The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Igor Gnatenko
i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I created this plugin. I think I will create something like yum plugin
auto-update-debuginfo, i.e. if at least one debuginfo package
installed - it will enable debug repos.
Well I don't see why it needs to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197403
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 11:33:35AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/01/2015 10:20 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/28/2015 10:42 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I receive a yellow box telling me: This update has not yet met the
minimum testing requirements defined in the Package Update Acceptance
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Sun, 1 Mar 2015 23:28:48 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
I do use it from time to time, but I'm currently on F21.
Me too, but the Copr builds of 3.6 feature a repo for F21, too.
The Qt UI is not a port, but more of a rewrite/redesign. Various dialogs
look very different.
I'd
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:20:07 +1100, Dan Fruehauf wrote:
Is it possible to compile audacious on its own and then supply gtk3 and qt
packages on top of it?
No. First of all, Qt has always been more than a GUI-library. It's a C++
development framework, and Audacious' core libs will likely use it
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I think this is some kind of connectivity issue.
Next time this happens can you run the koji command again with
'--debug' and see if anything stands out? Also make sure you can ping
and reach the koji web page.
There's also a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197924
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9125033
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197915
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9124747
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573
--- Comment #13 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com ---
As I hit Save Changes, I realized I forgot to add BR: perl. Added locally. I
can upload again if you want or import it with the change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573
--- Comment #12 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//dropbox-api-command.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//dropbox-api-command-1.17-5.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-WebService-Linode:
c1f0ead7867202af8ecae6b33fa32bc1 WebService-Linode-0.27.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197467
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
cicku's perl-WebService-Linode-0.27-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=617392
--
You are receiving this
On 2015-03-02 2:52, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Retired in f22 and rawhide now. Two remarks about the process:
- 'fedpkg' always makes me feel uneasy. I don't know what's going on
under the hood, and it messes up the git DAG. Those two separate
retirement commits should have been one plus a merge.
commit 8fa72c3db1e0b7ecea1f5d819e80e6ebd72afd1f
Author: Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me
Date: Mon Mar 2 22:24:50 2015 -0500
Update to 0.27
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-WebService-Linode.spec | 8 ++--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197915
Bug ID: 1197915
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.49 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 03/02/2015 05:11 AM, Dan Callaghan wrote:
Is there any reason why we shouldn't just upgrade applications to the
python35-* stack straight away, by providing python3-*?
The main issue here is that EPEL doesn't have releases, so there is no
way to take time to build everything and then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197924
Bug ID: 1197924
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.34 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Excerpts from Bohuslav Kabrda's message of 2015-03-02 22:17 +10:00:
- Original Message -
Excerpts from Bohuslav Kabrda's message of 2015-03-02 21:59 +10:00:
- Original Message -
Under the current proposal every package with Python 3 dependencies
would have to depend
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:00:02 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
I'll look at them tonight.
5/6 reviewed; one is a transitive dep, so I'll wait for that one.
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Summary of changes:
2c42411... Add missing deps for tests. (*)
8fa72c3... Update to 0.27 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
2c42411... Add missing deps for tests. (*)
8fa72c3... Update to 0.27 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
8fa72c3... Update to 0.27 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197467
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
On 03/02/2015 04:53 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
This is a followup to the EPEL IRC meeting discussion about python 3. I had
a
couple questions which led me to take Slavek's excellent work and try some
changes here:
Hi folks,
The Beaker team have put together a task that makes it feasible to
pre-test full rebuilds across all architectures (or at least primary
ones) before toolchain updates are landed in Koji:
Docs:
- Original Message -
On 27 February 2015 at 11:02, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015 3:14 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
For those not following along with the FPC ticket, Toshio and Tomspur
have a nice write-up of the options at
Summary of changes:
58690a3... 1.67 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I've not been keeping up with NCID (a caller id server/client system;
pretty neat, being able to send caller ID to mythtv, desktop notifications,
etc).
It needs some systemd love, and has newer upstream releases. I was using
it on a CentOS 6 server, and have no good way to test it on newer
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:15:46 -0700
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Could we get a Distribution component for Fedora EPEL in Bugzilla?
Might be useful for things like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197264
Well, we could make such a thing, but not sure it's really
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:49:39 +0800
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
I still met
Could not execute build: [('SSL routines', 'SSL3_WRITE_BYTES', 'ssl
handshake failure')]
this morning (2 hrs ago).
I think this is some kind of connectivity issue.
Next time this happens can you
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 17:25:23 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
In short: I don't see any reason, why bodhi should not accept push
requests.
This was a configuration bug/issue. Someone filed a ticket this morning
and we got it fixed up hopefully.
Please re-try your requests
On 03/02/2015 03:50 PM, Dave Melia wrote:
On 2015-03-02 14:47, Dave Melia wrote:
Hey,
Sorry if this isn't the place to ask, but I'm looking at the spec file
for nginx 1.7.10 and build requires systemd. I'm wondering if this is
actually the case for this version of nginx or is it just
On 03/01/2015 10:41 PM, Michael DePaulo wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a Dockerfile for X2Go. I intend to submit a PR to
fedora-Dockerfiles within a week.
https://github.com/mikedep333/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/add-x2go
(X2Go was already added in F20)
Hey,
Sorry if this isn't the place to ask, but I'm looking at the spec file
for nginx 1.7.10 and build requires systemd. I'm wondering if this is
actually the case for this version of nginx or is it just because Fedora
has replaced init with systemd now?
I'm assuming the only reason it
Am 02.03.2015 um 16:03 schrieb Mauricio Tavares:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
That said, containers on Linux are not really about security, the
whole thing has more holes than a swiss cheese. Maybe one day the
security holes can be fixed, but
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 02.03.15 09:17, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 03/01/2015 10:41 PM, Michael DePaulo wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a Dockerfile for X2Go. I intend to submit a PR to
fedora-Dockerfiles
Excerpts from Bohuslav Kabrda's message of 2015-03-02 21:59 +10:00:
- Original Message -
Under the current proposal every package with Python 3 dependencies
would have to depend on a specific python3x-* package, so then it would
be up to the maintainers of all those packages to
commit 693797f78d258b2caa1312c469f3296384ed5b5d
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 2 13:49:58 2015 +0100
0.25 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Text-VimColor.spec | 30 +-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 19
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-VimColor:
91ae616a8925bbf6bac3b8c85a003c1b Text-VimColor-0.25.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
693797f... 0.25 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197404
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Text-VimColor-0.25-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-VimColor-0.25-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
Hi developers,
I'm trying to finish port of yum-utils scritps to DNF and I came across
couple of scripts I'm not sure whether they are just legacy stuff or
someone still uses them. Do you need them? If so raise your voice and
tell us your use case so we can find the best way to support it.
I'm
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 24-02-15 18:34, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
As described here:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 05:05:28 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
If you want to help get Agda out of the rawhide and branched reports
then please help with reviewing the 6 new deps packages in the bug dependency
tree:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1164120
I'll look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197767
Bug ID: 1197767
Summary: perl-Math-Int64 FTBFS on s390 due to failing test
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Math-Int64
Assignee: dd...@cpan.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197692
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 91577
--
You are
commit 042f51b30ae101d48a56cc7b53580c5d2f672c35
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 2 15:19:30 2015 +0100
Avoid X11 dependency by Subpackaging SQL::Translator::Producer::Diagram
perl-SQL-Translator.spec | 17 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1
On Mon, 02.03.15 09:17, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 03/01/2015 10:41 PM, Michael DePaulo wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a Dockerfile for X2Go. I intend to submit a PR to
fedora-Dockerfiles within a week.
https://github.com/mikedep333/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/add-x2go
My apologies -- I forgot the change the title! /embarrassment
2015-03-02 14:47, Dave Melia wrote:
Hey,
Sorry if this isn't the place to ask, but I'm looking at the spec file
for nginx 1.7.10 and build requires systemd. I'm wondering if this is
actually the case for this version of nginx or
On 2015-03-02 14:47, Dave Melia wrote:
Hey,
Sorry if this isn't the place to ask, but I'm looking at the spec file
for nginx 1.7.10 and build requires systemd. I'm wondering if this is
actually the case for this version of nginx or is it just because
Fedora has replaced init with systemd now?
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On i386:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On armhfp:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl =
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:59:29 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Excerpts from Orion Poplawski's message of 2015-02-28 04:36 +10:00:
all python34 packages are retired
Except there is no way to retire an individual subpackage, is
commit 860bbb3cc00cf1b4acdad62f45f7ef1ac5be9885
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 2 13:47:31 2015 +0100
Do not use /usr/bin/env to interpret git-cpan
perl-Git-CPAN-Patch.spec | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff --git
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 05:25:51AM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote:
Recently, I've got several such messages for each of new submitted packages.
Is there something wrong with the upstream monitoring for Perl modules?
-- Forwarded message --
From: notificati...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197694
Bug ID: 1197694
Summary: perl-Dancer2-0.158000-1.fc23 FTBFS:
t/route-pod-coverage/route-pod-coverage.t test fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dancer2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197404
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-Text-VimColor-0.25-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=617100
--
You are receiving this mail
- Original Message -
This is a followup to the EPEL IRC meeting discussion about python 3. I had
a
couple questions which led me to take Slavek's excellent work and try some
changes here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Orion/EPEL7_Python3
Main ideas:
- (bikeshedding) - I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197692
Bug ID: 1197692
Summary: perl-Gnome2-GConf-1.044-21.fc23 FTBFS:
blib/arch/auto/Gnome2/GConf/GConf.so: undefined
symbol: gconf_engine_key_is_writable
Product: Fedora
Summary of changes:
76347ba... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
693797f... 0.25 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197404
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Text-VimColor-0.25-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-VimColor-0.25-1.fc22
--
You are receiving
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
28 packages were orphaned
-
apt [f22, f21, f20, master] was orphaned by kevin
Debian's Advanced Packaging Tool with RPM support
- Original Message -
Excerpts from Bohuslav Kabrda's message of 2015-03-02 21:59 +10:00:
- Original Message -
Under the current proposal every package with Python 3 dependencies
would have to depend on a specific python3x-* package, so then it would
be up to the
Hi,
On 02-03-15 12:00, Moez Roy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, this time is vesa's problem:
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2015-February/057183.html
But hardening breaks it indeed.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Pod-Usage:
1570995a48e048d16c879906e4acb51e Pod-Usage-1.67.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 58690a3151acac8a939cc308d3679b3c83bd426c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 2 10:41:05 2015 +0100
1.67 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Pod-Usage.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On 3/2/15, Moez Roy moez@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196676
proposed as F22 alpha blocker
Thanks, I was about to do that.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197403
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=617054
--
You are receiving this mail
commit 5a72874ae7594148b117c70f5452e763b78a4985
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 2 10:41:05 2015 +0100
1.67 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Pod-Usage.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 5c9ebb3a931dd5d1c02cdea538b64ae321cc991b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 2 10:41:05 2015 +0100
1.67 bump
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Pod-Usage.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197403
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
Hi all,
It's that time of the year again: GNOME 3.15.91 beta release is coming
out [1] this week while we're deep in the Alpha freeze in the Fedora land.
I'm running point on the 3.13.91 builds and will submit them as a single
megaupdate in Bodhi later this week.
If you are helping with
polymake has broken dependencies in the F-22 tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On i386:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On armhfp:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl =
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22 requires libHSzlib-0.5.4.1-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22 requires libHSxhtml-3000.2.1-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22 requires libHSvector-0.10.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so
[Agda-stdlib]
ghc-agda-lib-ffi-0.0.2-5.fc22.i686 requires
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:16 AM, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
So the rebuild to use hardened builds by default in rawhide, broke X.org.
Thanks guys, my system is more secure, but I can't run any apps.
Anyways enough snark from me, the problem seems to be that hardening
makes bind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195096
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197403
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573
--- Comment #11 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Ben Boeckel from comment #10)
Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//dropbox-api-command.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197403
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192380
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Usage-1.67-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this
Kevin Kofler venit, vidit, dixit 01.03.2015 06:43:
Michael J Gruber wrote:
this is a heads up notice that I intend to retire kde-plasma-daisy, the
reasons being:
- no upstream updates in almost 3 years
Then retiring it is pretty much the only option you have.
- FTBFS in rawhide because
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, this time is vesa's problem:
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2015-February/057183.html
But hardening breaks it indeed.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
2015-03-02 3:34 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com:
Il 27/02/2015 18:26, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade ha scritto:
2015-02-27 13:02 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com:
Hi,
Hello and Welcome Sandro!
following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself.
My name is
On Mon, 02.03.15 10:03, Mauricio Tavares (raubvo...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
wrote:
We are continuing to work on making running systemd within a container
better.
I am trying to get a /run on tmpfs patch to be acceptable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197692
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1197773
Referenced
On 2 March 2015 at 08:03, Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com wrote:
.
That said, containers on Linux are not really about security, the
whole thing has more holes than a swiss cheese. Maybe one day the
security holes can be fixed, but as of now, it's simply not
secure. And this
commit a12c6e5022159c4b008aace3c66f51f8a6346b92
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 2 16:48:03 2015 +0100
Fix a FTBFS failure with recent File::Find
- Fix broken grammar for entity_declaritive_item
- Modernize the spec
- Enable tests
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:21:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:18:12AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 23.02.15 08:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com)
The gpsd package in rawhide will be updated to 3.13, it's in git now
and will be built later this week or the next week if there are no
objections.
It bumps the libgps soname and there are also small API changes,
probably the most important change is that some arrays (used, PRN,
elevation,
LLVM, the C compiler, has OCaml bindings to its internals[1].
In the latest version they are generated using an OCaml library called
'ctypes'[2] (instead of however they were generated before -- maybe
written by hand or something).
Since we don't yet package ocaml-ctypes for Fedora, we've
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-CSV_XS:
62fadae9a88cc9fc921280a5bf1ff161 Text-CSV_XS-1.16.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150528
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-POE-1.365-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-POE-1.365-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
commit 02f856b8cd1be5b73013bb1f2349588cc20d3756
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Mar 2 17:32:17 2015 +
Update to 1.16
- New upstream release 1.16
- filter made more useful (access to other fields)
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec | 6 +-
sources |
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 08:42 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:21:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:18:12AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:42:25 -0800
Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
The underlying problem here is that it isn't just created when it is
missing. It is created *before* other tools have a chance to create
it. As I explained in 1197204 the boot.iso is created without a
/etc/resolv.conf,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Michael Mraka
michael.mr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi developers,
I'm trying to finish port of yum-utils scritps to DNF
Hi, thanks for working on this.
One request: when you get to debuginfo-install, can you please change
it to not disable the debuginfo repository
Hi, guys:
I stopped using Pound for myself (replaced with stunnel + HAproxy),
so I was looking at shedding its maintainership. Anyone wants to
take it over or should I instigate EOL?
Cheers,
-- Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
02f856b... Update to 1.16 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.16-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
02f856b... Update to 1.16
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
