On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> > That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323671
Bug 1323671 depends on bug 1323672, which changed state.
Bug 1323672 Summary: perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.5.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323672
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323672
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On 04/04/2016 09:46 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:00:14PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/01/2016 03:46 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:14:43PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Requires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323864
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323864
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1143495
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1143495=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323864
Bug ID: 1323864
Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999716 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Math-BigInt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323864
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Math-BigInt and version 1.9997.15 FAILED.
See for details
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323860
Bug ID: 1323860
Summary: perl-IRI-0.005 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-IRI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323853
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1143483
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1143483=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323853
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Catalyst-Runtime and version 5.90103 FAILED.
See for details
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323853
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323853
Bug ID: 1323853
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90104 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:07:50 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> KF> At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use
> KF> rich boolean Requires/Recommends for the time being until tooling
> KF> can
> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
KF> At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use
KF> rich boolean Requires/Recommends for the time being until tooling
KF> can catch up and allow us to push updates with them.
Could someone look over the language in
Thanks, but not working(
output:
/
[ilgrad@x230 rubygem-connection-pool]$ fedpkg retire "Renamed to bar"
rm '.gitignore'
rm 'rubygem-connection_pool.spec'
rm 'sources'
[master ed1] Renamed to bar
4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 89 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:32 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> OK, so I think Michael is kind of making my point for me:
>
> If we have something called @standard whose purpose is essentially to
> be a small
> set of things we expect everyone to need... having one of our top-
> tier
> deliverables
I recently got a rash of bug report that FreeCAD on f24 was segfaulting.
After looking at a few things I noticed that the f24 builds seem to be
missing all library based dependencies.
Has this happened to anyone else?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/04/2016 04:28 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place
>> for
>> systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in
>> F25+.
>
> Keep in mind that
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place
> for
> systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in
> F25+.
Keep in mind that Fedora Workstation does NOT include @standard as it
brings in
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:23:56 -0500
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > It does.
> >
> > Also, I haven't seen any of the breakage in webkit mentioned in this
> > thread here with a skylake laptop.
>
> The bug only occurs
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:20:34PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Also, going forward I'd love to see us build comps in a more sane manner than
> by editing an XML file; this simply *screams* for having a decent web UI to
> manage it, tied into pkgdb so when a package is retired it also
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It does.
>
> Also, I haven't seen any of the breakage in webkit mentioned in this
> thread here with a skylake laptop.
The bug only occurs in accelerated compositing (OpenGL) mode, which is
currently only used when necessary to support a
On 04/04/2016 03:30 PM, Ilia Gradina wrote:
> Hi all, in Fedora have two packages:
> 1. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection-pool
> and
> 2. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection_pool How delete
> my
> file in Fedora:
>
On 04/04/2016 12:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to move two systemd subpackages from the the @core group,
> but I don't know where to move them to.
>
> systemd-udev must be installed on "real hardware", so it must be
> part of Workstation, Server, Cloud, and any
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:33:51 -0400
Eric Griffith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup
> "DJ" == Dave Johansen writes:
DJ> To my knowledge mock for EL 5 has been broken for several months
DJ> now:
I've had no problems using it. I did rebuild all of EPEL5 at least ten
times recently and while there were plenty of failures I'm pretty sure
those failures
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works fine.
> > The online accounts step will be affected, but that's about it.
>
> And the
Hi all, in Fedora have two packages:
1. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection-pool
and
2. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection_pool How
delete my file in Fedora:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection-pool
Thanks and sorry for my
On 03/31/2016 09:28 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've just submitted
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06
This update does two things:
- Updates python to version 2.7.11
- Splits out the python macros into separate packages
It would be helpful if packagers would try
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323371
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322413
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works fine.
> The online accounts step will be affected, but that's about it.
Yes, only the webview portions of g-i-s would be affected, of course
(gnome-online-accounts page, and
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:47:42 -0700
Dave Johansen wrote:
> To my knowledge mock for EL 5 has been broken for several months now:
>
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Martin Ueding wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Am 03.04.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Chris Murphy:
>> So reboot a few times and check 'efibootmgr -v' to see if
>> you start getting accumulating boot entries again or not.
