On 2014-04-14, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
instead of KDM =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
Is the SDDM mature enough to replace more-or-less working KDM?
I ask because there has
ddclient is currently orphaned in Fedora since 2013-10-21.
If no one else steps up, I offer to take ownership as I use this program
daily and already maintain a small number of packages for Fedora.
Kind regards,
Tilmann
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I am using copr to build another candidate for lyx-2.1 and the build
fails for me with no message related with the failure:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-21/builds/
The only file I get is in this case build-9287.log that is useless.
I have built the package
On 14 April 2014 14:40, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
instead of KDM =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
Change owner(s): Martin Briza mbr...@redhat.com KDE SIG
Retire KDM as the
Ok the patch worked fine for building on my F20, which I did as a test,
however it failed the build in rawhide.
The only clue I can get is this:
configure: WARNING: unable to include jni.h
What's in the configure log file regarding this?
This is solved now, AFAIK. The configure
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:45:25 +0200, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display
manager
instead of KDM =
Dne 15.4.2014 02:07, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Rails depends on exact v8
version, which means v8 3.14 must have also their own SCL as part of the SCL.
Stupid question: what in rails depends on v8 exactly?
The only
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:14:11 +0200, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2014-04-14, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display
manager
instead of KDM =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
Is the SDDM
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:22:23 +0200, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 April 2014 14:40, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display
manager
instead of KDM =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
= Proposed Self Contained Change: 64bit ARM emulation on x86 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Virt_64bit_ARM_on_x86
Change owner(s): Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com
Allow running 64bit ARM (AArch64) VMs on x86 hosts using standard the standard
qemu and libvirt stack, as well as end
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Disable_Firewall
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
The firewalld service will not be enabled by default in the workstation
product.
== Detailed Description ==
On 04/14/2014 10:17 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL
Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Ruby 1.9.3 with Rails 3.2.8 is still commonly
Am 15.04.2014 11:01, schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Disable_Firewall
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
The firewalld service will not be enabled by default in
On 04/15/2014 12:05 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL
Change owner(s): Marcela
Compose started at Tue Apr 15 08:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
2ping-2.0-2.el7.noarch requires perl(Digest::CRC)
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires rdesktop
RemoteBox-1.7-1.el7.noarch requires perl-Gtk2
On 04/15/2014 02:07 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Rails depends on exact v8
version, which means v8 3.14 must have also their own SCL as part of the SCL.
Stupid question: what in rails depends on v8 exactly?
The only
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.04.2014 11:01, schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Disable_Firewall
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen
On 4/15/14, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.04.2014 11:01, schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Disable_Firewall
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
The
Am 15.04.2014 11:32, schrieb drago01:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
User Experience
Applications that are using sharing protocols such as DAAP or
UPnP will work out of the box, without the need to tweak or
disable the firewall service
On 14 April 2014 21:46, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
You are an early adopter; somewhat simpler now :)
Okay, since this morning:
createrepo_as --basename=test path/to/package.rpm
sudo appstream-util install test.xml.gz test-icons.tar.gz
I'll get a new appstream-glib release out at
Am 15.04.2014 11:32, schrieb drago01:
do we really want to go the way of dangerous defaults without
... dangerous ?
So install the workstation package set. Boot it up. Disable the firewall.
Which kind of vulnerabilities are able to find? Which ports are
accessible?
Avahi at least
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC, 14:00 Central Europe, 8:00 Boston, 5:00
San Francisco, 21:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
== Topic ==
* really finish Open Questions
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draft%29#Open_Questions
* plan tasks to split
On 12.4.2014 17:25, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.04.2014 17:11, schrieb Paul Wouters:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
we should not do anything - because we don't have a clue about the
network of the enduser
We know and handle a lot more than you think already using unbound with
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
AFAIK you can't have 2 mod_wsgi's, each one compiled against a
different Python major.minor, loaded by Apache at the same time for
various reasons. So the best solution would IMO be to create
python3-mod_wsgi (subpackage of
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Enable Software Collections =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Enable_Software_Collections
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
The Software Collections repositories will be enabled by default.
