The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
711
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
58
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
53
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 12:40:45AM -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.netwrote:
My plan is to retire these two xorg input drivers in rawhide in a week or
two. They are superseded by the evdev driver which is the default driver
On 3 April 2014 06:50, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Just another note that due to my knowledge on optimus I decide to drop
the review of bumblebee[1], and someone told me it's just a dirty
hack.
I personally think it as a hack as well.
Problems with Nouveau performance and
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of
bzip2.
Is this necessary?
I don't think so. A better way would be to change them to depend on
the actual executables they use,
Hello,
as Oracle is unlikely to re-license the libdb6 back to GPL, I like to
bring up the possibility of the libdb6 package. The idea is that the
current libdb package would still provide the libdb-5+, which is still
under GPL, and the new package would provide the newest, AGPL-ed libdb.
I would
Since AGPL is fedora-compliant license, there's no blocker to get
libdb6 into packages collection.
Besides, libdb5 is still critical for many packages (like RM), until
we get rid of it, I can only agree with your proposal.
Maybe, it's still time to rename the current libdb = libdb5 and get
newer
On 04/03/2014 03:47 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Many of the common users (such as rpm) are linked
against the library and don't use the command, so they won't be
impacted.
rpm does use bzip2 *command* and it would be impacted by this change.
rpm uses libbz2 only for compression and decompression
Hello,
Been active with packaging, productization and maintaining packages for
Mandriva Linux since 1999 and thought I should give it a try at fedora.
First cut is this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
And, it seems I need a sponsor here. Anyone?
Cheers.
--
devel
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
rpm does use bzip2 *command*
To be more precise, I believe only rpmbuild does.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081883
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 04/03/2014 03:46 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I saw that this got voted on in the meeting even though it didn't get
recorded as such for the meeting minutes. The proposal seemed to be:
use obs-sign to sign packages. That's not actually a proposal that we
can approve here. The proposal here
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 19:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:12:50PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
How does someone express strong disagreement to this change ?
Posting here is a good start. You can also add a note in the FESCo ticket
for approval once one is filed, and if
On 04/03/2014 02:29 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 04/03/2014 03:46 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I saw that this got voted on in the meeting even though it didn't get
recorded as such for the meeting minutes. The proposal seemed to be:
use obs-sign to sign packages. That's not actually a proposal
2014-04-03 6:09 GMT+02:00 Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net:
This _will_ break some setups. If you have AutoAddDevices off in your
xorg.conf then this will break. The main question to ask here is: do these
setups still exist and if so why do you have that option set and can we fix
the
On 04/03/2014 11:20 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
Since AGPL is fedora-compliant license, there's no blocker to get
libdb6 into packages collection.
Besides, libdb5 is still critical for many packages (like RM), until
we get rid of it, I can only agree with your proposal.
Maybe, it's still time to
On 04/02/2014 07:47 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
* Support for weak dependencies
Does this mean that rpm-build will be able to create packages with weak
dependencies? Will Fedora packages be allowed to declare weak
dependencies? Is dependency generator interface going to be extended so
that we
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:35 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
If fixes the problem but that doesn't tell the whole story. You have a conf
that implicitly says load the mouse driver and then fails because you
didn't have the mouse driver installed. Which is fair enough, the question
here is why is
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
CentOS 6 = gnutls 2.8.5
F20 = gnutls 3.1.20
The server is a python app and sets the priority string as follows:
priority=SECURE256:!CTYPE-X.509:+CTYPE-OPENPGP
this is fed to some gnutls function somewhere in the stack.
Does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084058
Bug ID: 1084058
Summary: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions-0.11-2.fc21
FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received fairly wide testing.
But we should be careful, so I want to ask for concrete problem reports
with the copr packages, besides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084058
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
I think the goal _is_ to not add any devices, yes. Bumblebee is
basically a second X server to run on the nvidia gpu and pipe the pixels
off that to the integrated gpu. So input only ever happens on the
integrated gpu's
This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
account and then doing su to get root privileges.
Is there a problem with logging into the local user account and then
typing su and the root password?
You are as such prompted to make a local user account when doing an
install
Am 03.04.2014 16:32, schrieb quickbooks office:
This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
account and then doing su to get root privileges.
Is there a problem with logging into the local user account and then
typing su and the root password?
i do *not* need a
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 07:32 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
account and then doing su to get root privileges.
What local account ?
Is there a problem with logging into the local user account and then
typing su and the root
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Re: F21 System Wide Change: RPM-4.12
From:
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
Reply-To:
Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date:
Thursday, April 03, 2014 08:54:18 AM
To:
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Groups:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:20:30AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10 then
they'll stop working until updated.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Gary Gatling gsgat...@ncsu.edu wrote:
Thanks a lot for the feedback.
I have asked the developers for input. I opened a issue of the github
issue tracker here:
https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/issues/568
After further experimentation it
2014-04-03 16:52 GMT+02:00 Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:20:30AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10 then
they'll stop working until updated.
Once upon a time, quickbooks office quickbooks.off...@gmail.com said:
This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
account and then doing su to get root privileges.
The only local account on many (most?) systems with network
authentication is root.
