[Bug 1240964] New: Environment file not read on EL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240964 Bug ID: 1240964 Summary: Environment file not read on EL7 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: fusioninventory-agent Assignee: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: ke...@famillecousin.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: maria...@tuxette.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: OPTION Variable not exist in Environmnent File /etc/sysconfig/fusioninventory-agent cat /etc/sysconfig/fusioninventory-agent # # Fusion Inventory Agent Configuration File # used by hourly cron job and service launcher to override the fusioninventory-agent.cfg setup. # # DONT FORGET to enable the service ! # # Add tools directory if needed (tw_cli, hpacucli, ipssend, ...) PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin # Global options (debug for verbose log, rpc-trust-localhost for yum-plugin) FUSINVOPT=--debug cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/fusioninventory-agent.service [Unit] Description=FusionInventory agent After=syslog.target network.target [Service] EnvironmentFile=-/etc/sysconfig/fusioninventory-agent Type=forking ExecStart=/usr/bin/fusioninventory-agent --daemon --pidfile /var/run/fusioninventory-agent.pid $OPTIONS [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target [Service] EnvironmentFile=-/etc/sysconfig/fusioninventory-agent Type=forking ExecStart=/usr/bin/fusioninventory-agent --daemon --pidfile /var/run/fusioninventory-agent.pid $OPTIONS Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.3.16-2.el7 I need to change the /etc/sysconfig/fusioninventory-agent from FUSINVOPT=--debug to OPTIONS=--debug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1240971] New: Please provide EPEL7 build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240971 Bug ID: 1240971 Summary: Please provide EPEL7 build Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: perl-Perl-Critic Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: jaroslaw.po...@cern.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rob.my...@gtri.gatech.edu perl-Perl-Critic is available from EPEL5 and EPEL6: please provide a build for EPEL7 too.. Thanks Jarek -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1240862] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240862 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Gith ||ubMeta-0.54-1.fc23 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-07-08 05:46:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
psabata pushed to perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta (master). 0.54 bump
From 580b570fcedee410e5a4814d61cab1d3f3ec5859 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:45:56 +0200
Subject: 0.54 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index da5ebbd..aa3432e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.50.tar.gz
/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.52.tar.gz
+/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta.spec
b/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta.spec
index 2facfbf..e96c110 100644
--- a/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta.spec
+++ b/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta
-Version:0.52
+Version:0.54
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Automatically include GitHub meta information in META.yml
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ URL:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BI/BINGOS/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
# Build
+BuildRequires: make
BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.76
BuildRequires: perl(strict)
@@ -58,6 +59,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 08 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.54-1
+- 0.54 bump
+
* Sun Jun 21 2015 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.52-1
- 0.52 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6c0ae10..1c14048 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-0072cc6fb032bedbb52ab6269b8f28bb Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.52.tar.gz
+274261d3120813486c2a9756ddf6f304 Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz
--
cgit v0.10.2
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta.git/commit/?h=masterid=580b570fcedee410e5a4814d61cab1d3f3ec5859
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-BeginLift
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20 On armhfp: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.20 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20 On armhfp: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.20 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1240964] Environment file not read on EL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240964 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj |maria...@tuxette.fr |ect.org | --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- It seems Marianne is the de facto maintainer here. Re-assigning. Why this package is owned by perl-sig is a mystery to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Gtk3
perl-Gtk3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On i386: perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On armhfp: perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Test-Vars
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp: perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Task-Catalyst
perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp: perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Gtk3-WebKit
perl-Gtk3-WebKit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-FindRef
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20 On armhfp: perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.20 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20 On armhfp: perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.20 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Method-Signatures
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On i386: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On armhfp: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-CatalystX-REPL
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp: perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: polymake
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20 On armhfp: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.armv7hl requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.20 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Test-Apocalypse
perl-Test-Apocalypse has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.006-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On i386: perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.006-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On armhfp: perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.006-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20 On armhfp: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.20 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Test-AutoBuild
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp: perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MongoDB
perl-MongoDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386: perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20 On armhfp: perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.20 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Carp-REPL
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) On i386: perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) On armhfp: perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-POE-API-Peek
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Perl CFLAGS and LDFLAGS change
Hello Perl hackers.
You could read
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/208954 about poor
implementation of Fedora 23 hardening feature.
It turned out that perl is broken too. Fortunately, only /usr/bin/perl is
broken. Not the libperl.so or any other XS modules. This issue is known as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804.
Playing with perl's Configure arguments shows different options are used at
different places and the best configuration looks like this (from perl.spec):
-/bin/sh Configure -des -Doptimize=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS \
--Dccdlflags=-Wl,--enable-new-dtags \
--Dlddlflags=-shared $RPM_OPT_FLAGS $RPM_LD_FLAGS \
+# ldflags is not used when linking XS modules.
+# Only ldflags is used when linking miniperl.
+# Only ccflags and ldflags are used for Configure's compiler checks.
+# Set optimize=none to prevent from injecting upstream's value.
+/bin/sh Configure -des \
+-Doptimize=none \
+-Dccflags=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS \
+-Dldflags=$RPM_LD_FLAGS \
+-Dccdlflags=-Wl,--enable-new-dtags $RPM_LD_FLAGS \
+-Dlddlflags=-shared $RPM_LD_FLAGS \
I tested this change locally and everything looks better then before.
Also this change makes other Perl packages' Makefile.PL's OPTIMIZE argument
redundant. Please also note the Build.PL's optimize argument is completly
ignored by Build.PL.
After sub-packaging some core modules, I will push this change into Fedora 23
only. I believe it does not break anything that does not have broken build
script. I did tests on architecture-specific packages perl-B-Utils (drivern by
ExtUtils::MakeMaker) and perl-PerlIO-Layers (driven by Module::Build).
You can use this simple script to verify you ELFs links as bind-now:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
while () {
chomp;
my $f = $_;
if (-f $f and -x $f and `file $f` =~ /ELF/) {
my $ok = `eu-readelf -d $f` =~ /BIND_NOW/;
print $ok ? q{OK} : q{BAD}, qq{\t$f\n};
}
}
Feed it with list of files to check.
Thus no other Perl mass rebuild is needed. I will check all the executables
procuduced from Perl packags after next perl weekly scratch rebuild. I also
think you still can use the OPTIMIZE and optimize arguments to Makefile.PL and
Build.PL in your packages. They are not harmfull. We can evaluate they removal
in the future.
I'd like to hear any critics.
