Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:05 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 With timed: you don't get the newest thing, but switching to the new
 stuff is more on your schedule. You can ignore the new release for a
 while and still get bugfixes/security updates until you are ready to 
 do
 the upgrade.

I should add one more thing: in my vision, applications are always
updated, period, and that's more important than anything else. We have
to do that no matter what, or people will start leaving Fedora for
Ubuntu Snappy Whatever which is supposed to arrive real soon now.
They're going to have a stable OS with up-to-date applications (not
considered part of the OS!), and we need that too to remain
competitive.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 28 May 2015 at 16:42, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
 On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:05 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 With timed: you don't get the newest thing, but switching to the new
 stuff is more on your schedule. You can ignore the new release for a
 while and still get bugfixes/security updates until you are ready to
 do
 the upgrade.

 I should add one more thing: in my vision, applications are always
 updated, period, and that's more important than anything else. We have
 to do that no matter what, or people will start leaving Fedora for
 Ubuntu Snappy Whatever which is supposed to arrive real soon now.
 They're going to have a stable OS with up-to-date applications (not
 considered part of the OS!), and we need that too to remain
 competitive.

Good luck with that vision. I would buy into it a bit more if this
wasn't the same chestnut dragged out every couple of releases to
somehow motivate us to accept whatever big OS change is being pushed.
It has become the Cry Wolf story and while eventually the wolf eats
the flock... it does so because no one believes the criers anymore.
Please, come up with a better story than people will drop us for
Ubuntu because none of the changes we have done have stopped that from
happening when it has happened.. and none of them have made us
overtake Ubuntu in the last 8 years.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
 On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:39 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
 Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first
 reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of course,
 but  could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of  an entire
 new distribution.

 I think we're already at the point where -- at least for Fedora
 Workstation (not sure about Server/Cloud), and except for
 infrastructure issues -- we can stop branding our releases with a
 version number, and simply have a particularly big offline update every
 six months. Behind-the-scenes, we still have the six-month cycle, but
 this is hidden to users. They get Fedora and it's just Fedora, not
 Fedora 21 or Fedora 22. People stop complaining about the 13-months of
 support that isn't long enough for them: we wouldn't have that short
 support window anymore, instead there is *indefinite* support so long
 as you take your monthly QAed updates pack (five small updates packs,
 then a big updates pack, then five smaller ones, then a big one, ...).
 This is the model Windows is moving to, and it makes a lot of sense to
 me.

I think that is technically possible.  I also think if it were done
without any sort of ABI/API stability kept in mind, people would be
irate.  Hiding what amounts to a major version release as an updates
pack is disingenuous at best, and will break things for users at
worst.

We cannot do what you describe without a massive amount of
re-education on what an update means in Fedora.  I'm kind of
surprised you even suggested this, given the focus of Workstation is
on developers (at the moment) and we're talking in another thread
about how to provided some kind of API/ABI at the platform level that
developers can depend on.  Your goal is nice, but we are nowhere near
the point of actually doing what you just said.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:08:23PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
 about how to provided some kind of API/ABI at the platform level that
 developers can depend on.  Your goal is nice, but we are nowhere near
 the point of actually doing what you just said.

Also, the release cycle is a reliable engine for press attention and
coverage. That shouldn't take precedence over good user experience, but
_does_ have value. We'd need to find a new way of generating at least
that much attention (or ideally, even more, of course).



-- 
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:58:03 -0500
Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:

 On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:39 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
  Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first 
  reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of
  course, but  could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of
  an entire new distribution.
 
 I think we're already at the point where -- at least for Fedora
 Workstation (not sure about Server/Cloud), and except for
 infrastructure issues -- we can stop branding our releases with a
 version number, and simply have a particularly big offline update
 every six months. Behind-the-scenes, we still have the six-month
 cycle, but this is hidden to users. They get Fedora and it's just
 Fedora, not Fedora 21 or Fedora 22. People stop complaining about the
 13-months of support that isn't long enough for them: we wouldn't
 have that short support window anymore, instead there is *indefinite*
 support so long as you take your monthly QAed updates pack (five
 small updates packs, then a big updates pack, then five smaller ones,
 then a big one, ...). This is the model Windows is moving to, and it
 makes a lot of sense to me.

Well, this is sort of the old 'rolling release' vs 'timed releases'
thing. ;) 

IMHO, some advanced users prefer/are happy with rolling releases, but I
think the majority of users would not be happy at all.

With rolling: you get the latest stuff soon, but you cannot decide when
you want to deal with that stuff very easily, you have to take it when
it's pushed to you (or block security and bugfixes). 

With timed: you don't get the newest thing, but switching to the new
stuff is more on your schedule. You can ignore the new release for a
while and still get bugfixes/security updates until you are ready to do
the upgrade. 

In some kind of ideal world it would be great if rawhide was the
rolling release and people who liked that model could use it day to
day. (Which is really already the case, but things do break so you need
to be good at troubleshooting and/or have alternatives in case the
thing you normally use breaks). 

kevin


pgpyNZ2Ep1J89.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Secure boot and packaging third-party kernel modules

2015-05-28 Thread David Smith
On 05/28/2015 10:26 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:

... stuff deleted ...

 Any thoughts or comments to this approach?  Anyone got a better idea?

Your process looks reasonable.

 Yes, I do know it is not good to have the keying material for the
 signing too easily available.  So I'm also keen to hear ideas how to
 protect the key better.  With that said, I'm planning on only providing
 access to the key file to the root user only.  And I'll look into if I
 can restrict the accesss even further with some SELinux rules (so only
 the ExecStartPre= script can access it together with the preparation
 script.

Systemtap has a similar problem. By definition, we compile kernel
modules and still need to work on a secure boot system. To solve it, we
automated the process you outlined above and added it to our existing
compile server functionality. On a client machine you ask for a
systemtap script to run, and behind the scenes the script gets shipped
off to a compile server that has a matching kernel devel environment and
matching MOKs. The signed module gets shipped back to the client system
and run.

The advantage we have here is that if you have lots of client systems,
none of them have the private MOK key installed on them - only the
server has the private key(s). We only pass around public key fingerprints.

 Another thought ... Are there other packages who could benefit of such a
 solution if it was made more generic?  I'm willing to investigate into
 this too, if there are more users out there ... Or if someone has
 already done that - no need to reinvent the wheel!

Systemtap's solution is probably pretty specific to ourselves, but the
general idea (and perhaps some code) could certainly be borrowed.

But really the best solution here is to get the mhvtl kernel module
upstream.

-- 
David Smith
dsm...@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 28 May 2015 17:32:24 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:

 On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:05:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
  In some kind of ideal world it would be great if rawhide was the
  rolling release and people who liked that model could use it day to
  day. (Which is really already the case, but things do break so you
  need to be good at troubleshooting and/or have alternatives in case
  the thing you normally use breaks). 
 
 Well, and as someone just pointed out to me, fairly enough, on Reddit,
 Rawhide is often a rolling release of the latest prerelease dev
 versions of software, and we don't really have a rolling release of
 the latest stable versions (except to the extent that people push
 these as updates, which is quite a lot).

Sure, agreed. 

Although there's a lot of stable releases of things that flow into
rawhide too in cases where upstream doesn't have a development branch
or the maintainer(s) decide something is not stable enough. 
Of course gnome, kernel, mesa and such are prereleases a good part of
the time. 

kevin




pgpXd0oUtej5M.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Przemek Klosowski

On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:

I think we're already at the point where -- at least for Fedora
Workstation (not sure about Server/Cloud), and except for
infrastructure issues -- we can stop branding our releases with a
version number, and simply have a particularly big offline update every
six months. Behind-the-scenes, we still have the six-month cycle, but
this is hidden to users. They get Fedora and it's just Fedora, not
Fedora 21 or Fedora 22. People stop complaining about the 13-months of
support that isn't long enough for them: we wouldn't have that short
support window anymore, instead there is *indefinite* support so long
as you take your monthly QAed updates pack

That's exactly what I had in mind.

BTW, the support issue is a serious block to Fedora adoption. The N-N+1 
model complicates administration: even if  in-situ upgrades work it's a 
different workflow than routine updates. A guarantee of long-term simple 
updates would definitely help Fedora.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:

 Am 28.05.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:

 On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:39 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:

 Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first
 reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of course,
 but  could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of  an entire
 new distribution.


 I think we're already at the point where -- at least for Fedora
 Workstation (not sure about Server/Cloud), and except for
 infrastructure issues -- we can stop branding our releases with a
 version number, and simply have a particularly big offline update every
 six months. Behind-the-scenes, we still have the six-month cycle, but
 this is hidden to users. They get Fedora and it's just Fedora, not
 Fedora 21 or Fedora 22. People stop complaining about the 13-months of
 support that isn't long enough for them: we wouldn't have that short
 support window anymore, instead there is *indefinite* support so long
 as you take your monthly QAed updates pack (five small updates packs,
 then a big updates pack, then five smaller ones, then a big one, ...).
 This is the model Windows is moving to, and it makes a lot of sense to
 me


 when i hear offline update i have enough at all

 frankly what people really need is relieable and fast *online updates* and
 not taking the esay road well go offline and that works pretty well over
 many years now *with expierience* what services you need to restart and if
 you should log off or just close specific applicatoons and start them again

 giving up and say meh i am not able and so go offline may work for some
 part of the userbase, that maybe even fine *as long* efforts to continue
 what we have now for many many years for advanced users won't die

I understand the sentiment.  I don't like rebooting for updates
either.  However, our efforts on live online updates to date have
been we'll let RPM update this and maybe throw some scripts at it to
restart things and hope it works.  It does in a lot of cases and
doesn't in others.  And our advanced users are distinguished by the
fact that they can figure out when it doesn't work and then fix
things.  That isn't really a _better_ experience than offline updates.
It's just familiar to you.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Reindl Harald



Am 28.05.2015 um 22:12 schrieb Josh Boyer:

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:

when i hear offline update i have enough at all

frankly what people really need is relieable and fast *online updates* and
not taking the esay road well go offline and that works pretty well over
many years now *with expierience* what services you need to restart and if
you should log off or just close specific applicatoons and start them again

giving up and say meh i am not able and so go offline may work for some
part of the userbase, that maybe even fine *as long* efforts to continue
what we have now for many many years for advanced users won't die


I understand the sentiment.  I don't like rebooting for updates
either.  However, our efforts on live online updates to date have
been we'll let RPM update this and maybe throw some scripts at it to
restart things and hope it works.  It does in a lot of cases and
doesn't in others.  And our advanced users are distinguished by the
fact that they can figure out when it doesn't work and then fix
things.  That isn't really a _better_ experience than offline updates.
It's just familiar to you


no, it is not just familiar to me

i came in 2006 from Windows because i had enough of this reboots all the 
time because of updates and software installations and hearing that 
nearly 10 years later linux distribution seriously consider to went back 
that road makes me puke




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Reindl Harald


Am 28.05.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:39 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:

Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first
reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of course,
but  could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of  an entire
new distribution.


