Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Modifying the image at all breaks the existing media verification >> option in the boot menu, and we know people get bad writes using bad >> or

[Bug 1382888] New: RFE: Upgrade to JSON-MaybeXS >= 1.003007

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382888 Bug ID: 1382888 Summary: RFE: Upgrade to JSON-MaybeXS >= 1.003007 Product: Fedora Version: 24 Component: perl-JSON-MaybeXS Severity: low Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-10-10 Fedora blocker review meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's blocker review meeting. There's just one proposed Final blocker to review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382001 there are five proposed Final freeze exceptions, but we're some way out from Final freeze, no real need to review them yet. I

[Test-Announce] 2016-10-10 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2016-10-10 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again on Monday! We've polished off the Beta, so it's time to clean up any loose

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:16:12AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Over on Windows and macOS, there is no such thing as a non-destructive > install media creation. It warns but obliterates the entire stick. > They also don't have persistence. So I think you're on very solid > ground calling both

[Bug 1382865] manually specified Requires: perl(foo) are ignored

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382865 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|

intention to unretire package: psad

Dear All, I intend to unretire the package psad (Port Scan Attack Detector) which was retired due to not having a native systemd unit. I have updated the package to the latest upstream version which supports journalctl and added an unit file. Here's my review request:

[389-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : 389-DS-NIGHTLY #94

See ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Changed this subject to match the other one I changed, so if I'm doing >> it wrong at least I'm consistent! >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Modifying the image at all breaks the existing media verification > option in the boot menu, and we know people get bad writes using bad > or flaky media This part, at least, should be relatively straightforward to

Re: grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Changed this subject to match the other one I changed, so if I'm doing > it wrong at least I'm consistent! > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> So, I think we would need to get

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 13:32 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > At the risk of muddying the waters a bit: now that OverlayFS is here, I > think that even a dd-copied image should be able to support persistence. > The image could notice that it's dd-copied (by checking GPT GUIDs or layout > or

[Bug 1382865] New: manually specified Requires: are ignored

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382865 Bug ID: 1382865 Summary: manually specified Requires: are ignored Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-generators Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1382865] manually specified Requires: are ignored

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382865 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|manually specified

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (epel7). "Perl 5.24 rebuild"

From d96c58f226d4f7734037557f54dcc4243c61ccc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 17:05:20 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.24 rebuild --- perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-Mock-Sub.spec

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (el6). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild"

From ac083305cb05ada25f8171340387bcd299efc4fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36:42 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (f24). "Mandatory Perl build-requires added "

From ce37685364f1ec31f3babb01eebe3ee78eef597d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:42:44 +0200 Subject: Mandatory Perl build-requires added ---

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (f24). "perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release"

From e9ac2a0907d8b6b655d81677a58c813248e1abe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 04:10:41 +0600 Subject: perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (epel7). "Mandatory Perl build-requires added "

From ce37685364f1ec31f3babb01eebe3ee78eef597d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:42:44 +0200 Subject: Mandatory Perl build-requires added ---

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (el6). "perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release"

From e9ac2a0907d8b6b655d81677a58c813248e1abe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 04:10:41 +0600 Subject: perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (epel7). "perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release"

From e9ac2a0907d8b6b655d81677a58c813248e1abe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 04:10:41 +0600 Subject: perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (f25). "perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release"

From e9ac2a0907d8b6b655d81677a58c813248e1abe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 04:10:41 +0600 Subject: perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (el6). "Perl 5.24 rebuild"

From d96c58f226d4f7734037557f54dcc4243c61ccc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 17:05:20 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.24 rebuild --- perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-Mock-Sub.spec

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (epel7). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild"

From ac083305cb05ada25f8171340387bcd299efc4fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:36:42 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (el6). "Mandatory Perl build-requires added "

From ce37685364f1ec31f3babb01eebe3ee78eef597d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:42:44 +0200 Subject: Mandatory Perl build-requires added ---

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (f24). "Perl 5.24 rebuild"

From d96c58f226d4f7734037557f54dcc4243c61ccc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 17:05:20 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.24 rebuild --- perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-Mock-Sub.spec

dfateyev pushed to perl-Mock-Sub (master). "perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release"

From e9ac2a0907d8b6b655d81677a58c813248e1abe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 04:10:41 +0600 Subject: perl-Mock-Sub: 1.07 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Mock-Sub.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

dfateyev uploaded Mock-Sub-1.07.tar.gz for perl-Mock-Sub

d17f1b3657aea192c16c440cba845ec2 Mock-Sub-1.07.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mock-Sub/Mock-Sub-1.07.tar.gz/md5/d17f1b3657aea192c16c440cba845ec2/Mock-Sub-1.07.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Sending this to devel@ as well as test@ as there's been some > relevant discussion there recently. We've been kicking around a couple > of issues lately: > > 1. Exactly what do we need to test and block