-- Petr
pgprAlNpH3oRD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-07-07)
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. Package(co)maintainers Status Change === ScrollZ orphan, vicodan 2 weeks ago apache-poiorphan, gil, orion 0 weeks ago blahtexml orphan 9 weeks ago cumin orphan, croberts, matt, tmckay 2 weeks ago ekg orphan, karlik 2 weeks ago ekg2 orphan, karlik 2 weeks ago elementaryorphan, spot, vicodan 2 weeks ago epic5 orphan, stefanok, vicodan 2 weeks ago fwbuilder orphan, till5 weeks ago gksu-polkit orphan, slaanesh, vicodan 2 weeks ago gmyth orphan, vicodan 2 weeks ago gtkperf orphan, vicodan 2 weeks ago gvrpcdorphan 9 weeks ago ha-jdbc orphan 3 weeks ago javanotes orphan 1 weeks ago jericho-html orphan, gil 2 weeks ago jgroups212orphan 3 weeks ago jsilver orphan 3 weeks ago kde-plasma-redshift orphan, lupinix 0 weeks ago ldd-pdf orphan 1 weeks ago libgnomecups orphan, ajax, alexl, caillon, 2 weeks ago caolanm, group::gnome-sig, hadess, johnp, mbarnes, rhughes, rstrode, ssp, vicodan, xiphmont libindicator orphan, echevemaster, jspaleta, 2 weeks ago vicodan mate-dialogs orphan, raveit65, rdieter, stefanok,2 weeks ago vicodan mule orphan, tspauld98 3 weeks ago ovirt-nodeorphan, apevec, fabiand, jboggs,6 weeks ago pmyers python-pbsorphan 5 weeks ago python-sgutilsorphan, grover 0 weeks ago python-sysv_ipc orphan 1 weeks ago python-xhtml2pdf orphan 0 weeks ago rubygem-inifile orphan, mcpierce3 weeks ago rubygem-mgorphan, mcpierce3 weeks ago rubygem-rack-mountorphan, vondruch1 weeks ago rubygem-regin orphan, vondruch1 weeks ago rubygem-wirbleorphan, maxamillion, mcpierce 3 weeks ago vios-proxyorphan, mcpierce3 weeks ago The following packages require above mentioned packages: Depending on: apache-poi (64), status change: 2015-07-06 (0 weeks ago) dbunit (maintained by: gil) dbunit-2.5.0-4.fc23.src requires mvn(org.apache.poi:poi) = 3.10.1 jasperreports (maintained by: gil, java-sig, msrb) jasperreports-4.0.2-14.fc23.src requires apache-poi = 3.10.1-3.fc23 jtnef (maintained by: orion) jtnef-1.8.0-5.fc23.noarch requires apache-poi = 3.10.1-3.fc23 jtnef-1.8.0-5.fc23.src requires apache-poi = 3.10.1-3.fc23 solr (maintained by: gil, java-sig) solr-4.10.4-1.fc23.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.poi:poi) = 3.10.1, mvn(org.apache.poi:poi-ooxml) = 3.10.1, mvn(org.apache.poi:poi-ooxml-schemas) = 3.10.1, mvn(org.apache.poi:poi-scratchpad) = 3.10.1 springframework (maintained by: msrb, gil) springframework-3.2.14-2.fc23.src requires mvn(org.apache.poi:poi) = 3.10.1 tika (maintained by: gil, java-sig) tika-1.5-6.fc23.src requires
[ANN] Release of Bugzilla 5.0
Today the Bugzilla Project is extremely proud to announce the release of Bugzilla 5.0, the most exciting new version of Bugzilla in our history. It has been slightly over two years since we released Bugzilla 4.4 in May of 2013. This new major release comes with many new features and improvements to WebServices and performance. Bugzilla 5.0 is our best release ever, and we hope that you enjoy and appreciate the results of these last two years of hard work by our entirely-volunteer community. Please note that the release of Bugzilla 5.0 also marks End Of Life for the Bugzilla 4.0 series, meaning that there will be no further updates for the 4.0.x series, even if there are serious security issues found in that series. We recommend that all installations running the 4.0 series upgrade as soon as possible to 5.0. Download Bugzilla is available at: https://www.bugzilla.org/download/ Release Notes Changes --- Before installing or upgrading, you should read the Release Notes for this version of Bugzilla: https://www.bugzilla.org/releases/5.0/release-notes.html It is VERY IMPORTANT to read the Release Notes if you are upgrading from one major version to another (such as 4.4.x to 5.0). To see a list of all changes between your version of Bugzilla and the current version of Bugzilla, you can use the chart at: https://www.bugzilla.org/status/changes.html The Bugzilla Update --- You can see the latest updates from the Bugzilla Project and the status of Bugzilla development on The Bugzilla Update: https://bugzillaupdate.wordpress.com/ Also, you can follow the Bugzilla Project on Twitter for frequent updates on new features being developed in Bugzilla, our current release plans, and much more: https://twitter.com/#!/bugzilla Report Bugs --- If you find a bug in Bugzilla, please report it! Instructions are at this URL: https://www.bugzilla.org/developers/reporting_bugs.html Support --- You can ask questions for free on the mailing lists (or in IRC) about Bugzilla, or you can hire a paid consultant to help you out: Free Support: https://www.bugzilla.org/support/ Paid Support: https://www.bugzilla.org/support/consulting.html About Bugzilla -- Bugzilla is a Defect Tracking System or Bug-Tracking System. Defect Tracking Systems allow individuals or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being free, Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack. Consequently, Bugzilla has quickly become a favorite of thousands of organizations across the globe, and is widely regarded as one of the top defect-tracking systems available. See https://www.bugzilla.org/about/ for more details. -- David Lawrence Release Manager, Bugzilla Project - To view or change your list settings, click here: http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=bugzilla-ow...@fedoraproject.org -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Re: octave 4.0.0
On Tuesday 07 July 2015 23:44:03 Kevin Kofler wrote: I am one of the comaintainers of the qtoctave package. I know the package is dead upstream. But last I checked, it worked. (There had been some issues, but I fixed those that I found.) If it still works fine, I object to retiring it. That said, I admit I haven't had the occasion to try the new Octave GUI yet. It may or may not be an adequate replacement for all users. Kevin Kofler Please note octave FAQ http://wiki.octave.org/FAQ#Why_did_you_create_yet_another_GUI_instead_of_making_one_that_already_exists_better.3F In this case the important thing is the last (and a half) paragraph: Also, many bits from QtOctave were reused in the GUI. QtOctave was a great and very useful tool. It looked beautiful and we are thankful to its developers for working on such a nice tool. However, it would have never been stable as it was. But most of all, the developers made it free software so we could reuse large chunks of it which were incorporated in what is now the Octave GUI. Notice also that the octave GUI, that is now the default, was also released for version 3.8 more than 1.5 years ago in that in my usage, I use it in classes, it is more stable than qtoctave ever was. Before that I have used qtoctave so I am aware of the problems presented by qtoctave. As Orion says the octave GUI is based on Qt (IIRC it supports both version 4 and 5). Regards, -- José Abílio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1240964] Environment file not read on EL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240964 Kevin Cousin ke...@famillecousin.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|Unspecified |x86_64 OS|Unspecified |Linux Severity|unspecified |medium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1240971] Please provide EPEL7 build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240971 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-07-08 05:42:28 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- perl-Perl-Critic-1.118-5.el7 is available in RHEL-7 and CentOS 7, so is not needed (and indeed not allowed) in EPEL-7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
psabata uploaded Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz for perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta
274261d3120813486c2a9756ddf6f304 Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz/md5/274261d3120813486c2a9756ddf6f304/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Re: octave 4.0.0
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:51 PM, José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote: Please note octave FAQ http://wiki.octave.org/FAQ#Why_did_you_create_yet_another_GUI_instead_of_making_one_that_already_exists_better.3F In this case the important thing is the last (and a half) paragraph: Also, many bits from QtOctave were reused in the GUI. QtOctave was a great and very useful tool. It looked beautiful and we are thankful to its developers for working on such a nice tool. However, it would have never been stable as it was. But most of all, the developers made it free software so we could reuse large chunks of it which were incorporated in what is now the Octave GUI. Notice also that the octave GUI, that is now the default, was also released for version 3.8 more than 1.5 years ago in that in my usage, I use it in classes, it is more stable than qtoctave ever was. Before that I have used qtoctave so I am aware of the problems presented by qtoctave. Then it's better to retire qtoctave in Fedora while adding Obsoletes tag to octave main package. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: openQA vs. Rawhide
also I think the Boston box is on git master branch (of openqa_fedora and openqa_fedora_tools), not develop, and I think is missing some of the latest commits Just a side-note - yes, Boston machine is running on master. I thought of it as production machine. But it raises questions - should we push hot-fixes directly into master in cases like these? Or should we merge develop into master as quickly as possible? Or should we run Boston on develop until our tests get stable enough? Jan ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
Re: Removing vm86 support?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote: Hi- I'm asking here because Fedora seems to one of few distros that enables CONFIG_VM86 on 32-bit kernels. I'm somewhat confused as to how that is to be honest. We don't explicitly set it in our config hunks, and we disable CONFIG_EXPERT, which is what the upstream option appears to require. So I believe the only reason it is enabled is because upstream has default y and some weird Kconfig interaction isn't playing nice and allowing it to be set even when CONFIG_EXPERT is not. Would anyone object if the upstream kernel (and hence Fedora) removed vm86 support? This would break 16-bit real mode programs under dosemu. It would have no effect on 16-bit protected mode programs under dosemu (i.e. anything that works on a 64-bit kernel), on dosbox (which you should be using instead of dosemu anyway) or on KVM (which is also a much better option than dosemu). I don't think you're going to get anything resembling an authoritative answer from this list. Here are a few things that might be helpful to know. 1) The 32-bit x86 kernels are extremely low priority in general for the kernel team. To the point where we announced that they really need extended community effort for truly 32-bit specific issues. 2) Fedora doesn't ship any code that would hit this that I'm aware of. Certainly end users might have some, but our community tends to favor first and fast over historical code. 3) As a start, I'm more than happy to disable CONFIG_VM86 in rawhide and see if people complain. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Fedora-r-devel-list] Libcurl support
R has support for libcurl (= 7.28.0) since R version 3.2.0. This feature allows the functions functions url() and download.file() to access secure URLs. With the US government adopting an https-only policy for federal websites and web services it is increasingly important to offer secure download facilities to R users. Users will also benefit from the increased security of downloading and installing R packages from a CRAN mirror that supports https. Users can test whether libcurl is supported with: capabilities(libcurl) libcurl FALSE Fedora binaries for R do not currently support libcurl. It would be very helpful if they did. It suffices to have libcurl-devel as a build requirement and it will be picked up by the configure script. Martyn --- This message and its attachments are strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender and delete it. Since its integrity cannot be guaranteed, its content cannot involve the sender's responsibility. Any misuse, any disclosure or publication of its content, either whole or partial, is prohibited, exception made of formally approved use --- ___ r-devel mailing list r-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: Removing vm86 support?
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 16:20 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: I'm asking here because Fedora seems to one of few distros that enables CONFIG_VM86 on 32-bit kernels. Would anyone object if the upstream kernel (and hence Fedora) removed vm86 support? This would break 16-bit real mode programs under dosemu. It would have no effect on 16-bit protected mode programs under dosemu (i.e. anything that works on a 64-bit kernel), on dosbox (which you should be using instead of dosemu anyway) or on KVM (which is also a much better option than dosemu). We don't even have dosemu packaged. Haven't since RHL 7.1 power tools, if brew is to be believed, certainly never in Fedora. I have occasionally appreciated the ability to compare vm86 to x86emu when debugging vesa failures, but that's rapidly ceasing to be a thing I need to care about. I do wonder why its something that needs to be removed entirely instead of locked in a disused filing cabinet in the basement, but I'm not going to shed any tears if it goes away. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: openQA vs. Rawhide
There's a neat GTK+ debugging thing called the GtkInspector which you can launch from any GTK+ 3 app with shift+ctrl+D. From that you can Or Ctrl+Shift+I, if you find that easier to remember (I as inspector) :-) look at Properties then GtkSettings, and look at the gtk-xft-* settings. I noticed two significant differences between anaconda running from boot.iso or KDE live and anaconda running from Workstation live, both at 1024x768 in a VM. gtk-xft-hintstyle is 'medium' in Workstation but 'full' in boot.iso/KDE, and gtk-xft-dpi is 98304 in Workstation but 98401 in boot.iso/KDE. That value is a DPI multiplied by 1024; Workstation's is exactly 96 (98304/1024 = 96), boot.iso/KDE is...a little bit more than 96. Basically we figured out that for some reason the defaults that should be set by /etc/X11/Xresources don't seem to actually be merged into X, in boot.iso and KDE live image at least. So GDK (part of GTK+) falls back on its internal defaults for hinting style and display resolution (DPI). Its default for hinting style, in the absence of any external indication, is 'hintfull', and its default for DPI is to actually calculate the 'correct' DPI for the display. It turns out that a KVM at 1024x768 reports its monitor's vertical size as 203mm; if you reproduce GDK's calculation with 768 pixels and 203mm: 768 (pixel height) * 25.4 (inches to MM) / 203 (height in MM) * 1024 (GDK's multiplication factor) ~= 98401 (actually a bit lower but it gets rounded to the nearest integer) and that's where the weird 98401 value comes from. What, that's a one hell of a debug story. Awesome job. ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
rawhide report: 20150708 changes
Compose started at Wed Jul 8 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws) apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:juddi-client) [aws] aws-tools-2015-2.fc23.i686 requires libaws_ssl.so [bluetile] bluetile-0.6-28.fc23.i686 requires ghc(gio-0.13.0.4-589ef11228222f8fdb72e24c64ce9d0a) [bustle] bustle-0.4.8-3.fc23.i686 requires libHSsetlocale-1.0.0.1-ghc7.8.4.so bustle-0.4.8-3.fc23.i686 requires ghc(setlocale-1.0.0.1-5b5a3b6eb589586826a90a4c287ca0e0) bustle-0.4.8-3.fc23.i686 requires ghc(hgettext-0.1.30-1fb42473ca2585938d9fc2bded6890b2) bustle-0.4.8-3.fc23.i686 requires ghc(gio-0.13.0.4-589ef11228222f8fdb72e24c64ce9d0a) [clearsilver] perl-clearsilver-0.10.5-29.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) perl-clearsilver-0.10.5-29.fc22.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20 [fcitx-libpinyin] fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.1-6.fc23.i686 requires libpinyin.so.5(LIBPINYIN) fcitx-libpinyin-0.3.1-6.fc23.i686 requires libpinyin.so.5 [gammaray] gammaray-qt5-2.2.1-10.fc23.i686 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-32) = 0:5.4.2 [ghc-gtk] ghc-gtk-0.13.4-1.fc22.i686 requires ghc(gio-0.13.0.4-589ef11228222f8fdb72e24c64ce9d0a) ghc-gtk-devel-0.13.4-1.fc22.i686 requires ghc-devel(gio-0.13.0.4-589ef11228222f8fdb72e24c64ce9d0a) [ghc-hjsmin] ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.7-7.fc23.i686 requires ghc(language-javascript-0.5.13-0b8335d6a2507ee73f3b41c61a1ea2bf) ghc-hjsmin-devel-0.1.4.7-7.fc23.i686 requires ghc-devel(language-javascript-0.5.13-0b8335d6a2507ee73f3b41c61a1ea2bf) [golang-github-samalba-dockerclient] golang-github-samalba-dockerclient-devel-0-0.1.gitc37a52f.fc23.noarch requires golang(github.com/docker/docker/utils) golang-github-samalba-dockerclient-devel-0-0.1.gitc37a52f.fc23.noarch requires golang(github.com/docker/docker/pkg/timeutils) golang-github-samalba-dockerclient-devel-0-0.1.gitc37a52f.fc23.noarch requires golang(github.com/docker/docker/pkg/stdcopy) golang-github-samalba-dockerclient-devel-0-0.1.gitc37a52f.fc23.noarch requires golang(github.com/docker/docker/pkg/jsonlog) [hadoop] hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-servlet) hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hadoop-hdfs-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-hdfs-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hadoop-mapreduce-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-mapreduce-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-servlet) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-client) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-client) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice) [hbase] hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) [ibus-libpinyin] ibus-libpinyin-1.7.1-4.fc23.i686 requires libpinyin.so.5(LIBPINYIN) ibus-libpinyin-1.7.1-4.fc23.i686 requires libpinyin.so.5 [julia] julia-0.3.7-2.fc23.i686 requires libspqr.so.1 julia-0.3.7-2.fc23.i686 requires libLLVM-3.5.so julia-devel-0.3.7-2.fc23.i686 requires libLLVM-3.5.so [klavaro] klavaro-3.01-0.pre1.1.fc23.1.i686 requires libgtkdataboks.so.0 [ldns] perl-ldns-1.6.17-14.fc23.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) perl-ldns-1.6.17-14.fc23.i686 requires libperl.so.5.20
Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-07-09)
WG meeting will be at 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 19:00 Brno, 13:00 Boston, 2:00+1d Tokyo, 3:00+1d Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode. = Topics = * Progress and goals for f23 and f24 (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-May/000786.html) * Open Floor -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Removing vm86 support?