I think we're already at the point where -- at least for Fedora
Workstation (not sure about Server/Cloud), and except for
infrastructure issues -- we can stop branding our releases with a
version number, and simply have a particularly big offline update every
six months. Behind-the-scenes, we still have the six-month cycle, but
this is hidden to users. They get Fedora and it's just Fedora, not
Fedora 21 or Fedora 22. People stop complaining about the 13-months of
support that isn't long enough for them: we wouldn't have that short
support window anymore, instead there is *indefinite* support so long
as you take your monthly QAed updates pack (five small updates packs,
then a big updates pack, then five smaller ones, then a big one, ...).
This is the model Windows is moving to, and it makes a lot of sense to
me


when i hear offline update i have enough at all

frankly what people really need is relieable and fast *online updates* 
and not taking the esay road well go offline and that works pretty 
well over many years now *with expierience* what services you need to 
restart and if you should log off or just close specific applicatoons 
and start them again


giving up and say meh i am not able and so go offline may work for 
some part of the userbase, that maybe even fine *as long* efforts to 
continue what we have now for many many years for advanced users won't die




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:05:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 In some kind of ideal world it would be great if rawhide was the
 rolling release and people who liked that model could use it day to
 day. (Which is really already the case, but things do break so you need
 to be good at troubleshooting and/or have alternatives in case the
 thing you normally use breaks). 

Well, and as someone just pointed out to me, fairly enough, on Reddit,
Rawhide is often a rolling release of the latest prerelease dev
versions of software, and we don't really have a rolling release of the
latest stable versions (except to the extent that people push these as
updates, which is quite a lot).


-- 
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

spot pushed to perl-Test-MockObject (master). 1.20150527

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 489f5cc2b1369ab04301a63d9929f84e370bf472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:13:33 -0400
Subject: 1.20150527


diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 0ae376e..03eb18a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ Test-MockObject-1.09.tar.gz
 /Test-MockObject-1.20120301.tar.gz
 /Test-MockObject-1.20140408.tar.gz
 /Test-MockObject-1.20150521.tar.gz
+/Test-MockObject-1.20150527.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-MockObject.spec b/perl-Test-MockObject.spec
index 2ab144f..39e2f30 100644
--- a/perl-Test-MockObject.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-MockObject.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-Test-MockObject
-Version:1.20150521
+Version:1.20150527
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ PERL_RUN_ALL_TESTS=1 make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 28 2015 Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org - 1.20150527-1
+- update to 1.20150527
+
 * Tue May 26 2015 Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org - 1.20150521-1
 - update to 1.20150521
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 82bd59d..5fd8bdb 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-824d0e0ca23cec908b436db9d95fa457  Test-MockObject-1.20150521.tar.gz
+af960be08a61ed322f585e965a56  Test-MockObject-1.20150527.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Test-MockObject.git/commit/?h=masterid=489f5cc2b1369ab04301a63d9929f84e370bf472
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Review swaps

2015-05-28 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
 Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:

 I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
 sagemath.  I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
 will be coming).  There are some interdependencies, noted below:

 1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
 No dependencies.

 hi
 taken
 can you review this
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215074
 thanks in advance
 gil

Done, and thank you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:39 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
 Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first 
 reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of course, 
 but  could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of  an entire 
 new distribution.

I think we're already at the point where -- at least for Fedora
Workstation (not sure about Server/Cloud), and except for
infrastructure issues -- we can stop branding our releases with a
version number, and simply have a particularly big offline update every
six months. Behind-the-scenes, we still have the six-month cycle, but
this is hidden to users. They get Fedora and it's just Fedora, not
Fedora 21 or Fedora 22. People stop complaining about the 13-months of
support that isn't long enough for them: we wouldn't have that short
support window anymore, instead there is *indefinite* support so long
as you take your monthly QAed updates pack (five small updates packs,
then a big updates pack, then five smaller ones, then a big one, ...).
This is the model Windows is moving to, and it makes a lot of sense to
me.

Michael
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Including tlp in Fedora Workstation by default

2015-05-28 Thread Jeremy Newton
* Do you think that the average user with a clicking sound card or disk
** corruption when suspending would be able to make the link to this new
** package?*
 Even better ... the integrated mouse pointer on my external ThinkPad USB
 keyboard stops working if USB suspend is enabled for this device.

I get this same issue with my computer, but TLP doesn't suspend input
devices... or at least it should.

 +1 ... If the kernel isn't perfect, lets make the kernel perfect instead.
 Just my 2 cents.

The one thing I like about TLP would be the ability to tune the
machine based on power state. If the kernel or gnome or whatever can
do this, I applaud it. Something like this should be default and
tweak-able. This includes disk spin down time, bus powersave modes and
variable writeback rates.

It's quite clear that battery life sucks for the stock install... I
think some initiative should be taken regardless of the method. I'm
sure that laptops are the most effected by this.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Fwd: clang++ compiler flags

2015-05-28 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256




-  Forwarded Message 
Subject: clang++ compiler flags
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 21:05:55 +0200
From: Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com
To: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Hi all,

'clang++' compiler is unable to use ARM %optflags used on Fedora
packaging:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=9868342name=build.logoffset=-4000

Which flags i can use on ARM architectures with clang++ compiler?

Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVZ3ABAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8bYwH/0x4tU6//prUfzxobJFMWD/c
aXUQFjVbN72vkaJFwUceBnasQKS8mOIk34AJ4zf7W9I7doypEcEvzeerPIamgRjj
+F4INpGo4UqzFjEOIBgowxg4P44KunOlbNSuHlgSdXph/QVhYT1zL2M/edvDEO2a
8gIF7Gh33DlXq9gb6tCb8N0RpNUJHSDd5Ottvr6TQdjyaSBkgB7HyhUAa4mwJGCE
ppBu6lMAhgHctw4O/zpZ9WsubwB+gLYXQyX61boRwuctsRz90+i7OebddpxOXpax
0SElf4mrWJ+O5kQ8+4xBPa98LqxFIryqrb/V13uI5mkIg+2zm7rsWKDAlE/7oOE=
=zprM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Przemek Klosowski

On 05/28/2015 11:42 AM, Will Woods wrote:

  Here's how it should work:

1) Download packages for the new system
2) Use the systemd Offline Updates[2] facility to install packages

This is really simple - simple enough that it should probably be
provided by the system packaging tools themselves.
Actually, there is a broad issue here: is there a point where the system 
is so stable that updating is a continuous process without the need for 
a Fedora N - N+1 transitions? Specifically, will we have a 3-digit 
Fedora release in May 2053 :-?


It seems to me that the 6-month release cycle has traditionally been 
driven by two separate reasons: technology and workflow. The first is a 
need to accommodate major, incompatible technology shifts. The second 
one just introduces a natural cadence of work leading to an orderly 
release.


Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first 
reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of course, 
but  could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of  an entire new 
distribution.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Minutes from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-05-28)

2015-05-28 Thread Honza Horak

==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-05-28)
==


Meeting started by hhorak at 17:00:56 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-05-28/env-and-stacks.2015-05-28-17.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---
* greetings..  (hhorak, 17:01:28)

* how to gather feedback from users? who are our users?  (hhorak,
  17:08:23)
  * LINK:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-May/000783.html
(hhorak, 17:09:39)
  * ACTION: hhorak to initiate a list of questions our WG want all
editions to ask.. and will share a link to some collaborative tool..
(hhorak, 17:36:44)

* Council Engineering update  (hhorak, 17:38:04)
  * LINK:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-May/000786.html
(hhorak, 17:38:11)
  * Think about if it would be possible to auto-enable  install copr
repos: dnf awesome-copr-auto-enable-install-plugin rhscl/httpd24
(vpavlin, 18:01:11)
  * IDEA: copr to have option to specify the main package from the copr
repo, so it may be installed as soon as user says `dnf copr-install
rhscl/httpd24`  (hhorak, 18:02:22)
  * IDEA: to prioritize few items from the whole WG's task list and set
a concrete goals for F23/F24 based on it..  (hhorak, 18:08:06)
  * IDEA: for now, playground is launched tomorrow by way of a dnf
plugin called playground .. which in fact just recognizes a very
small list of copr repos.. over time, the list of copr repos grow..
eventually.. the formal playground repo comes online...  (hhorak,
18:15:38)
  * ACTION: everybody to think about which of the tasks we make goals
from for F23/F24  (hhorak, 18:18:37)
  * ACTION: everybody to think about and write up questions that we want
to ask users of editions  (hhorak, 18:18:38)

Meeting ended at 18:19:16 UTC.




Action Items

* hhorak to initiate a list of questions our WG want all editions to
  ask.. and will share a link to some collaborative tool..
* everybody to think about which of the tasks we make goals from for
  F23/F24
* everybody to think about and write up questions that we want to ask
  users of editions




Action Items, by person
---
* hhorak
  * hhorak to initiate a list of questions our WG want all editions to
ask.. and will share a link to some collaborative tool..
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * everybody to think about which of the tasks we make goals from for
F23/F24
  * everybody to think about and write up questions that we want to ask
users of editions




People Present (lines said)
---
* hhorak (57)
* langdon (37)
* vpavlin (36)
* zodbot (4)
* bowlofeggs (3)
* bkabrda (0)
* phracek (0)
* ttomecek (0)
* sicampbell (0)
* juhp (0)
* ncoghlan (0)
* walters (0)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Przemek Klosowski

On 05/28/2015 02:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:


Am 28.05.2015 um 20:39 schrieb Przemek Klosowski:


Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first
reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of course,
but  could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of  an entire new
distribution


who talks about a entire new distribution?


more than 20 servers installed in 2008 with F9 and now on F21 while 
fully online and just a reboot like a ordinary kernel update - that's 
how things have to work
Yeah, me too, but we had to use several different tools on the way, and 
I actually got stuck in some cases, and decided to reinstall those. I am 
talking about making it a tested, official process.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1225066] perl-Test-MockObject-1.20150527 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225066



--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
spot's perl-Test-MockObject-1.20150527-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=639764

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Reindl Harald


Am 28.05.2015 um 20:39 schrieb Przemek Klosowski:

On 05/28/2015 11:42 AM, Will Woods wrote:

  Here's how it should work:

1) Download packages for the new system
2) Use the systemd Offline Updates[2] facility to install packages

This is really simple - simple enough that it should probably be
provided by the system packaging tools themselves.

Actually, there is a broad issue here: is there a point where the system
is so stable that updating is a continuous process without the need for
a Fedora N - N+1 transitions? Specifically, will we have a 3-digit
Fedora release in May 2053 :-?

It seems to me that the 6-month release cycle has traditionally been
driven by two separate reasons: technology and workflow. The first is a
need to accommodate major, incompatible technology shifts. The second
one just introduces a natural cadence of work leading to an orderly
release.

Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first
reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of course,
but  could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of  an entire new
distribution


who talks about a entire new distribution?

