Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > rpms/dmenu -- Generic menu for X ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) > > I'll take this one, finally. > P > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1309675] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/43_fts3.t test fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309675 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DBD-SQLite-1.48-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0e67ba6792 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > rpms/dmenu -- Generic menu for X ( master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) I'll take this one, finally. P signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

psabata set the monitor flag of perl-MooseX-App to nobuild

psabata set the monitor flag of perl-MooseX-App to nobuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] please review: 48383 import tasks with dynamic buffersizes.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48383 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48383/0001-Ticket-48383-import-tas ks-with-dynamic-buffer-sizes.patch -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Brisbane signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 350 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 112 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 14

[Test-Announce] 2016-02-22 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 24 Blocker Review

# F24 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-02-22 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have a few proposed blockers to review, so let's take a look at them. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-02-22 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's QA meeting. I don't think there's anything urgent to discuss - can anyone think of anything I've missed? If anyone has a reason we should run the meeting, please do reply to this mail and we can put it back on again :) Thanks folks! -- Adam Williamson

Re: CVE-2015-7547 fix for Fedora 21

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Miller wrote: >> I think what killed it was that lots of people were interested in >> continuing on Red Hat Linux 7.x and Red Hat Linux 9 indefinitely, but >> not nearly as many were interested in extended

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 855 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 620 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 469

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 246 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 228 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 222

Re: CVE-2015-7547 fix for Fedora 21

Matthew Miller wrote: > I think what killed it was that lots of people were interested in > continuing on Red Hat Linux 7.x and Red Hat Linux 9 indefinitely, but > not nearly as many were interested in extended life for the early > Fedora Core releases. *shrug* That was a problem, but without the

[Bug 1305249] perl-Devel-Timer-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305249 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-Timer-0.07-1.fc2

[Bug 1305188] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305188 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1305188] perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305188 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBIx-Connector-0.55-1.

[Bug 1305249] perl-Devel-Timer-0.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305249 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Devel-Timer-0.07-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

openbabel update in rawhide

Hi! While fixing the FTBFS in openbabel, I rebased it to current git HEAD. There seem to be some minor ABI changes, as expected with C++ libraries, so a rebuild of the dependent packages is required. I found the following consumers: avogadro ghemical gnome-chemistry-utils IQmol kalzium xdrawchem

[Bug 1310479] perl-MooseX-App-1.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310479 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13085465 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1310479] perl-MooseX-App-1.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310479 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1129110 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1129110=edit [patch] Update to 1.34 (#1310479) -- You are

[Bug 1310479] New: perl-MooseX-App-1.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310479 Bug ID: 1310479 Summary: perl-MooseX-App-1.34 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooseX-App Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1310476] New: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310476 Bug ID: 1310476 Summary: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.40 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Code-TidyAll Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1310475] New: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310475 Bug ID: 1310475 Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.64 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

eseyman pushed to perl-HTML-Defang (master). "Modernize spec file"

From e0f699a4bb6fa651594167da51f6d0af84174158 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:59:51 +0100 Subject: Modernize spec file --- perl-HTML-Defang.spec | 21 ++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git

eseyman pushed to perl-HTML-GenToc (master). "Modernize spec file"

From 4397f6e69ac33faa2f44d65c06e457e8e0213051 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:30:30 +0100 Subject: Modernize spec file --- perl-HTML-GenToc.spec | 23 +-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff

Re: Declining package maintenance requests?

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 09:52:17PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > > If a person is not able to make a click in 7 days (maybe vacation > > periods could be excluded from the count), why should he be able to do > > so in the following 21 days? > > What vacation

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

Am Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:08:23 +0100 schrieb Jens Lody : > Am Sun, 21 Feb 2016 21:35:32 + > schrieb Tom Hughes : > > > On 21/02/16 21:31, Jens Lody wrote: > > > > > I don't see any hint about verification, if I go to the > > > download-site from germany:

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

Am Sun, 21 Feb 2016 21:35:32 + schrieb Tom Hughes : > On 21/02/16 21:31, Jens Lody wrote: > > > I don't see any hint about verification, if I go to the > > download-site from germany: > > > > https://getfedora.org/de_CH/workstation/download/ > > > > There's just a button,