>
> Sadly, they keep accumulating.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> Something went wrong when epel-rpm-macros-5 was added to the EPEL5
> buildroot such that it works fine in koji but isn't actually present
> when you build in mock. So if you were trying to de-cruft your specs
>
Something went wrong when epel-rpm-macros-5 was added to the EPEL5
buildroot such that it works fine in koji but isn't actually present
when you build in mock. So if you were trying to de-cruft your specs
and found that things weren't working as you expected when you did a
mock build, that's why.
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:47:25 +0100
James Hogarth wrote:
...snip...
> How do others feel and does the Steering Committee feel it might be
> time to revisit the SCL question?
I'm against using SCL in epel until there are approved Fedora
guidelines.
The FPC folks know
On Sat, 2016-04-02 at 09:17 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> > So if there are issues with WebKit they should be fixed. "It can't
> > work lets go back to DRI2" isn't really an option in the long run
> It would be great if somebody would fix this. I just want to give a
> heads-up that we
From a2258128cfe5c49a15fdb90597bfa46185e44e01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:15:55 +0200
Subject: Link to upstream report for unbundling libcmark
---
perl-Clownfish-CFC.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
From d80117032c11a6a7213ab0ace169c241fa66be39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:26:00 +0200
Subject: 0.5.0 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321383
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Locale-1.03-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321696
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test2-0.36-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321696
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321559
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Code-TidyAll-0.43-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321382
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321382
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.03-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321559
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321938
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-PAR-Packer-1.030-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321938
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
HI all,
I was just wondering how the rest of the EPEL community felt in this area
and if perhaps teh EPEL Steering Committee might want to review policies
surrounding SCL use.
There's a growing need for more modern language versions in the EL world.
I've only just encountered this situation in
Hi,
I'd like to move two systemd subpackages from the the @core group,
but I don't know where to move them to.
systemd-udev must be installed on "real hardware", so it must be
part of Workstation, Server, Cloud, and any spin. It should not be
installed in containers and chroots, e.g. mock.
Is
Hi Chris,
Am 03.04.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> You can delete Boot0019 through Boot0129. Use either 'efibootmgr -b
> -B'
Funny enough, the first delete failed due to lack of memory! So there
was some hard limit reached.
> or rm from efivars/ but I wouldn't try deleting
On 04/03/2016 04:11 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:14:14 +0200
drago01 wrote:
No. This line does not tell you much.
Easy way to check for DRi3 is to run "glxinfo|grep buffer_age" ... if
you
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Images in this compose but not 24-20160403.n.0:
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Robotics live i386
Cinnamon live i386
Astronomy_kde live x86_64
Robotics live x86_64
Scientific_kde live i386
Astronomy_kde
From 16cfe40816f97eea20875dd5d64fa82208c5aad2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:47:57 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.025
- New upstream release 2.025
- Resolved memleak if SSL_crl_file was used (CPAN RT#113257, CPAN RT#113530)
- Simplify find
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.git/commit/?h=perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.025-1.fc25=16cfe40816f97eea20875dd5d64fa82208c5aad2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 16cfe40816f97eea20875dd5d64fa82208c5aad2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:47:57 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.025
- New upstream release 2.025
- Resolved memleak if SSL_crl_file was used (CPAN RT#113257, CPAN RT#113530)
- Simplify find
748115eb30e09d510a7df620e91e3bab Clownfish-CFC-0.5.0.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Clownfish-CFC/Clownfish-CFC-0.5.0.tar.gz/md5/748115eb30e09d510a7df620e91e3bab/Clownfish-CFC-0.5.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
I have orphaned the following branches. I don't have any machines that run
EPEL, and prefer to test things out before I push. These branches are also
supported and
maintained directly by Sphinx.