--
Chris Adams
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 07:32 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
This change will not affect logging into the console using the local
account and then doing su to get root privileges.
What local account ?
Is there a problem with logging into the local user
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:57:10PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-03 16:52 GMT+02:00 Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org:
Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10 then
they'll stop working until updated.
One, at least theoretical, way to resolve this would
On 04/03/2014 02:20 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received fairly wide testing.
But we should be careful, so I want to ask for concrete problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2014 10:52 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:20:30AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10
then they'll
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/03/2014 02:20 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2014 11:07 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/03/2014 02:20 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work
of Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages
that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084093
Bug ID: 1084093
Summary: perl-CPAN-Inject-1.14-4.fc21 FTBFS in non-koji mock
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Inject
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 03:52:49PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
Isn't this inevitable? If any extensions only claim to support 3.10 then
they'll stop working until updated.
I've had a pretty good experience here this time around. Almost
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:11:58AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
One option we could look into would be for GNOME to set this option on
by default for a month or so to give extension authors time to catch
up while not breaking any user extension that works unmodified.
My understanding was
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
One option we could look into would be for GNOME to set this option on
by default for a month or so to give extension authors time to catch
up while not breaking any user extension that works unmodified.
My understanding was
Matthias Clasen mclasen at redhat.com writes:
Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
gnome-shell-extension-fedmsg is still not working in Rawhide (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045669 ). This only affects
Fedora so thought I should mention it here.
--
devel
On 04/03/2014 03:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Also, as someone who has been testing this update in the COPR for
about a month now
Did you ( and others ) run through QA release blocking test cases for
Gnome or is this more I have been running Gnome for about a month now
kinda thing?
,
2014-04-02 19:24 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com:
= Proposed System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/lbzip2
While the speedup is desirable, it's not really obvious that this is the
right time to do the change.
Looking
On 04/03/2014 04:20 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received fairly wide testing.
But we should be careful, so I want to ask for concrete problem
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
You didn't mention the most important question:
Did the API or ABI change in backward-incompatible way?
If the answer to this question is yes, then the answer to updating
to gnome-3.12 needs to be no, because such changes in
On 04/03/2014 04:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Now, in reading that policy, there are quite a few things that match the
Things that would make it less likely to grant a request list. But, on the
other hand, by having a longer-than-typical Fedora release cycle this time
around, we are already in
2014-04-03 15:06 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 19:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:12:50PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
How does someone express strong disagreement to this change ?
Posting here is a good start. You can also add a note
2014-04-02 20:12 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 09:12 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
All the info has been sitting here @
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
I
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:32 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/03/2014 04:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Now, in reading that policy, there are quite a few things that match the
Things that would make it less likely to grant a request list. But, on the
other hand, by having a
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:05 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 10:50 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
CentOS 6 = gnutls 2.8.5
F20 = gnutls 3.1.20
The server is a python app and sets the priority string as follows:
Hi
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
Yes but I got updates for most of them. Couple of them are still broken
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/8/places-status-indicator/
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
Did you experience crashes or other serious problems with applications ?
Hi Matthias,
I had a problem with the new totem/Videos having a non-responsive UI.
I'm away on a work assignment until the 13th so unfortunately I
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:09:32PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
And I have yet to see any request have been made to the test list to
at least do the same validation on Gnome as is done before we release
an new GA release.
Note that I am not asking about armchair opinions about whether this
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
will that below ever get fixed in F20?
Maybe ... maybe not.
should i file a bug against the distribution?
No .. this makes no sense.
should i file a bug against Red Hat as upstream employer?
Neither does this
Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01:
Note: I didn't look at the bugs
then please don't answer at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01:
Note: I didn't look at the bugs
then please don't answer at all
What I wrote does not depend on what the bugs actually are.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 03.04.2014 19:54, schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01:
Note: I didn't look at the bugs
then please don't answer at all
What I wrote does not depend on what the bugs actually are
it does
Hi
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 19:54, schrieb drago01:
Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01:
What I wrote does not depend on what the bugs actually are
it does
No. You are not entitled to escalate it to any employer unless you have a
On 04/03/2014 06:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Looking at http://lbzip2.org/news , lbzip2 is still fixing crashes during
compression and decompression. That's rather troubling: we need the bzip2
implementation to be roughly as stable as file system*.*
They say that every non-trivial piece of
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
names
We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 03.04.2014 20:00, schrieb Adam Jackson:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
names
We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
i know that - on the
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Gerard Ryan gali...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
I had a problem with the new totem/Videos having a non-responsive UI.
Probably https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725063
--
-Elad Alfassa.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:53:04 +0200
Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/03/2014 11:20 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
Since AGPL is fedora-compliant license, there's no blocker to get
libdb6 into packages collection.
Besides, libdb5 is still critical for many packages (like RM), until
we get
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 20:00, schrieb Adam Jackson:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
names
We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not
Am 03.04.2014 21:44, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 20:00, schrieb Adam Jackson:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and if someone asks why i called Lennart in #1072368
names
We
Bad behavior in response to bad behavior just feeds a positive feedback
cycle ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_feedback ).
