https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181656
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
I'm inclined not to package this for EPEL-5 because the sqlite/DBD::SQLite is
so old it throws out loads of warnings when used:
$ ./Build test
commit 30a058855246c7d28d164015ab2feebfe84e28e0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 16 10:48:19 2015 +0100
Fix a basic regular expression when bootstrapping
Old filters call sed -e. Thus it's a basic regualar expression. '?' is
not a metacharacter in basic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180918
--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
openssl 1.0.1k was pushed to the F-21 stable updates repository earlier this
week so this should no longer be an issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181656
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit a65d48edc09d019722553b72a7c9ed0587f1767d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 16 12:23:46 2015 +0100
Decrase bzip2-devel version constrain
The unbundled bzip2 version is 1.0.6. I verified headers and tests
that 1.0.5 is compatible with 1.0.6. Therefore I
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-LibYAML:
6ac5aa764d55395175d7c6f60e606ce0 YAML-LibYAML-0.57.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c6d19a89b877f2eb7326130f127752d6e5099ef7
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Jan 16 14:32:11 2015 +
Update to 0.57
- New upstream release 0.57
- Update copyright year
- Use Swim cpan-tail block functions in doc
- Format string fixes (PR#21,
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.57-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
c6d19a8... Update to 0.57
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183106
Bug ID: 1183106
Summary: perl-JSON-XS compiled against wrong version of perl
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-JSON-XS
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183106
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183106
Mike Iglesias igles...@uci.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:12:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Jakub:
I will test gcc 5 on my Rawhide aarch64 machine, if you can point me
to either a build of it or an SRPM. So far I see no gcc 5 builds in
On 01/15/2015 05:15 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:19:19AM +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Hi all.
When upgrading F20 to F21 using FedUp, some users had a problem
with some packages not being upgraded (e.g. [1]). The problem was
caused by broken update path F20 - F21.
- Original Message -
Honza Horak wrote:
* Fedora Rings (hhorak, 12:03:21)
[snip]
* IDEA: definition of ring 1 is a minimal set of packages that give
you a functional system, with some sort of approval (hhorak,
13:31:21)
* IDEA: ring 1 should be self-hosted --
commit 3e5a5586476ff5888e1636498a2dedadb23ee937
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 16 09:32:01 2015 +0100
Fix dependency filtering
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec
On 15.1.2015 23:13, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2015-01-15 20:18 GMT+01:00 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com:
On 01/15/2015 04:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/14/2015 03:10 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
I'd like to collect
W dniu 16.01.2015 o 09:35, Petr Spacek pisze:
Another advantage could be mass-rebuild simplification. Maybe we could save
machine and man-time by not rebuilding noarch packages because of gcc rebase
or something like that.
GCC change may affect binaries which will generate other output which
On 01/15/2015 04:24 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
I look forward to future cooperation with you and thanks you all for
doing Fedora.
Welcome Jakub !
--
Jiri
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 16.1.2015 05:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at
07:45:00PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I personally know nothing of the subject, but found this article, I
wonder if
there's any truth here? If so, maybe the push for dnssec on f22 isn't as
wonderful as supposed:
There are not many guys interested in the Environment Stacks WG on the
nomination page [2] so far, which is really shame. Don't loose your
chance to help moving Fedora forward!
The main goal of this working group is to research and develop new or
improved methods of developing, testing,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
I'm with you, debugging spam needs to go away, GUI applications have
no business writing anything at all to the console, ever.
Except when they have really serious errors.
I once had an X problem that prevented Openoffice from working. It
showed no window, output nothing, and
Taskotron doesn't notice if subpackages have been dropped and cause
unresolvable dependencies because they are not obsoleted anywhere.
Examples: jogl2-javadoc, miglayout-examples, glusterfs-regression-tests
rubygem-json-doc, rubygem-rake-doc, and more
Yum is broken in the same way. And by
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
GCC change may affect binaries which will generate other output which
will change noarch packages.
It shouldn't change a program's behavior, unless the program itself is
relying on undefined behavior. Either way
Let me emphasize especially need for somebody who will be able to look
closely at and contribute to release engineering tools.
I think it's clear that no bigger change how the fedora looks will
happen without touching the tools we use currently in Fedora -- be it
koji, dist-git, copr. Having
Agenda:
- Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids nils!)
- Docker update
- Status rpm mechanisms for multiple config subpackages factory
reset files
- F22 items
- DevConf
- Open Floor
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:19:13AM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
GCC change may affect binaries which will generate other output which
will change noarch packages.
It shouldn't change a program's
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/15/2015 04:24 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
I look forward to future cooperation with you and thanks you all for
doing Fedora.
Welcome Jakub !
Yes, welcome!
