a
set of ansible playbooks:
https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa/ansible-playbooks
As we've been adding stuff, these playbooks have been getting more and
more
I'm a senior SW engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Red Hat Grid, whose
upstream is HTCondor:
http://research.cs.wisc.edu/htcondor/
http://www.redhat.com/products/mrg/grid/
My goal is to become a co-maintainer for the fedora condor package:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This is the one I have run in the past:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py
If you're going to use that script, PLEASE use this patch:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120418/ead924dd/attachment.bin
I
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:37:19 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:55:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:42:47 +0100
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
For f19 and f20 updates,
I think some packagers don't follow Fedora too often, so for a while
we can't avoid this issue. But fedpkg should have a RFE:
1. fedpkg checks if the branch is able to receive commits as normal,
then return status of the branch.
But here comes a problem, Fedora allows packagers to commit to the
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:04:04 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This is the one I have run in the past:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py
If you're going to use that script, PLEASE use this patch:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 19:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
However, IMHO it makes more
sense to just hook into AutoQA instead of running the same test
twice. Also it would allow to respond in a timely manner which might
better help to educate maintainers instead of when there are several
First thank you all for the comments.
@ Dennis, I have not found error uEnv.txt leaving the file as it is already
in / usr / share / uboot-BEAGLEBONE / uEnv.txt.beaglebone, but I believe he
should be set to the version of my card because there other files that
point to the version of the card, for
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.x86_64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as
w3c-markup-validator has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires perl(HTML::Template)
On ppc64:
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires
perl(SGML::Parser::OpenSP) = 0:0.991
dspam has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On ppc64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.ppc64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On x86_64:
dspam-web-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(GD::Graph::lines3d)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062881
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML:
c04a71d6fbeb7bd67b6beeb096a9f1db YAML-0.89.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c4e79f8a07dad45b5177f0e4599158f917822b96
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 10 10:51:38 2014 +0100
0.24 bump, fix CVE-2014-1875
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Capture-Tiny.spec |6 +-
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Capture-Tiny:
718e9d62c4a27a3207cf8506cb99d846 Capture-Tiny-0.24.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1ccbccded3ea018e90c95f47740894cfb0228b2f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 10 09:46:22 2014 +
Update to 0.89
- New upstream release 0.89
- Synopsis in YAML::Dumper didn't work as expected (CPAN RT#19838)
- Address complex regular
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-0.89-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
1ccbccd... Update to 0.89
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036596
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Summary of changes:
a98c0e9... 0.23 bump (*)
c4e79f8... 0.24 bump, fix CVE-2014-1875 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime:
2b1745e4f7c0777c02545033588f6394 DateTime-1.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:15:07PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Not unlikely. People maintaining only a few packages will only
receive a few mail. I am receiving many of them, often duplicates
and triple from various origins + followups from bugzilla + koji.
Since until know only you
commit 01d4fec0deb19f19c609e9bff9e4aaa3516d8979
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 10 10:13:02 2014 +
1.07 bump
.gitignore | 22 +-
perl-DateTime.spec | 11 +++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 26
The lightweight tag 'perl-DateTime-1.07-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
01d4fec... 1.07 bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062882
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-TimeZone:
5fb202d7622658854904ad53419a5a0d DateTime-TimeZone-1.64.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d9b21c130ec0d60b7a20cf336b346d3136a94480
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 10 10:34:40 2014 +
Update to 1.64
- New upstream release 1.64
- Under taint mode, DateTime::TimeZone-new( name = 'local' ) could die
depending on the method used
The lightweight tag 'perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.64-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
d9b21c1... Update to 1.64
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062883
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
--- Comment #5 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
New koji build provided at
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6511892
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Summary of changes:
b2cbf42... Fix wrong date in changelog (*)
823d961... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
3ac1428... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
b16588d... Avoid circular dependencies when bootstrapping (#1004376) (*)
a98c0e9... 0.23 bump (*)
c4e79f8... 0.24
commit 0a29c25fdf475973a3082a77a862e0be5a66b01f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 10 12:33:31 2014 +0100
0.014 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Runtime.spec | 15 ++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Runtime:
a6597bc25536a30476f0d75b64d35734 Module-Runtime-0.014.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062885
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
Summary of changes:
3ed30ce... Fix the dep list (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3ed30ce7c87544e981d09f55ff5999d9e852e65f
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 10 13:10:03 2014 +0100
Fix the dep list
perl-Capture-Tiny.spec |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Capture-Tiny.spec b/perl-Capture-Tiny.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062881
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Capture-Tiny-0.24-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Capture-Tiny-0.24-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062426
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Capture-Tiny-0.24-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Capture-Tiny-0.24-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062426
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Capture-Tiny-0.24-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Capture-Tiny-0.24-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062968
Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-RPC-XML:
6a4519dbc5130d872c13a7a23309f36b RPC-XML-0.78.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ff08316b90d44261e0669cb1c0c53f26974b76aa
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Feb 10 13:31:06 2014 +0100
0.78 bump
.gitignore |1 +
RPC-XML-0.77-hash_key_ordering.patch | 121 --
perl-RPC-XML.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062887
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062424
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Capture-Tiny 0.24
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062424
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1063306
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062424
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|impact=low,public=20140206,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062576
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062576
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load:
67674318b7b47b519abfd9f16292dc35 Class-Load-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ef5e1101b2f3c9f991b852e341380c568fb8fcdc
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 10 14:48:05 2014 +
Update to 0.21
- New upstream release 0.21
- Repository moved to the github moose organization
- This release by ETHER - update source URL
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060465
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Ok, this looks much better now, just a few more things.
1. You forgot to remove the %clean section.
2. You didn't filter out the underspecified dependencies. You can achieve that
with:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.21-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
ef5e110... Update to 0.21
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062968
--- Comment #2 from Yevgeniy yevgeniy.melnic...@googlemail.com ---
hi Tim,
thx for the answer.
i do not think, perl itself is the problem. as i said in my original comment, i
can run vncserver from command line. running following command as
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Base:
00bb04442c15d83473d2791ca7aa3fd9 Test-Base-0.61.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1eafccff67bae27390e4dd0a000b8e0f9d1d600b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Feb 10 18:48:22 2014 +
Update to 0.61
- New upstream release 0.61
- Switch to dzil
- Package upstream's LICENSE file
- Make %files list more explicit
- Run the pod
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Base-0.61-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
1eafccf... Update to 0.61
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Base-0.61-1.el7' was created pointing to:
1eafccf... Update to 0.61
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060361
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Summary of changes:
fe78653... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
8e8b018... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
