On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 11:01 -0400, Daniel Wille wrote:
Yeah, I noticed it because it's also a dep for xsd-3.3.0-1, which I
use.
The same problem is with classads package (dependency for
glite-lb-common and glite-lb-server):
glite-lb-common has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:01:58AM -0400, Daniel Wille wrote:
Yeah, I noticed it because it's also a dep for xsd-3.3.0-1, which I use.
If someone volunteers to become maintainer it can be easily unretired.
Regards
Till
___
epel-devel mailing list
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:40:02PM +0200, František Dvořák wrote:
I think classads has been retired because it wasn't needed in Fedora.
But it should be kept in EPEL.
So the proper way is to unretire it?
Yes, to make it easier you can tell me your FAS name if you would like
to maintain it.
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
891
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
345
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
110
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:32:00PM +0200, František Dvořák wrote:
My FAS name is valtri . I'm interested in EL5, EL6 and EPEL-7 (and
Fedora devel, if needed?).
The last maintainer (stevetraylen) is interested too, for EPEL branches.
Sorry, I was not aware that it is retired on all branches.
#4: Decide on criteria to unretire packages.
+
Reporter: till| Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Policy problem |Version:
Hi all,
As you probably already know, Jenkins will be in official repositories
of upcoming Fedora 21. If you're interested in it, please consider
participating in today's Jenkins test day.
All necessary information should be available on wiki:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:54:08PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
While we should be working on packaging guidelines, it has been very
How does gccgo affect the packaging of libraries?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from
- Original Message -
Hi,
I'm thinking can we ship for Fedora 22 some wallpapers in portrait
orientation?
We always shipped wallpapers in landscape mode. But I - and quite people
around me - have monitors rotated by 90°, which I personally find much
better for development.
Right
On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
I think this is problematic considering that some other languages
violates their language-specific packaging guidelines with
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
I think this is problematic considering that some other
@Matthew: I'm just stating a fact, the absence of guidelines does not
mean that we can accept reviews. In this case, you can't help but
violate a few general guidelines when you use the golang toolchain,
for instance: statically linked executables, that would require an
exception from fesco on
On Monday 29 of September 2014 12:40:30 Richard Hughes wrote:
On 29 September 2014 12:23, Matěj Cepl mc...@cepl.eu wrote:
Couldn’t we just stop this madness of bitmaps?
+10
SVGs are not a silver bullet.
Well, it's better than bitmaps.
You'd want a very different source SVG
file for an
On 09/30/2014 10:53 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place.
I think
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/30/2014 10:53 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we
2014-09-30 11:42 GMT+02:00 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com:
I tried, didn't work. It's not surprising because filing bugs doesn't fix
them.
If package owner doesn't answer or have no good reasons, just CC a
provenpackager and he will fix it for you.
H.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-10-01 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On 09/24/2014 06:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made
Hello,
I've requested the maintainer of vpnc to split vpnc-script from this
package and allow a new package that can be maintained independently (I
can be maintainer of it). The reason for the split is that the
vpnc-script package is used in more than just vpnc, and him being
unresponsive
2014-09-30 15:04 GMT+02:00 Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com:
In RHEL we are using preupgrade-assistant [1] which does this work.
If user write a check script then it will inform user that upgrade is not
supported.
The check script can also inform user that e.g. mariadb changed structure
and
No, definitely not.
preupgrade-assistant is only the tool which informs user or admin
what was change against the newest version and recommend actions for
inplace upgrades.
But as I mentioned. Currently now it's not available in Fedora.
Preupgrade-assistant doesn't modify system at all.
On
HI
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Petr Hracek wrote:
No, definitely not.
preupgrade-assistant is only the tool which informs user or admin
what was change against the newest version and recommend actions for
inplace upgrades.
But as I mentioned. Currently now it's not available in
Or better say, fedup remains as tool for upgrades.