Fedora dist-upgrades are routine tasks with YUM here for years in 
production so there is no new distribution nor a real need for going 
offline and any Fedora release not be able to get upgraded online would 
be a large step backwards


more than 20 servers installed in 2008 with F9 and now on F21 while 
fully online and just a reboot like a ordinary kernel update - that's 
how things have to work




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

spot uploaded Test-MockObject-1.20150527.tar.gz for perl-Test-MockObject

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
af960be08a61ed322f585e965a56  Test-MockObject-1.20150527.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-MockObject/Test-MockObject-1.20150527.tar.gz/af960be08a61ed322f585e965a56/Test-MockObject-1.20150527.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Review swaps

2015-05-28 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:04 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
 hi
 taken
 can you review this
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215080
 thanks in advance
 gil

Taken, and thank you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1226095] perl-Test-Pod-1.50 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226095



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9873491

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org
wrote:

 ...we can stop branding our releases with a
 version number...we still have the six-month cycle, but
 this is hidden to users...this is the model Windows is moving to...


As Josh alluded, I'm not exactly clear on the value of keeping things the
same behind the
scenes and hiding the release levels from the users.  For me, the release
change indicates
first of all that I should read the release notes and familiarize myself
with what has changed.

The release number also serves as an easy reference to what levels of
software you're running,
albeit at a high level (due to maintenance changes).  You're always going
to need to understand
that and if you get rid of the release number you'll need to come up with
another type of
indicator that is as simple and easy to understand.

Matt referenced the advertising factor; and that's a great point.  Everyone
always is interested
in the latest and greatest.  The press is geared toward that... everyone is
always buzzing about
the new Android release, IOS version, Windows version, etc.

Speaking of Windows, their strategy has more to do about changes to their
revenue model (which
has been driven by the fact that Linux, IOS, Android, etc. are Free.)
than anything else.  They are still
talking about major updates and if past experience is any guide you'll
probably see major changes
identified as Service Pack X as they did in the past.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1226095] New: perl-Test-Pod-1.50 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226095

Bug ID: 1226095
   Summary: perl-Test-Pod-1.50 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Test-Pod
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, pertu...@free.fr,
st...@silug.org



Latest upstream release: 1.50
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.49-1.fc23
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Pod/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1226095] perl-Test-Pod-1.50 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226095



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1031531
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1031531action=edit
[patch] Update to 1.50 (#1226095)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (el6) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (el6) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (f22) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (f22) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (f21) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (f21) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPSCo weekly meeting

2015-05-28 Thread dennis
Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   EPSCo weekly meeting on 2015-05-29 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC
   At e...@irc.freenode.net

The meeting will be about:



Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/2542/

___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Reindl Harald



Am 29.05.2015 um 01:11 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:

On 28 May 2015 at 16:42, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:05 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

With timed: you don't get the newest thing, but switching to the new
stuff is more on your schedule. You can ignore the new release for a
while and still get bugfixes/security updates until you are ready to
do
the upgrade.


I should add one more thing: in my vision, applications are always
updated, period, and that's more important than anything else. We have
to do that no matter what, or people will start leaving Fedora for
Ubuntu Snappy Whatever which is supposed to arrive real soon now.
They're going to have a stable OS with up-to-date applications (not
considered part of the OS!), and we need that too to remain
competitive.


Good luck with that vision. I would buy into it a bit more if this
wasn't the same chestnut dragged out every couple of releases to
somehow motivate us to accept whatever big OS change is being pushed.
It has become the Cry Wolf story and while eventually the wolf eats
the flock... it does so because no one believes the criers anymore


me too and besides that gnome is (luckily) not the only desktop on 
Fedora - Fedora *does not* need to be competitive for the price becoming 
the same and hit *existing users* in the face which choose Fedora 
*because it s* Fedora and *not* Ubuntu, Windows or OSX




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (el5) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (el5) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (f20) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (f20) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (master) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
eseyman changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu (master) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

2015-05-28 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz

W dniu 28.05.2015 o 07:28, Robin Lee pisze:

Sorry guys, my fault. (insert local idiom about elephant in a store 
here). Sorted out with help of spot and kalev.



You should update rpmfusion-free-relase. And run 'dnf downgrade
ffmpeg-libs'.

There is no 'branched' repos in RPMFusion. And before f22 is released,
you are actually using the 'rawhide' repos of RPMFusion. But After f22
released, RPMFusion f22 repos is then finally branched and the yum repo
configs are updated in new version of rpmfusion-free-release. So, if you
run a global 'dnf upgrade' before upgrade rpmfusion-free-release, you
will pull in some 'rawhide' packages from RPMFusion.


I rebuilt that part of rpmfusion I use (vlc, mplayer and deps).

Problem was with VirtualBox... so for some time I will have to deal 
without winxp vm (used from time to time for tools which are not wine 
friendly).

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

2015-05-28 Thread drago01
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
 W dniu 28.05.2015 o 07:28, Robin Lee pisze:

 Sorry guys, my fault. (insert local idiom about elephant in a store here).
 Sorted out with help of spot and kalev.

 You should update rpmfusion-free-relase. And run 'dnf downgrade
 ffmpeg-libs'.

 There is no 'branched' repos in RPMFusion. And before f22 is released,
 you are actually using the 'rawhide' repos of RPMFusion. But After f22
 released, RPMFusion f22 repos is then finally branched and the yum repo
 configs are updated in new version of rpmfusion-free-release. So, if you
 run a global 'dnf upgrade' before upgrade rpmfusion-free-release, you
 will pull in some 'rawhide' packages from RPMFusion.


 I rebuilt that part of rpmfusion I use (vlc, mplayer and deps).

 Problem was with VirtualBox... so for some time I will have to deal without
 winxp vm (used from time to time for tools which are not wine friendly).

You could use Boxes / virt-manager ... ships in the Fedora repo and
should be good enough for cases where you do not need hardware
accelerated 3D in the guest.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

pghmcfc pushed to perl-parent (perl-parent-0.234-1.fc23). Update to 0.234 (..more)

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 5330f6c608d419408dbf1f1462e2aded5baad169 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:07:30 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.234

- New upstream release 0.234
  - Fix the test for PMC loading to work on versions on Perl that don't have
Config::non_bincompat_options (CPAN RT#102626)

diff --git a/perl-parent.spec b/perl-parent.spec
index 7171f3b..24929ec 100644
--- a/perl-parent.spec
+++ b/perl-parent.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-parent
 Epoch: 1
-Version:   0.233
+Version:   0.234
 Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/parent.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 28 2015 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1:0.234-1
+- Update to 0.234
+  - Fix the test for PMC loading to work on versions on Perl that don't have
+Config::non_bincompat_options (CPAN RT#102626)
+
 * Tue May 26 2015 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1:0.233-1
 - Update to 0.233
   - The diagnostic about inheriting from ourselves was removed; it served no
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 992646e..20441eb 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fb2d4803c7c2423bae9403bb1cb48384  parent-0.233.tar.gz
+b02fc0e7f9b74de42e60816c38be  parent-0.234.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-parent.git/commit/?h=perl-parent-0.234-1.fc23id=5330f6c608d419408dbf1f1462e2aded5baad169
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

2015-05-28 Thread Moez Roy
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
 W dniu 28.05.2015 o 09:27, drago01 pisze:

 Problem was with VirtualBox... so for some time I will have to deal
  without
 winxp vm (used from time to time for tools which are not wine friendly).


 You could use Boxes / virt-manager ... ships in the Fedora repo and
 should be good enough for cases where you do not need hardware
 accelerated 3D in the guest.


 I am fully aware of it. Just this VM is about 7 years old and recreation of
 it from scratch would take too much time probably as I forgot what exactly
 is installed/added there etc.

 Tools to play with phones, flashing tools, devboards stuff, taxes etc.

 --

You can open the old .vdi file using virt-manager.

Alternativly you could build VirtualBox from source and configure it
without libvpx.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Review swaps

2015-05-28 Thread gil



Il 27/05/2015 18:04, gil ha scritto:



Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:

I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath.  I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming).  There are some interdependencies, noted below:

1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
No dependencies.

2. gap-pkg-polycyclic: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205904

Requires #1 and #3, so there is a bootstrap mechanism to build
without #3 the first time.

3. gap-pkg-alnuth: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205905
 Requires #2.  Tests require #4, so there is a bootstrap mechanism.

4. gap-pkg-radiroot: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206367
Requires #3.

5. gap-pkg-fga: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222690
No dependencies.

hi
taken
can you review this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215080
thanks in advance
gil

6. gap-pkg-edim: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223627
No dependencies.


taken

Other than the bootstrap builds neeed for #2 and #3, these are all
very simple packages.  GAP noarch packages are designed to just be
unpacked in the parent GAP directory.  Numbers 1 through 5 on this
list are noarch.  Number 6 takes a little more work because of the
arch-specific bit, but is still a pretty simple package.

Note that I recently changed jobs.  I no longer work in a Fedora /
RHEL / CentOS shop.  I now work in an Ubuntu shop.  And my commute
time increased as well.  Together, this means that my turnaround time
for reviews will probably be larger than it has been in the past.  If
you can handle that, give me some reviews to do for you in exchange
for these.  Thanks in advance.




--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

pghmcfc uploaded parent-0.234.tar.gz for perl-parent

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
b02fc0e7f9b74de42e60816c38be  parent-0.234.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-parent/parent-0.234.tar.gz/b02fc0e7f9b74de42e60816c38be/parent-0.234.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

2015-05-28 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz

W dniu 28.05.2015 o 09:27, drago01 pisze:

Problem was with VirtualBox... so for some time I will have to deal without
winxp vm (used from time to time for tools which are not wine friendly).



You could use Boxes / virt-manager ... ships in the Fedora repo and
should be good enough for cases where you do not need hardware
accelerated 3D in the guest.


I am fully aware of it. Just this VM is about 7 years old and recreation 
of it from scratch would take too much time probably as I forgot what 
exactly is installed/added there etc.


Tools to play with phones, flashing tools, devboards stuff, taxes etc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

pghmcfc pushed to perl-parent (master). Update to 0.234 (..more)

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 5330f6c608d419408dbf1f1462e2aded5baad169 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:07:30 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.234

- New upstream release 0.234
  - Fix the test for PMC loading to work on versions on Perl that don't have
Config::non_bincompat_options (CPAN RT#102626)

diff --git a/perl-parent.spec b/perl-parent.spec
index 7171f3b..24929ec 100644
--- a/perl-parent.spec
+++ b/perl-parent.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:  perl-parent
 Epoch: 1
-Version:   0.233
+Version:   0.234
 Release:   1%{?dist}
 Summary:   Establish an ISA relationship with base classes at compile time
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/parent.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 28 2015 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1:0.234-1
+- Update to 0.234
+  - Fix the test for PMC loading to work on versions on Perl that don't have
+Config::non_bincompat_options (CPAN RT#102626)
+
 * Tue May 26 2015 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1:0.233-1
 - Update to 0.233
   - The diagnostic about inheriting from ourselves was removed; it served no
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 992646e..20441eb 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fb2d4803c7c2423bae9403bb1cb48384  parent-0.233.tar.gz
+b02fc0e7f9b74de42e60816c38be  parent-0.234.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-parent.git/commit/?h=masterid=5330f6c608d419408dbf1f1462e2aded5baad169
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1225050] perl-DateTime-Locale-0.46 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225050



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-DateTime-Locale-0.46-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=639498

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata uploaded SQL-Statement-1.407.tar.gz for perl-SQL-Statement

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
abeedda4a2c085613cb77fb01631e5de  SQL-Statement-1.407.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-SQL-Statement/SQL-Statement-1.407.tar.gz/abeedda4a2c085613cb77fb01631e5de/SQL-Statement-1.407.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

rawhide report: 20150528 changes

2015-05-28 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu May 28 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenTK]
OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0
OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(System.Windows.Forms) = 
0:2.0.0.0
OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(System.Drawing) = 0:2.0.0.0
OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
[RepetierHost]
RepetierHost-0.90D-2.fc21.noarch requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
RepetierHost-0.90D-2.fc21.noarch requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0
RepetierHost-0.90D-2.fc21.noarch requires mono(System.Windows.Forms) = 
0:2.0.0.0
RepetierHost-0.90D-2.fc21.noarch requires mono(System.Drawing) = 
0:2.0.0.0
RepetierHost-0.90D-2.fc21.noarch requires mono(System.Core) = 0:3.5.0.0
RepetierHost-0.90D-2.fc21.noarch requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
[bless]
bless-0.6.0-14.fc22.i686 requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
bless-0.6.0-14.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0
bless-0.6.0-14.fc22.i686 requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
bless-0.6.0-14.fc22.i686 requires mono(Mono.Posix) = 0:2.0.0.0
[boo]
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Core) = 0:3.5.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(Microsoft.Build.Utilities) = 
0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(Microsoft.Build.Tasks) = 
0:2.0.0.0
boo-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(Microsoft.Build.Framework) = 
0:2.0.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System.Core) = 0:3.5.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(NAnt.DotNetTasks) = 
0:0.90.3780.0
boo-devel-0.9.4.9-11.fc22.i686 requires mono(NAnt.Core) = 0:0.90.3780.0
[dmlite-plugins-memcache]
dmlite-plugins-memcache-0.5.0-7.fc20.i686 requires libprotobuf.so.8
[eclipse-egit]
eclipse-egit-3.7.1-1.fc23.noarch requires osgi(org.eclipse.jgit.java7)
[gnome-shell-extension-background-logo]
gnome-shell-extension-background-logo-3.17.2-1.fc23.noarch requires 
gnome-shell = 0:3.17.2
[gnome-shell-extensions]
gnome-shell-extension-common-3.17.2-1.fc23.noarch requires gnome-shell 
= 0:3.17.2
[julia]
julia-0.3.7-2.fc23.i686 requires libLLVM-3.5.so
julia-devel-0.3.7-2.fc23.i686 requires libLLVM-3.5.so
[matreshka]
matreshka-servlet-devel-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires 
matreshka-servlet-lib{?_isa} = 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-servlet-lib-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires matreshka{?_isa} = 
0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-api-devel-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires 
matreshka-spikedog-api-lib{?_isa} = 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-api-lib-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires matreshka{?_isa} 
= 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-api-lib-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires 
matreshka-servlet-api{?_isa} = 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-core-devel-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires 
matreshka-spikedog-core-lib{?_isa} = 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-core-lib-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires matreshka{?_isa} 
= 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
matreshka-spikedog-core-lib-0.7.0-1.fc23.i686 requires 
matreshka-servlet-api{?_isa} = 0:0.7.0-1.fc23
[mesos]
mesos-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT.1.c513126.fc22.1.i686 requires libprotobuf.so.8
python-mesos-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT.1.c513126.fc22.1.i686 requires 
libprotobuf.so.8
[mojarra]
mojarra-2.1.7-8.fc20.noarch requires tomcat-servlet-3.0-api
mojarra-2.1.7-8.fc20.noarch requires tomcat-jsp-2.2-api
mojarra-2.1.7-8.fc20.noarch requires tomcat-el-2.2-api
[monodevelop]
monodevelop-2.8.8.4-9.fc23.i686 requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0
monodevelop-2.8.8.4-9.fc23.i686 requires mono(System.Core) = 0:3.5.0.0
monodevelop-2.8.8.4-9.fc23.i686 requires mono(System) = 0:2.0.0.0
monodevelop-2.8.8.4-9.fc23.i686 requires 
mono(Microsoft.Build.Utilities.v3.5) = 0:3.5.0.0
monodevelop-2.8.8.4-9.fc23.i686 requires 
mono(Microsoft.Build.Framework) = 0:3.5.0.0
monodevelop-2.8.8.4-9.fc23.i686 requires mono(Microsoft.Build.Engine) = 
0:3.5.0.0
[mule]
mule-module-builders-2.0.2.20080813-11.fc21.noarch requires 
tomcat-servlet-3.0-api
mule-transport-http-2.0.2.20080813-11.fc21.noarch requires 
tomcat-servlet-3.0-api
mule-transport-servlet-2.0.2.20080813-11.fc21.noarch requires 
tomcat-servlet-3.0-api
[netbeans-platform]

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-05-28)

2015-05-28 Thread Honza Horak
WG meeting will be at 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 19:00 Brno, 13:00 Boston, 
2:00+1d Tokyo, 3:00+1d Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.


= Topics =

* Continue discussion about Fedora Rings -- how to gather feedback from 
users? who are our users? 
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-May/000783.html)


* Council Engineering update 
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-May/000786.html)


* RHSCL Docker images compatibility with Fedora/Atomic use cases (are 
SCL images as developed under 
https://github.com/sclorg/rhscl2dockerfile/ usable in fedora/atomic or 
do we search for something different?)


* Open Floor

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

psabata uploaded DateTime-Locale-0.46.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Locale

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
f60bf58b2e2e29a49d214985fc17adca  DateTime-Locale-0.46.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Locale/DateTime-Locale-0.46.tar.gz/f60bf58b2e2e29a49d214985fc17adca/DateTime-Locale-0.46.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-DateTime-Locale (master). 0.46 bump

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 572ddd7d6b5e375353be7e299dee2b189f577795 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:19:59 +0200
Subject: 0.46 bump


diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 81ab018..fa65bcc 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /DateTime-Locale-0.45.tar.gz
+/DateTime-Locale-0.46.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec b/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec
index ab1c9ce..29eaddf 100644
--- a/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec
+++ b/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-DateTime-Locale
-Version:0.45
-Release:11%{?dist}
+Version:0.46
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Localization support for DateTime.pm
 # package itself is 'same terms as Perl'
 # modules under DateTime/Locale/ are generated from data provided by the CLDR 
project
@@ -11,26 +11,36 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Locale/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/DateTime-Locale-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  glibc-common
+# Build
 BuildRequires:  perl
-BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-# Run-time:
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.76
+BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
+BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
+# Runtime
 BuildRequires:  perl(base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Dist::CheckConflicts) = 0.02
 BuildRequires:  perl(List::MoreUtils)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Validate) = 0.91
-BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(utf8)
-BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
-# Tests:
-# File::Find::Rule not used
+# Tests only
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.96
 # Optional tests:
+BuildRequires:  perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.120900
+BuildRequires:  perl(CPAN::Meta::Prereqs)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Handle)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(IPC::Open3)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Wordlist)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Storable)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Changes)
+# XXX: BuildRequires   perl(Test::EOL)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Test::NoTabs)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Output)
-# Test::Pod 1.14 not used
-# Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 not used
-Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.41
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Spelling) = 0.12
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval $(perl -V:version); echo 
$version))
+Requires:   perl(Dist::CheckConflicts) = 0.02
 Requires:   perl(Params::Validate) = 0.91
 # perl-DateTime-Locale used to be bundled with perl-DateTime
 # ideally, this would be resolved with
@@ -39,8 +49,7 @@ Requires:   perl(Params::Validate) = 0.91
 # and this would introduce circular build dependencies
 Conflicts:  perl-DateTime = 1:0.7000-3.fc16
 
-%{?perl_default_filter}
-# Remove under-specified dependencies
+%global __requires_exclude 
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(Dist::CheckConflicts\\)$
 %global __requires_exclude 
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(Params::Validate\\)$
 
 %description
@@ -55,23 +64,26 @@ iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 Changes Changes.iconv \
  mv -f Changes.iconv Changes
 
 %build
-perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
-make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
 
 %check
 make test
 
 %files
-%doc Changes LICENSE LICENSE.cldr README
+%license LICENSE LICENSE.cldr
+%doc Changes README
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed May 27 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.46-1
+- 0.46 bump
+
 * Tue Jan 13 2015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.45-11
 - Modernize spec file
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 812962a..45a2f6e 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8ba6a4b70f8fa7d987529c2e2c708862  DateTime-Locale-0.45.tar.gz
+f60bf58b2e2e29a49d214985fc17adca  DateTime-Locale-0.46.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-DateTime-Locale.git/commit/?h=masterid=572ddd7d6b5e375353be7e299dee2b189f577795
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-DateTime-Locale (f22). 0.46 bump

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 572ddd7d6b5e375353be7e299dee2b189f577795 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:19:59 +0200
Subject: 0.46 bump


diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 81ab018..fa65bcc 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /DateTime-Locale-0.45.tar.gz
+/DateTime-Locale-0.46.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec b/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec
index ab1c9ce..29eaddf 100644
--- a/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec
+++ b/perl-DateTime-Locale.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-DateTime-Locale
-Version:0.45
-Release:11%{?dist}
+Version:0.46
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Localization support for DateTime.pm
 # package itself is 'same terms as Perl'
 # modules under DateTime/Locale/ are generated from data provided by the CLDR 
project
@@ -11,26 +11,36 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Locale/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/DateTime-Locale-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  glibc-common
+# Build
 BuildRequires:  perl
-BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-# Run-time:
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.76
+BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
+BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
+# Runtime
 BuildRequires:  perl(base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Dist::CheckConflicts) = 0.02
 BuildRequires:  perl(List::MoreUtils)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Validate) = 0.91
-BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(utf8)
-BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
-# Tests:
-# File::Find::Rule not used
+# Tests only
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.96
 # Optional tests:
+BuildRequires:  perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.120900
+BuildRequires:  perl(CPAN::Meta::Prereqs)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(IO::Handle)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(IPC::Open3)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Wordlist)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Storable)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Changes)
+# XXX: BuildRequires   perl(Test::EOL)
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Test::NoTabs)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Output)
-# Test::Pod 1.14 not used
-# Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 not used
-Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.41
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Spelling) = 0.12
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval $(perl -V:version); echo 
$version))
+Requires:   perl(Dist::CheckConflicts) = 0.02
 Requires:   perl(Params::Validate) = 0.91
 # perl-DateTime-Locale used to be bundled with perl-DateTime
 # ideally, this would be resolved with
@@ -39,8 +49,7 @@ Requires:   perl(Params::Validate) = 0.91
 # and this would introduce circular build dependencies
 Conflicts:  perl-DateTime = 1:0.7000-3.fc16
 
-%{?perl_default_filter}
-# Remove under-specified dependencies
+%global __requires_exclude 
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(Dist::CheckConflicts\\)$
 %global __requires_exclude 
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(Params::Validate\\)$
 
 %description
@@ -55,23 +64,26 @@ iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 Changes Changes.iconv \
  mv -f Changes.iconv Changes
 
 %build
-perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
-make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
 
 %check
 make test
 
 %files
-%doc Changes LICENSE LICENSE.cldr README
+%license LICENSE LICENSE.cldr
+%doc Changes README
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed May 27 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.46-1
+- 0.46 bump
+
 * Tue Jan 13 2015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.45-11
 - Modernize spec file
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 812962a..45a2f6e 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8ba6a4b70f8fa7d987529c2e2c708862  DateTime-Locale-0.45.tar.gz
+f60bf58b2e2e29a49d214985fc17adca  DateTime-Locale-0.46.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-DateTime-Locale.git/commit/?h=f22id=572ddd7d6b5e375353be7e299dee2b189f577795
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1225050] perl-DateTime-Locale-0.46 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225050



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DateTime-Locale-0.46-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DateTime-Locale-0.46-1.fc22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Including tlp in Fedora Workstation by default

2015-05-28 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
wrote:

 On 28 May 2015 at 10:45, Nadim Kobeissi nadim@nadim.computer wrote:
  I would like to suggest that tlp [0] be included with Fedora Workstation
 by
  default, starting with Fedora 23.

 Why can't we just use the correct defaults? Having a configure all
 the things version of powertop isn't going to help anybody but the
 power users. This stuff should just work out of the box. There are
 lots of reasons why some things like USB autosuspend are not enabled
 by default (sound cards clicking) and ALPM on some chipsets is
 disabled (risk of disk corruption) and I'd much rather fix the bugs in
 the kernel than add a whole heap of userspace config options. Seeing
 options for the CPU scaling governor and CPU undervolting really
 doesn't make me feel great about this new package installed by
 default.


I understand and appreciate your perspective. I have two counter-arguments,
although I do admit they do not fully answer your concern.

1: My understanding is that tlp ships with a default configuration that,
without any modification, will enable reasonable settings for power saving.
We can just have tlp start on boot with this configuration. This will
benefit everyone, not just power users, without any weird or dangerous
config tweaks being necessary. If you believe that the default
configuration has unsavory settings (for example, if we find that it causes
sound card clicking), then the Fedora package can modify these defaults
accordingly while keeping the things we like and consider safe.

2: I think anyone will reasonably agree that the Linux kernel should simply
be better. But until we're there, perhaps we should consider tlp as a
reasonable solution, even if it's a short-term one? We shouldn't inhibit
progressively better Fedora user experience until the kernel is perfect;
this would mean years of waiting for regular users.

Thanks for your response.

Nadim


 Richard
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1225049] perl-SQL-Statement-1.407 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225049

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-SQL-Statement-1.407-1.
   ||fc23
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-05-28 06:20:51



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-Module-ScanDeps (master). 1.19 bump

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From d09f89c2ff1c3279184625c9c1892adbbd8a7854 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:49:20 +0200
Subject: 1.19 bump


diff --git a/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec b/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec
index 3788122..400db97 100644
--- a/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Module-ScanDeps
 Summary:Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
-Version:1.18
+Version:1.19
 Release:1%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RS/RSCHUPP/Module-ScanD
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ScanDeps/
 BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  perl
-BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.76
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MM_Unix)
 BuildRequires:  perl(FindBin)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Fcntl)
@@ -66,12 +66,11 @@ Test/More.pm).  The values are hash references.
 %setup -q -n Module-ScanDeps-%{version}
 
 %build
-perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} +
 %{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
 
 %check
@@ -85,6 +84,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Module::ScanDeps.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 28 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.19-1
+- 1.19 bump
+
 * Fri Jan 30 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.18-1
 - 1.18 bump
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index fc53721..05a1eb4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3e621c9d42ef7e8277d33caf747f7746  Module-ScanDeps-1.18.tar.gz
+ea2545dbf46bae4cc43d9d07cad77b96  Module-ScanDeps-1.19.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Module-ScanDeps.git/commit/?h=masterid=d09f89c2ff1c3279184625c9c1892adbbd8a7854
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata uploaded Module-ScanDeps-1.19.tar.gz for perl-Module-ScanDeps

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
ea2545dbf46bae4cc43d9d07cad77b96  Module-ScanDeps-1.19.tar.gz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Module-ScanDeps/Module-ScanDeps-1.19.tar.gz/ea2545dbf46bae4cc43d9d07cad77b96/Module-ScanDeps-1.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Including tlp in Fedora Workstation by default

2015-05-28 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
Hi,
I would like to suggest that tlp [0] be included with Fedora Workstation by
default, starting with Fedora 23.

tlp is already a well-maintained Fedora package [1], is quite stable, and
achieves dramatic battery life and laptop optimization gains without having
to run a daemon or a background process. It also ships with informative
stat tools. It seems to be the current leader in zero-configuration laptop
performance optimization, and is extremely lightweight.

Since Fedora Workstation ships with NetworkManager, the helper package
tlp-rdw should also be included [2].

It seems like integrating the existing Fedora package as a default in
Fedora Workstation shipments should be a no-brainer. Why isn't this already
the case? Can we make this happen?

Thanks,
Nadim

[0] http://www.linrunner.de/en/tlp/tlp.html
[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/tlp
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/tlp-rdw
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

psabata pushed to perl-SQL-Statement (master). 1.407 bump

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From d3ffaacee86ba1b739c294e4d7997217caec393f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:18:02 +0200
Subject: 1.407 bump


diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index a53a4f0..a791ffc 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ SQL-Statement-1.27.tar.gz
 /SQL-Statement-1.402.tar.gz
 /SQL-Statement-1.404.tar.gz
 /SQL-Statement-1.405.tar.gz
+/SQL-Statement-1.407.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-SQL-Statement.spec b/perl-SQL-Statement.spec
index 80c3bb4..29e5822 100644
--- a/perl-SQL-Statement.spec
+++ b/perl-SQL-Statement.spec
@@ -1,44 +1,48 @@
 Name:   perl-SQL-Statement
-Version:1.405
-Release:9%{?dist}
+Version:1.407
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:SQL parsing and processing engine
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/SQL-Statement/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RE/REHSACK/SQL-Statement-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildArch:  noarch
+# Build
 BuildRequires:  perl
-BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.76
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
-# Run-time:
+# Runtime
 BuildRequires:  perl(base)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Clone) = 0.30
 BuildRequires:  perl(constant)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Data::Dumper)
-BuildRequires:  perl(DBI) = 1.612
+BuildRequires:  perl(DBI) = 1.616
 BuildRequires:  perl(Encode)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Errno)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Exporter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(List::Util)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Math::BigFloat)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Math::BigInt)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Math::Base::Convert)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Math::Trig)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Runtime)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Util) = 1.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.0
+# XXX: BuildRequires:  perl(SQL::UserDefs)
 BuildRequires:  perl(sort)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Text::Balanced)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Text::Soundex)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Time::HiRes)
 BuildRequires:  perl(vars)
-# Tests:
+# Tests only
 BuildRequires:  perl(Cwd)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Basename)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Path)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Spec)
 BuildRequires:  perl(lib)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Deep)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
-# Optional test:
+# Optional tests only
 # DBD::CSV buildrequires SQL::Statement
 %if 0%{!?perl_bootstrap:1}
 BuildRequires:  perl(DBD::CSV) = 0.30
@@ -47,11 +51,14 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(DBD::DBM) = 0.06
 BuildRequires:  perl(DBD::File) = 0.40
 BuildRequires:  perl(DBD::SQLite)
 BuildRequires:  perl(MLDBM)
-Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval $(perl -V:version); echo 
$version))
 Requires:   perl(Clone) = 0.30
-Requires:   perl(DBI) = 1.612
+Requires:   perl(DBI) = 1.616
+Requires:   perl(Math::Base::Convert)
 Requires:   perl(Params::Util) = 1.00
 Requires:   perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.0
+# This module doesn't seem to exist...
+# XXX: Requires:   perl(SQL::UserDefs)
 Requires:   perl(Text::Soundex)
 
 %global __requires_exclude 
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}^perl\\((Clone|Params::Util|Scalar::Util)\\)$
@@ -70,12 +77,11 @@ sed -i -e 's/\r//' README
 
 %build
 export SQL_STATEMENT_WARN_UPDATE=sure
-perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
-find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
 chmod -R u+w %{buildroot}/*
 
 %check
@@ -87,6 +93,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue May 26 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 1.407-1
+- 1.407 bump
+
 * Sun Sep 07 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.405-9
 - Perl 5.20 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 8cd8648..0b15cc1 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-22231c2e28996b5bfea9925d49c11de1  SQL-Statement-1.405.tar.gz
+abeedda4a2c085613cb77fb01631e5de  SQL-Statement-1.407.tar.gz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-SQL-Statement.git/commit/?h=masterid=d3ffaacee86ba1b739c294e4d7997217caec393f
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

jplesnik pushed to perl-DBIx-Class (master). Disable optional BR perl(Devel::FindRef)

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 45e902677fc6ae4003d83dd79270a3e2b0436d56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:34:36 +0200
Subject: Disable optional BR perl(Devel::FindRef)


diff --git a/perl-DBIx-Class.spec b/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
index 3e3fd41..b01e9da 100644
--- a/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
+++ b/perl-DBIx-Class.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Name:   perl-DBIx-Class
 Summary:Extensible and flexible object - relational mapper
 Version:0.082810
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RI/RIBASUSHI/DBIx-Class-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(DateTime::Format::Pg)
 BuildRequires:  perl(DateTime::Format::SQLite)
 BuildRequires:  perl(DBD::Pg)
 BuildRequires:  perl(DBD::SQLite)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::FindRef)
+# Optional for TEST_VERBOSE: BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::FindRef)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Errno)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Compare)
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp)
@@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man[13]/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 28 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.082810-3
+- Disable optional BR perl(Devel::FindRef)
+
 * Mon Dec 08 2014 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.082810-2
 - Explicitly provide modules I missed before, hopefully that's all this time
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-DBIx-Class.git/commit/?h=masterid=45e902677fc6ae4003d83dd79270a3e2b0436d56
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Including tlp in Fedora Workstation by default

2015-05-28 Thread Richard Hughes
On 28 May 2015 at 11:21, Nadim Kobeissi nadim@nadim.computer wrote:
 1: My understanding is that tlp ships with a default configuration that,
 without any modification, will enable reasonable settings for power saving.

I think what the kernel is providing is reasonable, from a regression
/ feature point of view. I agree some of the kconfig options could be
modified in a few cases, although this is the pain when we have a
single kernel for all the different products.

 then the Fedora package can modify these defaults accordingly
 while keeping the things we like and consider safe.

Do you think that the average user with a clicking sound card or disk
corruption when suspending would be able to make the link to this new
package?

 We shouldn't inhibit
 progressively better Fedora user experience until the kernel is perfect;
 this would mean years of waiting for regular users.

We shouldn't paper over the cracks. I've seen that again and again and
it just stops being maintainable after a few years.

Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Including tlp in Fedora Workstation by default

2015-05-28 Thread Richard Hughes
On 28 May 2015 at 10:45, Nadim Kobeissi nadim@nadim.computer wrote:
 I would like to suggest that tlp [0] be included with Fedora Workstation by
 default, starting with Fedora 23.

Why can't we just use the correct defaults? Having a configure all
the things version of powertop isn't going to help anybody but the
power users. This stuff should just work out of the box. There are
lots of reasons why some things like USB autosuspend are not enabled
by default (sound cards clicking) and ALPM on some chipsets is
disabled (risk of disk corruption) and I'd much rather fix the bugs in
the kernel than add a whole heap of userspace config options. Seeing
options for the CPU scaling governor and CPU undervolting really
doesn't make me feel great about this new package installed by
default.

Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1225476] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.19 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225476



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.19-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=639554

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1219989] perl-Finance-YahooQuote 0.25 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219989

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|0.25-1  |perl-Finance-YahooQuote-0.2
   ||5-1.fc21
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-05-28 07:59:02



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Finance-YahooQuote-0.25-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

jplesnik pushed to perl-XML-TreeBuilder (master). Update list of build-requires and requires

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 6ef1040b7266400a5d85248685e497dafca6ea95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:04:49 +0200
Subject: Update list of build-requires and requires


diff --git a/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec b/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec
index ac69085..524584d 100644
--- a/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec
+++ b/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Parser that builds a tree of XML::Element objects
 Name:  perl-XML-TreeBuilder
 Version:   5.4
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 License:   GPL+ or Artistic
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-TreeBuilder/
@@ -11,19 +11,23 @@ Source: 
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/XML/XML-TreeBuilder-%{version}.ta
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRequires: perl
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Basename)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
 BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Element) = 4.1
 BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Tagset)
+BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.14
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.04
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Perl::Critic)
+BuildRequires: perl(vars)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
+BuildRequires: perl(XML::Catalog) = 1.02
 BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)
-BuildRequires: perl(XML::Catalog) = 1.0.0
-BuildRequires:  perl(Devel::Cover)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Module::Build)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Exception)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Perl::Critic)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
-Requires:  perl(HTML::Element) perl(HTML::Tagset) perl(XML::Parser)
 
 %description
 perl-XML-TreeBuilder is a Perl module that implements a parser
@@ -54,6 +58,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null ';'
 %{perl_vendorlib}/XML/
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 28 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 5.4-2
+- Update list of build-requires and requires
+
 * Fri Aug 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 5.4-1
 - Perl 5.20 rebuild
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.git/commit/?h=masterid=6ef1040b7266400a5d85248685e497dafca6ea95
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Including tlp in Fedora Workstation by default

2015-05-28 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:57 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
 On 28 May 2015 at 11:21, Nadim Kobeissi nadim@nadim.computer wrote:
  1: My understanding is that tlp ships with a default configuration 
  that,
  without any modification, will enable reasonable settings for power 
  saving.
 
 I think what the kernel is providing is reasonable, from a regression
 / feature point of view. I agree some of the kconfig options could be
 modified in a few cases, although this is the pain when we have a
 single kernel for all the different products.
 

Actually, it *does* sound like this package might provide a way to
mitigate that situation (single kernel). If tlp can accept a
configuration file for what tweaks to make, then we can use the per
-product config feature to allow us to set certain features differently
on Workstation compared to Server/Cloud or non-product. (This would
still probably mean shipping things like the USB autosuspend disabled,
due to the other effects it can have).

Also, it's possible in the Fedora package to ship this tool without the
GUI (or at least, separate the GUI into a subpackage which isn't
installed by default, similar to how we do things with Epiphany). If we
don't *expose* these as options, but instead use the package to tweak
our defaults, would that provide some benefit here?




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

RFC: LiveUSB Creator Revamped

2015-05-28 Thread Martin Bříza

Hi everyone,

for quite a while, I've been working on implementation of a new, revamped  
UI, designed by Jakub Steiner for the LiveUSB Creator [0]. Currently, me  
and Luke are slowly moving to merge the changes back into the master  
branch of the tree. Some stuff is not done, like descriptions of the  
images or final look of the icons but the really important things are  
already there.


I'm writing here to ask you guys for input on what you think about how it  
looks like now. I've set up a Copr repository [1] and put a Windows  
package together [2].
I'm open to all kinds of feature requests, bug reports, any kind of input  
that comes to your minds.
The Copr version still contains just udisks support. Udisks2 will be added  
ASAP (when I rebase my branch against master and build the package again).


Specifically, what we'd love to settle is: what to do with the main screen  
with the three promoted images. Obviously, putting a Server or Cloud  
Product on a USB drive is a nonsense. One could argue the tool at least  
downloads the images for you, though.


Cheers,
Martin

[0] https://github.com/lmacken/liveusb-creator/tree/feature/new-ui
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mbriza/unstable/build/94636/
[2a] https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-creator.zip
[2b] http://ma.rtinbriza.cz/w/liveusb-creator.zip
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1219989] perl-Finance-YahooQuote 0.25 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219989

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Finance-YahooQuote-0.2 |perl-Finance-YahooQuote-0.2
   |5-1.fc21|5-1.fc20



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Finance-YahooQuote-0.25-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: RFC: LiveUSB Creator Revamped

2015-05-28 Thread Martin Bříza

On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:28:17 +0200, Martin Bříza mbr...@redhat.com wrote:


Hi everyone,

for quite a while, I've been working on implementation of a new,  
revamped UI, designed by Jakub Steiner for the LiveUSB Creator [0].  
Currently, me and Luke are slowly moving to merge the changes back into  
the master branch of the tree. Some stuff is not done, like descriptions  
of the images or final look of the icons but the really important things  
are already there.


I'm writing here to ask you guys for input on what you think about how  
it looks like now. I've set up a Copr repository [1] and put a Windows  
package together [2].
I'm open to all kinds of feature requests, bug reports, any kind of  
input that comes to your minds.
The Copr version still contains just udisks support. Udisks2 will be  
added ASAP (when I rebase my branch against master and build the package  
again).


Specifically, what we'd love to settle is: what to do with the main  
screen with the three promoted images. Obviously, putting a Server or  
Cloud Product on a USB drive is a nonsense. One could argue the tool at  
least downloads the images for you, though.


Cheers,
Martin

[0] https://github.com/lmacken/liveusb-creator/tree/feature/new-ui
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mbriza/unstable/build/94636/
[2a] https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-creator.zip
[2b] http://ma.rtinbriza.cz/w/liveusb-creator.zip


Also, to see it without actually installing it, there's just a little bit  
outdated screencap:

https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-6.ogv
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: RFC: LiveUSB Creator Revamped

2015-05-28 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:31 +0200, Martin Bříza wrote:
 Also, to see it without actually installing it, there's just a little
 bit  
 outdated screencap:
 https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-6.ogv

That looks quite good!

I have just one comment: the  Back, Write to USB disk, Cancel, and
Write to disk buttons belong in a header bar, at least when running in
GNOME.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: RFC: LiveUSB Creator Revamped

2015-05-28 Thread Neal Gompa
It's not nonsense to be able to put Server Product on USB. I've installed
Fedora Server on servers that way myself. Not so sure about Cloud images,
though. Those generally get uploaded to somewhere else to be used.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Martin Bříza mbr...@redhat.com wrote:

 On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:28:17 +0200, Martin Bříza mbr...@redhat.com
 wrote:

  Hi everyone,

 for quite a while, I've been working on implementation of a new, revamped
 UI, designed by Jakub Steiner for the LiveUSB Creator [0]. Currently, me
 and Luke are slowly moving to merge the changes back into the master branch
 of the tree. Some stuff is not done, like descriptions of the images or
 final look of the icons but the really important things are already there.

 I'm writing here to ask you guys for input on what you think about how it
 looks like now. I've set up a Copr repository [1] and put a Windows package
 together [2].
 I'm open to all kinds of feature requests, bug reports, any kind of input
 that comes to your minds.
 The Copr version still contains just udisks support. Udisks2 will be
 added ASAP (when I rebase my branch against master and build the package
 again).

 Specifically, what we'd love to settle is: what to do with the main
 screen with the three promoted images. Obviously, putting a Server or Cloud
 Product on a USB drive is a nonsense. One could argue the tool at least
 downloads the images for you, though.

 Cheers,
 Martin

 [0] https://github.com/lmacken/liveusb-creator/tree/feature/new-ui
 [1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mbriza/unstable/build/94636/
 [2a] https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-creator.zip
 [2b] http://ma.rtinbriza.cz/w/liveusb-creator.zip


 Also, to see it without actually installing it, there's just a little bit
 outdated screencap:
 https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-6.ogv

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: RFC: LiveUSB Creator Revamped

2015-05-28 Thread Lubomir Rintel
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:31 +0200, Martin Bříza wrote:
 On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:28:17 +0200, Martin Bříza mbr...@redhat.com 
 wrote:
 
  Hi everyone,
  
  for quite a while, I've been working on implementation of a new,  
  revamped UI, designed by Jakub Steiner for the LiveUSB Creator [0].

  Currently, me and Luke are slowly moving to merge the changes back 
  into  
  the master branch of the tree. Some stuff is not done, like 
  descriptions  
  of the images or final look of the icons but the really important 
  things  
  are already there.
  
  I'm writing here to ask you guys for input on what you think about 
  how  
  it looks like now. I've set up a Copr repository [1] and put a 
  Windows  
  package together [2].
  I'm open to all kinds of feature requests, bug reports, any kind of

  input that comes to your minds.
  The Copr version still contains just udisks support. Udisks2 will 
  be  
  added ASAP (when I rebase my branch against master and build the 
  package  
  again).
  
  Specifically, what we'd love to settle is: what to do with the main

  screen with the three promoted images. Obviously, putting a Server 
  or  
  Cloud Product on a USB drive is a nonsense. One could argue the 
  tool at  
  least downloads the images for you, though.
  
  Cheers,
  Martin
  
  [0] https://github.com/lmacken/liveusb-creator/tree/feature/new-ui
  [1] 
  https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mbriza/unstable/build/94636/
  [2a] https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-creator.zip
  [2b] http://ma.rtinbriza.cz/w/liveusb-creator.zip
 
 Also, to see it without actually installing it, there's just a little 
 bit  
 outdated screencap:
 https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-6.ogv

It looks neat!

A few notes:

1.) There's no scrollbar to scroll the list. It only appears upon
scrolling with a mouse wheel which is kind of useless.

2.) It would be nice if the release list was configurable (think
/usr/lib/liveusb-creator/releases.d + /etc/liveusb-creator/releases.d
instead of hardcoded in releases.py). That way the default
installations could bring in the Fedora distributions while an add-on
packages could add CentOS, RPM Fusion, etc.

3.) I've launched liveusb-creator_polkit. However it doesn't seem to
employ policykit -- the UI itself runs as root! The inconvenient side
-effect is that the file picker is not entirely relevant and I have
hard time finding the ISO file I've downloaded.

