Known issue, see threads [1] [2] plus possibly others.
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2015-October/001685.html
[2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-October/215611.html
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Looks like DNF is
Looks like DNF is failing on F24 / Rawhide.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:12 AM
Subject: ebay-cors-filter's builds started to fail in f24
To: sbona...@redhat.com
ebay-cors-filter's builds started to fail in f24
https://apps.fedoraproject.org
On 10/10/2015 08:03 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Haïkel mailto:hgue...@fedoraproject.org>>wrote:
If you want my opinion, implementing a cmake template in rpmdev-tools
with out-of-tree build support would be a better alternative.
Actually, I think all our rpmde
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Haïkel wrote:
> 2015-10-11 2:14 GMT+02:00 Neal Gompa :
> >
> > I pretty much wound up doing that, but I wanted to know if there was a
> > reason for not having it built into the macro like Mageia and SUSE do.
> >
> >
>
> Fedora's %cmake macros came first many year
2015-10-11 2:14 GMT+02:00 Neal Gompa :
>
> I pretty much wound up doing that, but I wanted to know if there was a
> reason for not having it built into the macro like Mageia and SUSE do.
>
>
Fedora's %cmake macros came first many years ago before Suse's version.
Again:
1. it has little value for
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Orion Poplawski
wrote:
> On 10/10/2015 02:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Over the last few weeks, I've been working on a number of packages that
>> use CMake for the build system for various distros, and I've noticed
>> something rather peculiar. O
On 10/10/2015 02:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
Hello all,
Over the last few weeks, I've been working on a number of packages that
use CMake for the build system for various distros, and I've noticed
something rather peculiar. Of all the distros I've built packages for
(Fedora/CentOS, openSUSE, Mageia
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 14:30:02 -0400
Lyude wrote:
> Hello! Although my legal name is Chandler, please just call me Lyude
> ;).
Hello. :)
> I've been a Linux user for a couple years now, and as of the past few
> years have became a developer and am working on making a career out of
> it. I'm curr
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151009:
Design_suite live x86_64
Cloud docker x86_64
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Scientific_kde live i386
Design_suite live i386
Kde live x86_64
No images in Rawhide 20151009 but not this.
Fail
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Haïkel wrote:
> 2015-10-10 22:25 GMT+02:00 Neal Gompa :
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Over the last few weeks, I've been working on a number of packages that
> use
> > CMake for the build system for various distros, and I've noticed
> something
> > rather peculiar. Of al
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151009:
Workstation disk raw armhfp
Images in 23 Branched 20151009 but not this:
Cloud docker x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 10 of 52
ID: 5361Test: x86_64 generic_boot default_install@uefi
ID: 5304Test: i386
Done, fails to build in rawhide due to an unrelated ARM builder failure.
> DEBUG util.py:393: Config error: releasever not given and can not be
> detected from the installroot.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3255/11403255/root.log
F23 update submitted.
--
devel mailing list
dev
2015-10-10 22:37 GMT+02:00 Xose Vazquez Perez :
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone update it ?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1145913
>
> -thanks-
>
Please start the unresponsive maintainer process.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Meanwhile, I'll update it in rawhide.
2015-10-10 22:25 GMT+02:00 Neal Gompa :
> Hello all,
>
> Over the last few weeks, I've been working on a number of packages that use
> CMake for the build system for various distros, and I've noticed something
> rather peculiar. Of all the distros I've built packages for (Fedora/CentOS,
> openSUSE,
Hi,
Can anyone update it ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1145913
-thanks-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:32:40 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> Here you go:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4921
>
> Wasn't sure what Component to use, so I guessed
> 'SCM (Source Code Management)'.
Thanks. We will get it sorted...
kevin
pgpM7F76XjcWP.pgp
Descr
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:27:30 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> What about createrepo_c? Are we using that now for Koji instead of
> createrepo?
No.
kevin
pgpMr0EAuYoCC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 02:28:21PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:03:32 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > (BTW is anyone else disturbed by the relatively massive user icons
> > that are now shown on git.fedorahosted.org? Seems to be a recent
> > change).
>
> Odd. I'm
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:03:32 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> (BTW is anyone else disturbed by the relatively massive user icons
> that are now shown on git.fedorahosted.org? Seems to be a recent
> change).
Odd. I'm not sure how that happened, it was definitely not intended.