Re: unannounced soname bump: libglpk

On 02/19/2016 11:33 AM, Björn Esser wrote: Am 19.02.2016 18:12 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski : I believe this is the list of broken packages in rawhide. $ sudo dnf --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide repoquery --whatrequires 'libglpk.so.36()(64bit)' Fedora rawhide - x86_64

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

Am Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:36:37 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi : > On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:32:46 -0500 > Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > So, I see that someone hacked Linux Mint, and slipped in some > > trojaned ISO download images. > > > > As a curiousity, I went

eseyman pushed to perl-HTML-SimpleParse (master). "Modernize spec file"

From 6cff64bf023e6ca28d332f5a191b48aaf5f7eb1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:35:52 +0100 Subject: Modernize spec file --- perl-HTML-SimpleParse.spec | 22 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

On 21/02/16 21:31, Jens Lody wrote: I don't see any hint about verification, if I go to the download-site from germany: https://getfedora.org/de_CH/workstation/download/ There's just a button, that directly downloads the iso. You must have javascript disabled for getfedora.org then - if it

eseyman pushed to perl-HTML-Tiny (master). "Modernize spec file"

From 08ab98c4eb776fe60d24d44a7e54499730835fab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:07:40 +0100 Subject: Modernize spec file --- perl-HTML-Tiny.spec | 30 +- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Re: Declining package maintenance requests?

Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > If a person is not able to make a click in 7 days (maybe vacation > periods could be excluded from the count), why should he be able to do > so in the following 21 days? What vacation periods? How do you know when a stranger on another continent might be on

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 01:43:54PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:31:05AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Sam Varshavchik > > wrote: > > > So, I see that someone hacked Linux Mint, and slipped in some trojaned ISO

eseyman pushed to perl-HTML-Toc (master). "Modernize spec file"

From f05e8472a416b0ab38818008df9ca59e11d0d580 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:24:08 +0100 Subject: Modernize spec file --- perl-HTML-Toc.spec | 29 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff

eseyman pushed to perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple (master). "Clean up spec file"

From c42f193fb0697aec60e1d178b8439aac7edcb1f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:13:49 +0100 Subject: Clean up spec file --- perl-HTML-TokeParser-Simple.spec | 23 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:31:05AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Sam Varshavchik > wrote: > > So, I see that someone hacked Linux Mint, and slipped in some trojaned ISO > > download images. > Since Fedora looks to be moving to Live USB

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > So, I see that someone hacked Linux Mint, and slipped in some trojaned ISO > download images. > Since Fedora looks to be moving to Live USB Creator (maybe Fedora Media Writer, TBD) as the primary download for Fedora

Fedora Rawhide 20160221 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160220: Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64 Images in Rawhide 20160220 but not this: Cloud_atomic disk raw

[Bug 1309675] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/43_fts3.t test fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309675 Bug 1309675 depends on bug 1308765, which changed state. Bug 1308765 Summary: sqlite-3.11.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308765 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1169647] perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-15.fc22 FTBFS: No Package found for libreoffice-headless

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169647 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:32:46 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote: > So, I see that someone hacked Linux Mint, and slipped in some > trojaned ISO download images. > > As a curiousity, I went to https://getfedora.org, to see how easy it > is to find instructions for verifying the

Re: CVE-2015-7547 fix for Fedora 21

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:42:44AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I really wish Fedora would provide the infrastructure to push security > updates for EOL releases. I still think that the one thing that killed > Fedora Legacy was its insane amount of bureaucracy and that with an ACL-less >

[Bug 1266751] perl-Event-RPC-1.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266751 Bug 1266751 depends on bug 1267179, which changed state. Bug 1267179 Summary: Review Request: perl-CBOR-XS - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267179 What|Removed

Updating gsl to 2.1 in Rawhide on Monday

I'll be updating gsl to 2.1 in Rawhide on Monday and rebuilding dependent packages. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276893 for some tracking info. A fair amount of work was done to get everything ready for this update, but there may be a couple stragglers. -- Orion

[Bug 1305707] perl-CBOR-XS-1.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305707 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1305707] perl-CBOR-XS-1.4 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305707 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CBOR-XS-1.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1285518] Review Request: perl-File-Edit-Portable - Read and write files while keeping the original line-endings intact

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285518 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.18-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1307195] perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307195 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1307195] perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307195 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

More prominent link to verification hashes

So, I see that someone hacked Linux Mint, and slipped in some trojaned ISO download images. As a curiousity, I went to https://getfedora.org, to see how easy it is to find instructions for verifying the downloaded images. I couldn't find it. There were many helpful download links, all over

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 01:58:55PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/21/2016 11:44 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > > >Now, I think that it makes sense to have the POC/Package Admins able to > >approve and/or decline requests. I think the following 3 improvements > >would greatly improve

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

Jonathan Underwood wrote: > My personal opinion is that (with a few possible exceptions, perhaps > critical path, or a subset of that), co-maintainership requests > shouldn't ever be turned down. That's really not in the spirit of > Fedora. Which makes me wonder why, for most packages, we even

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

On 02/21/2016 11:44 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: Now, I think that it makes sense to have the POC/Package Admins able to approve and/or decline requests. I think the following 3 improvements would greatly improve the ACL request experience: - auto-accept the ACL requests after 7 days of

[Bug 1307195] perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307195 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1309675] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/43_fts3.t test fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309675 Bug 1309675 depends on bug 1308765, which changed state. Bug 1308765 Summary: sqlite-3.11.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308765 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1310414] perl-podlinkcheck-13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310414 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13078180 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1310411] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310411 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13078128 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1310412] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160121 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310412 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13078144 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

On 21 February 2016 at 10:44, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:10:53AM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >> This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: >> >> On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati >>

[Bug 1310414] New: perl-podlinkcheck-13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310414 Bug ID: 1310414 Summary: perl-podlinkcheck-13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-podlinkcheck Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1310411] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310411 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1128976 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1128976=edit [patch] Update to 0.40 (#1310411) -- You are

[Bug 1310411] New: perl-Parse-PMFile-0.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310411 Bug ID: 1310411 Summary: perl-Parse-PMFile-0.40 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Parse-PMFile Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1310412] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160121 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310412 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1128977 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1128977=edit [patch] Update to 5.20160121 (#1310412) -- You

[Bug 1310412] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160121 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310412 Bug ID: 1310412 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160121 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

rawhide report: 20160221 changes

Compose started at Sun Feb 21 05:15:02 UTC 2016 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.18-3.fc24.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.4.0 [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

Hi, folks. It's been announced that Christoper Mang's packages will be orphaned next Friday unless he speaks up. A number of Perl packages are involved and I figured it would be nice to figure who's interested in maintaining which package by Friday. The packages involved: * perl-AnyEvent-I3 *

[Bug 1310366] perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310366 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

pghmcfc pushed to perl-YAML-LibYAML (perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.61-1.fc24). "Update to 0.61 (..more)"

From 0452a353b1184ad4e748925fc5f32bfd69406980 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:16:49 + Subject: Update to 0.61 - New upstream release 0.61 - Allow reading from and writing to IO::Handle (and derived) objects (GH#37) ---

[Bug 1310366] perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310366 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pghmcfc's perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.61-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=737489 -- You are receiving this mail

pghmcfc pushed to perl-YAML-LibYAML (master). "Update to 0.61 (..more)"

From 0452a353b1184ad4e748925fc5f32bfd69406980 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:16:49 + Subject: Update to 0.61 - New upstream release 0.61 - Allow reading from and writing to IO::Handle (and derived) objects (GH#37) ---

pghmcfc uploaded YAML-LibYAML-0.61.tar.gz for perl-YAML-LibYAML

9667700a73e0a8653f3ffce297368bf2 YAML-LibYAML-0.61.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-YAML-LibYAML/YAML-LibYAML-0.61.tar.gz/md5/9667700a73e0a8653f3ffce297368bf2/YAML-LibYAML-0.61.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Re: Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:10:53AM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: > > On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati > wrote: > > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: > [snip] > > Also I can help

Declining package maintenance requests? (Was Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26)

This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: [snip] > Also I can help with the i3 packages as I volounteered few weeks ago and > have been shot down by