4.) The dependency on udisks is missing and the error is not handled
gracefully. The following tracebacks appears on the console:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/liveusb/gui.py, line 830, in 
USBDeviceEnumerationStart
self.live.detect_removable_drives(callback=self.USBDeviceCallback)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/liveusb/creator.py, line 519, in 
detect_removable_drives
/org/freedesktop/UDisks)
  File /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 241, in get_object
follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes)
  File /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py, line 248, in 
__init__
self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name)
  File /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 180, in 
activate_name_owner
self.start_service_by_name(bus_name)
  File /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 278, in 
start_service_by_name
'su', (bus_name, flags)))
  File /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/dbus/connection.py, line 651, in 
call_blocking
message, timeout)
dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The 
name org.freedesktop.UDisks was not provided by any .service files

The UI is just not able to find the flash drive.

5.) The error handling seems messed up. When I hit the write button,
there's no error in the UI, but the following is in the console:

[gui:246] (u'T', u'h', u'e', u'r', u'e', u' ', u'i', u's', u' ', u'n', u'o', 
u't', u' ', u'e', u'n', u'o', u'u', u'g', u'h', u' ', u'f', u'r', u'e', u'e', 
u' ', u's', u'p', u'a', u'c', u'e', u' ', u'o', u'n', u' ', u't', u'h', u'e', 
u' ', u's', u'e', u'l', u'e', u'c', u't', u'e', u'd', u' ', u'd', u'e', u'v', 
u'i', u'c', u'e', u'.', u' ', u'R', u'e', u'q', u'u', u'i', u'r', u'e', u'd', 
u':', u' ', u'1', u'0', u'5', u'6', u'M', u'B', u'.', u' ', u'F', u'r', u'e', 
u'e', u':', u' ', u'7', u'0', u'2', u'M', u'B', u'.')
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/liveusb/gui.py, line 243, in run
self.copyImage(now)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/liveusb/gui.py, line 265, in copyImage
self.live.check_free_space()
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/liveusb/creator.py, line 263, in 
check_free_space
str(freebytes/1024**2) + MB)))
LiveUSBError: (u'T', u'h', u'e', u'r', u'e', u' ', u'i', u's', u' ', u'n', 
u'o', u't', u' ', u'e', u'n', u'o', u'u', u'g', u'h', u' ', u'f', u'r', u'e', 
u'e', u' ', u's', u'p', u'a', u'c', u'e', u' ', u'o', u'n', u' ', u't', 

Re: RFC: LiveUSB Creator Revamped

2015-05-28 Thread Dan Mossor

On 05/28/2015 07:36 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:

It's not nonsense to be able to put Server Product on USB. I've
installed Fedora Server on servers that way myself. Not so sure about
Cloud images, though. Those generally get uploaded to somewhere else to
be used.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Martin Bříza mbr...@redhat.com
mailto:mbr...@redhat.com wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:28:17 +0200, Martin Bříza mbr...@redhat.com
mailto:mbr...@redhat.com wrote:

Hi everyone,

for quite a while, I've been working on implementation of a new,
revamped UI, designed by Jakub Steiner for the LiveUSB Creator
[0]. Currently, me and Luke are slowly moving to merge the
changes back into the master branch of the tree. Some stuff is
not done, like descriptions of the images or final look of the
icons but the really important things are already there.

I'm writing here to ask you guys for input on what you think
about how it looks like now. I've set up a Copr repository [1]
and put a Windows package together [2].
I'm open to all kinds of feature requests, bug reports, any kind
of input that comes to your minds.
The Copr version still contains just udisks support. Udisks2
will be added ASAP (when I rebase my branch against master and
build the package again).

Specifically, what we'd love to settle is: what to do with the
main screen with the three promoted images. Obviously, putting a
Server or Cloud Product on a USB drive is a nonsense. One could
argue the tool at least downloads the images for you, though.

Cheers,
Martin

[0] https://github.com/lmacken/liveusb-creator/tree/feature/new-ui
[1]
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mbriza/unstable/build/94636/
[2a] https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-creator.zip
[2b] http://ma.rtinbriza.cz/w/liveusb-creator.zip


Also, to see it without actually installing it, there's just a
little bit outdated screencap:
https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-6.ogv

Server should remain as a choice - that is a common use case for USB 
drives as Neal stated.


I would suggest that Cloud be replaced with Plasma, but I don't know 
that Plasma has an official Fedora logo in line with the Product logos.


Dan

--
Dan Mossor, RHCSA
Systems Engineer
Fedora Server WG | Fedora KDE WG | Fedora QA Team
Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice
FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx
San Antonio, Texas, USA
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: RFC: LiveUSB Creator Revamped

2015-05-28 Thread Jiri Eischmann
Michael Catanzaro píše v Čt 28. 05. 2015 v 07:55 -0500:
 On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:31 +0200, Martin Bříza wrote:
  Also, to see it without actually installing it, there's just a 
  little
  bit  
  outdated screencap:
  https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-6.ogv
 
 That looks quite good!
 
 I have just one comment: the  Back, Write to USB disk, Cancel, and
 Write to disk buttons belong in a header bar, at least when running 
 in
 GNOME.

It's written in QML and I don't think something like header bar and CSD
is possible
there.

Jiri
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

limb created the branch 'epel7' for the package 'perl-File-RsyncP'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
limb created the branch 'epel7' for the package 'perl-File-RsyncP'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-RsyncP/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

jplesnik pushed to perl-GraphViz (master). 2.18 bump

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From cb939630506bb972f5c2092ce06b16b980f937d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:37:59 +0200
Subject: 2.18 bump


diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6966934..ae21461 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 /GraphViz-2.14.tgz
 /GraphViz-2.16.tgz
+/GraphViz-2.18.tgz
diff --git a/perl-GraphViz.spec b/perl-GraphViz.spec
index c25c470..67e441b 100644
--- a/perl-GraphViz.spec
+++ b/perl-GraphViz.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 Name:   perl-GraphViz
-Version:2.16
+Version:2.18
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool
-License:GPL+ or Artistic
+License:Artistic 2.0
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/GraphViz/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RS/RSAVAGE/GraphViz-%{version}.tgz
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(LWP::Simple) = 6
 BuildRequires:  perl(Parse::RecDescent) = 1.965001
 BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Usage) = 1.16
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 1.001014
 BuildRequires:  perl(Time::HiRes) = 1.51
 BuildRequires:  perl(vars)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
@@ -65,11 +65,15 @@ find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
 make test
 
 %files
+%license LICENSE
 %doc Changes README examples/
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 28 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 2.18-1
+- 2.18 bump
+
 * Wed Nov 12 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 2.16-1
 - 2.16 bump
 - Modernize spec file
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index edd9d3d..8be93ea 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-45954ab14ed5e5d2af0d7edaf982c927  GraphViz-2.16.tgz
+cd507325c0bbfcc168a034abaf60a12b  GraphViz-2.18.tgz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-GraphViz.git/commit/?h=masterid=cb939630506bb972f5c2092ce06b16b980f937d1
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

jplesnik uploaded GraphViz-2.18.tgz for perl-GraphViz

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
cd507325c0bbfcc168a034abaf60a12b  GraphViz-2.18.tgz

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-GraphViz/GraphViz-2.18.tgz/cd507325c0bbfcc168a034abaf60a12b/GraphViz-2.18.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

jplesnik pushed to perl-GraphViz (f22). 2.18 bump

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 0f086d8492452dc86ce15826322ccb9e9a934638 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:45:29 +0200
Subject: 2.18 bump


diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6966934..ae21461 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 /GraphViz-2.14.tgz
 /GraphViz-2.16.tgz
+/GraphViz-2.18.tgz
diff --git a/perl-GraphViz.spec b/perl-GraphViz.spec
index c25c470..67e441b 100644
--- a/perl-GraphViz.spec
+++ b/perl-GraphViz.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 Name:   perl-GraphViz
-Version:2.16
+Version:2.18
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool
-License:GPL+ or Artistic
+License:Artistic 2.0
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/GraphViz/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/R/RS/RSAVAGE/GraphViz-%{version}.tgz
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(LWP::Simple) = 6
 BuildRequires:  perl(Parse::RecDescent) = 1.965001
 BuildRequires:  perl(Pod::Usage) = 1.16
 BuildRequires:  perl(strict)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 1.001014
 BuildRequires:  perl(Time::HiRes) = 1.51
 BuildRequires:  perl(vars)
 BuildRequires:  perl(warnings)
@@ -65,11 +65,15 @@ find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
 make test
 
 %files
+%license LICENSE
 %doc Changes README examples/
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 28 2015 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 2.18-1
+- 2.18 bump
+
 * Wed Nov 12 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 2.16-1
 - 2.16 bump
 - Modernize spec file
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index edd9d3d..8be93ea 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-45954ab14ed5e5d2af0d7edaf982c927  GraphViz-2.16.tgz
+cd507325c0bbfcc168a034abaf60a12b  GraphViz-2.18.tgz
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-GraphViz.git/commit/?h=f22id=0f086d8492452dc86ce15826322ccb9e9a934638
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1225675] perl-GraphViz-2.18 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225675



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
jplesnik's perl-GraphViz-2.18-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=639624

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1225675] perl-GraphViz-2.18 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225675

Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-GraphViz-2.18-1.fc23



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1225675] perl-GraphViz-2.18 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225675



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-GraphViz-2.18-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-GraphViz-2.18-1.fc22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

limb changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-File-RsyncP (epel7) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
limb changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-File-RsyncP (epel7) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-RsyncP/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

limb changed psabata's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-File-RsyncP (epel7) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
limb changed psabata's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-File-RsyncP (epel7) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-RsyncP/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

limb changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on perl-File-RsyncP (epel7) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
limb changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on perl-File-RsyncP (epel7) to 
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-RsyncP/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

limb changed psabata's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-File-RsyncP (epel7) to 'Approved'

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
limb changed psabata's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-File-RsyncP (epel7) 
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-RsyncP/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Including tlp in Fedora Workstation by default

2015-05-28 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:18:21PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
 Doesn't tuned already do something similar to this?

These are the exact words I just typed in another message. :)

-- 
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes

2015-05-28 Thread Sergio Belkin
2015-05-27 13:16 GMT-03:00 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:

 On 05/27/2015 05:27 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:

  Video card:

 Slot:   00:02.0
 Class:  VGA compatible controller
 Vendor: Intel Corporation
 Device: 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller
 SVendor:Elitegroup Computer Systems
 SDevice:Device 1b76
 Rev:02
 Driver: i915
 Module: i915


  What did you use to get this list?  It's different than the lspci
 output.  lspci identifies mine as:
 Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)




 lspci -v -mm -k ;) Nice, isn't it?

 It's a bit weird I've reenabled the composite in KDE and problem it went
 away...



 Hi,

 any news, ideas, with about this topic, driver is working terrible, I
 thought that was a KDE issue, but in MATE it happens either...


 Today, a similar issue happened to me with the Fedora installer, when
 installing F22 on my old netbook.

 When the installation started, initially a couple of horizontal strips
 appeared, which gradually accumulated until the display was entirely
 unreadable and distorted.