== Detailed
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 02:14:25PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/15/2014 01:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
NOTE: If you are in the CC of this email, then you don't need to do
anything. I will fix your package for you. However you
should still read the email.
= Proposed Self Contained Change: libzhuyin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libzhuyin
Change owner(s): Peng Wu p...@redhat.com
An new intelligent input method for Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) provided by
libzhuyin using 3-grams to give better conversion than ibus-chewing with
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Enable Software Collections =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Enable_Software_Collections
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
The
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Enable Software Collections =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Enable_Software_Collections
Change owner(s): Matthias
Hi,
sorry for being a bit late to the discussion.
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 12:23 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Adding repos definitely should not be taken lightly. Frankly, if 2 is
really something worth doing, then perhaps also the (overly?) stringent
policies need rethinking.
The initial
Hello Petr,
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 4:02 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Instructions for testing on Fedora 20+ are available on:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver#How_To_Test
Please, run dnssec-trigger and let exclamations like It can't possibly
work! apart.
Some OCaml spec files do the following:
ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
This is always incorrect for several reasons:
Is %{ocaml_arches} used for anything?
In case not, maybe better to remove it?
Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Enable Software Collections =
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:23 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Jaroslav
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 13:18 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
The Software Collections repositories will be enabled by default.
* Policies and guidelines: Allow the inclusion of the software collections
repositories in Fedora products
Does the above refer to the repositories available at
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:19:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
Some OCaml spec files do the following:
ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
This is always incorrect for several reasons:
Is %{ocaml_arches} used for anything?
In case not, maybe better to remove it?
I've removed
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:01:51AM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Disable_Firewall
Change owner(s): Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
The firewalld service will not be enabled
Whoa, the fact that the Firewall is on by default in Fedora (along
with SELinux) is one of the reasons I choose Fedora over alternatives.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide
From: jor...@redhat.com
Date: 04/15/2014 07:08
Subject: Re: Python 3 and mod_wsgi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
AFAIK you can't have 2 mod_wsgi's, each one compiled against a
different Python major.minor, loaded by Apache at the same time for
HI
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Tadej Janež wrote:
Does the above refer to the repositories available at
https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/?
Yes.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:32:04 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:19:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
Some OCaml spec files do the following:
ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
This is always incorrect for several reasons:
Is
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:32:04 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:19:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
Some OCaml spec files do the following:
ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
Dne 11.4.2014 15:55, Florian Weimer napsal(a):
On 04/11/2014 01:18 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6
Change owner(s): Jan Staněk jsta...@redhat.com
Add BerkeleyDB v. 6, which changed license from
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:14:25 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:32:04 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:19:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
Dne 11.4.2014 14:57, Chris Adams napsal(a):
Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com said:
Add BerkeleyDB v. 6, which changed license from previous releases (GPLv2+ to
AGPLv3+), to Fedora while keeping the older version for packages which
cannot
use BerkeleyDB with the new
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 13:48 +0930, William Brown wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 23:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 08:49 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 04/14/2014 09:21 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
On 15 April 2014 14:35, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
Whoa, the fact that the Firewall is on by default in Fedora (along
with SELinux) is one of the reasons I choose Fedora over alternatives.
Same thing here, It was really surprising to see it as a proposed feature.
How can it be
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:31:30PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
fails on installed but unpackaged files, details were sent in private
mail
Thanks for the details.
The -15 package currently building in primary Koji should fix this.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 15:42 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 15 April 2014 14:35, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
Whoa, the fact that the Firewall is on by default in Fedora (along
with SELinux) is one of the reasons I choose Fedora over alternatives.
Same thing here, It was
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:35 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
What needs to be done to improve the firewall integration?
Zbyszek
The rule in the Workstation technical spec is: A firewall in its
default configuration may not interfere with the normal operation of
programs installed by
Hi everyone.