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 16:20 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: I'm asking here because Fedora seems to one of few distros that enables CONFIG_VM86 on 32-bit kernels. Would anyone object if the upstream kernel (and hence Fedora) removed vm86 support? This would break 16-bit real mode programs under dosemu. It would have no effect on 16-bit protected mode programs under dosemu (i.e. anything that works on a 64-bit kernel), on dosbox (which you should be using instead of dosemu anyway) or on KVM (which is also a much better option than dosemu). We don't even have dosemu packaged. Haven't since RHL 7.1 power tools, if brew is to be believed, certainly never in Fedora. Ah, it's in rpmfusion, not Fedora. I have occasionally appreciated the ability to compare vm86 to x86emu when debugging vesa failures, but that's rapidly ceasing to be a thing I need to care about. I do wonder why its something that needs to be removed entirely instead of locked in a disused filing cabinet in the basement, but I'm not going to shed any tears if it goes away. It may not end up going away. I want to mark it BROKEN, which means that basically everyone's config will disable it. The problem is that it's buggy and probably full of security holes. --Andy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-07-08 16:00 UTC)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-07-08 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-07-08 10:00 Wed US/Pacific PDT 2015-07-08 13:00 Wed US/Eastern EDT 2015-07-08 17:00 Wed UTC - 2015-07-08 18:00 Wed Europe/London BST 2015-07-08 19:00 Wed Europe/Paris CEST 2015-07-08 19:00 Wed Europe/Berlin CEST 2015-07-08 22:30 Wed Asia/Calcutta IST --new day-- 2015-07-09 01:00 Thu Asia/Singapore SGT 2015-07-09 01:00 Thu Asia/Hong_Kong HKT 2015-07-09 02:00 Thu Asia/Tokyo JST 2015-07-09 03:00 Thu Australia/Brisbane EST Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13 = Followups = #topic #508 New GID for openstack-neutron .fpc 508 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/508 = New business = #topic #550 Darktable and Rawspeed internal library .fpc 550 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/550 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2015-07-08)
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-07-08) === Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-07-08/fesco.2015-07-08-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (paragan, 18:00:02) * #1445 F23 Self Contained Changes (paragan, 18:01:34) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1445 (paragan, 18:01:34) * #1455 F23 System Wide Change: Standardized Passphrase Policy (paragan, 18:11:04) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1455 (paragan, 18:11:04) * We need io.js change page updated with the information provided on devel mailing list (paragan, 18:18:39) * AGREED: let's revisit this next time when draft gets ready for review (paragan, 18:19:26) * #1456 F23 System Wide Change: Node.js 0.12 (paragan, 18:19:38) * AGREED: F23 System Wide Change: Node.js 0.12 (+6, 1, -0) (paragan, 18:26:45) * #1457 F23 System Wide Change: jQuery (paragan, 18:27:08) * AGREED: F23 System Wide Change: jQuery (+7, 0, -0) (paragan, 18:34:05) * #1458 F23 System Wide Change: IBus 1.5.11 (paragan, 18:34:09) * AGREED: F23 System Wide Change: IBus 1.5.11 (+7, 0, 0) (paragan, 18:40:18) * Next week's chair (paragan, 18:40:32) * dgilmore to chair next week (paragan, 18:41:42) * Open Floor (paragan, 18:41:49) Meeting ended at 18:44:46 UTC. Action Items Action Items, by person --- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * paragan (67) * thozza (32) * nirik (25) * number80 (21) * dgilmore (12) * jwb (10) * zodbot (9) * ajax (7) * lupinix (2) * thozza2 (2) * Southern_Gentlem (1) * sgallagh (0) * rishi (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
gnat pushed to dspam (master). fix bug #1240913
From 55e10150e4f52b000830f32902b1340568e4c01e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:58:48 -0600
Subject: fix bug #1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 7aeaff6..6ba152d 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Summary:A library and Mail Delivery Agent for Bayesian SPAM
filtering
Name: dspam
Version:3.10.2
-Release:17%{?dist}
+Release:18%{?dist}
License:GPLv2
Group: System Environment/Daemons
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -40,11 +40,12 @@ BuildRequires: mysql-devel
BuildRequires: postgresql-devel
BuildRequires: sqlite-devel
BuildRequires: openldap-devel
-BuildRequires: systemd-units
+BuildRequires: systemd-units
Requires: dspam-libs = %{version}-%{release}
-Requires(post):systemd-sysv
-Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires(post): systemd-sysv
+Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires: binutils
%description
The DSPAM agent masquerades as the email server's local delivery agent
@@ -373,6 +374,9 @@ exit 0
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/dspam-web.conf
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 08 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-18
+- Explicitly require binutils for crontab file fixes bug #1240913
+
* Wed Jun 17 2015 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 3.10.2-17
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
--
cgit v0.10.2
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dspam.git/commit/?h=masterid=55e10150e4f52b000830f32902b1340568e4c01e
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
gnat pushed to dspam (f21). fix bug 1240913
From f7b7f95b13c6b023d6ad89c8480bc7ba0623fcd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:09:20 -0600
Subject: fix bug 1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 2da7bb9..1898284 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Summary:A library and Mail Delivery Agent for Bayesian SPAM
filtering
Name: dspam
Version:3.10.2
-Release:16%{?dist}
+Release:17%{?dist}
License:GPLv2
Group: System Environment/Daemons
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -40,11 +40,12 @@ BuildRequires: mysql-devel
BuildRequires: postgresql-devel
BuildRequires: sqlite-devel
BuildRequires: openldap-devel
-BuildRequires: systemd-units
+BuildRequires: systemd-units
Requires: dspam-libs = %{version}-%{release}
-Requires(post):systemd-sysv
-Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires(post): systemd-sysv
+Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires: binutils
%description
The DSPAM agent masquerades as the email server's local delivery agent
@@ -373,6 +374,9 @@ exit 0
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/dspam-web.conf
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 08 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-17
+- Explicitly require binutils for crontab file fixes bug #1240913
+
* Thu Feb 19 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-16
- Fix for bug #1193177 - Sqlite3 free
--
cgit v0.10.2
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dspam.git/commit/?h=f21id=f7b7f95b13c6b023d6ad89c8480bc7ba0623fcd5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
gnat pushed to dspam (epel7). fix bug 1240913
From 0dcd4968a816832d1cef8877c37af3d2236e23af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:13:23 -0600
Subject: fix bug 1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 044909f..1fcea95 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Summary:A library and Mail Delivery Agent for Bayesian SPAM
filtering
Name: dspam
Version:3.10.2
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Release:11%{?dist}
License:GPLv2
Group: System Environment/Daemons
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -40,11 +40,12 @@ BuildRequires: mysql-devel
BuildRequires: postgresql-devel
BuildRequires: sqlite-devel
BuildRequires: openldap-devel
-BuildRequires: systemd-units
+BuildRequires: systemd-units
Requires: dspam-libs = %{version}-%{release}
-Requires(post):systemd-sysv
-Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires(post): systemd-sysv
+Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires: binutils
%description
The DSPAM agent masquerades as the email server's local delivery agent
@@ -373,6 +374,9 @@ exit 0
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/dspam-web.conf
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 08 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-11
+- Explicitly require binutils for crontab file fixes bug #1240913
+
* Thu Feb 19 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-10
- Fix for bug #1193177
--
cgit v0.10.2
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dspam.git/commit/?h=epel7id=0dcd4968a816832d1cef8877c37af3d2236e23af
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
gnat pushed to dspam (el6). fix bug 1240913
From acc515038d63406dc3051f4c5a5c2c32c9647d37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:12:17 -0600
Subject: fix bug 1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 66f37ab..6369769 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Summary:A library and Mail Delivery Agent for Bayesian SPAM
filtering
Name: dspam
Version:3.10.2
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Release:7%{?dist}
License:GPLv2
Group: System Environment/Daemons
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ Requires(post): chkconfig
Requires(preun):chkconfig
Requires(preun):initscripts
Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires: binutils
%description
The DSPAM agent masquerades as the email server's local delivery agent
@@ -382,6 +383,9 @@ exit 0
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/dspam-web.conf
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 08 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-7
+- Explicitly require binutils for crontab file fixes bug #1240913
+
* Thu Feb 19 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-6
- Fix for bug #1193177
--
cgit v0.10.2
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dspam.git/commit/?h=el6id=acc515038d63406dc3051f4c5a5c2c32c9647d37
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Review Swap?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a while. I would be willing to do a review swap but I would probably have a slow turn around on my end (I'm currently on vacation and only occasionally get time to do this sort of thing). So if you're willing to swap or do the review, then please let me know. cppformat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279 hgsubversion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 Thanks, Dave I'm willing to review both your packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVnVq0AAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8y2oH/jP8fIg0k3myRyr/A2tGZVQU V0H5hPo5iUq9U1faM641739c2rbZId19HPNaibvIYPfnvjilqY8aLkQAlpXaheay xh0lk8rdyaKdXkIUCR/1UBLJf+rNgHk8IGBY6wltVfZ0pOp4hCn8DuI9FSofXOmm 51mtod1k78/fogtZH44BqfIDy0oQlNrCAb2FAFJvuj/2DILTeF4scOpnhMOFjeD+ R3S0vZ8ZiBxq9Jvn1SGrIn9OdMfjsLW0zLS+S483slI9QuJaKN0mf3VRh1Z8UYjb 8K88kKvdTWatnvw3EOP/KoRG/6v8TkJxKJ1cD4No48DcDKxHGAq1J6v+kIscTcA= =Wqhc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: FESCO Elections - June 2015 - Results
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 09:19:46 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: Il 30/06/2015 10:13, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto: Didn't even know it was happening. Where was it announced? Rich. On devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org and annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org I don't read those that often. I tend to think announcements ought to go to the devel@ list, which in practice is where I usually read them first (ie. replies to announcements). Rich. all emails to devel-announce@ go to devel@ but allows those that do not want to follow devel@ to have to follow but they can get important notices Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 892597] Review Request: glite-lb-types - Build-time component for gLite LB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892597 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lb-types-2.0.10-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
gnat pushed to dspam (f22). fix bug 1240913
From f7b7f95b13c6b023d6ad89c8480bc7ba0623fcd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:09:20 -0600
Subject: fix bug 1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 2da7bb9..1898284 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
Summary:A library and Mail Delivery Agent for Bayesian SPAM
filtering
Name: dspam
Version:3.10.2
-Release:16%{?dist}
+Release:17%{?dist}
License:GPLv2
Group: System Environment/Daemons
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -40,11 +40,12 @@ BuildRequires: mysql-devel
BuildRequires: postgresql-devel
BuildRequires: sqlite-devel
BuildRequires: openldap-devel
-BuildRequires: systemd-units
+BuildRequires: systemd-units
Requires: dspam-libs = %{version}-%{release}
-Requires(post):systemd-sysv
-Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires(post): systemd-sysv
+Requires: perl(Mail::MboxParser)
+Requires: binutils
%description
The DSPAM agent masquerades as the email server's local delivery agent
@@ -373,6 +374,9 @@ exit 0
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/dspam-web.conf
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 08 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-17
+- Explicitly require binutils for crontab file fixes bug #1240913
+
* Thu Feb 19 2015 Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca - 3.10.2-16
- Fix for bug #1193177 - Sqlite3 free
--
cgit v0.10.2
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dspam.git/commit/?h=f22id=f7b7f95b13c6b023d6ad89c8480bc7ba0623fcd5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Review Swap?
