Re: daveisfera's odb_2.3_cern copr build of odb for epel-5-i386 finished with 'failed'

2015-10-25 Thread Dave Johansen
The links in the above email don't work. For example, the "Build log" link says "Content Encoding Error" when I load it in Firefox: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/daveisfera/odb_2.3_cern/epel-5-i386/odb/build.log.gz This is the link that is listed if I start at the main page and d

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2015-10-26 Fedora QA Meeting

2015-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's QA meeting. We're pretty much gonna be in F23 Final test mode this week, I think. There's likely going to be an RC4 early in the week - we have a couple of proposed blockers in 32-bit KDE which are getting voting traction. We will be doing blocker review a

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > > an update for F23 also. > > I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after a

Fedora Rawhide 20151025 compose check report

2015-10-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151024: Design_suite live x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Soas disk raw armhfp Workstation live i386 Cinnamon live i386 Mate live i386 Workstation disk raw armhfp Mate disk raw armhfp Cinnamon live x86_64 Design_suite live i386 M

Re: Bug dnf update

2015-10-25 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: > Yes. He were loading for more time. > > Well, having a slow connection to your nearest mirror is not really a bug in dnf. Try again later or specify a different mirror. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-25 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > > an update for F23 also. > > I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all the F-2

Re: Bug dnf update

2015-10-25 Thread Albino B Neto
2015-10-25 17:01 GMT-02:00 Alexander Ploumistos : > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: >> >> ^CTerminated. Yes. He were loading for more time. Albino -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > > an update for F23 also. > > I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all

Re: Bug dnf update

2015-10-25 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: > ^CTerminated. > This looks like you pressed Ctrl+C and forced the termination yourself. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject

Re: Bug dnf update

2015-10-25 Thread Albino B Neto
2015-10-25 16:49 GMT-02:00 Igor Gnatenko : > I don't see bug here. The DNF were loading..., the network is ok. The DNF stoped. Albino -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/cod

Re: make unmaintained ??

2015-10-25 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push > an update for F23 also. I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all the F-23 freezing stages? It may cause FTBFSes or even broken bui

Re: Bug dnf update

2015-10-25 Thread Igor Gnatenko
I don't see bug here. On Sun, Oct 25, 2015, 7:48 PM Albino B Neto wrote: > Hi > > I was update on my system: > > # dnf update > Fedora 22 - x86_64 - Updates 66 kB/s | 18 MB 04:48 > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:01:45 ago on Sun Oct 25 > 14:25:58 2015. > > ^C

Bug dnf update

2015-10-25 Thread Albino B Neto
Hi I was update on my system: # dnf update Fedora 22 - x86_64 - Updates 66 kB/s | 18 MB 04:48 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:01:45 ago on Sun Oct 25 14:25:58 2015. ^CTerminated. Albino -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fed

Bodhi updates not pushed?

2015-10-25 Thread Christopher
On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694 it was brought to my attention that my updates for the zookeeper package weren't pushed to the f22 and f21 updates-testing repos, though I do see the one in the f23 repo. Did I do something wrong? Where can I go to check or fix the problem? --

F-23 Branched report: 20151025 changes

2015-10-25 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Oct 25 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Updated Packages: cogl-1.22.0-2.fc23 -- * Wed Oct 21 2015 Ray Strode 1.22.0-2 - Fix black login screen Resolves: #1272737 Size change: 1459 bytes mutter-3.18.1-4.fc23 * Wed Oct 21 2015 Ray Strode

rawhide report: 20151025 changes

2015-10-25 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Oct 25 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0