On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm pretty much stumped on a problem where freecad (really python-pivy)
> segfaults on F24 but seems to run fine on F23 and I can't find any
> substantive difference between any of the packages.
>
> Strangely installing Coin3 from f23 on a f24
I'm pretty much stumped on a problem where freecad (really python-pivy)
segfaults on F24 but seems to run fine on F23 and I can't find any
substantive difference between any of the packages.
Strangely installing Coin3 from f23 on a f24 system seems to fix the
problem...
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Hi,
Phoronix recently release article[1] about Intel's Clear Linux with some
cool graphs showing nice performance gain compared to Xubuntu.
I didn't have time to dig in and look how it's performing against Fedora,
but I'd assume Fedora can be compared to Xubuntu in terms of compiler
settings.
I t
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 16:24 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:36:54AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > For the record, we do in fact have a policy on this:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#Priority_and_Severity
> > I wouldn't exactly clai
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:36:54AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> For the record, we do in fact have a policy on this:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#Priority_and_Severity
> I wouldn't exactly claim that it's universally followed, but it *is*
> there. I do still foll
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 12:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:36:54 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >
> > For the record, we do in fact have a policy on this:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#Priority_and_Severity
> >
> > I wouldn't exac
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:36:54 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> For the record, we do in fact have a policy on this:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#Priority_and_Severity
>
> I wouldn't exactly claim that it's universally followed, but it *is*
> there. I do still f
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:17 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:53:39AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Seg, 2016-04-18 at 23:54 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and
> > > > it se
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 11:52:30 AM CDT Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today is an important day on the Fedora 24 schedule[1], with two significant
> cut-offs.
>
> Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix
> accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will b
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:53:39AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Seg, 2016-04-18 at 23:54 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and
> > > it seems I'm hitting these two bugs:
> > > * dnf repoquery --resolve is extremely slow #127
On Ter, 2016-04-19 at 10:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:20:51 +0100
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> >
> > On Seg, 2016-04-18 at 23:54 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > >
> > > It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review
> > > and
> > > it seems I'm hitt
Hi all,
Today is an important day on the Fedora 24 schedule[1], with two significant
cut-offs.
Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted
blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as 'stable' and included
in the Beta composes. Other builds will re
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:20:51 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2016-04-18 at 23:54 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and
> > it seems I'm hitting these two bugs:
> > * dnf repoquery --resolve is extremely slow #1279538
>
>
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:49 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Failed openQA tests: 5/64 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386)
i386 F24 is still failing to boot.
> ID: 13556 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On 4/17/16, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to take over maintenance of the surf package for Fedora.
>
> Good luck with the name collision...Someone asked me to rename it to
> surf-browser[1].
>
> [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat
On 4/17/16, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to take over maintenance of the surf package for Fedora.
Good luck with the name collision...Someone asked me to rename it to
surf-browser[1].
[1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554101
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
htt
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 5/64 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386)
ID: 13545 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/13545
ID: 13556 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL:
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 07:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 05:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262556 - anaconda - MODIFIED
> > AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_data' (when
> > wifi scan run and AP w
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:00:56PM -, Raphael Groner wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:20:51AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Actually simply specifying '-x Check OwnDirs' as an argument to any
> > fedora-review call also seems to work.
> >
> > Zbyszek
>
> Please explain how to valid
Dne 19.4.2016 v 13:57 Robert Mayr napsal(a):
> Err...ok, I saw there is a limit of 1GB, so I cleaned up the repo a bit
> and it's running now.
> Sorry for the noise.
Nope, there was really full storage. I cleaned it up, so that is reason
why subsequent build passed.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
de
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 1:25:50 PM CDT Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Monday, April 18, 2016 5:30:49 PM CDT Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> > > Is it acceptable to have Beta & Fina
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:20:51AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Actually simply specifying '-x Check OwnDirs' as an argument to any
> fedora-review call also seems to work.
>
> Zbyszek
Please explain how to validate manually the ownership guidelines, without the
help from (slow) dnf repoque
2016-04-18 22:01 GMT+02:00 Robert Mayr :
> I'm trying to build a package in COPR, the source RPM is rather large
> (500MB), but it always worked fine also with bigger source files. I
> supposed I had a bad URL an uploaded the SRPM twice, but the result is the
> same.
>
> Traceback (most recent cal
On 04/18/2016 05:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262556 - anaconda - MODIFIED
>AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_data' (when
>wifi scan run and AP which does not broadcast SSID is in range)
>
> This ought to be fixed in
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks! Time for a first F24 Beta blocker bug status mail. Today is
> the Beta freeze date, so we need to be really focusing on getting Beta
> into shape now.
Sorry about the delayed response, I'd already gone to bed with manflu.
> tl;
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 11/54 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386)
ID: 13478 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday, April 18, 2016 5:30:49 PM CDT Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > > Is it acceptable to have Beta & Final release dates for F24 as stated
>> > > on [1], or we really need
Hi!
The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.30 in rawhide only.
Dependent packages should rebuild.
dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --srpm --whatrequires gsoap --alldeps
davix-0:0.6.3-1.fc25.src
fts-0:3.3.1-5.fc24.src
glite-lb-server-0:3.0.18-10.fc24.src
glite-lbjp-common-gsoap-plugin
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 6/64 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386)
ID: 13395 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/13395
ID: 13398 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: htt
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am a little confused by the beginning of the %install section, could
>>> you
>>> please explain the syntax of the first line?
>>> (%make_install INSTALL="insta
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Branched 20160419.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
31 matches
Mail list logo