I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a while. I would be willing to do a review swap but I would probably have a slow turn around on my end (I'm currently on vacation and only occasionally get time to do this sort of thing). So if you're willing to swap or do the review, then please let me know. cppformat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279 hgsubversion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 Thanks, Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1172 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 626 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 391 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626/puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 241 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849/sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6811/drupal7-7.38-1.el5 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7012/drupal7-feeds-2.0-0.12.alpha9.el5 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7055/drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.3-1.el5 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7077/drupal7-ds-2.10-1.el5 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7094/drupal7-migrate-2.8-1.el5 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing drupal6-ctools-1.13-1.el5 drupal7-backup_migrate-3.1-1.el5 drupal7-domain_locale-1.0-0.7.beta5.el5 drupal7-ds-2.10-1.el5 drupal7-features-2.6-1.el5 drupal7-feeds-2.0-0.12.alpha9.el5 drupal7-i18n-1.13-1.el5 drupal7-language_cookie-1.9-1.el5 drupal7-metatag-1.6-1.el5 drupal7-migrate-2.8-1.el5 drupal7-taxonomy_access_fix-2.2-1.el5 drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.3-1.el5 gfal2-2.9.3-1.el5 gfal2-python-1.8.3-1.el5 lz4-r131-1.el5 perl-CDB_File-0.98-9.el5 php53-tcpdf-6.2.8-1.el5 root-5.34.32-1.el5 Details about builds: drupal6-ctools-1.13-1.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7022) Primarily a set of APIs and tools to improve the developer experience Update Information: **This is the last major bug and new feature release for ctools 6.x-1.x. From here on out, ctools 6.x is only maintained for security releases, until the d6 maintenance window closes.** Looking to fix future D6 CTools issues? Find japerry or merlinofchaos in #drupal-scotch, #drupal-contribute, or #drupal-panels -- and become a maintainer for D6 CTools. Changes since 6.x-1.12: * Issue #949098 by mikeytown2: Notice: Array to string conversion in ctools_preprocess_page * Issue #2255283 by cedarm: User search tab disappears * Issue #1451638 by Xen, rjbrown99: Rebuilding forms breaks in modal * Issue #1510118 by mikeytown2: Strict warning: Creating default object from empty value in views_content_views_content_type_admin_info() * Issue #1256878 by mstrelan: HTTP response render doesn't handle empty query string * Issue #1118134 by Manuel Garcia: Fix php 5.3 notice in export.inc * Issue #1675062 by DamienMcKenna: Remove use of JQUERY_UPDATE_REPLACE_PATH constant * Issue #1530010 by jwhat: Option for ctools_ajax_command_redirect() to open URL in new window * Issue #1149792 by mikeytown2: CTools - Allow ctools_ajax_page_preprocess to not be ran, add scripts call to js preprocess * Issue #1401532 by travist: Allow other modules to alter the Wizard trail ChangeLog: * Mon Jul 6 2015 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com - 1.13-1 - Updated to 1.13 (RHBZ #154) - Keep documentation where end-users expect it * Wed Jun 17 2015 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.12-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Apr 4 2015 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com - 1.12-1 - Updated to 1.12 (BZ #1203478) - Removed RPM README b/c it only explained common Drupal workflow * Sat Jun 7 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.11-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #154 - drupal6-ctools-1.13 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=154 drupal7-backup_migrate-3.1-1.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7086) Backup the Drupal database and files or migrate them to another environment Update Information: ## 7.x-3.1 A bug release fix for the 3.x branch. Changes since 7.x-3.0: * Added pantheon notice and free notice to NodeSquirrel page * Issue #2347637: Add a Note to Backup doesn't work with Jquery 1.7 * Set Nodesquirrel schedule to use smart delete by default * Issue #2477503: Error returned, but exit status is 0 * Issue #2369461: Scheduled Backups stopped working after 7.x-3.0? * Issue #2390057: Site doesn't come out of maintenance mode when backing up entire site * Issue #2455265: Update
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 237 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1 121 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087/dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 104 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1421/quassel-0.11.0-2.el7 42 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6262/cabal-install-1.16.1.0-1.el7,haskell-platform-2013.2.0.0-39.el7 28 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1545/strongswan-5.3.2-1.el7 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813/chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6942/openvas-gsa-6.0.3-4.el7,openvas-manager-6.0.3-3.el7,openvas-scanner-5.0.3-5.el7,openvas-cli-1.4.1-2.el7,openvas-libraries-8.0.3-2.el7 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6975/cryptopp-5.6.2-9.el7 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7005/python-pip-7.1.0-1.el7 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7017/rubygem-moped-1.5.3-1.el7 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7025/php-horde-Horde-Auth-2.1.10-1.el7,php-horde-Horde-Core-2.20.6-1.el7,php-horde-Horde-Icalendar-2.1.1-1.el7,php-horde-Horde-Form-2.0.10-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing WALinuxAgent-2.0.14-1.el7 ahc-tools-0.2.0-1.el7 blt-2.4-46.z.el7 devilspie2-0.39-1.el7 dnf-0.6.4-2.el7 drupal7-addressfield-1.1-1.el7 elk-3.1.12-12.el7 fedora-dockerfiles-0-0.16.giteab04ff.el7 gdal-1.11.2-1.el7 gfal2-2.9.3-1.el7 gfal2-python-1.8.3-1.el7 gsi-openssh-6.6.1p1-1.el7 ipmiutil-2.9.6-1.el7 libdbusmenu-12.10.2-9.el7 libindicator-12.10.1-5.el7 light-locker-1.6.0-4.el7 lz4-r131-1.el7 mate-themes-1.10.1-1.el7 mate-themes-extras-3.8.4-2.el7 mozilla-requestpolicy-1.0-0.8.20150701gitfe3716.el7 mpssh-1.3.3-2.el7 nginx-1.6.3-6.el7 nodejs-write-file-atomic-1.1.2-2.el7 ocserv-0.10.6-1.el7 osbs-0.14-1.el7 perl-CDB_File-0.98-9.el7 php-doctrine-datafixtures-1.0.2-1.el7 php-horde-Horde-Auth-2.1.10-1.el7 php-horde-Horde-Core-2.20.6-1.el7 php-horde-Horde-Form-2.0.10-1.el7 php-horde-Horde-Icalendar-2.1.1-1.el7 php-myclabs-deep-copy-1.3.0-1.el7 php-phpunit-PHP-CodeCoverage-2.1.7-1.el7 php-phpunit-PHPUnit-4.7.6-1.el7 php-phpunit-PHPUnit-MockObject-2.3.5-1.el7 php-silex-1.2.5-1.el7 php-theseer-autoload-1.19.0-1.el7 phpMyAdmin-4.4.11-1.el7 python-catkin_pkg-0.2.9-1.el7 python-catkin_tools-0.3.0-1.el7 python-copr-1.57-1.el7 python-dockerfile-parse-0.0.3-2.el7 python-nose-xcover-1.0.10-1.el7 python-proliantutils-2.1.0-1.el7 python-semantic_version-2.4.2-1.el7 python-wstool-0.1.6-1.el7 root-5.34.32-1.el7 rubygem-moped-1.5.3-1.el7 sakura-3.2.0-1.el7 statsd-0.7.2-5.el7 tor-0.2.6.9-2.el7 vertica-python-0.5.0-1.el7 youtube-dl-2015.07.04-1.el7 Details about builds: WALinuxAgent-2.0.14-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7010) The Microsoft Azure Linux Agent Update Information: Update to 2.0.14 ChangeLog: * Thu Jul 2 2015 Scott K Logan log...@cottsay.net - 2.0.14-1 - Update to 2.0.14 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1238682 - WALinuxAgent-2.0.14 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238682 ahc-tools-0.2.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7083) Tools for RDO-Manager automatic health checks Update Information: Initial build for el7 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1219540 - Review Request: ahc-tools - Tools for RDO-manager automatic health checks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219540 blt-2.4-46.z.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7061) Widget extension to the Tcl/Tk scripting language Update Information: Fix requirement for tcl API. Fix for RHBZ #1105266. References: [ 1 ] Bug #1238627 - blt requires too new tcl(abi)