 Video card:
 Slot:   00:02.0
 Class:  VGA compatible controller
 Vendor: Intel Corporation
 Device: Mobile 945GSE Express Integrated Graphics Controller
 SVendor:Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI]
 SDevice:Device 0110
 Rev:03
 Driver: i915
 Module: i915

 Ralf


I've managed for reduce failures appending the kernel parameter
i915.enable_ips=0, but it didn't disappear completely, but at least, I can
work using this graphic card.



-- 
--
Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-28 Thread Christian Schaller
Sounds great, I know Allan and Richard has some mockups for
how they want to do upgrades in GNOME Software, so hopefully
this will make it even easier to implement.

Christian

- Original Message -
From: Will Woods wwo...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:42:56 AM
Subject: fedup for F23 and beyond

[tl;dr: fedup is going away and should be re-implemented by the system
packaging tools.]

Hey all,

F22 is the fifth release we've handled with fedup. A lot has changed
since F17, and we've learned some valuable lessons about how upgrades
work (and how they fail).

We've come to the conclusion that the current design is unsupportable,
mostly due to upgrade.img, which turns out to cause more problems than
it solves[1].

So! For F23, fedup needs to be redesigned. Here's how it should work:

1) Download packages for the new system
2) Use the systemd Offline Updates[2] facility to install packages

This is really simple - simple enough that it should probably be
provided by the system packaging tools themselves.

As a proof-of-concept, I've implemented it as a DNF plugin, which you
can see here[3]: https://github.com/wgwoods/dnf-plugin-fedup

This behavior could also be implemented by PackageKit, which would make
it easy to write a proper GUI.

So that's the plan: drop upgrade.img, move upgrade support into the
system packaging tools. Sometimes simpler is better.

-w

[1] For example, here are three F22 release-blockers, all caused by
upgrade.img:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185604
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209941
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207251
That first one is a nasty crash inside systemd, which led to a
mailing-list discussion[1a] where Lennart concludes that the
double-switchroot thing we're doing with upgrade.img is just not
supportable[1b]. And I totally agree.
[1a] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-March/029030.html
[1b] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-April/031013.html
[2] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/SystemUpdates/
[3] It works just fine in F21, if you're feeling brave..

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1190033] perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.19-1.fc22 FTBFS: test fails: Error: Can't locate object method BINMODE via package IO::Capture::Tie_STDx at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Catalyst/Log.pm l

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190033

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0. |perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.
   |19-2.fc23   |19-2.fc22
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-05-28 08:00:30



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.19-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1225476] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.19 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225476

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.19-1
   ||.fc23
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-05-28 08:00:36



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1222727] perl-Module-Signature-0.79 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222727



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Module-Signature-0.79-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 1222921] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.056 is available

2015-05-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222921

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.056-1.fc23 |perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.056-1.fc22
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-05-28 08:06:50



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.056-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Including tlp in Fedora Workstation by default

2015-05-28 Thread Florian Weimer
On 05/28/2015 02:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

 Actually, it *does* sound like this package might provide a way to
 mitigate that situation (single kernel). If tlp can accept a
 configuration file for what tweaks to make, then we can use the per
 -product config feature to allow us to set certain features differently
 on Workstation compared to Server/Cloud or non-product. (This would
 still probably mean shipping things like the USB autosuspend disabled,
 due to the other effects it can have).

Doesn't tuned already do something similar to this?

-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Secure boot and packaging third-party kernel modules

2015-05-28 Thread David Sommerseth

Hi,

I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for Fedora and
EPEL.  This package also contains a kernel module, which normally works
fine - until you hit Secure Boot.

So I was wondering how to handle this the best way.  AFAIK, there are
currently no plans to get the mhvtl.ko kernel module into the upstream
kernel.

Some packages (VirtualBox, IIRC) can compile the kernel module
on-the-fly if it is missing during boot.  That's an easy thing to
implement.  But for secure boot, things gets complicated as the kernel
module needs to be signed.

I've played with mokutil and the sign-file script which is in
kernel-devel, based on this article [1].  This all works fine.  I could
easily install my own key, compile the mhvtl.ko module and sign it.  And
then it was possible to load the module.

[1]
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-modules-for-secure-boot.html

It's also important to remember that kernels do get updated.  So when a
new kernel is installed, it is (to my knowledge) required to recompile
the module.  If I'm mistaken, please educate me!


My current idea to solve this is to:

* Have a preparation script which the admin is required to run
  on a new system.  This scripts generates the needed key material and
  runs mokutil which installs the key.  It will then provide enough
  information so that the admin can reboot the system and get the MOK
  key installed.

* Have a unit file which runs a ExecStartPre= script.  This script
  will check if the key material exists.  If it does, it will check
  if the mhvtl.ko module for the currently running kernel exists.
  If the module is missing, it will compile it, sign it and load it.
  Failures along the way will cause the unit file to fail all together.
  When the ExecStartPre= script has completed successfully, it will
  start the needed processes it normally would do.


Any thoughts or comments to this approach?  Anyone got a better idea?


Yes, I do know it is not good to have the keying material for the
signing too easily available.  So I'm also keen to hear ideas how to
protect the key better.  With that said, I'm planning on only providing
access to the key file to the root user only.  And I'll look into if I
can restrict the accesss even further with some SELinux rules (so only
the ExecStartPre= script can access it together with the preparation
script.

Another thought ... Are there other packages who could benefit of such a
solution if it was made more generic?  I'm willing to investigate into
this too, if there are more users out there ... Or if someone has
already done that - no need to reinvent the wheel!


--
kind regards,

David Sommerseth
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

psabata pushed to perl-File-RsyncP (epel7). release bump for rebuild

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 40cf1dad314308dad39d7c410d5aa6d0fb8b477e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:55:22 +
Subject: release bump for rebuild


diff --git a/needs.rebuild b/needs.rebuild
deleted file mode 100644
index 815fd29..000
--- a/needs.rebuild
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/FC6MassRebuild
diff --git a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
index 6765a1d..28a305e 100644
--- a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
+++ b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name: perl-File-RsyncP
 Version: 0.62
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
 Summary: A perl implementation of an Rsync client
 License: GPL
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ make test
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Sep 10 2006 Mike McGrath imli...@gmail.com - 0.62-2
+- Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jul 21 2006 Mike McGrath imli...@gmail.com - 0.62-2
 - Fixed whitespace issue and removed SMP flags on make
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-RsyncP.git/commit/?h=epel7id=40cf1dad314308dad39d7c410d5aa6d0fb8b477e
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-File-RsyncP (epel7). fix br

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 7dcfbe3a41af867bcf3541cc0ce9dbcafbee0c0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:36:37 +
Subject: fix br


diff --git a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
index 3370a91..00e3a62 100644
--- a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
+++ b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name: perl-File-RsyncP
 Version: 0.68
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}.1
 Summary: A perl implementation of an Rsync client
 License: GPLv2
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ BuildRoot: 
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 
 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
 BuildRequires: %{_bindir}/iconv
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 
 %description
 File::RsyncP is a perl implementation of an Rsync client. It is compatible with
@@ -50,6 +51,9 @@ make test
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Oct 15 2007 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 0.68-2.1
+- add BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+
 * Wed Aug 22 2007 Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com - 0.68-2
 - Rebuild for BuildID
 - License change
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-RsyncP.git/commit/?h=epel7id=7dcfbe3a41af867bcf3541cc0ce9dbcafbee0c0c
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-File-RsyncP (epel7). Rebuild and license change

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From 30ed3f5b9fa2aa54dc59078f1a04bc6d1d311408 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike McGrath mmcgr...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:25:47 +
Subject: Rebuild and license change


diff --git a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
index 6c89e56..3370a91 100644
--- a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
+++ b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 Name: perl-File-RsyncP
 Version: 0.68
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 Summary: A perl implementation of an Rsync client
-License: GPL
+License: GPLv2
 Group: Development/Libraries
 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-RsyncP/
 Source0: 
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CB/CBARRATT/File-RsyncP-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ make test
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Aug 22 2007 Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com - 0.68-2
+- Rebuild for BuildID
+- License change
+
 * Mon Jun 04 2007 Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com - 0.68-1
 - Upstream released new version
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-RsyncP.git/commit/?h=epel7id=30ed3f5b9fa2aa54dc59078f1a04bc6d1d311408
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-File-RsyncP (epel7). - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From f0fa0c06c9e90046750ea708fe00c41aec241a69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:26:45 -0600
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild


diff --git a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
index ead714e..c81cb19 100644
--- a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
+++ b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name: perl-File-RsyncP
 Version: 0.68
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 Summary: A perl implementation of an Rsync client
 License: GPLv2
 Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ make test
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 08 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.68-10
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Dec 16 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.68-9
 - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-RsyncP.git/commit/?h=epel7id=f0fa0c06c9e90046750ea708fe00c41aec241a69
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-File-RsyncP (epel7). Perl 5.18 rebuild

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From ab73d06639ade55d0468df1151e7469067a8f126 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 03:04:51 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.18 rebuild


diff --git a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
index 556d453..03d755c 100644
--- a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
+++ b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-File-RsyncP
 Version:0.70
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
 Summary:A perl implementation of an Rsync client
 License:GPLv2
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Jul 18 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.70-8
+- Perl 5.18 rebuild
+
 * Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 0.70-7
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-RsyncP.git/commit/?h=epel7id=ab73d06639ade55d0468df1151e7469067a8f126
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-File-RsyncP (epel7). Perl mass rebuild

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From ddcb627f005325f924988b9cc79c29c163e1ec16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Marcela=20Ma=C5=A1l=C3=A1=C5=88ov=C3=A1?=
 mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:57:24 +0200
Subject: Perl mass rebuild


diff --git a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
index 65fe63d..e7a10cf 100644
--- a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
+++ b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-File-RsyncP
 Version:0.70
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
 Summary:A perl implementation of an Rsync client
 License:GPLv2
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jun 17 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.70-2
+- Perl mass rebuild
+
 * Tue Apr 05 2011 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com - 0.70-1
 - 0.70 bump
 - Utilizing parallel make
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-RsyncP.git/commit/?h=epel7id=ddcb627f005325f924988b9cc79c29c163e1ec16
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-File-RsyncP (epel7). Own vendor_perl/File dirs.

2015-05-28 Thread notifications
From f0c68389a60a3b8aea5e9baf233a185691e35436 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Skytt=C3=A4?= ville.sky...@iki.fi
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:34:44 +0200
Subject: Own vendor_perl/File dirs.


diff --git a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
index e7a10cf..6646101 100644
--- a/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
+++ b/perl-File-RsyncP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-File-RsyncP
 Version:0.70
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
 Summary:A perl implementation of an Rsync client
 License:GPLv2
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -37,12 +37,14 @@ make test
 %files
 %defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc Changes LICENSE README
-%{perl_vendorarch}/File/RsyncP.pm
-%{perl_vendorarch}/File/RsyncP/
-%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/File/RsyncP/
+%{perl_vendorarch}/File/
+%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/File/
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Nov 23 2011 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi - 0.70-3
+- Own vendor_perl/File dirs.
+
 * Fri Jun 17 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.70-2
 - Perl mass rebuild
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2



http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-RsyncP.git/commit/?h=epel7id=f0c68389a60a3b8aea5e9baf233a185691e35436
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

  1   2   >