On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:20:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
a web client is not allowed to say hey, i have a /jquery.js in the
cache from application A and re-use it for application B because
that would be *easy* attack vector
If only this was possible ...
On 06/30/2015 09:12 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote:
netty31 orphan 2 weeks ago
As far as I can tell only one package directly depended on netty31:
gradle. That dependency was actually a bug (gradle should build-require
netty3 instead of netty31)
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Proc-Fork (f21) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Proc-Fork/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Proc-Fork (master)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Proc-Fork/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Proc-Fork (f22) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Proc-Fork/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Proc-Fork (f22) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Proc-Fork/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From 6ff6c57affce25c07e6be16f0bcc504e31183bf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:39:30 +0200
Subject: Initial import
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..e507c2f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Il 30/06/2015 10:13, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
Didn't even know it was happening. Where was it announced? Rich.
On
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
and
annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Dist-Metadata
(master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Dist-Metadata/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 07:00:05AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jan Kurik jku...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings, all!
The elections for FESCo - June 2015 have concluded, and the results
are shown below.
FESCo is electing 4 seats this time.
A total of 90
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Dist-Metadata (f22)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Dist-Metadata/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Il 29/06/2015 20:32, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
that may be true but you hardly can sell DNF as improvement if you
need such workarounds while YUM worked perfectly for many years while
working around the package manager in general should be avoided
because no longs, no dependency solving and
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Dist-Metadata
(master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Dist-Metadata/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Dist-Metadata (f21)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Dist-Metadata/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
Il 30/06/2015 10:13, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
Didn't even know it was happening. Where was it announced? Rich.
On
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
and
annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I don't read those that
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Proc-Fork (f21) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Proc-Fork/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar created the branch 'f22' for the package 'perl-Proc-Fork'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Proc-Fork/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar created the branch 'f21' for the package 'perl-Proc-Fork'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Proc-Fork/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Proc-Fork (master) to
'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Proc-Fork/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
From: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 10:19:46 AM
Subject: Re: FESCO Elections - June 2015 - Results
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Germano
4675e7c5a3a5465c0dee08197bdcc7ee MooseX-Configuration-0.02.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MooseX-Configuration/MooseX-Configuration-0.02.tar.gz/md5/4675e7c5a3a5465c0dee08197bdcc7ee/MooseX-Configuration-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From ae05c865316fae5e25c3f164b478375f57e4499a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:08:03 +0200
Subject: Import
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..12b98b7 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1
ppisar created the branch 'f21' for the package 'perl-Dist-Metadata'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Dist-Metadata/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar created the branch 'f22' for the package 'perl-Dist-Metadata'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Dist-Metadata/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Dist-Metadata (f21)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Dist-Metadata/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
ppisar changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Dist-Metadata (f22)
to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Dist-Metadata/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
* Richard W.M. Jones [30/06/2015 09:13] :
Didn't even know it was happening. Where was it announced?
The devel-announce mailing list, Fedora Magazine, the planet, ...
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
OK we have been seeing reports of this problem but never enough data
to pin down what of many problems it could be. Patrick Uiterwijk has
written a script which if people could check and run it will help us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237387
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10256313
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Can I rebuild python-request-ftp from source on RHEL 6/7 from the fedora
22 SRPM?
Didn't read carefully. I see you are using pip to install. Ok. Can do first
thing in the morning when I'm back on that network. I'll test it on RHEL 6
and 7.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237371
Bug ID: 1237371
Summary: perl-CDB_File-0.98 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CDB_File
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237371
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
cmd: spectool -g /var/tmp/thn-Z2FPbc/perl-CDB_File.spec
return code: 22
stdout:
Getting
Pratyush,
Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we can get help
from Fedora experts.
Summary the problem:
Latest kexec-tools koji build in rawhide results in a wrong kexec binary,
kexec load fails with something like below:
R_X86_64_29
Unhandled rela relocation: R_X86_64_29
Change the subject a bit..
On 07/01/15 at 08:36am, Dave Young wrote:
Pratyush,
Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we can get help
from Fedora experts.
Summary the problem:
Latest kexec-tools koji build in rawhide results in a wrong kexec binary,
kexec load fails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237374
Bug ID: 1237374
Summary: perl-Coro-6.46 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Coro
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237374
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1044813
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1044813action=edit
[patch] Update to 6.46 (#1237374)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237374
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10256009
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237387
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1044845
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1044845action=edit
[patch] Update to 0.031 (#1237387)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237387
Bug ID: 1237387
Summary: perl-Test-Moose-More-0.031 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Moose-More
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Pá, 2015-06-26 at 14:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:21:02 -0400
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
But passwords and passphrases are not all the same shape or color -
the requirements for a password you want to use for ssh login over the
internet are quite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237116
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1044671
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1044671action=edit
[patch] Update to 3.8 (#1237116)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237116
Bug ID: 1237116
Summary: perl-Compress-LZF-3.8 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Compress-LZF
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
From 08bce97105941eb88eb815b7f1adabc33102c70b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rafael Fonseca rdoss...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:05:23 +0200
Subject: - Fix tests on big endian machines (#1235709)
diff --git a/perl-Glib-1.310-bigendian.patch b/perl-Glib-1.310-bigendian.patch
new file
- Original Message -
snip
No, it is not. It is opt-in now, we want it by default. Please read the
change. Thank you.
I don't see any options about it in GNOME's Network panel. I'm not interested
in integration as an after-thought.
I think it best to stop this dead-end discussion
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 26.06.2015 17:13, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 18:43 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Hey, I was out for a week, so this may be a bit of a late reply.
As Michael and Bastien already stated, all the GNOME networking UI
relies on information
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some attacker's.
The insecure mode means that you are vulnerable in the same way as the
On 30.06.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some attacker's.
The insecure mode means that
On 30.6.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some attacker's.
The insecure mode means that
On 30.06.2015 13:46, Stef Walter wrote:
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 26.06.2015 17:13, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 18:43 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Hey, I was out for a week, so this may be a bit of a late reply.
As Michael and Bastien already stated, all the
- Original Message -
On 30.6.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some
On 30.06.2015 13:58, Stef Walter wrote:
On 30.06.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237117
Bug ID: 1237117
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.26 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237123
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
spectool was unable to grab new sources
old source: Encode-2.74.tar.gz
old sha256:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237123
Bug ID: 1237123
Summary: perl-Encode-2.75 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Encode
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
With host kernel 4.2.0-0.rc0.git1.1.fc23.x86_64:
- KVM is broken (RHBZ#1236753)
- gnome-shell segfaults all the time (RHBZ#1237060)
Reverting back to 4.1.0-1.fc23 fixes both problems.
Please try
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237116
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10252532
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On 30.06.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should be connected to, but instead by some attacker's.
The insecure mode means that
From 58e454933fdb786ec3fabafdbef1caa44820d1e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rafael Fonseca rdoss...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:05:23 +0200
Subject: - Fix tests on big endian machines (#1235709)
diff --git a/perl-Glib-1.310-bigendian.patch b/perl-Glib-1.310-bigendian.patch
new file
On 30.06.2015 14:11, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 13:53, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 30.06.2015 11:24, Tomas Hozza wrote:
snip
It means that the site of your bank you are on may not be provided the
actual host you should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235709
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Glib-1.310-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Glib-1.310-2.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
On 30.06.2015 14:37, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
snip
No, it is not. It is opt-in now, we want it by default. Please read the
change. Thank you.
I don't see any options about it in GNOME's Network panel. I'm not interested
in integration as an after-thought.
From 11454e58d15bfc6796b03a1c4ebb2c2b44b32953 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:42:08 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.16
- New upstream release 0.16
- Fix regexp of _gcc_version for Ubuntu and Debian
- Set -std=c99 explicitly for older GCC
51fcf4af2f6b31b4eb90435615ace2bc Module-Build-XSUtil-0.16.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Module-Build-XSUtil/Module-Build-XSUtil-0.16.tar.gz/md5/51fcf4af2f6b31b4eb90435615ace2bc/Module-Build-XSUtil-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 11454e58d15bfc6796b03a1c4ebb2c2b44b32953 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:42:08 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.16
- New upstream release 0.16
- Fix regexp of _gcc_version for Ubuntu and Debian
- Set -std=c99 explicitly for older GCC
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:47:34AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
With host kernel 4.2.0-0.rc0.git1.1.fc23.x86_64:
- KVM is broken (RHBZ#1236753)
- gnome-shell segfaults all the time (RHBZ#1237060)
Reverting
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:21:47PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:47:34AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
With host kernel 4.2.0-0.rc0.git1.1.fc23.x86_64:
- KVM is broken
From 37510699ed2e58f35b32bf69d0fbeb2c6c3d0728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:00:40 +0200
Subject: Upstream update.
- Remove bundled modules.
- Modernize spec.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
94305bfe4b296da1cc999f8cb89ae504 Regexp-Common-net-CIDR-0.03.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Regexp-Common-net-CIDR/Regexp-Common-net-CIDR-0.03.tar.gz/md5/94305bfe4b296da1cc999f8cb89ae504/Regexp-Common-net-CIDR-0.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Compose started at Tue Jun 30 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[airsched]
airsched-1.00.0-12.fc23.i686 requires libzmq.so.4
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
Hi dear developers,
after upgrading to tb-38.0.1, thunderbird-lightning-3.3-5.fc22.x86_64
has been obsoleted (as the formus are telling), but still the addons
manager of tb shows lightning as installed extension which can be
activated and removed.
Because I thougt that tb-lighning is now
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:47:34AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
With host kernel 4.2.0-0.rc0.git1.1.fc23.x86_64:
- KVM is broken (RHBZ#1236753)
- gnome-shell segfaults all the time (RHBZ#1237060)
Reverting
I understand that as a request to write some simple how-to-use
document
for libpwquality and not a request to drop it altogether and use
instead ... what?