Fedora EPEL 7 Orphaned
Fedora EPEL 6 Orphaned
Fedora EPEL 5 Orphaned
--
devel mailing list
OLD: Fedora-24-20160403.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160404.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 28
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.18 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 314.82 MiB
Size
From 16cfe40816f97eea20875dd5d64fa82208c5aad2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:47:57 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.025
- New upstream release 2.025
- Resolved memleak if SSL_crl_file was used (CPAN RT#113257, CPAN RT#113530)
- Simplify find
675664fbe0a48b5844f916761323b5ce IO-Socket-SSL-2.025.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/IO-Socket-SSL-2.025.tar.gz/md5/675664fbe0a48b5844f916761323b5ce/IO-Socket-SSL-2.025.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
9 packages were orphaned
RunSnakeRun [f23, f22, master, f24] was orphaned by kevin
GUI Viewer for Python profiling runs
perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-Clownfish-CFC to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-Clownfish-CFC to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323671
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1323672
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323672
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1323671
Referenced
47790703e967e85200e4ce6cc86de845 Clownfish-0.5.0.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Clownfish/Clownfish-0.5.0.tar.gz/md5/47790703e967e85200e4ce6cc86de845/Clownfish-0.5.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
On 2016-04-04 07:49, Tom Hughes wrote:
I have been trying to resolve the FTBFS status of geos and related
issued in F24/Rawhide for two months now, without any success as the
maintainer, devrim, is not responding in any meaningful way. The
original bug report is:
I have been trying to resolve the FTBFS status of geos and related
issued in F24/Rawhide for two months now, without any success as the
maintainer, devrim, is not responding in any meaningful way. The
original bug report is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305276
Having failed
ppisar set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-Clownfish to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-Clownfish to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323677
Bug ID: 1323677
Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.25 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test2-Suite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323675
Bug ID: 1323675
Summary: perl-Net-SSLGlue-1.057 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-SSLGlue
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323672
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Clownfish-CFC and version 0.4.4 FAILED.
See for details
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323671
Bug ID: 1323671
Summary: perl-Clownfish-0.5.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Clownfish
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323672
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1143315
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1143315=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323671
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Clownfish and version 0.4.4 FAILED.
See for details
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323672
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323672
Bug ID: 1323672
Summary: perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.5.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Clownfish-CFC
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323671
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323671
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1143314
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1143314=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
On 04/03/2016 10:03 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:46:12PM -0400, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>>
>> I would be glad to put this up for review and maintain the package
>> assuming there is not someone else who
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055054
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292177
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323662
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323662
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata ---
Created attachment 1143310
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1143310=edit
A simple patch removing the private functions
Seems to resolve the issue but might break
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323662
Bug ID: 1323662
Summary: Authen::Krb5 uses internal and no longer existing krb5
functions
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Authen-Krb5
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292177
--- Comment #11 from Petr Šabata ---
Thank you. I wasn't testing this properly. I confirm the issue exists and
appears to be a design bug in the module. I'll file a new report for this.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322417
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Model-TkUI-1.354-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ee920a032b
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322417
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
From 731359f2a99af7d5b12a5d13d5483e4e58cfdd4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:30:26 +0200
Subject: 1.354 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Config-Model-TkUI.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files
From ff6d2be9218ec37c25c7e15cd59c89d5d34525d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:30:26 +0200
Subject: 1.354 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Config-Model-TkUI.spec | 5 -
sources | 2 +-
3 files
From 5e259b1a4f91f84c4cb5e2a0722b744668ecfaa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:52:26 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.086
- New upstream release 0.086
- Improved documentation of copy and move
- Simplify find command using -delete
---
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Path-Tiny.git/commit/?h=perl-Path-Tiny-0.086-1.fc25=5e259b1a4f91f84c4cb5e2a0722b744668ecfaa8
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
0f004bedcd36a7b3b517484d317b9bb8 Config-Model-TkUI-1.354.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Config-Model-TkUI/Config-Model-TkUI-1.354.tar.gz/md5/0f004bedcd36a7b3b517484d317b9bb8/Config-Model-TkUI-1.354.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo