... my fault. The package name (and the .spec file) is set to "kpmcore",
while the review request and PackageDB are set to "KPMcore"...
Should I retire in PackageDB and then redo the request package process?
Can I use the same review request by renaming it or I must do a new one?
Il
On 29/11/15 18:18, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:10:25 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
Solved by changing .spec file name as set in PackageDB.
The developer himself uses both kpmcore and KPMcore in the project, so I
think there's no problem in adopting KPMcore as name in Fedora.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 09:53:40PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2015-11-28 at 14:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:11:48 +
> > James Hogarth wrote:
> >
> > > I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything
> > > jumped
I'm trying to make the first build of an approved package (kpmcore),
I've imported the .src.rpm, but the build in rawhide fails (without
giving me a lot of information...):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12012584
The strange is scratch-build works:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277233
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 00:35:37 +0100
Björn Persson wrote:
> Is there a way to deal with the following situation in Koji?
>
> · Build tool B has a build-time dependency on itself.
> · B is linked to library L version 1.
> · L gets upgraded to version 2, which changes
On Sáb, 2015-11-28 at 14:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:11:48 +
> James Hogarth wrote:
>
> > I was flicking through package review requests to see if anything
> > jumped out as interesting when I saw this:
> >
> >
Solved by changing .spec file name as set in PackageDB.
The developer himself uses both kpmcore and KPMcore in the project, so I
think there's no problem in adopting KPMcore as name in Fedora.
Sorry for the noise.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
5c2c9e2f27c406e952c415decdadfd7e Hijk-0.26.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Hijk/Hijk-0.26.tar.gz/md5/5c2c9e2f27c406e952c415decdadfd7e/Hijk-0.26.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From fe9fca5b4c2ba55f37006d041ac5566df88db3a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:44:31 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.26
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Hijk.spec | 14 +++---
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+),
cf91c2e1306353647fc7a9fd8b881373 Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI-0.12.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI/Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI-0.12.tar.gz/md5/cf91c2e1306353647fc7a9fd8b881373/Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
>From f0efac54c89cd068b5ae0e1517f5982fabb5375b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:53:20 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.12
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI.spec | 7 +--
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285570
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
eseyman's perl-Hijk-0.26-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=702136
--
You are receiving this mail
Compose started at Sun Nov 29 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.18-2.fc23.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.3.0
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
ca045d6633078361fd7b1f1e2d316852 Mojolicious-6.33.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mojolicious/Mojolicious-6.33.tar.gz/md5/ca045d6633078361fd7b1f1e2d316852/Mojolicious-6.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
>From d1f4defc72af2815f637d241b8d9509aca57b7a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:51:31 +0100
Subject: Update to 6.33
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283540
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
eseyman's perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI-0.12-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=702137
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283442
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
eseyman's perl-Mojolicious-6.33-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=702139
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283540
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285570
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283442
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277233
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live i386
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151128
No images in Rawhide 20151128 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 48 of 49
ID: 9223Test: i386
>From 6aa8938158eb8379b86f869b75f5df77ab3d274f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 16:02:02 +
Subject: Fix broken previous fix for CPAN RT#99880, RHBZ#1158379
---
Crypt-Random-1.25-test-fix.patch | 17 -
>From 6aa8938158eb8379b86f869b75f5df77ab3d274f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 16:02:02 +
Subject: Fix broken previous fix for CPAN RT#99880, RHBZ#1158379
---
Crypt-Random-1.25-test-fix.patch | 17 -
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you
> > have a genuine reason why people should be careful
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282917
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-mysqld-0.17-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094440
Ján Rusnačko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrusn...@redhat.com
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you
> have a genuine reason why people should be careful about touching your
> package, or follow some specific process when doing so, or there's
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:10:25 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Solved by changing .spec file name as set in PackageDB.
>
> The developer himself uses both kpmcore and KPMcore in the project, so I
> think there's no problem in adopting KPMcore as name in Fedora.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
Both
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:50:22 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> It always used to be the case that the request for a package to be added
> to pkgdb was rejected if the title didn't match,
True. For a long time, reviewers have adjusted the bug title during review
because of that.
> so has a bug been
>
33 matches
Mail list logo