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Oct 7, 2016 12:39 PM, "Adam Williamson" > wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 20:03 +, John Florian wrote: >> > On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 12:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > If we do not

grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

Changed this subject to match the other one I changed, so if I'm doing it wrong at least I'm consistent! On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 00:18:21 -0400 > Eric Griffith wrote: > >> I'm just thinking out loud here,

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Oct 7, 2016 1:29 PM, "Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote: > > > >> > [...] I always run dnf manually from the > >> > command line, in a VT logged in as root. And I can run X while doing > >> > this and I've never had a dnf update issue. > > To the extent that the problem is that dnf

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Oct 7, 2016 12:39 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 20:03 +, John Florian wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 12:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > If we do not 'support' livecd-iso-to-disk any more, we no longer > > support: > > > > 1)

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

>> > [...] I always run dnf manually from the >> > command line, in a VT logged in as root. And I can run X while doing >> > this and I've never had a dnf update issue. To the extent that the problem is that dnf gets interrupted when its xterm dies, can that be worked around by dnf SIG_IGN'ing

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 09:16 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > The one concern I have is with Sugar on a Stick spin. Their > installation instructions require livecd-iso-to-disk, because their > media boots straight

Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

Hi folks! Sending this to devel@ as well as test@ as there's been some relevant discussion there recently. We've been kicking around a couple of issues lately: 1. Exactly what do we need to test and block on, in terms of writing images to USB sticks? 2. 'Default boot and install' table was

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 20:03 +, John Florian wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 12:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > If we do not 'support' livecd-iso-to-disk any more, we no longer > support: > > 1) persistent storage (via overlays) > 2) non-destructive write > > > I've known for quite some

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 21:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I personally think that wiping all existing data on the USB stick is > extremely user-unfriendly. A non-destructive method that just works would > make everyone happy (both the majority that wants something that just works, > no matter

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 09:16 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: The one concern I have is with Sugar on a Stick spin. Their installation instructions require livecd-iso-to-disk, because their media boots straight into SoaS, not Anaconda. But I have some ideas about how to deal with that going forward to,

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 11:12 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote: > > > There is currently no real way to use FMW on non-Fedora Linux > > distributions that don't a) support Flatpak and b) have an > > appropriate > > Flatpak runtime for running FMW on (beyond compiling it yourself, I > > guess). > > That

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

On Friday, 07 October 2016 at 19:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:43:10PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > Dear All, > > I was made aware that EOL software with known security bugs that will > > not be fixed upstream (due to EOL status) was

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 21:11 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 10/04/2016 08:10 PM, stan wrote: > > > I think I can confirm this advice. I always run dnf manually from the > > command line, in a VT logged in as root. And I can run X while doing > > this and I've never had a dnf update issue. >

Re: Review swaps

Hi Björn, Let's swap :D I've got some packages to review, just pick some ones open in Astronomy SIG tracker :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115 Greetings, Christian On 10/07/2016 09:18 PM, Björn Esser wrote: > Hello, > > I have another three reviews to swap [1]. The first

Review swaps

Hello, I have another three reviews to swap [1]. The first one in the tree is pretty brain-dead, the other two are a bit more advanced C-compiled packages, but not too exhausting. Any offers? Cheers, Björn [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1382810_resolved=1

Fedora Rawhide-20161007.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 70/102 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20161006.n.0): ID: 39438 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On 10/04/2016 08:10 PM, stan wrote: > I think I can confirm this advice. I always run dnf manually from the > command line, in a VT logged in as root. And I can run X while doing > this and I've never had a dnf update issue. The problem with this is that the VT doesn't have a long history, so

Re: Fedora 25-20161007.n.0 compose check report

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 17:35 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 3/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) > > Old failures (same test failed in 25-20161006.n.0): > > ID: 39572 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso > desktop_notifications_postinstall >

Fedora 25-20161007.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) Old failures (same test failed in 25-20161006.n.0): ID: 39572 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39572 ID: 39577 Test: x86_64

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:43:10PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Dear All, > I was made aware that EOL software with known security bugs that will > not be fixed upstream (due to EOL status) was reviewed and accepted into > Fedora recently. This came on the back of the FPC ticket

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:43:10PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Dear All, > I was made aware that EOL software with known security bugs that will > not be fixed upstream (due to EOL status) was reviewed and accepted into > Fedora recently. This came on the back of the FPC ticket

Re: Weak password madness is back again

Hi, On 07-10-16 18:58, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 18:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Suggested fix if you "shell out to passwd" in g-c-c, then why not also do this in g-i-s presumable you can share the code then and have less security sensitive code to worry about ? When you

grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

This probably should have its own thread but I'm just changing the subject. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Eric Griffith wrote: > I'm just thinking out loud here, but, given that rpm-ostree does not use > grubby, and we do have the Bootloader Spec, and no other distro

