Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LetsEncrypt#Scope > Why is this a proposed Change? Let's Encrypt was pushed out to *all* currently supported Fedora releases, so of co

Re: Review swaps (4 R packages)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/08/2016 11:14 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Hi! > > I have 4 R package that I submitted for review. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333 R-highlight > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334 R-inline > https://b

F24 Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LetsEncrypt#Scope Change owner(s): * Nick Bebout *James Hogarth * Nick Le Mouton The Let's Encrypt client is now packaged in Fedora. This will allow Fedora users to easily install the

Re: rpmlint FAILED for cppad-20160000.0-2.fc24

> "KP" == Kamil Paral writes: KP> Hello, we have an RFE for adding a rpmlint whitelist feature here: KP> https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T692 I can't actually log into phabricator to respond there, but really this needs to be with the spec file. I edit spec files in vim, with s

Re: ebay-cors-filter's dependencies failed to resolve in f24

On 02/08/2016 08:51 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Hi, just received: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:46 PM, > wrote: > > ebay-cors-filter's dependencies failed to resolve in f24 > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/ebay-cors-filter

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

On 02/08/2016 08:56 AM, Digimer wrote: > On 08/02/16 08:56 AM, Michele Baldessari wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:03:46PM -0500, Digimer wrote: >>> On 17/12/15 09:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 12/17/2015 05:27 PM, Digimer wrote: > I'll take co-maintainer to assist Alex as she comes

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

Of course On 02/08/2016 06:32 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > I've taken them for the time being and I'll go over the specs and > sources sometime this week. Can I bug you if I have any questions? > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/li

Re: Python packages not compliant to Fedora guidelines

On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 11:00:29AM +0100, Haïkel wrote: > Problem is that these guidelines are not compliant with EL7 guidelines. > I have the reverse problem that packages from EPEL7 don't build > anymore on CentOS. Where are these guidelines documented? Kind regards Till -- devel mailing list

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

On 02/08/2016 01:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 02/08/2016 12:45 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: >>> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:21 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: Part of the change i

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/08/2016 12:45 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:21 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: >>> Part of the change is defining the exact subset. The idea is that it >>> shou

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 12:47 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 02/08/2016 12:45 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:21 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > > > Part of the change is defining the exact subset. The idea is that > > > it  > > > should be small, to keep cloud images small

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/2016 12:45 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:21 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: >> Part of the change is defining the exact subset. The idea is that it >> should be small, to keep cloud images small for apps that don't use >>

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:21 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > Part of the change is defining the exact subset. The idea is that it > should be small, to keep cloud images small for apps that don't use > Python themselves. Wouldn't it be a better goal to not have Python at all on Cloud images? --  Ma

[Bug 1305134] Review Request: perl-Data-Page-Pageset - Change long page list to be shorter and well navigate

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305134 Denis Fateyev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

I've taken them for the time being and I'll go over the specs and sources sometime this week. Can I bug you if I have any questions? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.22 Release

FYI: Coming to Rawhide soon. - Elio -- Forwarded message -- From: Kai Engert Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:01 AM Subject: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.22 Release To: mozilla-dev-tech-crypto The NSS team has released Network Security Services (NSS) 3.22, which is a minor release. New funct

Re: Firefox - call for testing (Gtk3 effort)

abrt should write the reason why it ignores crashes of Firefox to system logs. Jakub On 02/03/2016 02:48 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: On 02/03/2016 02:45 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: On 02/03/2016 10:53 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: Also please remove Firefox from ABRT blacklist at: /etc/abrt/abrt-a

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

On 02/08/2016 02:13 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 08/02/16 08:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >> python3 package to be split in several more subpackages: >> * system-python-libs - a subset of standard Python library considered >> essential to run "system tools" requiring Python >> * system-python - /u

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

On 02/08/2016 09:21 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 02/08/2016 08:27 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> = Proposed Self Contained Change: System Python = >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/System_Python >> >> Is this intended to mirror Debian's pyt

Re: Containers: we're asking for ponies, so here's a suggestion for the Minimum Viable (Modular) Pony Show

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:37:40PM +0100, Šimon Lukašík wrote: > Thing is just we have slightly different approach. Let me explain. Using OpenSCAP sounds great. Mostly, I wanted to focus on results and what the user sees rather than implementation details. The advantages you describe sound exciti

Review swaps (4 R packages)

Hi! I have 4 R package that I submitted for review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333 R-highlight https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334 R-inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305335 R-Rcpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305336 R-RInside

Re: ebay-cors-filter's dependencies failed to resolve in f24

hi depend on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305015 regards .g Il 08/02/2016 16:51, Sandro Bonazzola ha scritto: Hi, just received: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:46 PM, > wrote: ebay-cors-filter's dependencies failed to resolve in f24 ht

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

On 08/02/16 08:56 AM, Michele Baldessari wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:03:46PM -0500, Digimer wrote: >> On 17/12/15 09:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> On 12/17/2015 05:27 PM, Digimer wrote: I'll take co-maintainer to assist Alex as she comes up to speed. I maintained the "cluster"

Re: ebay-cors-filter's dependencies failed to resolve in f24

Hi, just received: On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:46 PM, wrote: > ebay-cors-filter's dependencies failed to resolve in f24 > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/ebay-cors-filter > > -- > You received this message due to your preference settings at > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:31:12PM -, Raphael Groner wrote: > You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any more". > Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security patches? To > retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea. That's quite the opposite, yo

Re: Containers: we're asking for ponies, so here's a suggestion for the Minimum Viable (Modular) Pony Show

On 02/08/2016 03:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: At DevConf.cz, I said that 2016 needed to be the year of the _show_ part of "show & tell" for what we started with the "rings" proposal and now what we're calling, vaguely, "modularity". Some of that is scary, because anything really new always is.

