Re: Dumb newbie packager questions

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:36 AM William Moreno wrote: > El 22/10/2016 10:27 p. m., "Christopher" > escribió: > > > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09 AM William Moreno < > williamjmore...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m.,

Re: Dumb newbie packager questions

El 22/10/2016 10:27 p. m., "Christopher" escribió: > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09 AM William Moreno wrote: >> >> El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m., "Christopher" escribió: >> > >> > I should probably know the answers

Re: Dumb newbie packager questions

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:09 AM William Moreno wrote: > El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m., "Christopher" > escribió: > > > > I should probably know the answers to these by now, but... > > > > 1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NVR in

Re: Dumb newbie packager questions

El 22/10/2016 9:51 p. m., "Christopher" escribió: > > I should probably know the answers to these by now, but... > > 1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NVR in Koji, which one will get tagged, and when? Which one will Bodhi use when I create an update? By

Dumb newbie packager questions

I should probably know the answers to these by now, but... 1. If I trigger more than one build for the same NVR in Koji, which one will get tagged, and when? Which one will Bodhi use when I create an update? 2. Should I preserve the entire changelog in the SPEC? Or should I roll it over when I

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 594 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 356 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 74

[Bug 1387881] New: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387881 Bug ID: 1387881 Summary: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime-Locale Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

chkr pushed to perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin (master). "Rebuild against new krb5-1.15-beta1"

From ed6180eaff631352a55d1f2b6793c1a33550c43f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Krause Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:33:41 +0200 Subject: Rebuild against new krb5-1.15-beta1 --- perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 472 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 466 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 397

[Bug 1385280] perl-App-Cmd contains a lot of test files which should not be installed.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385280 --- Comment #10 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to Van de Bugger from comment #9) > > They are tests, not examples. In practice, they are sometimes the only examples of use of the module. > If original Perl

[Bug 1385280] perl-App-Cmd contains a lot of test files which should not be installed.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385280 --- Comment #9 from Van de Bugger --- > It's ridiculous generalizing all the tests are not worth of documentation. They are tests, not examples. > It would help if you explained why you feel this is a bug. It is

Re: Python guidelines and removing .egg-info

Am Samstag, den 22.10.2016, 20:05 +0100 schrieb Sérgio Basto: > On Sáb, 2016-10-22 at 20:39 +0200, Björn  > > Hello together, > > > > can someone point me to the part of the Python packaging > > guidelines, > > which explicitly says .egg-info *MUST* be removed before build? > > >

Re: Private Bugzilla bugs

On 22 October 2016 at 01:31, Jeff Fearn wrote: > On 22/10/2016 4:54 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 10/21/2016 08:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> We don't run the Bugzilla so the capability of who has it and who does >>> not is not set by us. >> >> Bugzilla's group-based

Re: Python guidelines and removing .egg-info

On Sáb, 2016-10-22 at 20:39 +0200, Björn > Hello together, > > can someone point me to the part of the Python packaging guidelines, > which explicitly says .egg-info *MUST* be removed before build? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Upstream_Egg_Packages > Cheers, >   Björn

Python guidelines and removing .egg-info

Hello together, can someone point me to the part of the Python packaging guidelines, which explicitly says .egg-info *MUST* be removed before build? Cheers, Björn ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora Rawhide-20161022.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 11/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161021.n.0): ID: 43276 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/43276 ID: 43282

Fedora 25-20161022.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 5/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161021.n.0): ID: 43161 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/43161

Re: Co-maintainer sponsorship

Am Samstag, den 22.10.2016, 16:22 + schrieb Christopher: > With some of the stuff transitioning from fedorahosted Trac to > pagure, and with some of the wiki pages not being concise or up-to- > date, can somebody point me to the best current instructions to > request a co-maintainer be added?

