spot pushed to perl-Mail-Sender (master). "0.901"

From 706fc427b0a6ef7dde53d4da3a2329dc297bac3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:52:19 -0400 Subject: 0.901 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Mail-Sender.spec | 8 +++- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Unicode 9.0 support

Is there any point in updating fonts in rawhide to their Unicode 9.0 versions, before the change is implemented? Besides the font checking tools that do not know of Unicode 9.0 (or 8, I think), will anything important break after such an update? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] openQA downtime today

Hey folks! Just to let you know I'm planning to do some work on the production openQA instance today, upgrading it to Fedora 24 and to the recent openQA/os-autoinst git snapshots that have been running on staging for the last week or so. Last night I figured out the bug which had been causing

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160705.n.0 compose check report

On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 13:41 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Kde live i386 > Kde live x86_64 > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > Kde raw-xz armhfp > Minimal raw-xz armhfp > > Failed openQA tests: 22/78 (x86_64), 1/16 (i386) Just for the record,

Re: Fixing /.autorelabel

On Sun, 03.07.16 19:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 01:13:35AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Thu, 30.06.16 22:27, Petr Lautrbach (plaut...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > SELinux is in Permissive mode during this time. > > > > > >

Re: LBNL BSD licence

2016-07-05 11:45 GMT+02:00 Dave Love : > I've realized that the licence for a package I've recently had reviewed > is actually "LBNL BSD" > , not BSD3 with a DoE > disclaimer, as I thought. (Mea culpa, but licensecheck

Re: Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > Between my $dayjob, other foss projects and last but not > least spending time with my wife and children I'm way too busy > lately. > > So I'm trying to find a new home for the packages I maintain > pretty

dnf system upgrade has zero progress on text boot (`quiet no rhgb`)

One of my laptops has quiet and no rhgb in the grub line, so no pretty UI. As I wasn't paying attention, I used the fedup commands (download, reboot), which got routed to dnf. Upon reboot, the on-screen output showed a partial boot (from systemd messages) and no indication that an upgrade was

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 380 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 362 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 356

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 484 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 246 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 113

Re: Orphaning msp430-binutils, msp430-gcc, msp430-libc, mp430mcu, and mspdebug

On 07/04/2016 06:21 PM, Rob Spanton wrote: Hi, Unfortunately I find myself having to orphan these packages: * msp430-binutils * msp430-gcc * msp430-libc * msp430mcu * mspdebug When I originally brought them into Fedora, I was doing a fair amount of msp430 firmware development. Now

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 5 July 2016 at 06:46, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 07/05/2016 11:09 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2016

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On 07/05/2016 03:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:56:37PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my experience is that it's more likely than not that it won't boot,

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On 5 July 2016 at 06:46, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/05/2016 11:09 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones >>> wrote: Timely article

Fedora Rawhide-20160705.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 22/78 (x86_64), 1/16 (i386) ID: 24710 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL:

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:56:37PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my > >experience is that it's more likely than not that it won't boot, and > >no one cares. > > Well, that's

[Bug 1352899] New: perl-Text-Template-Simple-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352899 Bug ID: 1352899 Summary: perl-Text-Template-Simple-0.90 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-Template-Simple Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1352894] New: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.016 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352894 Bug ID: 1352894 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.016 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:10:03PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > >> If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my > >> experience is that it's

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160705.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160704.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160705.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 66 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 56.90 KiB Size of dropped packages

Broken dependencies: perl-Algorithm-Permute

perl-Algorithm-Permute has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386:

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my >> experience is that it's more likely than not that it won't boot, and >> no one cares. > > > Well,

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/05/2016 11:09 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > > > wrote: > > > > Timely article in the

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my experience is that it's more likely than not that it won't boot, and no one cares. Well, that's independent for the state as primary vs secondary architecture. If we remove i686

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On 07/05/2016 11:09 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Timely article in the Register today:

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:09:46AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones >> > wrote:

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:09:46AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > > > Timely article in the Register today: > > >

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages

On 07/04/2016 02:43 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote: Hi! We have just removed the dependency generator from the proposal [0], see diff [1]. The implementation of it (backported from RPM upstream) is significantly lacking: Python

LBNL BSD licence

I've realized that the licence for a package I've recently had reviewed is actually "LBNL BSD" , not BSD3 with a DoE disclaimer, as I thought. (Mea culpa, but licensecheck didn't spot it.) Anyway, I've fixed that, but I can't find any discussion

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Timely article in the Register today: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/ > > > > I've been

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: IBus Emoji Typing

- Original Message - > = Proposed Self Contained Change: IBus Emoji Typing = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_Emoji_Typing > > Change owner(s): > * Takao Fujiwara > > The IBus core will provide the Emoji Unicode typing with the IBus XKB > engines. > > == Detailed

Re: i686 as secondary arch?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Timely article in the Register today: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/ > > I've been thinking about this as i686 is so often broken that I've now > stopped

i686 as secondary arch?

Timely article in the Register today: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/ I've been thinking about this as i686 is so often broken that I've now stopped bothering to test it in the libguestfs tests that I do on Rawhide:

[Bug 1352615] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0126 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352615 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

FESCo and Council elections in July 2016

Greetings, FESCo and Council elections are now open and we're looking for new candidates: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections For FESCo we have opened four seats: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations For Council we have opened one seat:

FESCo and Council elections in July 2016

Greetings, FESCo and Council elections are now open and we're looking for new candidates: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections For FESCo we have opened four seats: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations For Council we have opened one seat:

Fedora 25 Bugzilla Rawhide rebase

Greetings, This e-mail is intended to inform you about the upcoming Bugzilla changes happening on 2016-07-26 (Rawhide bug rebase) and what you need to do, if anything. We will be automatically changing the version for most rawhide bugs to Fedora 25. This will result in regular bugs reported

Re: [Ambassadors] EMEA Sponsorship Program for Flock

Hello everyone, this is a friendly reminder that tonight is the deadline to submit your requests. You have until 23:59:59 UTC + to do so. Thank you. -Giannis > On June 26, 2016 at 12:45 AM Giannis Konstantinidis > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > in

REMINDER: Changes submission deadline for Fedora 25 is today

Hi everyone! Today we have Fedora 25 Changes submission deadline [1]. No more System Wide Changes should be submitted for this release (after 23:59 UTC today). Alpha release is currently planned on August, the 23rd with Alpha Freeze two weeks earlier. In case you'll need any help with your Change

REMINDER: Changes submission deadline for Fedora 25 is today

Hi everyone! Today we have Fedora 25 Changes submission deadline [1]. No more System Wide Changes should be submitted for this release (after 23:59 UTC today). Alpha release is currently planned on August, the 23rd with Alpha Freeze two weeks earlier. In case you'll need any help with your Change