Re: Containers: we're asking for ponies, so here's a suggestion for the Minimum Viable (Modular) Pony Show

On 02/08/2016 03:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: At DevConf.cz, I said that 2016 needed to be the year of the _show_ part of "show & tell" for what we started with the "rings" proposal and now what we're calling, vaguely, "modularity". Some of that is scary, because anything really new always is.

Containers: we're asking for ponies, so here's a suggestion for the Minimum Viable (Modular) Pony Show

At DevConf.cz, I said that 2016 needed to be the year of the _show_ part of "show & tell" for what we started with the "rings" proposal and now what we're calling, vaguely, "modularity". Some of that is scary, because anything really new always is. It's important that we do this in a way that *bo

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - lnovich ooprala and vjancik

On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 09:38:28 +0100 Ondřej Vašík wrote: > Kevin Fenzi píše v Čt 04. 02. 2016 v 13:34 -0700: > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses > > for these package maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the > > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are st

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:03:46PM -0500, Digimer wrote: > On 17/12/15 09:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 12/17/2015 05:27 PM, Digimer wrote: > >> I'll take co-maintainer to assist Alex as she comes up to speed. I > >> maintained the "cluster" package in Fedora up until it was retired in > >>

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/2016 08:31 AM, Raphael Groner wrote: > You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any > more". Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security > patches? To retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea. I w

Re: Pidora

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > At DevConf I understood that Pidora is dead and the people cannot be > reached. However the new rebuild from Ian is already more awesome (it > contains Ada and Haskell). However, we still need more people interested > in helping there. I

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any more". Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security patches? To retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea. I would be happy to see someone to take and continue shorewall maintainership, at least in rawhide.

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 3 packages were orphaned idjc [f23, f22] was orphaned by sergiomb DJ application for streaming audio https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/idjc lemonpos [epe

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

On 02/08/2016 02:13 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: >> liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008) >> liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010) > Hmm, I have a lot of colleagues using versions 7.5 and 8.0, so I am > tempted to take them. Fee

Re: rpmlint FAILED for cppad-20160000.0-2.fc24

> I have comments at the top of the spec file that explain the reason for > the warning below. In addition, I have posted messages about this > warning on this list; see > project.org/thread/GI3L74J47OLRTYLQIMSEUA7SUZR5VLU7/#JUUSDFET2HBPUDIP3G7CPHB7Q7XCCLEG > > Should I just ignore the message bel

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: > liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008) > liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010) Hmm, I have a lot of colleagues using versions 7.5 and 8.0, so I am tempted to take them. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lis

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

On 08/02/16 08:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: python3 package to be split in several more subpackages: * system-python-libs - a subset of standard Python library considered essential to run "system tools" requiring Python * system-python - /usr/bin/system-python binary (interpreter) for the tools to

Re: Fedora 24 Mass Rebuild

> > #2) Not sure how the rpmlint notification system is setup, but I > > found it odd that I received notification of packages that passed. > > Really why send those? Or is it something I can configure what type > > of notification I would want? > > It seems there's only triggers on 'new result' o

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Graphical System Upgrades

> Also can we ensure that gnome software/packagekit updates the dnf database > correctly before we recommend, or even enable, this upgrade method? > It's bad enough right now with F23 and dnf autoremoving stuff installed via > the packagekit interfaces but add in a whole system upgrade being out o

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

liborigin: Origin 7.5 (last release 2008) liborigin2: Origin 8.1 (last release 2010) On 02/08/2016 12:22 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: >> Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin >> files are not covered by these rele

Re: Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: > Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin > files are not covered by these releases. Would you happen to know the latest Origin version supported by liborigin? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://l

Orphaning liborigin and liborigin2

Hi all, I'm going to orphan liborigin and liborigin2 in Rawhide. Last liborigin dependency was LabPlot, but this does not depend on liborigin with 2.x releases available in Rawhide. Same for liborigin2 which was required by scidavis. Upstream development is dead for years now and newer Origin file

Re: In A World Where...TCs don't exist?

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:11:49PM +0100, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Already added to our next grooming meeting. Nice. Without realizing this discussion already happened here, I asked Dennis the same question as Rich, about the status of the its (virt-builder's) metadata distribution as part of Fedo

Re: Pidora

> During his DevConf presentation, Ian mentioned that he had to recompile a lot > of the base packages to get it working, so I'm guessing not. His presentation > should be on YouTube by now if you're interested. You might also want to have a look at "Fedora 23 Remix for Pi 2B" [1] by Vaughan. Th

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/08/2016 08:27 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed Self Contained Change: System Python = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/System_Python > > Is this intended to mirror Debian's python-minimal? > > What steps have been taken to ac

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

> It's part of what nss-myhostname provides. There's clearly no > consensus on the "gateway" feature. The belief of operating systems' programmers that a lack of a default gateway must imply no network connectivity constricts useful network designs. My objection to the "gateway" name is simply