Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 5/92 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160909.n.0):
ID: 33418 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 12/92 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160909.n.0):
ID: 33554 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests
On Sáb, 2016-09-10 at 18:14 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2016-09-10 at 18:05 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > this is a 3rd part repo but you may have better acknowledgment of
> > > what
> > > happen
> > >
>
Unfortunately if you will put Suggests - DNF will use it for
"priority", not as recommending some package to install. It will stay
as this for quite some time..
From GUI you can use PackageKit (via DBus), same you can do from
terminal to ask for installing package.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:49 P
On 09/08/2016 01:27 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> Blog post here may be relevant:
>
> https://streamcomputing.eu/blog/2016-09-06/transition-period-for-fglrx-to-amdgpurocm-no-kernel-4-4-or-xorg-1-18-support/
>
>
> Not sure exact hardware you are using, so may not be directly relevant.
> If it is, the
Hi,
there have been submitted these Bugs:
Drop the gcc dependency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195005
gdb pulls in devel packages (gcc, kernel-headers, etc.) [former Summary]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306591
due to recent GDBs hav
On Saturday, September 10, 2016 9:19:27 AM CDT Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are in the process of importing aarch64 to the primary koji instance as
> part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/
> RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures The import and enablement of aarch64 is
> for ra
On Saturday, September 10, 2016 11:35:15 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > at the same time i386 we be moving from /pub/
> > fedora/ to /pub/fedora-secondary/
>
> When was this agreed upon? I don't recall this being discussed. With
> ~20% of ou
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:35:15 -0400
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Dennis Gilmore
> wrote:
> > at the same time i386 we be moving from /pub/
> > fedora/ to /pub/fedora-secondary/
>
> When was this agreed upon? I don't recall this being discussed. With
> ~20% of our downl
On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 17:54:07 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 10:44 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > Fedora Infrastructure currently maintains two sites for general open
> > source code hosting: fedorahosted.org and pagure.io.
> >
> > Fedorahosted.org was e
On Sáb, 2016-09-10 at 18:05 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > this is a 3rd part repo but you may have better acknowledgment of
> > what
> > happen
> >
> >
> > Forwarded Message
> > From: Sérgio Basto
> > Reply-to: RP
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> this is a 3rd part repo but you may have better acknowledgment of what
> happen
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> From: Sérgio Basto
> Reply-to: RPM Fusion developers discussion list develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org>
> To: rpmfusion
this is a 3rd part repo but you may have better acknowledgment of what
happen
Forwarded Message
From: Sérgio Basto
Reply-to: RPM Fusion developers discussion list
To: rpmfusion devel
Cc: Richard Shaw
Subject: build perl problem on mythtv
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 16:38:34 +010
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> at the same time i386 we be moving from /pub/
> fedora/ to /pub/fedora-secondary/
When was this agreed upon? I don't recall this being discussed. With
~20% of our downloads for Workstation and related desktop spins still
being x86_32, and
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are in the process of importing aarch64 to the primary koji instance as
> part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/
> RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures The import and enablement of aarch64 is for
> rawhide only, w
Hi All,
We are in the process of importing aarch64 to the primary koji instance as
part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/
RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures The import and enablement of aarch64 is for
rawhide only, we expect to add power big and little endiian sometime before
the
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:37:19 +0200
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
>> Kevin, help me please with cleanup:
>>
>> [ignatenkobrain@people02 ~][PROD]$ rm -rf
>> /home/fedora/ignatenkobrain/public_git/*
>> rm: cannot remove
>> ‘/home/fedora/ignatenkobrain/p
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If it requires actions from releng, then it's system-wide change. But
> it's not about changing existing process of building distro, it's just
> bugfixing releng tools.
No, the need of rel-eng's involvement does not define whether
something
18 matches
Mail list logo