Can you file a
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 15:54:41 -0400
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > > So I was having a look at how to change this in the configuration,
> > > but I don't understan
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots are
> > created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into the
> > b
Hello all,
Over the last few weeks, I've been working on a number of packages that use
CMake for the build system for various distros, and I've noticed something
rather peculiar. Of all the distros I've built packages for (Fedora/CentOS,
openSUSE, Mageia, Debian, and Ubuntu), only Fedora/CentOS do
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:12:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:07:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:54:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 a
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:07:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:54:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > > > Are we using a branch of koj
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:54:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> > > Are we using a branch of koji?
> >
> > Is this part of the mysterious Koji 2.0 codebase that I can't
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 15:54:41 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
...snip...
> > So I was having a look at how to change this in the configuration,
> > but I don't understand how the dnf.conf is generated at all. There
> > seems to be no refer
2015-10-10 21:38 GMT+02:00 Nuno Dias :
> Hi,
>
> Following the procedure from "Join the package collection
> maintainers", let me introduce myself,
>
> I usually create rpms to my use, and after some years doing that, I
> realised that maybe I should contribute, I use Linux every day, I
> starte
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:54:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> > Are we using a branch of koji?
>
> Is this part of the mysterious Koji 2.0 codebase that I can't seem to find
> anywhere?
I don't know - was that question directed to
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots
> are
> > > created in k
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots are
> > created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into the
> > b
Hi,
Following the procedure from "Join the package collection
maintainers", let me introduce myself,
I usually create rpms to my use, and after some years doing that, I
realised that maybe I should contribute, I use Linux every day, I
started with RedHat some year ago, and now Fedora is my De
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:20:22AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 09:17 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >On 8 October 2015 at 17:04, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>Christopher Meng wrote:
> >>>IMO motif should 'Obsoletes' lesstif in Fedora since motif is free now.
> >>
> >>The reason we k
On 10/09/2015 11:30 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
Though, I don't quite understand what the purpose for sonames
are in the first place, if they aren't really designed for supporting
parallel installable stuff...
They signal a break in ABI. Applications must be recompiled to link to
the new version be
On 10/10/2015 04:24 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 10/10/15 10:59, Rex Dieter wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots
are
created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into
the buildroot. this means t
Compose started at Sat Oct 10 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[389-ds-base]
389-ds-base-1.3.4.4-1.fc23.armv7hl requires librpmio.so.3
389-ds-base-1.3.4.4-1.fc23.armv7hl requires librpm.so.3
[CableSwig]
Cable
Compose started at Sat Oct 10 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.f
Am 10.10.2015 um 12:46 schrieb Haïkel:
2015-10-10 12:17 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
Am 10.10.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Haïkel:
Engineering is not science
really?
as previously stated, it's about compromises
well, that can end in something like "the cleverer give in until he becomes
the dumb
2015-10-10 12:17 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 10.10.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Haïkel:
>>
>> Engineering is not science
>
>
> really?
>
>> as previously stated, it's about compromises
>
>
> well, that can end in something like "the cleverer give in until he becomes
> the dumber itself" in german "
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 10/10/15 10:59, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>>> as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots
>>> are
>>> created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into
>>> the buildroot. this means that in f24 and on dnf wi
Am 10.10.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Haïkel:
Engineering is not science
really?
as previously stated, it's about compromises
well, that can end in something like "the cleverer give in until he
becomes the dumber itself" in german "Der Klügere gibt solange nach bis
er selbst der Dümmere ist"
On 10/10/15 10:59, Rex Dieter wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots are
created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into
the buildroot. this means that in f24 and on dnf will be used to create
the buildroot. as
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> as of this morning US time we have changed the way rawhide buildroots are
> created in koji. rawhide is now using dnf to install the packages into
> the buildroot. this means that in f24 and on dnf will be used to create
> the buildroot. as well as manage the updates on yo
2015-10-10 1:12 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Ian Malone wrote:
>> I'm actually all for unbundling, but going it alone is not guaranteed
>> to be simple. "Oh, hey, that deprecated function has been removed."
>
> Then you try to port the application to the new APIs, and if it's not
> possible, you reve
2015-10-10 1:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> When the packager has reasoned belief that debundling is actively bad
>> in some way for this package, I think we should trust the packager. I
>> know not everyone on this thread agrees, but in general, Fedora
>> *always* places a
On 09/10/15 21:13, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I completely, wholeheartedly agree with you here. However, the
> unfortunate fact of life is that we can lead a horse to water but
> cannot make them drink. Our previous policy was essentially holding
> the horse's head under the water until it drained
45 matches
Mail list logo