On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2014-05-16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > * Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been updated and
> > now asks for the `Upstream URL` to be specified next to the `Package Name`
> > and `Short Description`.
> >
>
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:50:16AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/19/2014 11:50 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >>On 2014-05-16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>>* Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been upda
No, As I said. you are 15 years old. FAS accounts are permissible just
for +13 years old. So no problem with that-. Enjoy, and start to
contribute.
2014-05-19 23:52 GMT-04:30 Martín Buenahora :
> El lun, 19-05-2014 a las 23:45 -0430, Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado
> escribió:
>> Please we need
El lun, 19-05-2014 a las 23:45 -0430, Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado
escribió:
> Please we need a signed letter for your parents for verify. :), just kidding.
>
> Welcome to Fedora
>
> Now seriously, I'm not a RH Legal guy, but register a FAS account it
> is only permissible for +13 years old
Please we need a signed letter for your parents for verify. :), just kidding.
Welcome to Fedora
Now seriously, I'm not a RH Legal guy, but register a FAS account it
is only permissible for +13 years old people. So if you can do a FAS
account, also you can sign FPCA.
2014-05-19 23:11 GMT-04:30
On 05/19/2014 11:50 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2014-05-16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
* Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been updated and
now asks for the `Upstream URL` to be specified next to the `Packa
El lun, 19-05-2014 a las 19:51 +0200, Haïkel escribió:
> Hi Martin !
>
> Welcome to Fedora 😄
>
> Practical question to Legal geeks, is being minor an issue for
> contributing and do we have a process to cover that ? In some
> countries, I know for sure that it requires parents agreement.
>
> Reg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/19/2014 09:34 AM, Laurent Rineau wrote:
> Le Monday 19 May 2014 09:01:25 nonamedotc a écrit :
>> I can take ipe. I have used it on and off...
>
> Please take the ownership.
>
> What I found difficult with Ipe is that the Otfried Cheong has no
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:25:51AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:39:55AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > I would like to package this software for Fedora and possible
> > EPEL if others think it would be useful. I have reviewed the
> > Fedora package review process [4] an
Taylor Braun-Jones wrote:
> I'm noticing that the qt5* packages in rawhide are still at 5.2.1. With
> the RC having been out for a couple weeks and the official 5.3 release due
> out tomorrow, I was wondering if any of the packaging work has begun?
Waiting for 5.3.0 final at least, as the python
Welcome to Fedora !
If you don't find a sponsor before the beginning of June, feel free to ping
me (fas: hguemar, irc nick: number80). At the moment, I have very limited
bandwidth.
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de
Hi Martin !
Welcome to Fedora 😄
Practical question to Legal geeks, is being minor an issue for contributing
and do we have a process to cover that ? In some countries, I know for sure
that it requires parents agreement.
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Hi,
My name is Christopher Tubbs. I'm a long-time user of Fedora and
Linux, and a big fan of free (as in speech) software. I love bigdata
and scientific computing, and consider myself a seasoned Java
developer and Maven user.
I'm currently working on Apache Accumulo as my first package for
Fedora
Hello everyone.
My name is Martin Buenahora. I'm on the FAS as "zironid". I'm from
Colombia, 15 years old and Linux user since 2011.
I joined to the Fedora project, more specifically the packaging group,
because I wanted to make something new. I have no previous experience in
packaging of any kin
Le Monday 19 May 2014 22:54:41 Christopher Meng a écrit :
> Or simply write down these in Fedora release notes. Gpodder has done this.
There should be packages for the conversion tools in Fedora, because it can be
written in the release notes.
--
Laurent Rineau
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Lau
Or simply write down these in Fedora release notes. Gpodder has done this.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi all,
I'm noticing that the qt5* packages in rawhide are still at 5.2.1. With the
RC having been out for a couple weeks and the official 5.3 release due out
tomorrow, I was wondering if any of the packaging work has begun? If not,
I'd be happy to contribute some of the packaging work that I have
Le Monday 19 May 2014 09:01:25 nonamedotc a écrit :
> I can take ipe. I have used it on and off...
Please take the ownership.