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49003 - idm-console-framework - remove incorrect restriction on host and port in LDAP URLs

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49003 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49003/0001-Ticket-49003-Allow-LDAP-Urls-with-host-and-port.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 18:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Suggested fix if you "shell out to passwd" in g-c-c, then why not > also do this in g-i-s presumable you can share the code then and > have less security sensitive code to worry about ? When you do > make sure you run passwd as root (from

including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

Dear All, I was made aware that EOL software with known security bugs that will not be fixed upstream (due to EOL status) was reviewed and accepted into Fedora recently. This came on the back of the FPC ticket [1] asking to make some changes in the Python Packaging Guidelines. I did go back and

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 578 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 341 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 59

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-10-07)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-10-07) === Meeting started by kalev at 16:00:29 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-10-07/fesco.2016-10-07-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 16:17 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Pá, 2016-10-07 at 15:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > So 2 devel cycles ago we had this whole discussion > > about how forcing people to choose strong passwords in anaconda > > was making live hard for testers / test-installs

Re: Weak password madness is back again

Hi, On 07-10-16 18:03, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 15:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, So 2 devel cycles ago we had this whole discussion about how forcing people to choose strong passwords in anaconda was making live hard for testers / test-installs and this decision was

Re: Weak password madness is back again

Hi, On 07-10-16 17:42, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 15:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: So can we get this fixed please, or do we need to escalate this all the way up to FESco again ? Hi, The status quo is that we are not in compliance with FESCo's policy [1], which clearly

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 15:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > So 2 devel cycles ago we had this whole discussion > about how forcing people to choose strong passwords in anaconda > was making live hard for testers / test-installs and this > decision was reverted. > > So now here I'm doing a

[389-devel] Re: Please review design proposal for tickets 47986 and 48976

there is a problem not yet covered in the proposal: setting the backend to "referral-on-update" until the topology is in sync prevents to ealry client updates, but what to do about internal updates, eg passwordpolicy attributes. I have a wild idea, but maybe someone has a suggestion on how

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > But there is one more issue. FESCo's policy actually requires that only > admin users (wheel users, including the initial user account) would be > able to set weak passwords, and that unprivileged users should be >

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Pá, 2016-10-07 at 15:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> So 2 devel cycles ago we had this whole discussion >> about how forcing people to choose strong passwords in anaconda >> was making live hard for testers /

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 15:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > So can we get this fixed please, or do we need to escalate > this all the way up to FESco again ? Hi, The status quo is that we are not in compliance with FESCo's policy [1], which clearly applies to all tools that change passwords and

Re: [security fix] ghostscript rebased to 9-20 for all releases

Thank you, Solomon for that info, actually gutenprint maintainer is my colleague, but he is sick today. I'm adding him into CC, so he's aware of it when he returns. ;) 2 Zdenek: Please, look at the whole thread here -

dist.depcheck PASSED for FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997

dist.depcheck PASSED for FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/571dad3c-8ca0-11e6-b011-525400120b80/task_output/FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997.i386.log ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [security fix] ghostscript rebased to 9-20 for all releases

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:14:57PM -, David Kaspar wrote: > Right now, I think only packages that depend on ghostscript-devel subpackage > *might* be affected by this change. List of those packages: > > ariamaestosa > > ImageMagick > > wfdb Add gutenprint to that list. I don't expect the

dist.depcheck PASSED for FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997

dist.depcheck PASSED for FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/571dad3c-8ca0-11e6-b011-525400120b80/task_output/FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997.x86_64.log ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 00:18:21 -0400 Eric Griffith wrote: > I'm just thinking out loud here, but, given that rpm-ostree does not > use grubby, and we do have the Bootloader Spec, and no other distro > uses grubby, would it be prudent to take a really hard look at > whether

[security fix] ghostscript rebased to 9-20 for all releases

Hello folks, ghostscript package has been rebased to version 9.20 across all current Fedora releases. I am very well aware that we shouldn't do rebases for current releases, to avoid stability problems. However, I have decided for this step in order to fix 4 CVEs that arrived yesterday for

Re: Screenshots with Wayland and Dual Displays

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > I just noticed that I can't take a screenshot of anything on the > secondary > > display when using two displays - you just get a transparent

Re: Weak password madness is back again

Hi, On 07-10-16 16:17, Tomas Mraz wrote: On Pá, 2016-10-07 at 15:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, So 2 devel cycles ago we had this whole discussion about how forcing people to choose strong passwords in anaconda was making live hard for testers / test-installs and this decision was

[Bug 1380152] perl-HTTP-Tiny 0.068 pulls in lots of new dependencies including Xorg

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA

Re: Docker/Libvirt networking issue / bug?