Just a quick heads up that there won't be a meeting on Friday this week
as it's a holiday for many countries (Good Friday).
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:01:51AM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
== Detailed Description ==
The current level of integration into the desktop and applications does not
justify enabling the firewalld service by default. Additionally, the set of
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
Am 15.04.2014 15:59, schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:35 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
What needs to be done to improve the firewall integration?
Zbyszek
The rule in the Workstation technical spec is: A firewall in its
default configuration may not interfere
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-04-15)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 12:01:12 UTC. The full logs are available
at
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:40:20 AM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall
Am 15.04.2014 11:32, schrieb drago01:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:18 AM,
NOTE: If you are in the CC of this email, then you don't need to do
anything. I will fix your package for you. However you
should still read the email.
Some OCaml spec files do the following:
ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
This is always incorrect for several reasons:
(1)
On 04/15/2014 01:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
NOTE: If you are in the CC of this email, then you don't need to do
anything. I will fix your package for you. However you
should still read the email.
Some OCaml spec files do the following:
ExclusiveArch:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087903
Bug ID: 1087903
Summary: perl-CSS-Minifier for EPEL 6 and 7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CSS-Minifier
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087904
Bug ID: 1087904
Summary: perl-Text-Patch for EPEL 6 and 7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-Patch
Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
Reporter:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:51:10 +0200
Vitaly Kuznetsov vi...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Tim all,
in Cloud WG we have 'Automatic Smoketests on Image Build' task:
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/38
AFAIK you have somehting similar among future Taskotron goals. It
would be nice if we can
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Try-Tiny:
98049893c9ce161ba4d1393e00dc8bea Try-Tiny-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 11.4.2014 16:59, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Create new set of packages and introduce proper
versioning
in order to not confuse the dynamic linker.
Is this symbol versioning intended to be upstream?
Ideally,
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 10:28 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:40:20 AM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall
Am
Am 15.04.2014 16:28, schrieb Christian Schaller:
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:40:20 AM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall
Am 15.04.2014 11:32,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:01:49 +0200
Vitaly Kuznetsov vi...@redhat.com wrote:
Vitaly Kuznetsov vi...@redhat.com writes:
Hi Tim all,
snip
Yesterday I've tried setting up Taskotron (according to
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/dexy-themed/) on 3 F20 VMs in EC2 and
actually I've failed
commit 306ac7adc756e03faa08f7857b657e127c84b7f3
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Apr 15 15:39:28 2014 +0100
Update to 0.21
- New upstream release 0.21
- Also skip the test if Capture::Tiny is too old
(https://github.com/doy/try-tiny/issues/17)
It would be nice to get this done and merged back into rawhide _before_
any mass rebuild.
rel-eng ticket to coordinate mass rebuild:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5877
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 15:07 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Remote Journal Logging =
The communication between the two daemons is done over standard HTTPS,
following rather simple rules, so it is possible to create alternate
implementations without much
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 08:59 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 14:35 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
What needs to be done to improve the firewall integration?
Zbyszek
The rule in the Workstation technical spec is: A firewall in its
default configuration
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:19:37 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
We need to be able to produce official updates to the Fedora Cloud
images. Initially, we plan to release these updates monthly, but also
need the ability to release an out-of-cycle update in the event of a
Dne 15.4.2014 10:21, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15.4.2014 02:07, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
Rails depends on exact v8
version, which means v8 3.14 must have also their own SCL as part of
the SCL.
Stupid question:
This might be another one to make sure and land and iron out any issues
before a mass rebuild.
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5877
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 15.4.2014 17:14, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15.4.2014 10:21, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15.4.2014 02:07, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Jaroslav Reznik
jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Rails depends on exact v8
version, which means v8 3.14 must have also their own
On 04/15/2014 04:28 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:40:20 AM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall
Am 15.04.2014 11:32,
To be clear here, all this is implemented in the two daemons right?
