Re: Linux Presentation

2016-02-23 Thread A RAJASEKHAR
thank you Andrew Sent with MailTrack On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Andrew Clayton wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:07:38 +0530, A RAJASEKHAR wrote: > > > hi friends can anyone tell me

Re: Linux Presentation

2016-02-23 Thread Andrew Clayton
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:07:38 +0530, A RAJASEKHAR wrote: > hi friends can anyone tell me what is qemu e1000 > emulation Wow random. My guess would be it's qemu emulating an Intel e1000 network interface. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/list

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Ralf Senderek
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Till Maas wrote: I used my access to the signing server to verify the key before signing it. But why is confirming the fingerprint here a step forward? Why would someone search in this mailing list for the fingerprint of the gpg key? FWIW, the signing server just gave me a

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 08:13:59PM +0100, Ralf Senderek wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Till Maas wrote: > > > You can already get the keys at various places: > > > > - Fedora website > > - physical DVDs > > - fedora-repos git repository > > - fedora-repos RPM on kojipkgs > > - fedora-repos RPM F

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 23 February 2016 at 12:13, Ralf Senderek wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Till Maas wrote: > >> You can already get the keys at various places: >> >> - Fedora website >> - physical DVDs >> - fedora-repos git repository >> - fedora-repos RPM on kojipkgs >> - fedora-repos RPM Fedora mirrors

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Ralf Senderek
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Till Maas wrote: You can already get the keys at various places: - Fedora website - physical DVDs - fedora-repos git repository - fedora-repos RPM on kojipkgs - fedora-repos RPM Fedora mirrors - Fedora ISO images on Fedora mirrors - Eventually DNSSEC protected from

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

2016-02-23 Thread Brendan Jones
On 15/02/16 07:46, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: The new version of qjackctl, which now depends on qt5. We cannot do the update without fixing this. As far as I can tell, the qjackctl does not use the QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS directly. The offending flags come through qmake. Other than this the new qsynth a

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:22:24PM -, Ralf Senderek wrote: > Yes, for people who look only in one place, the manipulated web server. > But that is the reason why the fingerprint has to pop up in different places > where it is hard to fake. Even if this one user can be tricked, others can > dis

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:01:29 +0100 Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:23:13AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:45:03 + > > Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > > > I don't think there is any utility in pointing people to a > > > keyserver here. > > > > I think it w

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:47:51PM +, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > They key itself should come with signatures. That it doesn't is weird > and inconvenient. If it came with a single signature by a long lived > key used for the purpose of authenticating keys, it would go a log > way. The gpg tool

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:23:13AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:45:03 + > Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > I don't think there is any utility in pointing people to a keyserver > > here. > > I think it would allow them to check signatures against their web of > trust. Since

Nonresponsive maintainer: maci

2016-02-23 Thread Denis Fateyev
Hello there, Does anybody know how to contact Marcel Wysocki ("m...@satgnu.net", FAS login: maci)? While ago, according the policy I've initiated nonresponsive maintainer procedure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304786 , since there is no contact with main contact for Fedora branche

Fedora Rawhide 20160223 compose check report

2016-02-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Generic boot x86_64 Generic boot i386 Kde disk raw armhfp Cloud disk raw x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160222: Server disk raw armhfp Images in Rawhide 20160222 but not this: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_a

Re: Linux Presentation

2016-02-23 Thread A RAJASEKHAR
i have one doubt in linux, If the desktop of linux is very slow. what the steps to take for that and how to debug that Sent with MailTrack On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:07 PM, A RAJASEKHAR wro

Re: Linux Presentation

2016-02-23 Thread A RAJASEKHAR
hi friends can anyone tell me what is qemu e1000 emulation Sent with MailTrack On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Alexis Jeandet < alexis.jean...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Here you ma

Re: Linux Presentation

2016-02-23 Thread Alexis Jeandet
Hi, Here you may find some good material: http://free-electrons.com/docs/freesw/ http://free-electrons.com/docs/reasons/ Best regards, Alexis. Le mardi 23 février 2016 à 14:26 +, Jules Bashizi a écrit : > Hi Guyz of Devel !  > > I am to present Linux to Intellectual lecturers and students at >

Re: Linux Presentation

2016-02-23 Thread John M. Harris, Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I would start by separating the idea of kernel and operating system. Linux is the kernel, and the GNU operating system is normally used. On February 23, 2016 9:26:49 AM EST, Jules Bashizi wrote: >Hi Guyz of Devel ! > >I am to present Linux to Inte

Linux Presentation

2016-02-23 Thread Jules Bashizi
Hi Guyz of Devel ! I am to present Linux to Intellectual lecturers and students at University , i am looking for good material where to write my slide from . My aim in this presentation will be to demistify Linux Operating System and encourage more people to use the OS . If by any means , you k

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:45:03 + Gregory Maxwell wrote: > New users are stateless and little can be done there; at least not > right now when pre-textual security procedures' like Fedora's are > ubiquitous and thus can't be taken as a clear sign of compromise. Right. > Existing users are anot

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:12:41 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:47:51PM +, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi > > wrote: > > > My point was that you can get the signatures off the key from the > > > keyserver and see i

Re: More prominent link to verification hashes

2016-02-23 Thread Ryan S. Brown
On 02/22/2016 05:34 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 22 February 2016 at 13:00, Ralf Senderek wrote: The Fedora team could get a profile and verify the key(s) through github, the Fedora and Red Hat web sites, the Fedora magazine twitter account, and by having the Fedora team all sign public

Re: Access denied [Was: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26]

2016-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 20/02/16 08:50 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/20/2016 08:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 06:26:42AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/20/2016 05:01 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: rpms/freefem++ -- PDE solving tool ( master f23 f22 el6 ) I am trying to push an upd

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

2016-02-23 Thread Johannes Lips
> rpms/backintime -- Simple backup tool inspired from the Flyback I've taken backintime, as always co-maintainers are highly welcome, since it needs quite a bit of work to get it up to date. Thanks, Johannes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/

Re: Fedora 24 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)

2016-02-23 Thread Jan Kurik
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Greetings! > > Today, on 2016-Feb-23, we have reached Fedora 24 Change Checkpoint: > Completion deadline (testable) [1]. > > At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially > complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is t

Fedora 24 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)

2016-02-23 Thread Jan Kurik
Greetings! Today, on 2016-Feb-23, we have reached Fedora 24 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable) [1]. At this point, all accepted changes [2] should be substantially complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is to be enabled by default, it must be so enabled at Change Complet

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2016

2016-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 22/02/16 13:37 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 02/22/2016 04:55 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: In the past few days and weeks we did a mass rebuild of Fedora rawhide packages in mock with GCC 6 (and corresponding libtool) and for those packages that failed also rebuilt the same package with gcc-5.