On 02/26/2015 09:47 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 02/25/2015 09:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417
apt -- Debian's Advanced Packaging Tool with RPM support ( master f22
f21 f20 )
[..
On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 04:59 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Feb 24, 2015 8:32 AM, "Mikolaj Izdebski" wrote:
On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
I would much rather live without any legacy jdk, and if so then
without any
rules. But not settin
On 02/25/2015 09:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417
apt -- Debian's Advanced Packaging Tool with RPM support ( master f22 f21 f20 )
[...]
synaptic -- Graphical frontend for APT packa
On 02/24/2015 05:04 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 04:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 10:12]:
On 02/24/2015 04:06 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 09:58]:
On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On 02/24/2015 04:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 10:12]:
On 02/24/2015 04:06 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 09:58]:
On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24 09:29]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 20
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 27/01/15 11:51, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Hello,
> >> ** A build containing latest Django will be pushed to f22 branch late in
> >> dev
> >> cycle. If we decide not to push Django-1.8, nothing will be broken.
> >> ** Django 1.8 f
On 02/25/2015 09:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:58:54 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I.e. when updating the master repository on the server, we emptied
our mirrorlists, and let the _master_ poll repomd.xmls from the
_mirrors_. When it found a mirror's "repomd.xml" was in sync,
On 02/25/2015 08:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417
fakechroot -- Gives a fake chroot environment ( master f22 f21 f20 )
fakeroot -- Gives a fake root environment ( master f22 f21 f
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 08:15:51 -0500,
Josh Boyer wrote:
This is an opportunity for community members for whom i686 is a
passion to join the team to participate in the bugfixing required. We
previously called out the need for assistance[2], but had no
substantial response. We hope that being
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:58:17 -0500,
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
1. JDK-(N+1) is first shipped. The maintainer of JDK-N intends not to package
it, so JDK-(N+1) includes Obsoletes:JDK-N from the start.
2. Someone revives JDK-N. Oops, it cannot be installed because JDK-(N+1)
obsoletes it.
If
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:22:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:47:47 +0100
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > There will be such times, sure.
> > Here (Germany), in recent times, they happen almost daily. My guess
> > is the "fedora flavors", the launch of f22 and the mass-rebui
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose 5
(TC5) is now available for testing.
** PLEASE NOTE **: This will likely be a short-lived compose - while
it was spinning we discovered the likely cause of the bug that causes
live image boots to often fail with a kernel crash, an
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:48:34PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
> based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417
> maildrop -- Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities ( master f22 f21 f20
> )
taken. bruno and I have be
On Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 20:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
> based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417
[...]
> arpack -- Fortran 77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems
> ( master f22 f21 f20 )
T
On Qua, 2015-02-25 at 12:48 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> po4a -- A tool maintaining translations anywhere ( master f22 f21 f20
> )
taken ...
dpkg and other Debian tools need it. I built it for epel7
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On 25 February 2015 at 10:58, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/25/2015 06:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:47:47 +0100
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>
> In another (much smaller) project, when pushing updates, we had
>>> removed all mirrors from our mirrorlists and had let the s
Am 25.02.2015 um 21:38 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac:
Dne 25.2.2015 v 18:44 Reindl Harald napsal(a):
Am 25.02.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Paul Wouters:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm? Syncing is allowed to my knowledge. C-a-d and gdm allow a clean
reboot/poweroff. But sysrq does an
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:58:54 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I sense a misunderstanding. With "pushing" I was referring to
> "uploading/publishing" a package to the repository on the master.
> The mirrors were polling ad lib, at intervals at their preference.
Ah right. Then yes, we do the same th
Dne 25.2.2015 v 18:44 Reindl Harald napsal(a):
Am 25.02.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Paul Wouters:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm? Syncing is allowed to my knowledge. C-a-d and gdm allow a clean
reboot/poweroff. But sysrq does an abnormal reboot/poweroff, which we
cannot allow.
On 02/25/2015 12:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
> based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417
>
> fail2ban -- Daemon to ban hosts that cause multiple authentication errors (
> master f22 f21 f20 )
> vtk -- The Visualization
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:40:57 +0200
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > Rawhide should absolutely be a site for early integration work, but
> > it really should NOT be a place to dump nightly builds. There are
> > many people that actually use Rawhide as a day-to-day system and
> > treating it like a dumpi
The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417
apt -- Debian's Advanced Packaging Tool with RPM support ( master f22 f21 f20 )
arpack -- Fortran 77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems (
master f22 f21 f2
On 02/25/2015 10:23 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 25.2.2015 v 17:18 Troy Dawson napsal(a):
>> On 01/09/2015 02:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
>>> I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the notification
>>> that the EPEL6 version w
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 14:16 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:53 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 08:41 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 17:03 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:39 +, Petr Pisar wro
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-02-25)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:01:14 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-02-25/fesco.2015-02-25-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:53 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 08:41 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 17:03 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:39 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > On 2015-02-22, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > > Introduce
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 08:41 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 17:03 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:39 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On 2015-02-22, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > Introduce an "in-development" flag for packages in Fedora.
> > > >
> > > I
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>> Does
>> %undefine _hardened_build
>> help?
>
> that version works for me
Hmmm, am I doing something wrong? I've tried both:
%undefine _hardened_build
and:
%undefine _hardened_build
%global _hardened_build 0
at the t
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-02-26 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-02-26 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2015-02-26 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2015-02-26 1
On 25 February 2015 at 06:41, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 17:03 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:39 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On 2015-02-22, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > Introduce an "in-development" flag for packages in Fedora.
> > > >
> > > I lik
On 02/25/2015 06:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:47:47 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
In another (much smaller) project, when pushing updates, we had
removed all mirrors from our mirrorlists and had let the server poll
"repodata/repomd.xml" from the mirrors to re-adde a mirror t
> On 02/24/2015 06:41 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Hello,
> >> "java" would be the preferred JRE in Fedora. The package would have no
> >> content, but it would have Requires on preferred Fedora JRE, currently
> >> java-1.8.0-openjdk. This could be easily changed as default JRE changes.
> >> The s
Am 25.02.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Paul Wouters:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm? Syncing is allowed to my knowledge. C-a-d and gdm allow a clean
reboot/poweroff. But sysrq does an abnormal reboot/poweroff, which we
cannot allow. Similar, remounting read-only is also security s
Am 25.02.2015 um 18:47 schrieb Chris Adams:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said:
when you are on a machine where you have pysical only keyboard and
mouse it is not - not every PC stands in front of your face - think
about kiosk mode and so on...
But Fedora out-of-the-box is not secured for
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said:
> when you are on a machine where you have pysical only keyboard and
> mouse it is not - not every PC stands in front of your face - think
> about kiosk mode and so on...
But Fedora out-of-the-box is not secured for that already. An admin
needs to do additio
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm? Syncing is allowed to my knowledge. C-a-d and gdm allow a clean
reboot/poweroff. But sysrq does an abnormal reboot/poweroff, which we
cannot allow. Similar, remounting read-only is also security senstive,
which we cannot allow.
Without being l
On Wed, 25.02.15 11:16, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> > We generally default "secure". The thing is that with sysrq you can
> > kill arbitrary processes if you have acecss to the console, and other
> > things, and that's just too security se
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:47:47 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> The user-side of this problem is quite simple:
>
> The metalinks/mirrorlists as being used in yum or mock configs are
> pointing to mirrors, which are broken or out of sync. I.e. the
> metalinks/mirrorlist are incorrect.
Sure. Althoug
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> We generally default "secure". The thing is that with sysrq you can
> kill arbitrary processes if you have acecss to the console, and other
> things, and that's just too security sensitive.
There are other useful things, like sync, remount read-only, r
On Wed, 25.02.15 18:05, Ali AlipourR (alipoo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
> >
> > The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
> > /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provided by systemd. You
> > can edit th
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>> Affected packages:
>> IQmol
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090
>
>> avogadro
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090
Are avogadro and IQmol affected by the same bug, or was this a mistak
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Hello:
>
>> I've got a package that is currently failing to build in Rawhide. It
>> has a home-brewed garbage collector inside, and it appears the GC is
>> confused about which objects are on the stack, and which are on the
>> heap. I want to try building without the hard
On 02/25/2015 04:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:29:14 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
If so, then you have cached metadata thats older than a few days.
No.
If not, then it's indeed those mirrors that are out of sync.
These mirrors are out of sync. Whether you like it or not,
HEADS UP -- new time and place; since we would have a collision in
#fedora-meeting and it seems to be better to have meetings on the same
channel every week, let's meet at #fedora-meeting-2.
WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (08:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
22:00 Tokyo, 23:00 Brisbane) in #f
Dne 25.2.2015 v 15:23 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dne 24.2.2015 v 14:25 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>>> https://release-monitoring.org/projects/updates/failed
>> Weird pagina
On 02/25/2015 09:04 AM, Petr Machata wrote:
> Orion Poplawski writes:
>
>> On 02/24/2015 05:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
Getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-1.0.2/libs/base/include/mrpt/utils/mrpt_macros.h:296:150:
error: no match for 'operator<<' (ope
Dne 25.2.2015 v 17:18 Troy Dawson napsal(a):
> On 01/09/2015 02:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
>> I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the notification
>> that the EPEL6 version was being orphaned because of filters.