When you say it uses https, thats natively done in the daemons, they
don't need apache or some other https implementor in the way?
Which ssl stack does this use? nss? openssl? gnutls? something else?
kevin
signature.asc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087334
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
...snip...
Special Requests: Cockpit would like to request an additional 2-4
weeks on the Fedora 21 schedule to ensure completion of the core
functionality.
So, you want to push final release out to november? Or can you expand
on what you mean by 'on the Fedora 21 schedule' ?
kevin
On 04/15/2014 04:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.04.2014 16:28, schrieb Christian Schaller:
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:40:20 AM
Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Workstation:
On 04/15/2014 02:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
HI
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Tadej Janež wrote:
Does the above refer to the repositories available at
https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/?
Yes.
So this change can be re-stated like Workstation product will have SCLs
from
users running applications which opening a high port in the background
like license checks and so on (as example ZendStudio) will be really
thankful that as default these ports are open on the WAN
Why does it listen on a port for license checks? It should just contact
the server and
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.04.2014 16:28, schrieb Christian Schaller:
There was a long thread about this on the desktop mailing list, and I was
not in the 'disable the firewall' camp in that discussion, but nobody in
that thread or here
I don't know whether this should be a gnome-boxes bug, an rpcbind bug,
or a FESCo ticket, or something else, so I'm asking here.
rpcbind enables itself by default. This page says that it has a
specific exception, so it's okay:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Starting_services_by_default
I
...snip...
Packages for the repository are built in COPR. The COPR owner can
propose the repository as a whole for inclusion into the Playground
repository by marking it as such in COPR. Repositories/packages
successfully built and satisfying the Playground repository's
Policies are copied
Are there plans to show SCL's in gnome-software as well, or is that
drifting too far from 'applications' ?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.04.2014 16:28, schrieb Christian Schaller:
There was a long thread about this on the desktop mailing list, and I was
not in the 'disable
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 08:47 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I don't know whether this should be a gnome-boxes bug, an rpcbind bug,
or a FESCo ticket, or something else, so I'm asking here.
rpcbind enables itself by default. This page says that it has a
specific exception, so it's okay:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:07:47AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Might be good to specify better what a 'severe security issue' is.
Perhaps Any update rated important or higher on the severity scale?
https://access.redhat.com/site/security/updates/classification/
Yeah, that needs to be worked
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 15.04.2014 16:28, schrieb Christian Schaller:
There was a long
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 08:47 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I don't know whether this should be a gnome-boxes bug, an rpcbind bug,
or a FESCo ticket, or something else, so I'm asking here.
rpcbind enables itself by default.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:16:29AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
rpcbind has this script:
postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then
# Initial installation
/bin/systemctl enable rpcbind.service /dev/null 21 || :
fi
nfs-utils has this script (excerpted):
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:26:58AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So you could use this instead if you need the native compiler:
ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_native_compiler}
I should have said that if you have to do this, it's very likely to be
a bug. There are *very* few reasons why a
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
━━━
I naively ported my Django app to Python 3 and didn't realize WSGI was
going to be an issue. I saw python3-django was available for Fedora
I think you and I disagree that b is broken. In my mind b
(listening w/firewall closed) is precisely what the firewall is
designed to do... act as a failsafe in the event of an unexpected
application listening when a user doesn't really know or want it to.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 09:16 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 08:47 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I don't know whether this should be a gnome-boxes bug, an rpcbind bug,
or a FESCo ticket, or something
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 09:13 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I keep thinking that, if I had unlimited time, I'd write a totally
different kind of firewall. It would allow some policy (userspace
daemon or rules loaded into the kernel) to determine when programs can
listen on what sockets and
On 15.04.2014 11:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
it is not a point of *what i can do and do*
it is a point what the ordinary 08/15 user does which assumes
to have a by default secure system after install
Fedora is not for ordinary users. Fedora is for geeks and developers
that like to experiment
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo