WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* Follow-ups
* Playground result repo
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-April/000770.html)
* Dockerfiles recommended ti
On 04/22/2015 02:44 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm updating plplot to 5.11.0 in rawhide. This changes sonames, breaks APIs,
eats babies, etc. I'll be working on rebuilding dependent packages.
gdl-0.9.5-5.fc23.src.rpm
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.67-5.fc22.src.rpm
psfex-3.17.1-4.fc22.src.rpm
scam
I'm updating plplot to 5.11.0 in rawhide. This changes sonames, breaks APIs,
eats babies, etc. I'll be working on rebuilding dependent packages.
gdl-0.9.5-5.fc23.src.rpm
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.67-5.fc22.src.rpm
psfex-3.17.1-4.fc22.src.rpm
scamp-2.0.4-1.fc22.src.rpm
techne-0.2.3-13.fc22.src.r
On 04/22/2015 12:36 PM, Fl@sh wrote:
> Hi, all!
> I'm developing qt-virt-manager.
> I have to say: this is not a Qt-clone of the virt-manager.
> The application is able to perform a lot, so I suggest you to
> use, and look forward to your wishes.
> (I'm make fedora-build, if somebody build it for o
if you have time can you review this one?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214385
thanks in advance
Il 22/04/2015 21:05, Richard Shaw ha scritto:
My package, fldigi, has been in Fedora for some time, but in
attempting to get other related projects into Fedora from the same
upstream,
On 04/22/2015 11:36 AM, Fl@sh wrote:
> Hi, all!
> I'm developing qt-virt-manager.
> I have to say: this is not a Qt-clone of the virt-manager.
> The application is able to perform a lot, so I suggest you to
> use, and look forward to your wishes.
> (I'm make fedora-build, if somebody build it for o
take ..
regards
Il 22/04/2015 21:05, Richard Shaw ha scritto:
My package, fldigi, has been in Fedora for some time, but in
attempting to get other related projects into Fedora from the same
upstream, it was discovered that a fork of xmlrpc++ was being bundled
in the package.
A bundling excep
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-04-23 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-04-23 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-04-23 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-04-23 1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-04-22)
===
Meeting started by jwb at 18:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-04-22/fesco.2015-04-22-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
My package, fldigi, has been in Fedora for some time, but in attempting to
get other related projects into Fedora from the same upstream, it was
discovered that a fork of xmlrpc++ was being bundled in the package.
A bundling exception was not granted[1] even though xmlrpc++ is not
currently in Fed
Hi, all!
I'm developing qt-virt-manager.
I have to say: this is not a Qt-clone of the virt-manager.
The application is able to perform a lot, so I suggest you to
use, and look forward to your wishes.
(I'm make fedora-build, if somebody build it for other
distributives, then , pls, say to me for ann
Hi, all!
I'm developing qt-virt-manager.
I have to say: this is not a Qt-clone of the virt-manager.
The application is able to perform a lot, so I suggest you to
use, and look forward to your wishes.
(I'm make fedora-build, if somebody build it for other
distributives, then , pls, say to me for ann
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214130
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #2 f
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 15:05 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 15:01 +0200, Robert Mayr wrote:
> > > Maybe his RH address?
> > > apa...@redhat.com
> >
> > Anish just left Red Hat.
> >
> > He is also moving countrie
On 04/22/2015 05:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:52:54 +0200
> Joachim Backes wrote:
>
>> As yum has been replaced by dnf, there is a question for me: will
>> yumdownloader (installed by yum-utils.rpm) be replaced by something
>> like dnfdownloader (installed for example by (a
HI
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm not volunteering!
>
> ...but perhaps a yum->dnf transition guide on the Fedora wiki would be
> nice which would cover things like this.
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Yum_to_DNF_Cheatsheet
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm not volunteering!
>
> ...but perhaps a yum->dnf transition guide on the Fedora wiki would be nice
> which would cover things like this.
Since dnf development started, its developers have kept the
documentation also updated. You can f
I'm not volunteering!
...but perhaps a yum->dnf transition guide on the Fedora wiki would be nice
which would cover things like this.
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.or
On 04/22/2015 05:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> There's a plugin...
In package dnf-plugin-core
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:52:54 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
> As yum has been replaced by dnf, there is a question for me: will
> yumdownloader (installed by yum-utils.rpm) be replaced by something
> like dnfdownloader (installed for example by (a new) dnf-utils.rpm)?
There's a plugin...
dnf down
As yum has been replaced by dnf, there is a question for me: will
yumdownloader (installed by yum-utils.rpm) be replaced by something like
dnfdownloader (installed for example by (a new) dnf-utils.rpm)?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two)
Kernel-4.0.0-1.fc22.x86_64
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
now I'm curious.
Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in
/usr/libexec, or in /usr/share?
/usr/libexec. From (info standards):
`libexecdir'
The directory for installing executable programs to be run by other
programs ra
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Hello,
> >> I confess I've only seen /usr/libexec used for add-on utilities, but
> >> now I'm curious.
> >>
> >> Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in
> >> /usr/libexec, or in /usr/share?
> >
> > /usr/libexec. Fro
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
>> I confess I've only seen /usr/libexec used for add-on utilities, but
>> now I'm curious.
>>
>> Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in
>> /usr/libexec, or in /usr/share?
>
> /usr/libexec. From (info standards)
Hello,
> I confess I've only seen /usr/libexec used for add-on utilities, but
> now I'm curious.
>
> Does it make more sense for these sort of scripts to live in
> /usr/libexec, or in /usr/share?
/usr/libexec. From (info standards):
> `libexecdir'
> The directory for installing executable p
Hi folks,
The Ceph package ships some utilities that are not intended to be run by users.
1. There's one utility that prepares Ceph's object storage daemon and
that is at is in /usr/libexec/ceph/ceph-osd-prestart.sh . The systemd
unit file calls that with "ExecStartPre=".
2. There are some other
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 15:05 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 15:01 +0200, Robert Mayr wrote:
> > Maybe his RH address?
> > apa...@redhat.com
>
> Anish just left Red Hat.
>
> He is also moving countries, so maybe that's why he hasn't been very
> responsive lately?
I just spoke
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-04-22 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
Antti J=?iso-8859-1?B?5A==?=rvinen wrote:
> There is also same decision to make regarding libraries that have not been
> re-packaged to support both qt4 and qt5. One good example is
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/qjson/
> -> there is no separate binary package libqjson-qt5 and lib
Compose started at Wed Apr 22 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
Kevin Kofler writes:
> For applications that support both? In the absence of other criteria (e.g.
> features that are not yet ported, or conversely, features that require Qt
> 5), the rule of thumb is to build against Qt 5 on Fedora 22 and newer, and
> against Qt 4 on Fedora 21 and older.
T
31 matches
Mail list logo