- Ken
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:42 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no
The discussion got rather long, but I didn't see one particular aspect
discussed:
Remote users would not be
On 01/16/2015 03:39 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:42 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no
The discussion got rather long, but I didn't see one particular
Am 16.01.2015 um 10:50 schrieb Björn Persson:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
I'm with you, debugging spam needs to go away, GUI applications have
no business writing anything at all to the console, ever.
Except when they have really serious errors.
I once had an X problem that prevented Openoffice
On 01/16/2015 01:39 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Agenda:
- Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids nils!)
- Docker update
- Status rpm mechanisms for multiple config subpackages factory
reset files
- F22 items
- DevConf
- Open Floor
Thanks regards, Phil
Logs:
Meeting ended Fri
On 01/15/2015 03:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
So it's kWarning, not kDebug and it can't be ignored by using kdebugdialog
settings. There are two options - fix the underlying issue or change
kWarning to kDebug - it just depends on how important it is and it seem
as Harald
On 16 January 2015 at 01:31, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Honza Horak wrote:
* Fedora Rings (hhorak, 12:03:21)
[snip]
* IDEA: definition of ring 1 is a minimal set of packages that give
you a functional system, with some sort of
On 01/14/2015 04:00 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On 01/13/2015 06:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will not use
the lvm plugin. we make every buildroot from scratch using a fully
clean environment to help with ensuring reproducability.
- Original Message -
On 16 January 2015 at 01:31, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Honza Horak wrote:
* Fedora Rings (hhorak, 12:03:21)
[snip]
* IDEA: definition of ring 1 is a minimal set of packages that give
you a
On 16 January 2015 at 02:49, Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com wrote:
There are not many guys interested in the Environment Stacks WG on the
nomination page [2] so far, which is really shame. Don't loose your chance
to help moving Fedora forward!
The main goal of this working group is to
On 01/16/2015 05:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 16 January 2015 at 01:31, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com
mailto:bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Honza Horak wrote:
* Fedora Rings (hhorak, 12:03:21)
[snip]
* IDEA: definition of
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015, at 07:31 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
Let me emphasize especially need for somebody who will be able to look
closely at and contribute to release engineering tools.
I think it's clear that no bigger change how the fedora looks will
happen without touching the tools we use
Hi,
I've orphaned lua-sec, lua-dbi and prosody packages.
Feel free to take ownership of those ones.
Regards,
--
Johan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:53:36 +0100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
Agreed. In principle, any package could affect the build of any other
package (e.g. bash version could realistically influence build
results), but we ignore this. As you say, something like this would
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:41 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
If it's installing a regular file, then it won't work - the package
(daemon) needs to create it on start.
I filed a bug about this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182785
Though I wonder if this should be a Change
Compose started at Fri Jan 16 15:03:08 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 15:39 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
There's a chance of a successful exploitation that would result in
obtaining my privileges. Sure, gaining access to my account is bad
enough, but if I run su or sudo, they have root!
Along these lines, someone pointed out a rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:18:17 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/14/2015 04:00 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On 01/13/2015 06:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will
not use the
that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will
not use the lvm plugin. we make every buildroot from scratch
using a fully clean environment to help with ensuring
reproducability.
You can cache and still preserve reproducability. What I'm
planning for Copr is to
- Original Message -
Excerpts from Stephen John Smoogen's message of 2015-01-09 10:25 +10:00:
On 8 January 2015 at 17:01, Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Personally I am not looking forward to maintaining more branches
and/or (sub-)packages for every python3X-*.
I
I have been regular user of CENTOS 6.5 7. I need to know how can get
the latest package of Prosody XMPP for CentOS. Currently I can get only
prosody-0.8.2-7.el6.x86_64.rpm however I need to get Prosody 0.9.7. Please
advice direct me to correct forum / Person.
Distribution: CentOS 6
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2015-01-16/epel.2015-01-16-17.05.log.html
17:05:03 smooge #startmeeting epel
17:05:03 zodbot Meeting started Fri Jan 16 17:05:03 2015 UTC. The chair
is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:05:03 zodbot Useful Commands:
On 01/16/2015 09:44 AM, Ram M wrote:
I have been regular user of CENTOS 6.5 7. I need to know how can
get the latest package of Prosody XMPP for CentOS. Currently I can get only
prosody-0.8.2-7.el6.x86_64.rpm however I need to get Prosody 0.9.7.
Please advice direct me to correct forum /
On 2015-01-16, 17:52 GMT, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
It's probably not upgraded for policy reasons. However,
I wanted the newer version too. You can update the spec file
of this SRPM, if 0.9.4 is not recent enough for you.
Otherwise, just rebuild it:
Instead of maintaining your own RPM on
50 matches
Mail list logo
