Compose started at Tue Dec 30 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
On 12/29/2014 04:48 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Fair enough. But to me, adding GNOME Software (GS) also cannot install
compilers, interpreters and other CLI tools creates a more problematic
situation.
To me, Fedora Workstation w/ Gnome is an incarnation of GnomeOS - An
OS aimed at single-user,
On 30/12/14 13:07, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/29/2014 04:48 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
And if walking this path, the Workstation default mode would be the one
corresponding to a developer, right?
Define Workstation. I don't know which audience the people, who
implemented it, were aiming at -
Am 30.12.2014 um 13:07 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
Is GS intended to be a one size fits all solution for both novice
users and the workstation target developer user?
I don't know if it's aimed at being a one size fits all solution. To
me, it's a matter of fact, that in general, there can never
On 30 December 2014 at 01:26, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
Minor correction, CentOS is unbranded RHEL and Fedora is not RHEL
upstream (so far as I am aware anyway).
That is incorrect. Fedora is upstream for RHEL and
* Ian Malone [30/12/2014 13:09] :
On 30 December 2014 at 01:26, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
That is incorrect. Fedora is upstream for RHEL and therefore upstream for
CentOS as well albeit, one step removed.
I stand corrected then. Anyone know when this changed?
This has
Hi,
A bug is open for perl-XML-TreePP since July (for opening a epel 7
branch) with no reaction
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123681)
I need this package so I'm volunteer to maintain it
Cheers and seasons greetings
Marianne / Jehane
--
Marianne (Jehane) Lombard
Geekfeminist
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 14:53 +0100, Marianne Lombard wrote:
Hi,
A bug is open for perl-XML-TreePP since July (for opening a epel 7
branch) with no reaction
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123681)
I need this package so I'm volunteer to maintain it
This bug seems unnecessary.
Hi,
I have written here because the bug was already 5 month old without a
reaction and the package don't seem maintened (upstream is 0.43 and
fedora is 0.39 ).
I have follow your advice and made a request for epel7
Le 30/12/2014 16:09, Yanko Kaneti a écrit :
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 14:53
It seems that the version of systemd in F20 doesn't have the systemctl
list-timers option which makes interrogating timers more difficult.
I need a timer that runs daily (with certain prerequisites) but I'm not
having any luck.
Here's my timer unit:
[Unit]
Description=Timer for the JSON based
Would it make sense to include Firefox Aurora / Developer Edition in
rawhide?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 30 December 2014 at 13:13, Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr wrote:
* Ian Malone [30/12/2014 13:09] :
On 30 December 2014 at 01:26, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
That is incorrect. Fedora is upstream for RHEL and therefore upstream for
CentOS as well albeit, one step
It will be great!
2014-12-30 19:09 GMT+03:00 Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com:
Would it make sense to include Firefox Aurora / Developer Edition in
rawhide?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On 30/12/14 04:07 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/29/2014 04:48 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Fair enough. But to me, adding GNOME Software (GS) also cannot install
compilers, interpreters and other CLI tools creates a more problematic
situation.
To me, Fedora Workstation w/ Gnome is an incarnation
On 29/12/14 04:33 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
This certainly works, but is it really a reasonable trade-off in a
developer context where things like compilers and interpreters are
part of the very core? What role does Gnome Software play here? How
fruitful is the idea to hide packages in this
On 30/12/14 20:57, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 29/12/14 04:33 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
This certainly works, but is it really a reasonable trade-off in a
developer context where things like compilers and interpreters are
part of the very core? What role does Gnome Software play here? How
I'll try
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6071
thank you
Mosaab
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:38:22 +0100
From: punto...@libero.it
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: NetBeans Re-Enable
Il 29/12/2014 19:56, Itamar Reis
Peixoto ha scritto:
On 30/12/14 12:34 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 30/12/14 20:57, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 29/12/14 04:33 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
This certainly works, but is it really a reasonable trade-off in a
developer context where things like compilers and interpreters are
part of the very core? What role
On 30/12/14 22:58, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 30/12/14 12:34 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 30/12/14 20:57, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 29/12/14 04:33 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Gnome Software is to abstract the package concept to only
focus on applications accessible to desktop.
Agreed. And I
On 30/12/14 22:58, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 30/12/14 12:34 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 30/12/14 20:57, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Bottom line: isn't there is a mismatch between Gnome Software (GUI
applications only) and the idea of a developer using both CLI and GUI
tools? And if so, how
2014-12-30 23:58 GMT+02:00 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org:
MATE apps not visible means they needed app-data included on their
.desktop files hence the pleas from Richard Hughes.
Perhaps I couldn't get my thoughts in order when I started this thread, but
among the things I wrote was
The Workstation PRD explicitly, more than once states developers of
all sorts are the primary target market. The special focus is for a
platform for application development.
I wonder two things:
a.) Should more developer tools be installed by default?
'dnf group list' shows the following items
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 08:07:37PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:57:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
You will need to convince a sponsor to sponsor you.
The license for mygui changed between 3.2.0 and 3.2.1 from LGPLv3+ to MIT.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177679
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzill...@free.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177679
Francois Cartegnie bugzill...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bugzilla77@free.f |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177679
--- Comment #11 from Francois Cartegnie bugzill...@free.fr ---
Mistake, was not STL file, but blender OBJ.
Opened via Quick Slice
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzill...@free.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177679
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177819
Bug ID: 1177819
Summary: Failed at step NO_NEW_PRIVILEGES spawning
/usr/sbin/amavisd: Invalid argument
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: amavisd-new
30 matches
Mail list logo