Note also that libpwquality is highly configurable and for things
that
can not be configured currently a configuration can be easily
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046006
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
On Jun 28, 2015 11:39 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 29.6.2015 v 06:13 Dave Johansen napsal(a):
I would like to start providing the latest version of ODB in a COPR for
stable releases of Fedora and RHEL. Is there a
best practice for this sort of thing?
The main question
With host kernel 4.2.0-0.rc0.git1.1.fc23.x86_64:
- KVM is broken (RHBZ#1236753)
- gnome-shell segfaults all the time (RHBZ#1237060)
Reverting back to 4.1.0-1.fc23 fixes both problems.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming
It doesn't need updating, the error you're seeing is:
DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space for 65536 bytes at device :09:00.1
Which I reported upstream here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/32629
but which didn't get any answers.
You can test the work-around there though.
Cheers
-
From ad40e2926eef8af84b8e3fd13811bfde51a7dd18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:26:38 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.06
- New upstream release 0.06
- More strict C99 check code
- Fix for older GCC( 5.0)
diff --git
From fb127dbff4b018ad995acf0257dbef08e859f346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 07:09:13 +0200
Subject: Rebuild against pl-7.2.2
diff --git a/perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi.spec b/perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi.spec
index
e6ed28199c0cb423516b88a0698db0ec Encode-2.75.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Encode/Encode-2.75.tar.gz/md5/e6ed28199c0cb423516b88a0698db0ec/Encode-2.75.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 86540dd7d0bcdaff0784a032b1a83a7c592549dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 07:22:03 +0200
Subject: 2.75 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1a02621..b658c41 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -21,3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237123
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Encode-2.75-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=666253
--
You are receiving this mail because:
From 3918c36144b45865deac34d31501823b3679b696 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 07:22:03 +0200
Subject: 2.75 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1a02621..b658c41 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -21,3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237123
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
From 2647eea8f936ea1062ca156daf8a971713485086 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 07:22:03 +0200
Subject: 2.75 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1a02621..b658c41 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -21,3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237123
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Encode-2.75-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-2.75-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237123
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Encode-2.75-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-2.75-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
e4850cb9257ee254910e2136cd8e4fc2 Test-Moose-More-0.031.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Moose-More/Test-Moose-More-0.031.tar.gz/md5/e4850cb9257ee254910e2136cd8e4fc2/Test-Moose-More-0.031.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
2cfab94d57c6508918bec360d1b08985 Coro-6.46.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Coro/Coro-6.46.tar.gz/md5/2cfab94d57c6508918bec360d1b08985/Coro-6.46.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 5a0ee354ebad0717d39d662b29bbe91644616837 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 07:53:09 +0200
Subject: 6.46 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 130297b..0e93ccd 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -22,3
On 30.06.2015 16:07, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 11:24 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
The thing is that some information are unrelated to NM. There is no
reason to push all information back to NetworkManager, since its role
is
explicitly defined - manage network connections and
Am 30.06.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Ahmad Samir:
IIUC, what's happening here is that they bundle the extension with
Thunderbird 38 so it's installed and enabled by default; so when you
create a new Thunderbird profile,
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 11:24 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
The thing is that some information are unrelated to NM. There is no
reason to push all information back to NetworkManager, since its role
is
explicitly defined - manage network connections and leave the DNS
resolution and configuration up
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 14:23 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Except that this is exactly what we DON'T want to do. DNSSEC is an
extension of DNS and it can be used even without the need for the
whole
Internet to be signed. We want to use it even if the network-provided
DNS resolvers don't support
On 30.06.2015 16:07, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 14:23 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Except that this is exactly what we DON'T want to do. DNSSEC is an
extension of DNS and it can be used even without the need for the
whole
Internet to be signed. We want to use it even if
With the DNSSEC feature enabled as per the testing instructions, I'm
sometimes (but not always) getting failures for popular geek blog Boing
Boing, when public DNS still works:
$ host boingboing.net
Host boingboing.net not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
$ host boingboing.net 8.8.8.8
Using domain
On 30 June 2015 at 15:16, Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
Hi dear developers,
after upgrading to tb-38.0.1, thunderbird-lightning-3.3-5.fc22.x86_64
has been obsoleted (as the formus are telling), but still the addons
manager of tb shows lightning as installed extension
On 30 June 2015 at 17:22, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 30.06.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Ahmad Samir:
IIUC, what's happening here is that they bundle the extension with
Thunderbird 38 so it's installed and enabled by default; so when you
create a new Thunderbird profile,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 06:44:41PM +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
Please file a bug against dnssec-trigger. It will be better for
getting additional information. Also please see the reply by Paul
Wouters to your previous email.
Oh hey. I forgot that I posted this already, and didn't see the reply.
On 30.06.2015 17:07, Matthew Miller wrote:
With the DNSSEC feature enabled as per the testing instructions, I'm
sometimes (but not always) getting failures for popular geek blog Boing
Boing, when public DNS still works:
$ host boingboing.net
Host boingboing.net not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