On 09/30/2014 03:57 PM, Petr Hracek wrote:
No, definitely not.
preupgrade-assistant is only the tool which informs user or admin
what was change against the newest version and recommend actions for
inplace upgrades.
But as I mentioned.
Hi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Petr Hracek wrote:
In RHEL we are using preupgrade-assistant [1] which does this work.
If user write a check script then it will inform user that upgrade is not
supported.
The check script can also inform user that e.g. mariadb changed structure
and it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147143
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Preupgrade assistant performs assessment of the system from the
upgradeability point of view.
It is based on OpenSCAP engine.
It reports potential risks for in-place upgrading system.
fedup can call our API. For sure.
That's all.
On 09/30/2014 03:59 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
HI
On Tue, Sep
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
@Rich Jones: I agree with you that gaining experience, but that could
be done using a copr repository or granting exceptions for a limited
set of packages.
Well the specific case was that libguestfs has golang bindings, and we
wanted to
commit 89cd6ed077a532bec7b4d1a00e4047cdb7d23803
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Sat Sep 6 23:05:55 2014 +0200
Update to 4.18
.gitignore |1 +
perl-EV.spec |8 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47900
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47900/0001-Ticket-47900-Adding-an-entry-with-an-invalid-passwor.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Petr Hracek wrote:
Preupgrade assistant performs assessment of the system from the
upgradeability point of view.
It is based on OpenSCAP engine.
It reports potential risks for in-place upgrading system.
fedup can call our API. For sure.
Was there any
On 2014-09-24, 16:22 GMT, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
In Czech we say Když se kácí strom, létají třísky
I have to admit I have hard time with this proverb. Whenever
I hear somebody to use it is usually to cover for his mistakes
or worse (it was a favorite proverb of
Hi Nikos,
I'm sorry that I haven't responded earlier. I was under the impression
that your request only affected EPEL and that you have contacted the
EPEL maintainer now. I just re-read the conversation - it looks like
that I have overseen that the request was indeed for the fedora
branches (at
2014-09-30 16:20 GMT+02:00 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
@Rich Jones: I agree with you that gaining experience, but that could
be done using a copr repository or granting exceptions for a limited
set of packages.
Well the
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-09-30)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 13:03:32 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 16:50 +0200, Christian Krause wrote:
Hi Nikos,
I'm sorry that I haven't responded earlier. I was under the impression
that your request only affected EPEL and that you have contacted the
EPEL maintainer now. I just re-read the conversation - it looks like
that I have
Hey,
So to follow on the topic of publishing F21 Alpha base image...
I talked to Tianon from Docker today on IRC and our current output of
build in Koji is not acceptable as input for their official images repo
- they use Dockerfiles to build even base images - input is a Dockerfile
and
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:55:40PM +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
I talked to Tianon from Docker today on IRC and our current output
of build in Koji is not acceptable as input for their official
images repo - they use Dockerfiles to build even base images - input
is a Dockerfile and tarred
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:55 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote:
Tianon also mentioned future feature which would support signed images -
we would probably want to produce such signed image by ourselves, not
just give Docker rootfs and let them sign it.
How does this intersect with
In addition to the standard RHEL base repositories please ensure the
following repositories are also enabled.
[rhel-7-server-extras-rpms]
name = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Extras (RPMs)
[rhel-7-server-optional-rpms]
name = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Optional (RPMs)
Those
On 30/09/14 12:40 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:55 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote:
Tianon also mentioned future feature which would support signed images -
we would probably want to produce such signed image by ourselves, not
just give Docker rootfs and let them sign it.
Good afternoon folks,
Please join us tomorrow (Wednesday, Oct 1st) at 2PM EDT (6PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Kernel Status Update
2) Aarch64 a) Status update
b) 21_Alpha_TC1
3) F21 Armhfp Beta
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion
snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is:
$ pkg-config
Compose started at Tue Sep 30 16:27:39 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:32:08PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion
snippets. The modern one
Hi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
In principle all fixes should be upstreamed, but this is a trivial
packaging change that can be easily and safely done just in
Fedora.