What I found difficult with Ipe is that the Otfried Cheong has not kept the
compatibility between Ipe6 and Ipe7: a file created by ipe6, and even ipe5,
cannot be opened
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:22:31PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2014-05-17 at 09:27 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:44 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > > There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
> >
> > It's not that there are many broken redi
On Sáb, 2014-05-17 at 09:27 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:44 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
>
> It's not that there are many broken redirect it's that we didn't put in
> place any redirect atm :)
Today, I un
On odd weeks WG meeting will be at 15:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe,
11:00 (noon) Boston, 8:00 San Francisco, 0:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting
on Freenode.
= Topics =
* plan which tests should be done by Taskotron on Playground repo
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
I'd like to leave this position to others... Although these two share the
same upstream at all.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
I can take ipe. I have used it on and off...
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Laurent Rineau
wrote:
> Le Monday 19 May 2014 19:16:56 Christopher Meng a écrit :
>> I will take figtoipe.
>
> I imagine you want to take 'ipe' too, do not you?
>
> --
> Laurent Rineau
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/La
On Seg, 2014-05-19 at 13:23 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> If you have packaged TR(I tried it at 12th due to a post on one
> website which I often visit), feel free to submit. A useful tutorial
> for newcomer is available at:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Computational chemistry is by no means dead. There are big packages
> available for real calculations, e.g. NWChem and PSI4 are available
> in Fedora.
I wish point out 'Ascend', in review now
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088) and
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:39:55AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> I would like to package this software for Fedora and possible
> EPEL if others think it would be useful. I have reviewed the
> Fedora package review process [4] and will follow those steps
> if this is well received.
It does sound us
2014-05-19 4:20 GMT-03:00 Susi Lehtola :
> On Sun, 18 May 2014 21:23:51 -0500
> Jon wrote:
> > Indeed, something strange:
> >
> > $ spectool -g mopac7.spec
> > curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
> >
> > The maintainer of the mopac7 package should fix the source0, or retire
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 02:49:29PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:16:30AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:39:23AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Sat, 17 May 2014 09
Le Monday 19 May 2014 19:16:56 Christopher Meng a écrit :
> I will take figtoipe.
I imagine you want to take 'ipe' too, do not you?
--
Laurent Rineau
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LaurentRineau
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:16:30AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:39:23AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sat, 17 May 2014 09:30:59 +0200
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:
I will take figtoipe.
Meanwhile I've prepared pdftoipe RPM.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Broken deps for i386
--
[MegaMek]
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires libgcj_bc.so.1
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3
On 2014-05-19, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> Why there is a limit on http:// and https:// URI schemata?
>
> Do we have projects that are hosted on a FTP w/o any kind of
> documentation? If so I guess we could add FTP, are you thinking a
I lack time to deal with my Fedora packages, and I just orphaned the two of
them that I no longer use in my day job: ipe and figtoipe. I hope they will
find new maintainers, because I know users, mostly in research centers, who
expect those packages to be maintained.
https://admin.fedoraprojec
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
8 packages were orphaned
blacs [devel] was orphaned by spot
Basic Linear Algebra Communication Subprograms
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/blacs
f1lt [
05.05.2014 14:00, nob...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
> ===
>
> 4 packages were orphaned
>
> transfig [devel,f19,f20] was orphaned by kdudka
> A utility for converting FIG files (made by
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:00:12AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2014-05-16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > * Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been updated and
> > now asks for the `Upstream URL` to be specified next to the `Package Name`
> > and `Short Description`.
> >
>
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:41:06AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 19.5.2014 07:53, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35:25PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>I am curious about this as well. The URL should be taken from RPM and
> >>refreshed with every update of the package.
On 2014-05-16, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> * Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been updated and
> now asks for the `Upstream URL` to be specified next to the `Package Name`
> and `Short Description`.
>
Why there is a limit on http:// and https:// URI schemata?
-- Petr
--
Dne 19.5.2014 07:53, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35:25PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I am curious about this as well. The URL should be taken from RPM and
refreshed with every update of the package. The same applies for Summary and
Description.
Very simply, there is w
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 09:39:23AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 17 May 2014 09:30:59 +0200
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:18 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Note that 'fedpkg retire' happens to be br
On Sun, 18 May 2014 21:23:51 -0500
Jon wrote:
> Indeed, something strange:
>
> $ spectool -g mopac7.spec
> curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
>
> The maintainer of the mopac7 package should fix the source0, or retire
> the package.
mopac7 is orphan in F20 and rawhide, an
42 matches
Mail list logo