>> Troy Daws
On 01/09/2015 02:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hi,
> I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
> I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the notification
> that the EPEL6 version was being orphaned because of filters.
> Troy Dawson
>
Hi All,
This has turned out to be much more p
Orion Poplawski writes:
> On 02/24/2015 05:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> Getting:
>>>
>>> /builddir/build/BUILD/mrpt-1.0.2/libs/base/include/mrpt/utils/mrpt_macros.h:296:150:
>>> error: no match for 'operator<<' (operand types are
>>> 'std::basic_ostream' and 'std::ostr
Il 25/02/2015 16:32, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
See:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-January/207036.html
kevin
thanks!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.or
On 12.02.2015 20:51, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Hi
>
> As my work usually is around fixing packages which failed to build on
> AArch64 I spend lot of time with Koji.
>
> Today I started writing script which has to list all current FTBFS
> entries from selected Koji instance - kind like [1] does
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:29:14 +0100
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > If so, then you have cached metadata thats older than a few days.
> No.
>
> > If not, then it's indeed those mirrors that are out of sync.
>
> These mirrors are out of sync. Whether you like it or not,
> mirrormanager is dysfunctional
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 14:01 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > This is an opportunity for community members for whom i686 is a
> > > passion to join the team to participate in the bugfixing
> > > required. We previously called out the need for assistance[2],
> > > but had no substantial response
On 02/25/2015 04:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:49:47 +0100
Richard Z wrote:
Hi,
when doing yum update in the last few weeks I am seeing thousands of
errors like
...snip...
and
http://mirror.netcologne.de/fedora/linux/updates/21/i386/drpms/autocorr-en-4.3.5.2-11.fc21_4.
See:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-January/207036.html
kevin
pgpvhRy6yWFJN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.o
hi
on my F20 system happen this problem
any ideas?
regards
gil
koji -d build rawhide --scratch
~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/google-http-java-client-1.19.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
successfully connected to hub
Uploading srpm:
~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/google-http-java-client-1.19.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
2015-02-25 16:18:58,752 [D
Am 25.02.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
If so, then you have cached metadata thats older than a few days.
If not, then it's indeed those mirrors that are out of sync
mirrors are regulary out of sync
you can see that even with /var/cache/yum as tempfs often
signature.asc
Description: Ope
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:49:47 +0100
Richard Z wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when doing yum update in the last few weeks I am seeing thousands of
> errors like
...snip...
> and
>
> http://mirror.netcologne.de/fedora/linux/updates/21/i386/drpms/autocorr-en-4.3.5.2-11.fc21_4.3.6.2-3.fc21.noarch.drpm:
> [Err
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/25/2015 03:43 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ali AlipourR wrote:
> Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that wa
On 02/25/2015 03:43 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ali AlipourR wrote:
Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
>>>
>>> The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
>>> /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provided b
>it is nothing someone is using regulary and that settings are security
>settings recommended by most auditing tools
security part is admit able, but still I think it is too much strict,
e.g. what is security problem of having 'r' request enabled?
(specially considering that fedora uses relativel
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ali AlipourR wrote:
>>> Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
>>
>> The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
>> /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provided by systemd. You
>> can edit that file, create yo
Am 25.02.2015 um 15:35 schrieb Ali AlipourR:
Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
/usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provided by systemd. You
can edit that file, create your own in /etc/sysct
On 02/25/2015 03:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Ali AlipourR wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
>
> The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
> /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provide
>> Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
>
> The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
> /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provided by systemd. You
> can edit that file, create your own in /etc/sysctrl.d/, or (as root)
> set it to whateve
> i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform
Interesting so you are saying that the kernel sub community is
effectively
only x86_64
If you are going down that road you better ask for every kernel
SIG
to emerge or step up in
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Monitoring-Plugin from: to: Obsolete on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Monitoring-Plugin
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIG
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchcommits of package:
perl-Monitoring-Plugin from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Monitoring-Plugin
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ext
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchcommits of package:
perl-Monitoring-Plugin from: to: Obsolete on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Monitoring-Plugin
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SI
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Monitoring-Plugin from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Monitoring-Plugin
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ex
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Monitoring-Plugin from: to: Obsolete on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Monitoring-Plugin
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/S
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchcommits of package:
perl-Monitoring-Plugin from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Monitoring-Plugin
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Monitoring-Plugin from: Approved to: Obsolete on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Monitoring-Plugin
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 02/25/2015 02:15 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform
Interesting so you are saying that the kernel sub community is effectively
only x86_64
If you are going down that road you
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting so you are saying that the kernel sub community is effectively
>>> only x86_64
>>>
>>> I
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dne 24.2.2015 v 14:25 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > https://release-monitoring.org/projects/updates/failed
>
> Weird pagination
When you filter?