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1172 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 237 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4008/cross-binutils-2.23.51.0.3-1.el6.1 88 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-5742/asterisk-1.8.32.3-1.el6 28 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1501/strongswan-5.3.2-1.el6 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6742/seamonkey-2.28-6.ESR_31.7.0.el6 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828/chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6928/ansible-1.9.2-1.el6 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6949/directfb-1.4.11-3.el6 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6968/cryptopp-5.6.2-9.el6 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7003/python-pip-7.1.0-1.el6 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7007/drupal7-feeds-2.0-0.12.alpha9.el6 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031/python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7090/php-horde-Horde-Auth-2.1.10-1.el6,php-horde-Horde-Core-2.20.6-1.el6,php-horde-Horde-Icalendar-2.1.1-1.el6,php-horde-Horde-Form-2.0.10-1.el6 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7015/drupal7-ds-2.10-1.el6 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7066/drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.3-1.el6 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7103/drupal7-migrate-2.8-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing WALinuxAgent-2.0.14-1.el6 alpine-2.20-1.el6 docker-io-1.6.2-3.el6 drupal6-ctools-1.13-1.el6 drupal7-addressfield-1.1-1.el6 drupal7-backup_migrate-3.1-1.el6 drupal7-domain_locale-1.0-0.7.beta5.el6 drupal7-ds-2.10-1.el6 drupal7-i18n-1.13-1.el6 drupal7-language_cookie-1.9-1.el6 drupal7-metatag-1.6-1.el6 drupal7-migrate-2.8-1.el6 drupal7-taxonomy_access_fix-2.2-1.el6 drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.3-1.el6 elk-3.1.12-12.el6 fedora-dockerfiles-0-0.16.giteab04ff.el6 gfal2-2.9.3-1.el6 gfal2-python-1.8.3-1.el6 lz4-r131-1.el6 mozilla-requestpolicy-1.0-0.8.20150701gitfe3716.el6 mpssh-1.3.3-2.el6 osbs-0.14-1.el6 perl-CDB_File-0.98-9.el6 php-doctrine-datafixtures-1.0.2-1.el6 php-horde-Horde-Auth-2.1.10-1.el6 php-horde-Horde-Core-2.20.6-1.el6 php-horde-Horde-Form-2.0.10-1.el6 php-horde-Horde-Icalendar-2.1.1-1.el6 php-silex-1.2.5-1.el6 php-theseer-autoload-1.19.0-1.el6 python-catkin_pkg-0.2.9-1.el6 python-catkin_tools-0.3.0-1.el6 python-dockerfile-parse-0.0.3-2.el6 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 python-wstool-0.1.6-1.el6 root-5.34.32-1.el6 statsd-0.7.2-5.el6 uwsgi-2.0.11-1.el6 vertica-python-0.5.0-1.el6 Details about builds: WALinuxAgent-2.0.14-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7014) The Microsoft Azure Linux Agent Update Information: Update to 2.0.14 ChangeLog: * Thu Jul 2 2015 Scott K Logan log...@cottsay.net - 2.0.14-1 - Update to 2.0.14 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1238682 - WALinuxAgent-2.0.14 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238682 alpine-2.20-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7050) powerful, easy to use console email client Update Information: Build from new upstream for 2.10, fixes rhbz#1092688 rhbz#1142890 ChangeLog: * Mon Jul 6 2015 Joshua Daniel Franklin joshuadfrank...@yahoo.com 2.20-1 - Build from new upstream for 2.10, fixes rhbz#1092688 rhbz#1142890 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1092688 - alpine-2.11-1.fc20 SEGV on specific message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092688 [ 2 ] Bug #1142890 - alpine-2.20 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142890 docker-io-1.6.2-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7020) Automates deployment of containerized applications
Re: qmake needed by fedora-review?
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: On 08/07/15 20:02, Dave Johansen wrote: I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly? Or am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not finding qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock? The build is done in mock, but that spec is using qmake in macro definitions in the spec file and fedora-review is presumably examining the spec locally before invoking mock. I had just noticed the same thing when manually building the source .rpm manually. Thanks, Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review Swap?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/08/2015 09:23 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a while. I would be willing to do a review swap but I would probably have a slow turn around on my end (I'm currently on vacation and only occasionally get time to do this sort of thing). So if you're willing to swap or do the review, then please let me know. cppformat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279 hgsubversion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 Thanks, Dave I'm willing to review both your packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427 It looks like these two lines are unused and are causing problems because qmake isn't available when they're run: %global qtinc %(qmake -query QT_INSTALL_PREFIX)/include %global qtlib %(qmake -query QT_INSTALL_PREFIX)/lib Please, leave comment in bugzilla directly. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVnXmaAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8aVEH/RrtWEZvdrilYvGmOXsUKcDz qaeGtsMfpXdvXMCoKu7eSjD1Ul/LnDJLz/wMMtVkbEktzpXMo/XE61qGExih2ezL v5DL+gGugVRTG+7UtbrsufBJl7xavc4LSjcTurY45599RMot+LZtTAJKvdLbavYd NeF4qN8yePpNfFul0e+HBaJ7c8tiDlMULe4VYvocM39ZJqkkHDDGyZy+pLJ8/7p1 CJKUqbZhQv6e4errarVu32zK28+UNkhBkV04HZTGVlJUa8pzSmU2QimFsUSGy15y oi5lt28xS94uszIqGDqyez9dcZMpifLjYXYMYibyM2OFYoiGMCBs7XcvKEa+MHQ= =I9Rl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review Swap?
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a while. I would be willing to do a review swap but I would probably have a slow turn around on my end (I'm currently on vacation and only occasionally get time to do this sort of thing). So if you're willing to swap or do the review, then please let me know. cppformat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279 hgsubversion: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 Thanks, Dave I'm willing to review both your packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427 It looks like these two lines are unused and are causing problems because qmake isn't available when they're run: %global qtinc %(qmake -query QT_INSTALL_PREFIX)/include %global qtlib %(qmake -query QT_INSTALL_PREFIX)/lib -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: qmake needed by fedora-review?
On 08/07/15 20:02, Dave Johansen wrote: I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly? Or am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not finding qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock? The build is done in mock, but that spec is using qmake in macro definitions in the spec file and fedora-review is presumably examining the spec locally before invoking mock. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: qmake needed by fedora-review?
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly? Or am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not finding qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock? Sorry for the noise. It looks like this was being caused by an issue in the .spec file being reviewed. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: updates-testing: multilib broken for days now
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:30:40 +0200 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: ...snip... Protected multilib versions: polkit-0.113-1.fc21.x86_64 != polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686 This is due to polkit splitting out a polkit-libs package between those two versions. This makes it only include the polkit-libs package instead of a polkit.i686. You should be able to just remove the old polkit.i686, but I agree it needs to be handed by the package cleanly for upgrades. File a bug for the polkit maintainer(s)? kevin pgpq9LMMDVDee.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction: Jonny Heggheim
Do anyone have time to sponsor me? I have three Java packages waiting for formal review: * hid4java: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230949 * rescu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231457 * Java-WebSocket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231570 Sincerely Jonny Heggheim -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F23 Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides
On 07/07/2015 03:12 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hello
I've got an initial implementation of this using the rpm dependency generator
hooks, as suggested in the other thread [1].
The resulting scripts are here: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/rpm-mpi-hooks/
There is just one problem: an elf binary in an $MPI_HOME subfolder will now
trigger both the elf as well as the mpi dependency generator, resulting in
both
libfoo.so()(64bit)
libfoo.so()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
being generated for /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib/libfoo.so. However, to achieve the
goal of disambiguating the provides of libfoo and libfoo-openmpi,
libfoo-openmpi should only provide libfoo.so()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64).
The only solution which comes to mind is adding
%__elf_exclude_path ^%{_prefix}/lib(64)/(openmpi|mpich)/.*$
to elf.attr. Is this acceptable?
It appears to be sufficient to define this macro anywhere, not just in
elf.attr. So I think it could be added in to a rpm macros file in
openmpi/mpich-devel. Also I think you need (64)? or (|64).
Cool stuff, thanks for working on this.
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-June/211570.html
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[389-devel] please review: Ticket 48013 - Inconsistent behavior with Content Sync Plugin and invalid cookies
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48013 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48013/0001-Ticket-48013-Inconsistent-behaviour-of-DS-when-LDAP-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: Self Introduction: Jonny Heggheim
Hello Jonny, On 8 July 2015 at 20:56, Jonny Heggheim heg...@gmail.com wrote: Do anyone have time to sponsor me? I have three Java packages waiting for formal review: * hid4java: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230949 * rescu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231457 * Java-WebSocket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231570 You might consider contacting the Java special interest group: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java They have a mailing list and IRC channel, so you might find someone to review your packages there. Jonathan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Removing vm86 support?
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 11:29 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: It may not end up going away. I want to mark it BROKEN, which means that basically everyone's config will disable it. The problem is that it's buggy and probably full of security holes. Certainly using it the way xserver needs to for int10 is a root escalation waiting to happen, mapping the zero page is not wise. CONFIG_BROKEN sounds just fine to me. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
updates-testing: multilib broken for days now
-- Running transaction check --- Package polkit-libs.x86_64 0:0.113-1.fc21 will be installed --- Package udisks2.x86_64 0:2.1.3-4.fc21 will be updated --- Package udisks2.x86_64 0:2.1.3-4.fc21 will be updated --- Package udisks2.x86_64 0:2.1.6-1.fc21 will be an update -- Processing Dependency: libudisks2(x86-64) = 2.1.6-1.fc21 for package: udisks2-2.1.6-1.fc21.x86_64 -- Running transaction check --- Package libudisks2.x86_64 0:2.1.3-4.fc21 will be updated --- Package libudisks2.x86_64 0:2.1.6-1.fc21 will be an update -- Finished Dependency Resolution -- Finding unneeded leftover dependencies Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies Error: Multilib version problems found. This often means that the root cause is something else and multilib version checking is just pointing out that there is a problem. Eg.: 1. You have an upgrade for polkit which is missing some dependency that another package requires. Yum is trying to solve this by installing an older version of polkit of the different architecture. If you exclude the bad architecture yum will tell you what the root cause is (which package requires what). You can try redoing the upgrade with --exclude polkit.otherarch ... this should give you an error message showing the root cause of the problem. 2. You have multiple architectures of polkit installed, but yum can only see an upgrade for one of those architectures. If you don't want/need both architectures anymore then you can remove the one with the missing update and everything will work. 3. You have duplicate versions of polkit installed already. You can use yum check to get yum show these errors. ...you can also use --setopt=protected_multilib=false to remove this checking, however this is almost never the correct thing to do as something else is very likely to go wrong (often causing much more problems). Protected multilib versions: polkit-0.113-1.fc21.x86_64 != polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F23 Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides - Review request
On 08.07.2015 22:28, Orion Poplawski wrote: It appears to be sufficient to define this macro anywhere, not just in elf.attr. So I think it could be added in to a rpm macros file in openmpi/mpich-devel. Ah cool, actually it seems to also work if I add it directly to mpi.attrs, meaning that all pieces are nicely confined in one place. Also I think you need (64)? or (|64). Correct, fixed. I'm seeing this also in cmake: $ grep '(64)' /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/cmake.attr %__cmake_path ^/usr/lib(64)/cmake/.*/.*(Config\.cmake|-config\.cmake)$ suppose it should be fixed there too. I've now posted the review request for the rpm-mpi-hooks package at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241282 A quick double check of the mpi.req and mpi.prov as part of the review would also be appreciated. Once the package is approved, openmpi and mpich will need to BuildRequire: rpm-mpi-hooks, and openmpi-devel and mpich-devel will need to Require: rpm-mpi-hooks. And finally, once that is done too, all *-openmpi and *-mpich packages will need to be rebuilt. Thanks, Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1241301] perl-App-a2p-1.009 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241301 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Created attachment 1050047 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1050047action=edit [patch] Update to 1.009 (#1241301) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1241301] New: perl-App-a2p-1.009 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241301 Bug ID: 1241301 Summary: perl-App-a2p-1.009 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-a2p Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.009 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.008-1.fc23 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-a2p/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. Note that there is also a set of Python guideline changes pending which I will send in a separate announcement. - Guidelines for making use of weak dependencies (Recommends:, Suggests:, etc.) have been added. *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies *https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/531 - The SSL Certificate Handling guidelines were slightly clarified. *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SSLCertificateHandling *https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ASSLCertificateHandlingdiff=414415oldid=412705 *https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/536 - The Locally running services section of the Default Services guidelines been clarified. *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices#Locally_running_services *https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ADefaultServicesdiff=414410oldid=413672 *https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/532#comment:6 - The guidelines for referencing upstream source were overhauled to include more information about git hosting services. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL * https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ASourceURLdiff=417378oldid=372006 * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/547 - The General Naming section of the Package Naming Guidelines has been modified to bring mention of lower casing and use of dashes to the beginning, and to slightly emphasize the use of lower case package names. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming * https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ANamingGuidelinesdiff=417380oldid=400817 * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/541 ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. Note that there is also a set of Python guideline changes pending which I will send in a separate announcement. - Guidelines for making use of weak dependencies (Recommends:, Suggests:, etc.) have been added. *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies *https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/531 - The SSL Certificate Handling guidelines were slightly clarified. *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SSLCertificateHandling *https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ASSLCertificateHandlingdiff=414415oldid=412705 *https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/536 - The Locally running services section of the Default Services guidelines been clarified. *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices#Locally_running_services *https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ADefaultServicesdiff=414410oldid=413672 *https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/532#comment:6 - The guidelines for referencing upstream source were overhauled to include more information about git hosting services. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL * https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ASourceURLdiff=417378oldid=372006 * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/547 - The General Naming section of the Package Naming Guidelines has been modified to bring mention of lower casing and use of dashes to the beginning, and to slightly emphasize the use of lower case package names. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming * https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3ANamingGuidelinesdiff=417380oldid=400817 * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/541 ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
Re: Error running python in mock?
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can bulid a package on my machine (F21 32-bit), but when I try and build
it with mock, I get an error when trying to run python. Here's the output:
RPM build errors:
+ cd durin42-hgsubversion-dde1ade36a49
+ '%{__python2}' setup.py build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.N6A81W: line 31: fg: no job control
Stupid user error on my part. I had forgotten to upload .spec with the BR
for python and so the Review Request still didn't work.
Sorry again for the noise,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
MEGA Invitation
sheldon.co...@gmail.com sent you an invitation to join MEGA.\n\n; --- Message from user: --- Hello, join me on MEGA and get access to encrypted storage and communication. Get 50 GB free! --- Please create your free MEGA account by clicking on the following link:\n\n; https://mega.nz/#newsignupZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZmVkb3JhcHJvamVjdC5vcmfwY3jnznykEg Best regards, Team MEGA -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-08)
On Qua, 2015-07-08 at 21:55 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: nightfall mmahut, astronomy-sig 60 weeks ago version available on Fedora : nightfall-1.62-15.fc20 version available upstream : nightfall-1.86.tar.gz No wonder does not compile, but the package aren't orphan , so I can take ownership neither fix it . How I take care of it ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1221832] perl-Dancer2-0.161000 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221832 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10325727 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1220595] perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-07-08 20:29:50 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu --- Updated in rawhide. No big changes so I'll leave it alone unless someone requests that it be pushed to the release branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Error running python in mock?
I can bulid a package on my machine (F21 32-bit), but when I try and build
it with mock, I get an error when trying to run python. Here's the output:
RPM build errors:
+ cd durin42-hgsubversion-dde1ade36a49
+ '%{__python2}' setup.py build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.N6A81W: line 31: fg: no job control
Any ideas on why the issue is?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1220595] perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1 |perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1 |.14 is available|.15 is available --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Latest upstream release: 1.15 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.14-1.fc23 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Parallel-ForkManager/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1220595] perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Created attachment 1050050 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1050050action=edit [patch] Update to 1.15 (#1220595) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1221832] perl-Dancer2-0.161000 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221832 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Created attachment 1050041 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1050041action=edit [patch] Update to 0.161000 (#1221832) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1221832] perl-Dancer2-0.161000 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221832 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Dancer2-0.160003 is|perl-Dancer2-0.161000 is |available |available --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Latest upstream release: 0.161000 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.16-3.fc23 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dancer2 Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
tibbs pushed to perl-Parallel-ForkManager (master). Update to 1.15.
From fda408bb0f724f59cd7f1d554bba49a5fc4567ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:22:15 -0500
Subject: Update to 1.15.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2f87db2..e725c85 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ Parallel-ForkManager-0.7.5.tar.gz
/Parallel-ForkManager-1.12.tar.gz
*.rpm
/Parallel-ForkManager-1.14.tar.gz
+/Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Parallel-ForkManager.spec b/perl-Parallel-ForkManager.spec
index ec58af0..d2dae3e 100644
--- a/perl-Parallel-ForkManager.spec
+++ b/perl-Parallel-ForkManager.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Parallel-ForkManager
-Version:1.14
+Version:1.15
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Simple parallel processing fork manager
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Jul 08 2015 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu - 1.15-1
+- Update to latest upstream version.
+
* Tue Jun 23 2015 Marianne Lombard jeh...@fedoraproject.org - 1.14
- Update to latest upstream version
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ee41496..516ba7e 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-35d50b023cd3d7a28b350c98a78f7d40 Parallel-ForkManager-1.14.tar.gz
+a8e8705151523c3b01baa40c2f493e46 Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz
--
cgit v0.10.2
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Parallel-ForkManager.git/commit/?h=masterid=fda408bb0f724f59cd7f1d554bba49a5fc4567ce
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1220595] perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- tibbs's perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.15-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=667636 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1220595] perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10325755 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
tibbs uploaded Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz for perl-Parallel-ForkManager
a8e8705151523c3b01baa40c2f493e46 Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Parallel-ForkManager/Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz/md5/a8e8705151523c3b01baa40c2f493e46/Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1241301] perl-App-a2p-1.009 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241301 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10325743 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
qmake needed by fedora-review?
I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly? Or
am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not finding
qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock?
Here's the output from the process:
[dlj@JohansenDev ~]$ fedora-review -b 1231427
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1231427
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1231427
INFO: -- SRPM url:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/COPASI/COPASI-4.16.101-4.20150707git192df4.fc22.src.rpm
INFO: -- Spec url: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/COPASI/COPASI.spec
INFO: Using review directory: /home/dlj/1231427-COPASI
INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files
sh: qmake: command not found
sh: qmake: command not found
sh: qmake: command not found
sh: qmake: command not found
INFO: Downloading (Source0):
https://github.com/copasi/COPASI/archive/192df43f09810b4416c7c59bec08ed63a2c22186.zip#/COPASI-192df43f09810b4416c7c59bec08ed63a2c22186.zip
INFO: Running checks and generating report
ERROR:
Exception(/home/dlj/1231427-COPASI/srpm/COPASI-4.16.101-4.20150707git192df4.fc22.src.rpm)
Config(fedora-21-i386) 0 minutes 15 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/dlj/1231427-COPASI/results
ERROR: Command failed:
INFO: WARNING: Probably non-rawhide buildroot used. Rawhide should be used
for most package reviews
And here's the output in build.log:
Mock Version: 1.2.10
Mock Version: 1.2.10
Mock Version: 1.2.10
ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs --target i686
--nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/COPASI.spec'],
chrootPath='/var/lib/mock/fedora-21-i386/root'shell=FalseprintOutput=Falseenv={'LANG':
'en_US.utf8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock',
'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf
\x1b]0;mock-chroot\x07mock-chroot', 'HOME': '/builddir',
'CCACHE_DIR': '/tmp/ccache', 'CCACHE_UMASK':
'002'}gid=135user='mockbuild'timeout=0logger=mockbuild.trace_decorator.getLog
object at 0xb697426cuid=1000)
Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs
--target i686 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/COPASI.spec'] with env
{'LANG': 'en_US.utf8', 'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOSTNAME':
'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf
\x1b]0;mock-chroot\x07mock-chroot', 'HOME': '/builddir',
'CCACHE_DIR': '/tmp/ccache', 'CCACHE_UMASK': '002'} and shell False
sh: qmake: command not found
sh: qmake: command not found
warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: JohansenDev
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
Wrote:
/builddir/build/SRPMS/COPASI-4.16.101-4.20150707git192df4.fc21.src.rpm
Child return code was: 0
LEAVE do --
Mock Version: 1.2.10
Any advice? Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F23 Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview
Hi, On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:47 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: So this was discussed at today's FESCo meeting[1]. Basically, we're not sure that it makes sense to have both interpreters in the distribution, particularly since they are merging back together in the future. Would you be willing to consider just packaging io.js *as* node.js in Fedora 23? Among other things, this would avoid the need to go through additional package reviews, rebuild nodejs-* packages to work with io.js, etc. My limited understanding of io.js is that it is essentially a superset of node.js functionality, This is correct. It has additional features but is broadly compatible with the ecosystem of packages available via npm. so it seems like just moving to this instead of node.js 0.12.0 would make sense. I'm fine with moving the default engine in Fedora 23 to io.js. I'm not so fine with still calling the package we ship io.js in nodejs, since it's not node.js, and we can't be entirely sure the next version of node.js will be greater than the current version of io.js (although I believe that is the plan). Otherwise, will this Change require building NPM packages for iojs -module rather than (or in addition to) nodejs-module? Can this be avoided by running them with an alternatives-provided /usr/bin/node? No. Only binary modules would require special iojs-foo cousins due to the different binary compatibility surface of the two engines. These would be built from the SRPMS that already exist. While binary module SRPMs would require changes, none would be necessary for pure-JavaScript modules. npm does not offer any ability to ship different code when different node.js/io.js versions are used, so it really isn't necessary for us to either. The vast majority of all code in the ecosystem will either Just Work or detect and do the right thing at runtime. We also don't really have the resources to maintain two separate stacks of JavaScript applications, as you're rightly concerned about. Therefore, we do not intend to support shipping different versions of pure-JavaScript nodejs software for different engines, though it of course will be possible to express that a particular package only works/doesn't work with a particular engine via Requires/Conflicts. Note that all of the above is a concern for the SIG even if we only ship io.js in Fedora, as I'd eventually like to get 0.12 into EPEL without leaving 0.10 users in the dust. My intention was to design the binary SRPM build logic such that the same SRPM would build nodejs-foo and iojs-foo cousins on Fedora and nodejs0.10-foo and nodejs0.12-foo cousins on EPEL with no spec changes. So remember that some big changes are coming to nodejs-packaging and binary module SRPMs anyway, the only question is which branches they're landing in. ;-) Can you please add this information on change wiki page as well? Thanks, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-07-08 16:00 UTC)
On 8 July 2015 at 19:46, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-07-08 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-07-08 10:00 Wed US/Pacific PDT 2015-07-08 13:00 Wed US/Eastern EDT 2015-07-08 17:00 Wed UTC - 2015-07-08 18:00 Wed Europe/London BST 2015-07-08 19:00 Wed Europe/Paris CEST 2015-07-08 19:00 Wed Europe/Berlin CEST 2015-07-08 22:30 Wed Asia/Calcutta IST --new day-- 2015-07-09 01:00 Thu Asia/Singapore SGT 2015-07-09 01:00 Thu Asia/Hong_Kong HKT 2015-07-09 02:00 Thu Asia/Tokyo JST 2015-07-09 03:00 Thu Australia/Brisbane EST Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13 = Followups = #topic #508 New GID for openstack-neutron .fpc 508 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/508 = New business = #topic #550 Darktable and Rawspeed internal library .fpc 550 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/550 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Apologies in advance, in all likelihood I will not be able to make the meeting this week. -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