The way to break out of it is for the person you control (namely YOU)
to behave well. If others don't do so, things can calmly escalate and
proper measures taken.
Am 03.04.2014 22:04, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Bad behavior in response to bad behavior just feeds a positive feedback
cycle ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_feedback ).
The way to break out of it is for the person you control (namely YOU)
to behave well. If others don't do so, things
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
will that below ever get fixed in F20?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so
far, you don't seem to have convinced him or any other systemd
developers
On 3 April 2014 20:00, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
I'm not the only developer considering unsubscribing from fedora-devel
because of emails like the original email. Either the
Am 03.04.2014 22:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
will that below ever get fixed in F20?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so
far, you don't seem
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 22:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
will that below ever get fixed in F20?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
The developer does not
Am 03.04.2014 22:37, schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 3 April 2014 20:00, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
I'm not the only developer considering unsubscribing from fedora-devel
because
Am 03.04.2014 22:46, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 22:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
will that below ever get fixed in F20?
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:41:58PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368
The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so
far, you don't seem to have convinced him or any other systemd
developers or, well, anyone else.
than
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 22:37:19 +0200
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 April 2014 20:00, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
We didn't, and no justification would matter. It's not acceptable
behaviour, and you need to knock it off.
I'm not the only developer considering
On 04/03/2014 10:32 AM, quickbooks office wrote:
3.1.4.2.2. Disabling Root Logins
To further limit access to the root account, administrators can
disable root logins at the console by editing the /etc/securetty file.
This is done in the name of accountability, by forcing an administrative
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:58:59AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 16:35 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
If fixes the problem but that doesn't tell the whole story. You have a conf
that implicitly says load the mouse driver and then fails because you
didn't have the mouse
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 04/03/2014 10:32 AM, quickbooks office wrote:
3.1.4.2.2. Disabling Root Logins
To further limit access to the root account, administrators can
disable root logins at the console by editing the
sextractor (source extraction from astronomical images) has change its
license from CeCiLL to GPLv3+ in upstream version 2.19.5
Regards
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
swarp (astronomical imaging resampling and coadding) has change its license
from CeCILL to GPLv3+ in upstream version 2.38.0
Regards, Sergio Pascual
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
Nowadays it's a clusterfsck. I've managed to screw up my bootloader. Is
there a way to reinstall it without reinstalling the world? Would it make
sense to split the whole
Am 04.04.2014 03:08, schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
besides that it is the wrong list: grub2-install
Nowadays it's a clusterfsck. I've managed to screw up my bootloader. Is
commit 6ada91085a2fa69ef7fc111ad871505bc4bf596d
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Apr 3 14:05:56 2014 +1000
new package for el6
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks.spec | 115 ---
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
---
On 04/03/2014 06:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:09:43PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
You didn't mention the most important question:
Did the API or ABI change in backward-incompatible way?
If the answer to this question is yes, then the answer to updating
to
On Apr 3, 2014 7:18 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.04.2014 03:08, schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
besides that it is the wrong list:
What's the right
hi all,
I'm writing today because I have just submitted my first package for review,
huzzah!
My name is Michael McCune and I am a newly minted associate at Red Hat. I have
been a software developer for just shy of 20 years, doing most of my work in
the embedded realm of automotive GPS
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 23:00 +0530, Gerard Ryan wrote:
From what I remember, videos directly in my home directory were
displayed as thumbnails on the main window and they would play fine.
If I tried to add/open a local video from another location (even
subdirectory of my home) by clicking on
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 18:08 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
Just wondering if you've read this page yet:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2?rd=Grub2
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Hi,
What is the software that is used to make images like :
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png
Or
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administrators_Guide/images/Network_Interfaces-bridge-with-bond.png
I haven't
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 18:08 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Once upon a time (Fedora 15? -- I've lost track), it was possible to
reinstall the bootloader using grub-install.
Just wondering if you've read this page yet:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of
Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have
already received fairly wide testing.
I'll share here what I mentioned on desktop list...
The gnome-3.12 copr includes a couple
On Apr 3, 2014 9:27 PM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote:
Hi,
What is the software that is used to make images like :
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png
Or
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:57 AM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote:
Hi,
What is the software that is used to make images like :
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png
Or
Libreoffice Draw works just fine too in some simpler cases. Inkscape
however is more comprehensive. Libreoffice Draw can export in svg
format also so that your graphic can later on be edited/enhanced in
Inkscape.
--
Suchakra
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083915
Bug ID: 1083915
Summary: perl-CPAN-Checksums-2.08-8.fc21 FTBFS in non-koji mock
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Checksums
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083915
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 2f5171ebe57317144913e65115ad3082b3089106
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Apr 3 09:13:12 2014 +0200
Fix test skip-condition to pass in mock
CPAN-Checksums-2.08-New-signature.patch| 61
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083960
Bug ID: 1083960
Summary: perl-autodie-2.25 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-autodie
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083961
Bug ID: 1083961
Summary: perl-Carp-1.3301 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Carp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083964
Bug ID: 1083964
Summary: perl-File-MimeInfo-0.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-MimeInfo
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