Yes I found this out and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 24.2.2015 v 14:25 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> https://release-monitoring.org/projects/updates/failed
Weird pagination
Vít
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU7ddnAAoJEAzgnueZF7h8BGYP/jCRcMcGX2jDnd0tegwer9I8
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform
>>
>>
>> Interesting so you are saying that the kernel sub community is effectively
>> only x86_64
>>
>> If you are going down that road you better ask for every kernel S
user: limb set for jpo acl: commit of package: perl-Monitoring-Plugin from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Monitoring-Plugin
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-de
>> i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform
>
>
> Interesting so you are saying that the kernel sub community is effectively
> only x86_64
>
> If you are going down that road you better ask for every kernel SIG
> to emerge or step up in the process.
>
> Where does ARM fi
On 02/25/2015 01:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
i686 Kernel SIG steps up and agrees to handle bugs on that platform
Interesting so you are saying that the kernel sub community is
effectively only x86_64
If you are going down that road you better ask for every kernel
SIG to emerge or step
Summary of changes:
c157510... Update to 0.18 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Ali AlipourR wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
/usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf which is provided by systemd. You
can edit that file, create your ow
>> This is an opportunity for community members for whom i686 is a
>> passion to join the team to participate in the bugfixing required.
>> We previously called out the need for assistance[2], but had no
>> substantial response. We hope that being transparent about our
>> priorities will prompt int
Hi,
Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?
Regards,
Ali
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 08:15 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> This is an opportunity for community members for whom i686 is a
> passion to join the team to participate in the bugfixing required.
> We previously called out the need for assistance[2], but had no
> substantial response. We hope that bein
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 14:30 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Josh Boyer <
> jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Hello Fellow Contributors!
> >
> > [...]
> > It's possible down the road that, if there is no community
> > interest in i686, the project might look at other o
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 17:03 +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:39 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2015-02-22, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > Introduce an "in-development" flag for packages in Fedora.
> > >
> > I like the confession that no in-developemnt code gets magically
> > sta
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:30 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Hello Fellow Contributors!
>>
>> [...]
>> It's possible down the road that, if there is no community interest in
>> i686, the project might look at other options such as making i686 a
>> second
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hello Fellow Contributors!
>
> [...]
> It's possible down the road that, if there is no community interest in
> i686, the project might look at other options such as making i686 a
> secondary architecture. This is not because we want to drive aw
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:42:49AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
>wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:33:34AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >A A This looks cool.
> >A A On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Bean
On 02/25/2015 01:49 PM, Richard Z wrote:
Hi,
when doing yum update in the last few weeks I am seeing thousands of errors like
(1/2): _local/primary_db| 3.4 MB 00:00
updates/21/i386/primary_db FAILED
http://mirror.netcologne.de/fedora/linux/updates/21/i38
Hello Fellow Contributors!
Our kernel team has been adrift in bugs roughly forever. The time we
spend on triage is time we don't get to spend fixing substantial bugs
on hardware lots of people are using, especially new/emergent
hardware. We have spoken previously about the difficulty of kernel bug
Hi,
when doing yum update in the last few weeks I am seeing thousands of errors
like
(1/2): _local/primary_db| 3.4 MB 00:00
updates/21/i386/primary_db FAILED
http://mirror.netcologne.de/fedora/linux/updates/
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:22:37 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Correction:
>
> Bug 1085761 looks like the main bug, should we marked bug 1185565 was
> duplicated of 1085761 ?
>
The answer is found in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1185565#c2
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
/*Kevin Kofler*/ wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:31:59 +0100:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform
in Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s):
On 02/25/2015 10:07 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
However, if there are JAR files which are useful
for a developer, they can have a -legacy version too!
There is no technical reason to suffix anything - you can put JARs that
depend on old version
Dear packagers,
On Sunday, 08 February 2015 at 01:06, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I intend to update openbabel to pre-2.4 (current Git master) in rawhide
> in a few weeks.
This has now landed in rawhide only. I tried rebuilding all packages
that have a build dependency on openbabel. I
On 02/25/2015 10:55 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> /*Mikolaj Izdebski */ wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2015
> 10:07:28 +0100:
>> On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>>> However, if there are JAR files which are useful
>>> for a developer, they can have a -legacy version too!
>> There is no t
/*Mikolaj Izdebski */ wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2015
10:07:28 +0100:
On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
However, if there are JAR files which are useful
for a developer, they can have a -legacy version too!
There is no technical reason to suffix anything - you can put JARs that
depen
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