Co-maintainer sponsorship

With some of the stuff transitioning from fedorahosted Trac to pagure, and with some of the wiki pages not being concise or up-to-date, can somebody point me to the best current instructions to request a co-maintainer be added? I have a colleague who's helping me update some of my packages, but

Re: /usr/include/math.h:346:1: error: template with C linkage

On 10/22/2016 03:55 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:20:32 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: FYI - I'm starting to see more builds fail with errors like the following in rawhide: In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/cmath:45:0, from

Re: Unknown build target

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:12:43 +0200 Antonio Trande wrote: > I Kevin. > > So if i wanted to test a build against packages in updates-testing > wouldn't be possible? nope, because there is no buildroot that populates from updates-testing. This is why we have buildroot

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Retire Synaptics Driver

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:37:38 - "Johannes Lips" wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:17:08 +1000 > > Peter Hutterer > > > > > Yeah, I have never seen that here. > > > > Can you perhaps provide the information Oliver is asking for

Re: /usr/include/math.h:346:1: error: template with C linkage

On 10/22/2016 12:20 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: FYI - I'm starting to see more builds fail with errors like the following in rawhide: In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/cmath:45:0, from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/math.h:36, from

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161022.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-25-20161021.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161022.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 83 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:56.89 KiB Size

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Broken dependencies: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin

perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin-0.17-12.fc25.aarch64 requires libkadm5clnt_mit.so.10()(64bit) perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin-0.17-12.fc25.aarch64 requires libkadm5clnt_mit.so.10(kadm5clnt_mit_10_MIT)(64bit) On

Re: /usr/include/math.h:346:1: error: template with C linkage

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:20:32 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > FYI - > > I'm starting to see more builds fail with errors like the following > in rawhide: > > In file included from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/cmath:45:0, > from /usr/include/c++/6.2.1/math.h:36, >

Re: Critpath flags on Emacs and Guile

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:23:54 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom Hughes wrote: > > Because it's packaging some emacs extensions: > > > > % rpm -ql libidn.x86_64 | fgrep emacs > > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/libidn > > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/libidn/idna.el > >

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001013-1.fc26). "Update to 0.001013 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive.git/commit/?h=perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001013-1.fc26=45146df50c979cfbe1be281a4c7812db08060ed5 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive (perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001013-1.fc25). "Update to 0.001013 (..more)"

From 45146df50c979cfbe1be281a4c7812db08060ed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:15:15 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.001013 - New upstream release 0.001013 - Avoid possible warnings about special variables only being used once - Update old

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive (f25). "Update to 0.001013 (..more)"

From 45146df50c979cfbe1be281a4c7812db08060ed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:15:15 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.001013 - New upstream release 0.001013 - Avoid possible warnings about special variables only being used once - Update old

-filesystem packages (was: Re: Critpath flags on Emacs and Guile)

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 01:24:57 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Probably better to just drop the -filesystem subpackage and make all dependent > packages co-own that dir. Those -filesystem packages are a remnant of time > before repoquery could be used to easily find all packages that

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive (master). "Update to 0.001013 (..more)"

From 45146df50c979cfbe1be281a4c7812db08060ed5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:15:15 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.001013 - New upstream release 0.001013 - Avoid possible warnings about special variables only being used once - Update old

pghmcfc uploaded Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001013.tar.gz for perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive

72cf6acdd2a0a8b105821a4db98e4ebe Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001013.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001013.tar.gz/md5/72cf6acdd2a0a8b105821a4db98e4ebe/Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001013.tar.gz

[Bug 1387849] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387849 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1213090 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1213090=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1387849] New: perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387849 Bug ID: 1387849 Summary: perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Unicode-Collate Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1387849] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387849 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1387849] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387849 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Unicode-Collate-1.14 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1387462] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20161020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387462 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20161020-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1387453] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387453 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.98-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

review swap

Hi there! I have some python-packages [1] waiting for review. Any volunteers? Cheers, Björn [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1387834 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Unknown build target

On 10/22/2016 01:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:55:16 +0200 > Antonio Trande wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> Just a question: >> >> why does Koji not work with specific tags? > ..snip... >> koji: error: Unknown build target: f25-updates-testing > > Because

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 471 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 465 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 397

[Bug 1384495] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.96 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384495 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.9

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Retire Synaptics Driver

> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:17:08 +1000 > Peter Hutterer > > Yeah, I have never seen that here. > > Can you perhaps provide the information Oliver is asking for in the bug? I've just tried libinput again and it seems to be working without any problems. Don't