On 02/12/2015 07:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
(Logistical note: please keep all replies to this thread on
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
tl;dr Shall we consider requiring a lesser package review for packages
that are not present on Product or Spin install media?
== Premise ==
So, some time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192372
Bug ID: 1192372
Summary: perl-Data-Peek-0.43 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Data-Peek
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192376
Bug ID: 1192376
Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-libwww-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186281
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192382
Bug ID: 1192382
Summary: perl-Test-Inter-1.06 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Inter
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Fri Feb 13 2015 at 2:02:27 AM Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015, at 01:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
tl;dr Shall we consider requiring a lesser package review for packages
that are not present on Product or Spin install media?
It's worth noting here that
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
Hi,
I just released mock-1.2.7. It have - beside one small bug and new F22
configs - one important change.
The rawhide configs have this one line included:
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf'
which means that Mock will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192369
Bug ID: 1192369
Summary: perl-Apache-LogRegex-1.60 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Apache-LogRegex
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192371
Bug ID: 1192371
Summary: perl-CGI-4.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CGI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192370
Bug ID: 1192370
Summary: perl-Capture-Tiny-0.28 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Capture-Tiny
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192373
Bug ID: 1192373
Summary: perl-DBD-CSV-0.48 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-CSV
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192374
Bug ID: 1192374
Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod-0.32 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192377
Bug ID: 1192377
Summary: perl-List-Compare-0.43 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-List-Compare
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192381
Bug ID: 1192381
Summary: perl-Socket-2.018 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Socket
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192380
Bug ID: 1192380
Summary: perl-Pod-Usage-1.65 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Usage
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192379
Bug ID: 1192379
Summary: perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.25 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Perldoc
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Summary of changes:
d2d46cb... 3.25 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192379
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Bug-fix update suitable for F≥22.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
commit d2d46cbdc0cb5f2cf70b8d03f75366918b9f1eae
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 10:54:03 2015 +0100
3.25 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Pod-Perldoc.spec | 15 ---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Perldoc:
4991ce24fab9900312f11d9c8ab7576f Pod-Perldoc-3.25.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192379
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
I've built new rpms for phabricator and deployed them to staging.
https://phab.qadevel-stg.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
If you have a bit of time, please help poke at the staging instance so
we have some confidence that deploying the new versions to production
won't break things horribly :)
On Friday, February 13, 2015, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
RHEL/EPEL users do not have DNF available, therefore they are unable to
build packages for Fedora Rawhide. There is however a workaround. Just
change
* Paul Howarth [12/02/2015 20:05] :
We generally have requires for most optional functionality in Perl
packages at the moment, to avoid bugs being raised about missing
dependencies when people try to use that optional functionality.
Based on past emails, I suspect that Colin wishes nothing in
On 13.02.2015 08:11, Casey Jao wrote:
How feasible would it be to keep the listings in primary.xml and
filelists.xml sorted by package name and arch? Doing so could open the door
to simple and efficient diffs of repository metadata.
Something like pdiffs in Debian?
Those two are by far the
Hi,
I just released mock-1.2.7. It have - beside one small bug and new F22
configs - one important change.
The rawhide configs have this one line included:
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf'
which means that Mock will use DNF for building packages for rawhide
targets. There are two
Hi,
there's been some work in progress already:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850896
Proof-of-concept code (to be merged into dnf/createrepo_c in the future):
https://github.com/Tojaj/DeltaRepo
The idea behind that is simple:
* create deltas as small repos on server
* download
How feasible would it be to keep the listings in primary.xml and
filelists.xml sorted by package name and arch? Doing so could open the door
to simple and efficient diffs of repository metadata.
Createrepo_c [1] keeps packages sorted by filename [2] by default.
Sorting based on filenames was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192377
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.43-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.43-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190421
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.43-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.43-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-List-Compare:
5a5024219599ebf7b1539e3642738b8c List-Compare-0.43.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
3b4ea3b... 0.43 bump, performance enhancements (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3b4ea3b2e0a9864f95c4448eee97381e8e260990
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 12:23:57 2015 +0100
0.43 bump, performance enhancements
.gitignore |1 +
perl-List-Compare.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
3b4ea3b... 0.43 bump, performance enhancements (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 02/12/2015 08:51 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
I plan to make something like Ubuntu has [2] which was great help when I
was working on fixing packages while working for Canonical.
With Michael Simacek we are working on Koschei [1,2] - a service for
tracking package buildability status. I
Dear all,
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I didn't find any.
Summary: I have a proposal to make it easier for maintainers to have
multiple versions of the same library in distro (by making it
*naturally* possible) (and with minimal maintenance overhead), and for
On 01/24/2015 07:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
This is not entirely true. GCC and related projects apply a pretty
complex peer review process, with defined roles and privileges. (Cf. the
file MAINTAINERS in GCC's sourcetree for details).