Agreed but also note that even packages that install to the recommended
location
Hi
Ask Fedora (http://ask.fedoraproject.org) uses Askbot which is a Django
based web application. We need a few developers to implement some bug
fixes and features for askbot and while upstream developers are active,
our requirements are pretty high. So if anyone here wants to help out,
please
Compose started at Tue Sep 30 17:31:06 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:45:15PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
In principle all fixes should be upstreamed, but this is a trivial
packaging change that can be easily and safely done just in
Fedora.
Agreed
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled in
the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in a
popular external repository, require these functions.
According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069394#c1, the
HAVEGE feature is disabled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147023
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146465
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Inline-Struct-0.11-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Inline-Struct-0.11-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147882
Bug ID: 1147882
Summary: perl-B-Lint-1.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-B-Lint
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100706
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147882
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147892
Bug ID: 1147892
Summary: perl-Tangerine-0.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Tangerine
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147893
Bug ID: 1147893
Summary: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tangerine:
df8919a8f5eb405d1202f3bbf5426421 Tangerine-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 85927e9daed484ba1ccad47fa0dd147d6be5e702
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 30 12:32:23 2014 +0200
0.05 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Tangerine.spec | 10 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Modern:
b53e9b7f759ca0689ec14e4f2fef17c2 Test-Modern-0.012.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1c9684c1364476c404f2d2a19cf3de12c7d18e05
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Sep 30 11:40:13 2014 +0100
Update to 0.012
- New upstream release 0.012
- does_ok no longer calls the internal Test::Builder '_try' method
perl-Test-Modern.spec |6 +-
Summary of changes:
1c9684c... Update to 0.012 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
85927e9... 0.05 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Modern-0.012-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
1c9684c... Update to 0.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Modern-0.012-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
1c9684c... Update to 0.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
85927e9... 0.05 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-B-Lint:
f29eda0033cc414c32380de4adf47538 B-Lint-1.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8a56ed1b608b146e20f2adde10ad48d216c46ba8
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 30 13:10:10 2014 +0200
1.18 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-B-Lint.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147892
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Tangerine-0.05-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tangerine-0.05-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147892
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Tangerine-0.05-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tangerine-0.05-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147882
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed
commit 11e6cb7966e415525bb000193b588999e184d905
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 30 13:31:34 2014 +0200
1.18 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-B-Lint.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147882
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-B-Lint-1.18-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-B-Lint-1.18-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
commit c8181db5095920290ff64178c51fa99e55d65686
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Sep 30 14:44:03 2014 +0200
Bump to rebuild against libev-source 4.19
perl-EV.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-EV.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133512
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Throwable:
458e43d3ec7a816720d5f6aa614b46e1 Throwable-0.200012.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 275392cb80ccec87df7632d7ca3aad216022da51
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 30 16:29:19 2014 +0200
0.200012 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Throwable.spec | 34 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757
Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757
--- Comment #6 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
(In reply to Matěj Cepl from comment #5)
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #4)
There were a recommendation to not using absolute paths when invoking perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Digest-PBKDF2:
a8910c9bcf831ceb4a84a18ab6a5e800 Digest-PBKDF2-0.010.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b9881d87b9524bd738a16a467c119990cc1c70ac
Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org
Date: Wed Oct 1 06:34:46 2014 +1000
Initial import (#1147795).
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Digest-PBKDF2.spec | 50 +++
sources |1
Summary of changes:
b9881d8... Initial import (#1147795). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b9881d8... Initial import (#1147795). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
b9881d8... Initial import (#1147795). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139043
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13-2.fc21
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13-2.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-logger-msg-1.2.13-2.fc19
--
You are
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145509
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127475
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Locale-PO-0.24-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147882
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
94 matches
Mail list logo
