Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Certainly, but with none of the features in Btrfs actually emitting scary > "experimental" warnings anymore, and even all features working in btrfs RAID > 5/6 now, I think we should really start pushing it to more people. Or at > least develop

Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

On 23 June 2015 at 18:40, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: >> >> On 23 June 2015 at 14:15, Neal Gompa wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >>>

Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 23 June 2015 at 14:15, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >>> > >>> As I recall, Josef Bacik mentioned that he'd be pus

F23 System Wide Change: jQuery

= Proposed System Wide Change: jQuery = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/jQuery Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth jQuery is a fast, small, and feature-rich JavaScript library. It makes things like HTML document traversal and manipulation, event handling, animation, and Ajax much simple

F23 Self Contained Change: npm 2

= Proposed Self Contained Change: npm 2 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/npm2 Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth Fedora 23 features npm 2, the latest version of the package manager for node.js and other JavaScript platforms. == Detailed Description == While npm 2 is a major version n

F23 Self Contained Change: Node.js 0.12

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Node.js 0.12 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodeJS012 Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth Fedora 23 will be updated to Node.js 0.12, the latest release of the platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network ap

F23 Self Contained Change: Local Test Cloud

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Local Test Cloud = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Local_Test_Cloud Change owner(s): * Mike Ruckman * Kushal Das testcloud is a small tool to download and boot cloud images locally. == Detailed Description == testcloud was created because manually boot

F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview

= Proposed Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/iojs Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth io.js is an npm compatible platform originally based on Node.js™ that supports version 6 of the ECMAScript standard and additional features, developed wit

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

Revised Detailed Description: Fedora Netizen is an open source operating system for enabling internet citizens, also known as netizens, to engage online services and communities. Fedora Netizen includes software packages for focusing on civic engagement and internet safety features related to cybe

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

Kevin -- > Detailed Description > - > > Fedora Netizen is an open source operating system for enabling > internet citizens, also known as netizens, to engage online services > and communities. Fedora Netizen includes software packages for > focusing on civic engagement

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 End Of Life

As of 23rd of June 2015, Fedora 20 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 20. A previous reminder was sent on 27th of May [0]. Fedora 21 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after t

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:52:18 -0400 Corey Leong wrote: > I refined the the Detailed Description [1] [2] per the questions > concerning the Fedora Spin development. > > Detailed Description > - > > Fedora Netizen is an open source operating system for enabling > intern

Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

On 23 June 2015 at 14:15, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> >>> As I recall, Josef Bacik mentioned that he'd be pushing for Btrfs >>> becoming the default in Fedora 23 >>> >>> . At this point,

Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> As I recall, Josef Bacik mentioned that he'd be pushing for Btrfs >> becoming the default in Fedora 23 >> >

Re: Updating SFML to 2.3

Hi, On 06/23/2015 03:34 PM, Pranav Kant wrote: I unorphaned SFML couple of days back. I plan to update the version to latest upstream version, SFML 2.3 in f21, f22 and rawhide. Affected package : marsshooter $ repoquery --whatrequires SFML SFML-devel marsshooter To build marsshooter against la

Re: Pondering the Emacs add-on packaging situation

On 23 Jun 2015 20:06, "Neal Becker" wrote: > > The case I just fixed is a bit different - it's not something that comes > from elpa, melpa, etc., but is an add-on that was just a contributed part > that ships with mercurial. Probably many cases of emacs-foo fedora packages > are like this. > Oh,

Re: dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration

On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 18:43 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote: > I hope that GNOME Shell somehow only displays the state provided by > NM. > Bastien, please correct me if I'm wrong and please elaborate on the > details of what the functionality does (e.g. if you launch a new > browser > or so). Yes, that

Re: Self-Introduction: Mike Ruckman (roshi)

Yay, Hi Mike ;) I'm ready to help you anytime) On Tue, Jun 23, 2015, 2:37 AM Mike Ruckman wrote: > Hey devel list! > > I'm Mike (mostly known as roshi on freenode) and I'd like to become a > packager. I don't have much experience (outside of local scratch builds > to test fixes) with packaging,

Re: Pondering the Emacs add-on packaging situation

The case I just fixed is a bit different - it's not something that comes from elpa, melpa, etc., but is an add-on that was just a contributed part that ships with mercurial. Probably many cases of emacs-foo fedora packages are like this. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > As I recall, Josef Bacik mentioned that he'd be pushing for Btrfs > becoming the default in Fedora 23 > > > . At this point, I'm personally convinced that it is certainl

Pondering the Emacs add-on packaging situation

Hi, So, while filing a bunch of bugs against packages not complying with the Emacs add-on packaging guidelines, I started to think about the state of add-ons for Emacs [1]. Since those guidelines were put in place, Emacs has grown its own package manager (package.el, shipped with Emacs[2]), and n

Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Neal Gompa gmail.com> writes: > >> As I recall, Josef Bacik mentioned that he'd be pushing for Btrfs becoming > the default in Fedora 23. At this point, I'm personally convinced that it is > certainly ready and doable for F23. >> >> Perhaps

Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

Neal Gompa gmail.com> writes: > As I recall, Josef Bacik mentioned that he'd be pushing for Btrfs becoming the default in Fedora 23. At this point, I'm personally convinced that it is certainly ready and doable for F23. > > Perhaps other guys with more experience on this stuff could chime in wit

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:25:20 -0400 Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Standardized_passphrase_policy > > Um... how is this Self Contained? If we

Re: libscrypt versions on koji

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:35:26PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:34:10 +0300 > Beat Küng wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I did scratch builds on koji for f21 [1], f22 [2] & f23 [3]. On f22 > > the build fails because of an older version of libscrypt. According > > to the root.log, the

dnssec-trigger + GNOME + NetworkManager integration

Hi all. I would like to start a new fresh discussion where we can hopefully converge towards successful integration of default DNS resolver with NetworkManager on Fedora Workstation (GNOME). I think there are (at least) two major issues that need to be resolved: - system-wide Captive Portal detec

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Standardized_passphrase_policy Um... how is this Self Contained? If we're creating a standardized distro wide policy, it is by definiti

Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

Hey all, Over the last few months (since Fedora 22 beta's release), I've been using Btrfs as my daily driver filesystem across a multitude of machines. After Fedora 22 released, I tried it with RAID 5 and RAID 6 enabled on a few machines with fantastic success (there aren't even any scary warnings

rawhide report: 20150623 changes

Compose started at Tue Jun 23 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [amqp] 1:amqp-devel-1.0-1.20150622svn1686756.fc23.noarch requires amqp = 0:1.0-1.20150622svn1686756.fc23 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch

F23 Self Contained Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Standardized_passphrase_policy Change owner(s): * Kevin Fenzi * David Cantrell * Tomas Mraz Currently a number of places ask users to set passphrases/passwords. Some of them enforce some

Re: Heads up: OCaml 4.02.2+rc1 coming to Rawhide

OCaml 4.02.2 (final) has been released, so I will update to this. This will not require any kind of mass rebuild this time, since it's basically identical to the release candidate. So this will go out as a compatible update to the base 'ocaml' package. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Gr

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

Am 23.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Radek Holy: So, to fix it, the "Requires:" should be e.g. "/usr/bin/python". See also https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Guidelines&oldid=413629#Effect_of_the_UsrMove_Fedora_Feature that's a nice writing BUT Fedora decided later to make thes

Re: Latest syslinux build breaks Rawhide images: any help figuring out why?

On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 08:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 08:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > this started happening when the F23 rebuild of syslinux landed - > > 6.03 > > -4.fc23. Prior to that, the attempt to rebuild it for the hardening > > change - which would

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

- Original Message - > From: "Radek Holy" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: ndbeck...@gmail.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 5:47:10 PM > Subject: Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python) > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michael Šimáč

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

- Original Message - > From: "Michael Šimáček" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , ndbeck...@gmail.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 3:58:49 PM > Subject: Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python) > > On 2015-06-23 13:21, Neal Becker wrote: > > I updated mercu

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-06-24)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-06-24 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets belo

Re: Latest syslinux build breaks Rawhide images: any help figuring out why?

On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 08:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > this started happening when the F23 rebuild of syslinux landed - 6.03 > -4.fc23. Prior to that, the attempt to rebuild it for the hardening > change - which would have been 6.03-4.fc23 - failed, so the previous > build was 6.02-2.fc22 ,

Latest syslinux build breaks Rawhide images: any help figuring out why?

Hi, folks. We have a serious issue with Rawhide (F23) images at present: syslinux is broken. This means all the images fail to boot when syslinux is used as the bootloader (they do boot when grub is used, i.e. when booting via UEFI). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234653 this starte

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 23.06.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Josh Boyer: >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 23.06.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Michael Šimáček: DNF cannot resolve provides that look like file path:

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot

perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.67-6.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.67-6.fc23.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLpl

Broken dependencies: perl-Test-AutoBuild

perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1

perl-Flickr-API license change

With perl-Flickr-API-1.13-1.fc23 build comes new license. It was Artistic 2.0. It's GPL+ or Artistic now. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

Am 23.06.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Josh Boyer: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 23.06.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Michael Šimáček: DNF cannot resolve provides that look like file path: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223478 Priority "Low" - seriously? It is