Somewhat over-simplified the
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:55:02AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/24/2015 07:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
This is not entirely true. GCC and related projects apply a pretty
complex peer review process, with defined roles and privileges. (Cf. the
file MAINTAINERS in
On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 15:21 +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Dear all,
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I didn't find any.
Summary: I have a proposal to make it easier for maintainers to have
multiple versions of the same library in distro (by making it
*naturally* possible)
Summary of changes:
8df4071... 1.60 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
6691f37... 0.32 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
After reading this article[1] on how many totally unsecured mongodb
installations there are on the internet, I noticed a recent (and
worrying) change in the defaults on Fedora's mongodb package.
In January, the Fedora rawhide package for mongo[2] was changed to
listen on all interfaces by
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:54:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Meanwhile, we've had much more critical vulnerablities in widely used
libs (Remember heartbleed), which all have been quite easy to fix
packaging-wise. IMO, to a great portion, thanks to having mostly banned
static linkage and
On 13 February 2015 at 13:06, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:49:13 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 20:18 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 12/02/15 19:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
(Logistical note: please keep all replies to this thread
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192381
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Socket-2.018-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Socket-2.018-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191491
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Socket-2.018-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Socket-2.018-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Capture-Tiny:
2923ba0524f4f42a6022f3ef1ca1913d Capture-Tiny-0.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
dc5f63f... 0.28 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
OK, I completed my fedfind/wikitcms conversion patch for
openqa_fedora_tools. I also fixed up some of the test case submission
data bits - they broke with relval report-auto (instead of jskladan's
version of non-interactive result submission) because they didn't
quite grok the 'test instance'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192370
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
Summary of changes:
f24c353... 2.018 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5de7dbd179584a5d66ca5a12eb1ed3666796b486
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:31:05 2015 +0100
2.018 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Socket.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192381
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 13.02.2015 15:53, Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
KDE SIG is investigating some recent/serious reported crasher bugs in
rawhide, notably:
Could not sync environment to dbus. (startkde)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191171
and (an older one, but the situation has
As my work usually is around fixing packages which failed to build on
AArch64 I spend lot of time with Koji.
Today I started writing script which has to list all current FTBFS
entries from selected Koji instance - kind like [1] does but with few
extras:
- no packages which got built
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192374
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Improvement suitable for F≥22.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
commit 6cc22cd3285da0247f565813918acb3eff8e3faf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:31:05 2015 +0100
2.018 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Socket.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192374
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
commit 8df40713d227f390a19a3994a75a2efc3c6eecfc
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:04:07 2015 +0100
1.60 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Apache-LogRegex.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Apache-LogRegex:
3f6ab3b4a12093fbcf3b2628416a8ea4 Apache-LogRegex-1.60.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6691f37d5f9d6f8de73c6a52d3a7a1ae7e42d80a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:17:56 2015 +0100
0.32 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod.spec | 10 +++---
sources |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Socket:
d735fd2a339c4676e0e3733af327cc09 Socket-2.018.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192381
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Socket-2.018-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Socket-2.018-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191491
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Socket-2.018-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Socket-2.018-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
commit dc5f63fa7f33e7add5392d15ee90114ee087d44e
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 13:48:14 2015 +0100
0.28 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Capture-Tiny.spec | 25 ++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 12
commit f24c35384866a718c5092c57675619caff858bdf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:31:05 2015 +0100
2.018 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Socket.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192381
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 13:54 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/13/2015 10:56 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Modified version of Zbyszek's idea with time constraints follows:
1) Accept the new package into Fedora N even with bundled libraries.
I am inclined to be Fedora needs to encounter a
Hi
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
Thanks. I think when I'd looked at it I'd discounted the review and
comment on others' submissions process as it would seem to require you
to have a better idea of what you're doing than the person submitting
the package, and potentially
commit 4e46f2b642dfafbd49ab9dbcd7a569be7fbf68e6
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 17:13:18 2015 +0100
4.13 bump
.gitignore |1 +
CGI-4.04-Make-Test-Deep-tests-optional.patch | 39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192371
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
On 13. 2. 2015 at 19:10:01, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Friday, February 13, 2015, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
RHEL/EPEL users do not have DNF available, therefore they are unable to
build packages
Jerry James wrote on 02/14/2015 12:23 AM:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:28 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
as i wrote in my e-mail titled jni libraries fails in koji
i have the same problem
i haven't done any changes in koji client config
I tried the csdp build again this morning to see if
On 02/13/2015 04:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
words, I think it might be reasonable to have bundling in the outer
rings be a blacklist rather than a whitelist, so long as we can always
find out with a simple repoquery what contains
Build was OK, but bodhi is giving an error:
bodhi -n -r F22 -t enhancement -N 'see:
https://github.com/cython/cython/blob/master/CHANGES.rst ' Cython-0.22-1.fc22
Creating a new update for Cython-0.22-1.fc22
Cython-0.22-1.fc22 not tagged as an update candidate
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:55:23 +0100
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/12/2015 10:40 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is the koji rawhide repo not pointing to the new F23 builds/repo
somehow? My otf2-1.5.1-1.fc23 build doesn't appear to be showing
up.
commit 68db1ab2dac194b2ac7bfbf09e42f13610ff9ebf
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 17:04:05 2015 +0100
Regenerate a2p.c bug #1177672
perl.spec | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177672
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.18.4-292.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.18.4-292.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:53:09 -0500
Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Build was OK, but bodhi is giving an error:
bodhi -n -r F22 -t enhancement -N 'see:
https://github.com/cython/cython/blob/master/CHANGES.rst '
Cython-0.22-1.fc22 Creating a new update for Cython-0.22-1.fc22
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
It is possible, but it'll need package reviews for each new version.
Yes, it is a new package so a new review will be required (for either the
old-compat or the new-parallel-installable version).
this requirement for an additional review is likely non-negotiable.
commit acbbb74c8442aa623d73b82e150ffd7b9a2ad896
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 17:04:05 2015 +0100
Regenerate a2p.c bug #1177672
perl.spec | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI:
1de46434384fc0e59da6b6b407130c20 CGI-4.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0e2038f2f5976ede4e2c7cc549d96b7e24607827
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 17:13:18 2015 +0100
4.13 bump
.gitignore |1 +
CGI-4.04-Make-Test-Deep-tests-optional.patch | 39
On 13 February 2015 at 15:35, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:00:07 +, Ian Malone wrote:
Actually, a question I have about this is how it will impact people
trying to become maintainers. When I last checked (it may have
changed) the only way to do that
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:45:50 +0900
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Note that this fails on buildSRPMFromSCM, i.e. when creating srpm,
and not on buildArch (armv7hl, i686, x86_64), where rpmbuild the
newly created srpm is executed.
So when using mock, usually srpm is already
Rex Dieter wrote:
Sure, additional documentation is always welcome. Are you willing to help
write some?
My apologies, re-reading the whole thread, including the initial post, I see
you did have a specific proposal... to which I responded separately to a
couple of points (but otherwise, a
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:21:17 +0330
Hedayat Vatankhah hedayat@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I didn't find any.
...snip...
Proposal: let's make it possible to have multiple versions of the
same library installed, as far as their .so
On 02/13/2015 11:25 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Ryan S. Brown rya...@redhat.com writes:
[...] In January, the Fedora rawhide package for mongo[2] was
changed to listen on all interfaces by default [...] To help
protect users, I think the default should be changed back to
localhost only.
a fix for this problem is:
(see
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wrapper.spec
)
# rpmbuild 4.6 support
%if ! 0%{?__isa_bits}
%ifarch x86_64 ia64 ppc64 sparc64 s390x alpha ppc64le aarch64
%global __isa_bits 64
%else
%global __isa_bits 32
%endif
On 02/12/2015 07:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Second, I will call attention to the fact that different Fedora
users have very different needs from the software. For example,
those running Fedora Server and Fedora Cloud are likely far more
concerned with Fedora as a *deployment* platform
On 13 February 2015 at 09:05, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/13/2015 04:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:43:53PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
words, I think it might be reasonable to have bundling in the outer
rings be a blacklist rather than a
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-02-16
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's Blocker Review time again! While we don't yet have an Alpha TC to
test, testing against rawhide has continued. The results have yielded a
couple proposed blockers: 3 Alpha
I need FORTRAN for R and R packages - if it's not 100% for the R
ecosystme I'd consider any bugs to be at least blockers for beta, if
not alpha.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Freitag, den 13.02.2015, 13:53 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Fri, 13
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 01:53:12PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:47:07 -0800
Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
as has happened many times before, the GCC bump in rawhide has broken
all Fortran packages, desperately needing a mass rebuild.
Can you
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:47:07 -0800
Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
as has happened many times before, the GCC bump in rawhide has broken
all Fortran packages, desperately needing a mass rebuild.
Can you expand on the breakage? Is it that they no longer rebuild?
Or
This patch started writing the test suite for 389 DS. Eventually all of
TET will be ported to lib389 tests in 389 DS.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48003
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48003/0001-Ticket-48003-build-suite-framework.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:49:13 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Ultimately, it's about one thing: Help get more software into Fedora
without scaring people away.
What is the background for this? Who has been scared
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:45:23 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:49:13 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Ultimately, it's about one thing: Help get more software into Fedora
without scaring people away.
What is the background for this? Who has been scared away?
Here's one
commit 8289ee15033124e5d91d0102221d917ea16e71b0
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Feb 13 13:09:59 2015 +0100
0.48 bump
perl-DBD-CSV.spec | 12 +++-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBD-CSV.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-CSV:
11391a868171dfe493f0a907d8c33596 DBD-CSV-0.48.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
