In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
dnf/libsolv yet, which means these tags will have no effect at image
compose time.
This has implications for spin kickstarts: the set of packages included
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48215
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48215/0001-Ticket-48215-verify_db.pl-doesn-t-verify-DB-specifie.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48228
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48228/0001-Ticket-48228-wrong-password-check-if-passwordInHisto.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48228/0002-Ticket-48228-CI-test-added-test-cases-for-ticket-482.patch
--
389-devel
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:09:34AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 4 August 2015 at 04:33, Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
As for updating the ncurses package, my current plan is to build the
libs in both ABIs (so there are four builds total with the wide and
narrow
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available which
simplify packaging by removing some of the boilerplate which was
previously
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-08-05 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On 31/07/15 14:49 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Ceph failed to build with some impenetrable C++ error:
In file included from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:28:0,
from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional_io.hpp:19,
from ./include/encoding.h:289,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, at 01:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Either %config or %config(noreplace) can cause problems during update.
Neither one is completely safe with regard to breaking a program at
runtime. It can be necessary to switch from %config(noreplace) to %config,
or vice versa, in
Hi folks,
I can't reproduce this issue.
$ sudo dnf install
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/blktap/3.0.0/3.fc23.git0.9.2/x86_64/blktap-devel-3.0.0-3.fc23.git0.9.2.x86_64.rpm
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:47:42 +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
I can't reproduce this issue.
Believe me, you can. You only created a completely different test-case,
which may not suffer from the same problem.
How to reproduce:
1. Use Fedora 22.
2. dnf install blktap-devel
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:47:42 +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
I can't reproduce this issue.
Believe me, you can. You only created a completely different test-case,
which may not suffer from the same problem.
How to
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:00:59 +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
How to reproduce:
1. Use Fedora 22.
2. dnf install blktap-devel --disablerepo=updates-testing
Can you send debugdata from dnf?
# dnf install blktap-devel --disablerepo=updates-testing --debugsolver
and then archive 'debugdata'
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 06:37:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, at 01:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Either %config or %config(noreplace) can cause problems during update.
Neither one is completely safe with regard to breaking a program at
runtime. It can be necessary to
Compose started at Wed Aug 5 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
On Thursday, 23 July 2015 at 19:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and
On 08/01/2015 03:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:40:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
[In light of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383]
'dnf install
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
dnf/libsolv yet, which means these tags will have no effect at image
compose time.
This has implications for spin kickstarts: the set of packages included
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Ryan S. Brown rya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/01/2015 03:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:40:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
[In
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
dnf/libsolv yet, which means these tags will have no effect at image
compose
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
dnf/libsolv
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:33 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
dnf/libsolv yet, which
On 08/04/2015 05:12 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Paul W. Frields (sticks...@gmail.com) said:
Here's my perspective as an i686 Fedora user...
I have a box (2009-ish) that's in use as a file/backup server.
I have 3 i686 boxen.
2 are 2009-ish atom-netbook, one is a 2000-ish PIII-desktop.
As
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 11:12 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Here's my perspective as an i686 Fedora user...
I have a box (2009-ish) that's in use as a file/backup server. As
such, I don't
spend a lot of time futzing with it - it doesn't run rawhide, it
rarely runs
the prereleases until
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:57:20 +0200
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
ok. I will transfer libzrtcpp to you. ;)
You should talk to dyfet directly about sipwitch...
Well I just did the non-reponsive maintainer procedure for ucommon,
his other package. I suppose it is fair to assume
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:11:26 +0300
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:47:31 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously. ;) If the Rawhide broken deps report had found it,
breakage could have been avoided.
A different try:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6225
Or file it in the infrastructure tracker
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
dnf/libsolv yet, which means these tags will have no effect at image
compose time.
To
Dear All,
I have orphaned the python-ufc package. This package has been
superceded by python-ffc, and upstream have abandoned python-ufc.
FWIW, python-ffc is under review[0], but it seems the submission has
been abandoned by the submitter (Fabian Abfolter).
I actually tried to retire this
Hi all,
Next week I'm going to update to the new libappstream-glib with a
soname bump in F23 and rawhide. The only deps (gnome-software and
fwupd) just needs updating to the newest releases and these are my
packages also. Any problems, please squeak.