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 23.06.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Michael Šimáček: >> >> DNF cannot resolve provides that look like file path: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223478 > > > Priority "Low" - seriously? It is probably worth pointing out that th

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

Am 23.06.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Michael Šimáček: DNF cannot resolve provides that look like file path: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223478 Priority "Low" - seriously? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

On 2015-06-23 13:21, Neal Becker wrote: I updated mercurial to mercurial-3.4.1-1 and did a fedpkg push. Now I tried a local build, and tried to locally install, but I got: sudo dnf install x86_64/*3.4.1* [sudo] password for nbecker: Last metadata expiration check performed 0:22:21 ago on Tue J

Re: libscrypt versions on koji

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:34:10 +0300 Beat Küng wrote: > Hi > > I did scratch builds on koji for f21 [1], f22 [2] & f23 [3]. On f22 > the build fails because of an older version of libscrypt. According > to the root.log, the 3 versions are: 1.20-1.fc21, 1.19-3.fc22, > 1.20-2.fc23. Is there a reason

Updating SFML to 2.3

I unorphaned SFML couple of days back. I plan to update the version to latest upstream version, SFML 2.3 in f21, f22 and rawhide. Affected package : marsshooter $ repoquery --whatrequires SFML SFML-devel marsshooter To build marsshooter against latest SFML, a small patch is required. My sponsor M

Re: Puppet 4

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Michael Stahnke wrote: > As a point of moderation, we could probably break out the FHS/stateless > discussion into its own thread, as at this point this has nearly nothing to > do with Puppet. Good point. Let me circle it back around: It seems reasonable for a m

libscrypt versions on koji

Hi I did scratch builds on koji for f21 [1], f22 [2] & f23 [3]. On f22 the build fails because of an older version of libscrypt. According to the root.log, the 3 versions are: 1.20-1.fc21, 1.19-3.fc22, 1.20-2.fc23. Is there a reason why f22 uses an older version? There is an open bug request [4]

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

On 23 June 2015 at 12:21, Neal Becker wrote: > Also, can someone please confirm that I correctly took care of > obsoleting the mercurial-emacs{-el} as per: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs Thanks for doing this. I checked the spec file, and the obsoletes/provides look correct. H

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

On 23.6.2015 13:21, Neal Becker wrote: > I updated mercurial to mercurial-3.4.1-1 and did a fedpkg push. > > Now I tried a local build, and tried to locally install, but I got: > sudo dnf install x86_64/*3.4.1* > [sudo] password for nbecker: > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:22:21 ago

Re: need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

Am 23.06.2015 um 13:21 schrieb Neal Becker: I updated mercurial to mercurial-3.4.1-1 and did a fedpkg push. Now I tried a local build, and tried to locally install, but I got: sudo dnf install x86_64/*3.4.1* [sudo] password for nbecker: Last metadata expiration check performed 0:22:21 ago on

need rpm help (nothing provides /bin/python)

I updated mercurial to mercurial-3.4.1-1 and did a fedpkg push. Now I tried a local build, and tried to locally install, but I got: sudo dnf install x86_64/*3.4.1* [sudo] password for nbecker: Last metadata expiration check performed 0:22:21 ago on Tue Jun 23 06:57:18 2015. Error: nothing provi

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Cloud Systemd Networkd

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > I know this is a little off-topic, but why don't we use systemd-networkd in > Fedora proper as a replacement for the ifcfg scripts when NetworkManager > isn't desired? Or at least provide it as an alternative option to > NetworkManager and ifcf

Self Introduction: Jon Kerr Nilsen

Hi all, As suggested in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Introduce_yourself I'd like to introduce myself. I'm

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Cloud Systemd Networkd

I know this is a little off-topic, but why don't we use systemd-networkd in Fedora proper as a replacement for the ifcfg scripts when NetworkManager isn't desired? Or at least provide it as an alternative option to NetworkManager and ifcfg scripts in general? On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Jan K

Fedora 23 Bugzilla Rawhide rebase

Greetings, This e-mail is intended to inform you about the upcoming Bugzilla changes happening 2015-July-14 (Rawhide bug rebase) and what you need to do, if anything. We will be automatically changing the version for most rawhide bugs to Fedora 23. This will result in regular bugs reported agai

Change Checkpoint: Proposals submission deadline is today

Hi everyone! Today is the last day/chance to submit your system wide changes for Fedora 23 [1]! Your proposed change has to be at least in "Ready for Wrangler" state. For policies, check out [2]. Empty template is available at [3]. All changes approved so far are available on the ChangeSet [4] w