Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-22 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.10.2015 um 04:37 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Reindl Harald wrote: it *is* useful in case nobody reports a problem because you get the confirmation the package not only works for you Sorry, "it is not useful" was too strong a statement. I mean it is not *as relevant* for the decision whether

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

2015-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:38:53PM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > Sandro Mani writes: > > > On 22.10.2015 16:54, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > So the package is installing pynestkernel.so in > > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/nest/pynestkernel.so. However, the > > dependency generator expects MPI-enab

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

2015-10-22 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, 22 Oct, 2015 at 17:42:26 GMT, Orion Poplawski wrote: > FYI - paraview is currently FTBFS due to cmake 3.4.0. I'll debug this tomorrow. Moved to the top of my list (since CMake 3.4.0 RC2 just came out). --Ben -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Sérgio Basto wrote: > Kevin, Sounds like the experiences with an update with 50 packages like > a KDE , but most cases are just a leaf package, which a "works for me" > is a good feedback, for me . Even for a leaf package, it does not work. The example of 10 "works for me" and 1 "deletes all my d

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Reindl Harald wrote: > it *is* useful in case nobody reports a problem because you get the > confirmation the package not only works for you Sorry, "it is not useful" was too strong a statement. I mean it is not *as relevant* for the decision whether to push the update as the presence or absence

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

2015-10-22 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 21:30, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > > Feel free to bump&rebuild mkvtoolnix. I'm planning an update to 8.5.0, > > but I don't know if I'll be able to do it in time. Is there

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

2015-10-22 Thread Dave Love
Sandro Mani writes: > On 22.10.2015 16:54, Sandro Mani wrote: > So the package is installing pynestkernel.so in > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/nest/pynestkernel.so. However, the > dependency generator expects MPI-enabled binaries to be in one of > several known MPI directories, which are >

Fedora Rawhide 20151022 compose check report

2015-10-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151021 Images in Rawhide 20151021 but not this: Cloud docker x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 18 of 52 ID: 6908Test: x86_64 universal server_multi_empty ID: 6904Test: x86_64 universal server_multi_empty@uefi ID:

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

2015-10-22 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/19/2015 12:46 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide. The > affected packages seem to be: > > # repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source > "libpugixml.so.1()(64bit)" > paraview-4.4.0-1.fc24.src.rpm FYI - par

Fedora 23 Final status is NO-GO

2015-10-22 Thread Jan Kurik
At the Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting that just ends, was agreed *not to release* the Fedora 23 Final. Due to present blockers in the RC2 build, the decision is No-Go. The release slips for one week. Second Go/No-Go meeting to be planned for the next Thursday. Meeting details can be seen here:

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

2015-10-22 Thread Richard Shaw
Pugixml 1.7 has been built in rawhide and I have rebuilt OpenImageIO against it. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

2015-10-22 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 17:27 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > So the package is installing pynestkernel.so in > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/nest/pynestkernel.so. However, the > dependency generator expects MPI-enabled binaries to be in one of > several known MPI directories, which are > > $MPI_

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

2015-10-22 Thread Sandro Mani
On 22.10.2015 16:54, Sandro Mani wrote: On 22.10.2015 16:49, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hiya, I recently packaged up nest[0] which is widely used in the computational neuroscience research community. The review ticket is here[1], and the copr builds are here[2]. Even though the rpm builds perfectly

Re: Review swaps

2015-10-22 Thread Antonio Trande
On 10/22/2015 05:04 PM, Jerry James wrote: > I need two packages reviews: > > 1. arb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272606 >This is a FLINT add-on that newer versions of sagemath want. I take it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272652 -- Antonio Trande mailto: s

Review swaps

2015-10-22 Thread Jerry James
I need two packages reviews: 1. arb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272606 This is a FLINT add-on that newer versions of sagemath want. 2. gap-pkg-grape: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273244 I finally figured out how to adapt this package so that it uses the fre

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

2015-10-22 Thread Sandro Mani
On 22.10.2015 16:49, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hiya, I recently packaged up nest[0] which is widely used in the computational neuroscience research community. The review ticket is here[1], and the copr builds are here[2]. Even though the rpm builds perfectly, dnf won't install them from the copr. Thi

Packaging question on MPI requires

2015-10-22 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hiya, I recently packaged up nest[0] which is widely used in the computational neuroscience research community. The review ticket is here[1], and the copr builds are here[2]. Even though the rpm builds perfectly, dnf won't install them from the copr. This is what I get: > [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-he

Re: Undefined %epoch problem (Re: rawhide report: 20150730 changes)

2015-10-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:41:58 -0400 (EDT), Tomas Mlcoch wrote: > 1) > There were several points of failure: > * Developer who made a typo in spec file which results into bad dependency. > * rpmbuild which built an rpm with broken dependency. > * Fedora's automated depcheck that wasn't able to find

Re: Undefined %epoch problem (Re: rawhide report: 20150730 changes)

2015-10-22 Thread Tomas Mlcoch
- Original Message - > On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:58:07 -0400 (EDT), Tomas Mlcoch wrote: > > > RPM itself expects epoch to be number: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/140744377b019e0de81d76d0931c32228d2ed57e/lib/rpmvercmp.c#L124-L143 > > > > YUM expects epoch to be integ

F-23 Branched report: 20151022 changes

2015-10-22 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Oct 22 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Removed package: vfrnav-20141211-1.fc22 Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 1 Modified Packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 (0 ) Size change of modified packages: 0 (0 ) Size of removed packages: 7381878 (7.0 M) Size change: -7381

rawhide report: 20151022 changes

2015-10-22 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Oct 22 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

Re: Undefined %epoch problem (Re: rawhide report: 20150730 changes)

2015-10-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:58:07 -0400 (EDT), Tomas Mlcoch wrote: > RPM itself expects epoch to be number: > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/140744377b019e0de81d76d0931c32228d2ed57e/lib/rpmvercmp.c#L124-L143 > > YUM expects epoch to be integral number: > https://github.com/rpm-soft