Richard
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:45:59PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Dear All,
I have orphaned the python-ufc package. This package has been
superceded by python-ffc, and upstream have abandoned python-ufc.
FWIW, python-ffc is under review[0], but it seems the submission has
been abandoned
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
dnf/libsolv
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 13:36 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
What keeps us from completing livemedia-creator Koji integration for
Fedora 23? And what of the state of pungi?
Time and resources. We don't have enough of either to do it in F23.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:36:20PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags).
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Over the last few months (since Fedora 22 beta's release), I've been using
Btrfs as my daily driver filesystem across a multitude of machines. After
Fedora 22 released, I tried it with RAID 5 and RAID 6 enabled on
On Wednesday, August 05, 2015 01:36:20 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags).
[sorry this is late, I sent it from the wrong email address : RC2 will
be landing in ~8 hours]
Somewhat later than scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please help us complete as much of
the validation testing as we can!
We already know we'll
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-08-05)
===
Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:09 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-08-05/fesco.2015-08-05-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-08-06 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-08-06 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-08-06 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-08-06
On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 09:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.7.2015 v 18:15 Matthias Clasen napsal(a):
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just out of curiosity, do you have already any candidates for
File
Triggers? I suppose /sbin/ldconfig is one of them. Do you
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:11:26 +0300
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
On 08/05/2015 10:02 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
As a test balloon, I've now added file triggers to gdk-pixbuf2-2.31.5
-2.fc24, and librsvg2-2.40.9-3.fc24 now relies on them to get its
pixbuf loader registered.
Let me know if you see any problems with those updates that might be
caused by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239777
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209679
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250360
Bug ID: 1250360
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel and Trademark problem.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250360
mejiko kame55-itasenpara...@y2.dion.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250365
Bug ID: 1250365
Summary: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel and Trademark problem.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel
Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250365
mejiko kame55-itasenpara...@y2.dion.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250372
Bug ID: 1250372
Summary: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple and Trademark
problem.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250372
mejiko kame55-itasenpara...@y2.dion.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250373
Bug ID: 1250373
Summary: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel is Trademark problem.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250373
mejiko kame55-itasenpara...@y2.dion.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250375
mejiko kame55-itasenpara...@y2.dion.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250375
Bug ID: 1250375
Summary: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple and Trademark
problem.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250373
mejiko kame55-itasenpara...@y2.dion.ne.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On
polymake has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250528
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-ja1rq6/100.0%
return code: 1
stdout:
stderr:
sha256sum:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250528
Bug ID: 1250528
Summary: perl-Prima-1.44 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Prima
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250532
Bug ID: 1250532
Summary: perl-Text-Xslate-3.3.5 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-Xslate
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250532
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
cmd: spectool -g /var/tmp/thn-sXjU5I/perl-Text-Xslate.spec
return code: 22
stdout:
Getting
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch
perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
efc577c1e60dc378f58b24a2e90d8aa6 Prima-1.44.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Prima/Prima-1.44.tar.gz/md5/efc577c1e60dc378f58b24a2e90d8aa6/Prima-1.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 0f9c6c87d76ac4aec6a85e3d20b59e6241d1f282 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:47:09 +0200
Subject: 1.44 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4339be4..74fa322 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -3,3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250528
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Prima-1.44-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=675517
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250528
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
On 7/18/15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
I thought I'd ask here first: is there a strong reason *not* to include
those keys?
It's not recommended to encourage end users installing EOL releases.
However a seperate package for gpg keys from EOL releases is OK.
But is it
Hello Fedora,
The Fedora 22 release cycle is in full swing, and beats have been opened
for the F22 Releasae Notes. Over the coming weeks, the release notes
for the next version of Fedora will be assembled by Docs team writers,
packageers, developers, and community members of all forms.
Yeah,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244501
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Message-6.10-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241727
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-Message-6.10-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242918
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-A_kYqw/100.0%
return code: 1
stdout:
stderr:
sha256sum:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242918
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250756
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-nJMyT6/100.0%
return code: 1
stdout:
stderr:
sha256sum:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250756
Bug ID: 1250756
Summary: perl-REST-Client-273 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-REST-Client
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Aug 5, 2015 2:55 AM, Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:09:34AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 4 August 2015 at 04:33, Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
As for updating the ncurses package, my current plan is to build the
libs in
99 matches
Mail list logo
