The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
767
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
114
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
99
cc'ing to devel list as well.
On 29 May 2014 11:26, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote:
Glad to see this happening after long time.
On 29 May 2014 10:25, Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
It took some time but finally we have a working
system-config-language[1]
The comment is from 2007
Ralf Ertzinger 2007-11-28 06:44:41 EST
Apart from the IOS files, the sources contain two binary files
(mips64_microcode, ppc32_microcode) which are somehow incorporated into the
emulator.
I do not know what these files contain or where they come from and what license
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this
is the
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
fail to build for two releases will be be
On 05/29/2014 08:43 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this
is the first run after adapting the
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora.
On 29/05/14 15:31, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On 29/05/14 15:31, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:50:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:31:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
If someone doesn't step up soon I'll take CUnit.
I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty
Branch field and doesn't let me continue. I'll look into reporting that
as a bug first.
:-(
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:31:52 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
If someone doesn't step up soon I'll take CUnit.
I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty
Branch field and doesn't let me
On Thu, 29 May 2014 09:59:00 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I visited pkgdb to try taking CUnit, but I can't. Pkgdb presents an empty
Branch field and doesn't let me continue. I'll look into reporting that
as a bug first.
:-(
Odd, I took it with no issues. If you'd like it we can
On 05/23/2014 11:01 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
Dear maintainers of dependent packages of ipython,
I will update python-ipython in rawhide next week on Friday to version 2.1.0.
This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [2].
Any chance you could push this now?
The ipython that's
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:50:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
CUnit being required by curl. So maybe the output needs restructuring.
And one of the CUnit comaintainers needs to take ownership.
Do you have a suggestion about how to restructure? It seems to me that
the limits of plaintext emails
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:50:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
CUnit being required by curl. So maybe the output needs restructuring.
And one of the CUnit comaintainers needs to take ownership.
Do you have a suggestion
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing with an idea of building lua libraries against compat-lua to
allow luajit working with them. My initial motivation for this is that there
are projects which don't work with Lua-5.2 and developers for various
reasons
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:43:49PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
xorg-x11-drv-cirrus orphan, airlied, ajax, alexl,
caillon, caolanm, glisse,
hadess, johnp,
Hi Jochen,
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 15:43, Till Maas wrote:
Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this
is the first
On 05/28/2014 05:26 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:52:23PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 05/28/2014 01:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:32:04PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:41:45AM -0400,
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various reasons, is
there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
--
Cheers,
Tim
Freedom, Features, Friends, First - Fedora
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:28:18PM -0400, Tim St Clair wrote:
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
Many folks like to use clang as their primary compiler for various
reasons, is there anyone who knows a workaround or fix?
If
Hi,
I'm working on packaging Salome (The Open Source Integration Platform
for Numerical Simulation) [1], and the cmake scripts there install tons
of binaries and python scripts to the /usr/bin/salome folder. Is this
acceptable?
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] http://www.salome-platform.org/
--
devel
2014-05-29 18:27 GMT-03:00 Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Hi,
I'm working on packaging Salome (The Open Source Integration Platform for
Numerical Simulation) [1], and the cmake scripts there install tons of
I packaged and maintained it packaged in Mandriva for a few years.
If I
binaries and python scripts to the /usr/bin/salome folder. Is this
acceptable?
I believe a symbolic link should be acceptable. Actually creating a subdir
would probably have a lot of opposition, but it should be possible to
reconfigure salome to use %_libexecdir/salome or %_libdir/salome
Hi,
I'll take ownership of python-ZConfig as I already maintain a few Python
packages and I'm interested in keeping python-ZODB in the distribution.
Eduardo
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
2014-05-29 18:04 GMT+02:00 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com:
On 05/23/2014 11:01 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
Dear maintainers of dependent packages of ipython,
I will update python-ipython in rawhide next week on Friday to version 2.1.0.
This will be shortly before the mass rebuilt on 6/6 [2].
Ok, so I don't get bit again by bodhi letting me do something I shouldn't...
Do I just unpush the update but NOT delete it?
I have a newpackge update and one of the three packages has a problem so
obviously I don't want to push it to stable. Once I get the email that's
it's been successfully
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so I don't get bit again by bodhi letting me do something I shouldn't...
Do I just unpush the update but NOT delete it?
I have a newpackge update and one of the three packages has a problem so
obviously I don't
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so I don't get bit again by bodhi letting me do something I shouldn't...
Do I just unpush the update but NOT delete it?
I have a newpackge update and one of the three packages has a problem so
obviously I don't
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Is it true actually? Last time I was checking the Ruby packages contained
different/modified version of upstream JS files.
AFAICT they're both fine.
rubygem-uglifier includes the main uglify-js via git submodules:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:56:02PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
binaries and python scripts to the /usr/bin/salome folder. Is this
acceptable?
I believe a symbolic link should be acceptable. Actually creating a subdir
would probably have a lot of opposition, but it should be possible to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101986
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101994
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054061
--- Comment #6 from Howard Chu h...@symas.com ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #5)
I'm sorry but the reproducer involves a lot of openldap code. Please provide
perl-only reproducer. Otherwise I must conclude the bug is in the
34 matches
Mail list logo