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:51:59AM +0300, Catalin wrote: > maybe I'm come with not right answer , > I think that depend by network configuration over internet and routing process > over applications. so will not be any conflict. I'm right? > > Both docker and libvirt use iptables to direct traffic

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Pá, 2016-10-07 at 15:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > So 2 devel cycles ago we had this whole discussion > about how forcing people to choose strong passwords in anaconda > was making live hard for testers / test-installs and this > decision was reverted. > > So now here I'm doing a

[Bug 807793] Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807793 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pcsc-perl-1.4.14-2.el7

Weak password madness is back again

Hi, So 2 devel cycles ago we had this whole discussion about how forcing people to choose strong passwords in anaconda was making live hard for testers / test-installs and this decision was reverted. So now here I'm doing a F25 Fedora ARM test install, end up in the gnome-ified first-time-setup

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49003 - console - always use the host and port when constructing an LDAP URL

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49003 ds-console https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49003/0001-Ticket-49003-Add-the-host-and-port-to-the-ldapurl-in.patch idm-console-framework

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires

OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

Hi all, the openssl will be rebased in Rawhide to 1.1.0 on Monday. There will be also 1.0.2 compat package (compat-openssl10) so the dependencies are not broken and Rawhide should be installable. Also things that do not depend on openssl should be rebuildable without changes. On the other hand

Re: /sbin/nologin in /etc/shells

Andrew Toskin wrote: > If it were really important to make sure the user could no longer > access the system at all, why not just delete the account? Deleting > the user does not (necessarily) delete their data, so what's the use > case for keeping the account at all in such a situation? The

Re: Call for help contacting contributor: spike

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 08:35:52AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:20:55PM +0200, spike wrote: > > On 05.10.2016 12:44, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > It has been a month, more than I expected, so I asked FESCo to consider > > > the user > > > spike MIA:

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-MCE-Shared

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-MCE-Shared https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-MCE-Shared/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-Messaging-Message

pkgdb_updater updated: description of perl-Messaging-Message https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Messaging-Message/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1380212] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380212 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.01-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: problems in Virtualbox

Hi, - Original Message - > From: "mario riassetto" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 2:52:41 PM > Subject: problems in Virtualbox > > I have noted a one problem in to the start of the image in Virtualbox. > Virtualbox in

[Bug 1380212] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380212 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.01-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: A new tool for backward compatibility analysis of API/ABI interfaces in RPM packages

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 05:58:10PM +0300, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: > > > 06.10.2016, 08:23, "Pierre-Yves Chibon": > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:36:16PM +0300, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: > >>  The tool is based on different software stack for analysis of backward > >>  compatibility developed

Re: Orphaning vdr-streamdev

On 09/27/2016 04:47 AM, Felix Kaechele wrote: I'm orphaning vdr-streamdev since I no longer use it. There shouldn't be any open issues with this one. Since apparently nobody is all that keen to take it and I'm still using it, I'm willing to take it. Thomas

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 578 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 340 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 59

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 848 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 697 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849 sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 340

Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Thursday, 06 October 2016 at 18:58, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hello, > > I was surprised to see /usr/share/texlive on my system although I > remembered very well removing it months ago. It turned out to be > caused by two rpmsave files, although some *empty* directories weren't > removed:

[Bug 1380152] perl-HTTP-Tiny 0.068 pulls in lots of new dependencies including Xorg

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380152 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com

pghmcfc pushed to perl-URI (perl-URI-1.71-5.fc25). "Soften Business::ISBN dependency from Requires: to Suggests: (..more)"

From c89b6346fce383d05aba97584797cac28d118d47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:11:35 +0100 Subject: Soften Business::ISBN dependency from Requires: to Suggests: This avoids pulling in gd and X libraries (#1380152) --- perl-URI.spec | 19

pghmcfc pushed to perl-URI (perl-URI-1.71-5.fc26). "Soften Business::ISBN dependency from Requires: to Suggests: (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-URI.git/commit/?h=perl-URI-1.71-5.fc26=c89b6346fce383d05aba97584797cac28d118d47 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

pghmcfc pushed to perl-URI (f25). "Soften Business::ISBN dependency from Requires: to Suggests: (..more)"

From c89b6346fce383d05aba97584797cac28d118d47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:11:35 +0100 Subject: Soften Business::ISBN dependency from Requires: to Suggests: This avoids pulling in gd and X libraries (#1380152) --- perl-URI.spec | 19

pghmcfc pushed to perl-URI (master). "Soften Business::ISBN dependency from Requires: to Suggests: (..more)"

From c89b6346fce383d05aba97584797cac28d118d47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 08:11:35 +0100 Subject: Soften Business::ISBN dependency from Requires: to Suggests: This avoids pulling in gd and X libraries (#1380152) --- perl-URI.spec | 19

  1   2   >