Hello,
as far as I can see, EPEL 7 currently provides packages `python-django`
and `python-django15` being versions 1.6.5 and 1.5.6 respectively. EPEL
6 provides `python-django15` and `Django14` being 1.5.6 and 1.4.14.
According to the Django documentation [1], since version 1.7 was
released,
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 07:38 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Therefore please get it be re-reviewed before it is unretired.
OK, created a review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148415
I would appreciate the review. :-)
Thanks,
František
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 01:28:04PM +0300, Dionysis Grigoropoulos wrote:
Hello,
as far as I can see, EPEL 7 currently provides packages `python-django`
and `python-django15` being versions 1.6.5 and 1.5.6 respectively. EPEL
6 provides `python-django15` and `Django14` being 1.5.6 and 1.4.14.
On 1 October 2014 14:33, Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 01:28:04PM +0300, Dionysis Grigoropoulos wrote:
Hello,
as far as I can see, EPEL 7 currently provides packages `python-django`
and `python-django15` being versions 1.6.5 and 1.5.6
Hi,
upstream asked us 6 months ago if it would be possible to rename
rubygem-passenger package to passenger and clean-up the package
little bit to match the progress Passenger did in last years.
The reason to do this is that Passenger is not real rubygem anymore and
supports more languages
Hi,
Dennis, could you please build Alpha base image with updated bash? (And
probably also prepare F20 and Rawhide images so that we can really call
the Fedora image official with all it's tags?)
We should probably also consider using Fedora Cloud SIG account on
github to push these image to
On 30 September 2014 02:09, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 22:05 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Who is using magnifying glasses to view icons?
Icons are displayed far larger in GNOME Shell than in other desktop
environments, and the difference between an SVG
div dir=ltrdivdivdivHello,br/divI am trying to package
STLPlus (a href=http://sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/;
target=_blanksourceforge.net/projects/wbrstlplus/files/stlplus3//a)
library for fedora. There are few doubts I have in mind regarding
packaging it.brbr/div1. The library
Pranav,
Can you please re-send the e-mail without all the unnecessary HTML tags?
Your e-mail is quite unreadable at the moment.
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 05:11 -0400, Pranav Kant wrote:
div dir=ltrdivdivdivHello,br/divI am trying to package
STLPlus (a
Hello,
I am trying to package STLPlus (
sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/) library for fedora. There
are few doubts I have in mind regarding packaging it.
1. The library is dependent on another project viz. 'makefiles' (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/makefiles/).
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 06:06 -0400, Pranav Kant wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to package STLPlus
(sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/) library for fedora.
There are few doubts I have in mind regarding packaging it.
1. The library is dependent on another project viz.
'makefiles'
On 09/29/2014 01:19 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Please put the actual validation into an external script,
brp-desktop-file-validate or whatever. That way its consistent with the
other similar things, easier to test-run outside rpmbuild and unlike
inlining, has room for future growth.
Thanks
Hello all,
When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below).
While it's most likely a minor infrastructure issue, I'd suggest exercising
caution when downloading sources from pkgs.fedoraproject.org.
I've also
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in
a popular external repository, require these functions.
According to
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:02:34PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below).
While it's most likely a minor infrastructure issue, I'd suggest exercising
caution when
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in
a popular external repository,
On 10/01/2014 03:07 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
# If no desktop files are installed, return immediately
if ! ls -A $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/applications/ 2/dev/null; then
exit 0
fi
That tests whether the directory exists, not whether it contains
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:57 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
That might be a good reason, but it's not the one given at the start
of this proposal, that was that larger icons are needed for the
software centre (i.e. for applications to get included in the
installer) due to higher resolution displays.
Greetings!
This time I'm sending Accepted Changes 100% Complete reminder a bit
earlier than usually as we still have quite a lot of work to do on
Changes and it's going to help other teams to participate in Changes
process earlier (aka Docs team etc.).
2014-10-14 Accepted Changes 100% Complete
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:19 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I think the software center and shell display icons at the same size,
so
it matters equally to both.
I would be smarter if I checked such facts BEFORE sending emails and not
immediately AFTER. The icons in Software are indeed smaller.
On 1.10.2014 15:12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 08:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
in the Fedora package. Newer releases of
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
# If no desktop files are installed, return immediately
if ! ls -A $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/applications/ 2/dev/null; then
exit 0
fi
That tests whether the directory exists, not whether it contains
desktop files. If that's what you want, then
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/01/2014 03:07 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
# If no desktop files are installed, return immediately
if ! ls -A $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/applications/ 2/dev/null; then
exit 0
fi
That tests
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:06:44AM -0400, Pranav Kant wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to package STLPlus (
sourceforge.net/projects/stlplus/files/stlplus3/) library for fedora. There
are few doubts I have in mind regarding packaging it.
1. The library is dependent on another project viz.
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1
(TC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010 . Please see the following
pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:56:32AM +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
Hi,
Dennis, could you please build Alpha base image with updated bash? (And
probably also prepare F20 and Rawhide images so that we can really call the
Fedora image official with all it's tags?)
Just to confirm, these 3 images
On 10/01/2014 03:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in
a popular external repository, require these
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
wrote:
At the moment applications have to provide an icon = 32x32px in size
to be included in the AppStream metadata and shown in the software
center. This is *tiny* on a HiDPI screen, so should I mandate that all
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:59:52PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
So, at this point, I think I'm going to desubmit (is that a word?
unsubmit?) my request for a second opinion and won't be pursuing
this any further. Apologies for any wasted time, and thanks Nikos
for explaining what havege is
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:02:34PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below).
While it's
- Mensaje original -
De: Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com
Para: Dennis Gilmore dgilm...@redhat.com
CC: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, Lokesh Mandvekar
l...@switzerlandmail.ch
Enviados: Miércoles, 1 de Octubre 2014 1:56:32
Asunto: [Base]
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-10-01)
===
Meeting started by mattdm at 17:00:18 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-10-01/fesco.2014-10-01-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-10-01/fedora-meeting-1.2014-10-01-18.00.html
Minutes (text):
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
It's now retired in both F21 and master. Feel free to go ahead with the
libinfinity builds.
thank you.
Rex, I prepared a new build for libqinfinity in the master branch, if
you point me to the SRPMs you would like to use for
Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:14:24PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
It's now retired in both F21 and master. Feel free to go ahead with the
libinfinity builds.
thank you.
Rex, I prepared a new build for libqinfinity in the master branch, if
you point me to the SRPMs
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 12:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
Several suggestions have been made that warrant discussion:
1) Upgrades from Fedora 20
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-10-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-10-02 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-10-02 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-10-02
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-10-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Towards the end of today's blocker review meeting, we decided it would be good
for us to have a another meeting this week to deal with the unusually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:56:32 +0200
Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Dennis, could you please build Alpha base image with updated bash?
(And probably also prepare F20 and Rawhide images so that we can
really call the Fedora image
I'm sure I should file a ticket about this somewhere, but I'm not sure
where.
I was just signing up for yet another Fedora mailing list, and saw the
default image boxes at the bottom of the screen that indicate broken
links. Sure enough, I'm getting 404s for these URLs, all of which are
referred
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:21:08 -0600
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure I should file a ticket about this somewhere, but I'm not sure
where.
Infrastructure trac:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/newticket
I was just signing up for yet another Fedora mailing list,
Hi
Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive) shell
in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian (
https://lwn.net/Articles/343924/) have been using dash as the default shell
and Android uses mksh. While this appears to have been done primary to
increase
Once upon a time, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com said:
Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive) shell
in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian (
https://lwn.net/Articles/343924/) have been using dash as the default shell
and Android uses mksh.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Glib-Object-Introspection:
eca9d0aac6008d0566d143cc1f6b8a6f Glib-Object-Introspection-0.025.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8deb1ac97dbf5d79604df160d1f75f016b9961d9
Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org
Date: Wed Oct 1 17:02:06 2014 +1000
0.025 bump
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 0ceaaa9ecada3cbd0ed267925762790f5b0ea210
Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org
Date: Wed Oct 1 17:02:24 2014 +1000
0.025 bump
clog |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/clog b/clog
new file mode 100644
index 000..650ed55
--- /dev/null
+++
Summary of changes:
33c2319... 0.024 bump (*)
40dee7b... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_M (*)
2206b93... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
8deb1ac... 0.025 bump
0ceaaa9... 0.025 bump
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121365
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.025-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148328
Bug ID: 1148328
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.75 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067394
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148328
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139043
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139043
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141390
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141390
--- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Builds successfully at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7739321
Licensing is correct
rpmlint contains a warning for DOS line endings in README which can be fixed by
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit:
384105f762dbe2ba5b8e79a809b4a512 TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-TimeZone:
b43030a38d74cd3993ba803da21fbc80 DateTime-TimeZone-1.75.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f77db55c4bb7cdd9af6ce6cbf80d45f60e91cddc
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 1 15:26:26 2014 +0200
1.75 bump
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148328
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148328
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.75-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.75-1.fc21
--
You are
commit db93c9717f88108f19270e73584e9514c552
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 1 16:13:05 2014 +0200
1.75 bump
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit c0a403082250c748c95ceb8cbf9b0b6f856d8e28
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 1 16:27:42 2014 +0200
1.75 bump
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148328
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.75-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.75-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121365
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142584
--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FZlzgLrxi8a=cc_unsubscribe
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47900
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47900/0001-Ticket-47900-Server-fails-to-start-if-password-admin.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
66 matches
Mail list logo
