[389-devel] Re: Backend addition problem

On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 12:27 +1000, William Brown wrote: > > Now, I can create the objectClass: domain with ldif2db for the backend. > > But the goal is to do this live. I think I'm getting the no_such_object, > > because DS doesn't know *what* backend this entry should be put into, > > because

[389-devel] Re: Backend addition problem

> Now, I can create the objectClass: domain with ldif2db for the backend. > But the goal is to do this live. I think I'm getting the no_such_object, > because DS doesn't know *what* backend this entry should be put into, > because there is no parent, so the NO_SUCH_OBJECT comes from the rootdse >

[389-devel] Backend addition problem

Hi, With the new python 3 installer and tools I'm hitting an issue adding backends. {william@ldapkdc 12:04} ~/development/389ds I0> dsconf -D 'cn=Directory Manager' -H ldap://localhost backend create Enter password for cn=Directory Manager on ldap://localhost : Enter value for

[Bug 671445] [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671445 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ti...@math.uh.edu

[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-11-01)

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:23 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "C" == Christopher writes: > > C> Also, after taking a package, how does one check to see if all of its > C> dependencies are in a good state? (non-orphaned) > > Get the list of

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (perl-MCE-Shared-1.806-1.fc26). "Update to 1.806 (..more)"

From 21d3d8711817841e57b04d781992a21f922b93a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:06:53 + Subject: Update to 1.806 - New upstream release 1.806 - Added a new section titled LOCKING to the MCE::Shared documentation - Tweaked

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2016-11-03 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2016-11-03 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. rktime): 2016-11-03 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2016-11-03 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2016-11-03

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (master). "Update to 1.806 (..more)"

From 21d3d8711817841e57b04d781992a21f922b93a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:06:53 + Subject: Update to 1.806 - New upstream release 1.806 - Added a new section titled LOCKING to the MCE::Shared documentation - Tweaked

pghmcfc uploaded MCE-Shared-1.806.tar.gz for perl-MCE-Shared

6542076cf8001647039083af23a2c1e8 MCE-Shared-1.806.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MCE-Shared/MCE-Shared-1.806.tar.gz/md5/6542076cf8001647039083af23a2c1e8/MCE-Shared-1.806.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1390798] perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0301 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390798 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1390798] perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0301 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390798 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pghmcfc's perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0301-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=814646 -- You are receiving

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-TrailingSpace (perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0301-1.fc26). "Update to 0.0301 (..more)"

From 8eab22c47d6eae038978d03515fdab823539533b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:51:11 + Subject: Update to 0.0301 - New upstream release 0.0301 - Skip "sample-data" in t/dogfood.t, which caused problems with parallel testing ---

[Bug 1390790] perl-MCE-1.807 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390790 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

pghmcfc uploaded Test-TrailingSpace-0.0301.tar.gz for perl-Test-TrailingSpace

ed7cea52688b019e9d9dbf92d7054cd5 Test-TrailingSpace-0.0301.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-TrailingSpace/Test-TrailingSpace-0.0301.tar.gz/md5/ed7cea52688b019e9d9dbf92d7054cd5/Test-TrailingSpace-0.0301.tar.gz ___

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-TrailingSpace (master). "Update to 0.0301 (..more)"

From 8eab22c47d6eae038978d03515fdab823539533b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:51:11 + Subject: Update to 0.0301 - New upstream release 0.0301 - Skip "sample-data" in t/dogfood.t, which caused problems with parallel testing ---

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE (perl-MCE-1.807-1.fc26). "Update to 1.807 (..more)"

From 6a5fac7f56385d677edb26b12cbff6cf63f7b9a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 18:59:17 + Subject: Update to 1.807 - New upstream release 1.807 - Enhanced relay capabilities - Added Mandelbrot example to MCE::Example - Added extra

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MCE (master). "Update to 1.807 (..more)"

From 6a5fac7f56385d677edb26b12cbff6cf63f7b9a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 18:59:17 + Subject: Update to 1.807 - New upstream release 1.807 - Enhanced relay capabilities - Added Mandelbrot example to MCE::Example - Added extra

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

Yeah, sorry, looks like either hyperkitty or I messed up. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

El 2/11/2016 12:16 p. m., "Adam Williamson" escribió: > > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:50 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On a related note, why on earth is the main Fedora repo set to expire > > every two weeks? (and its -source and -debuginfo every week??) It's not > >

pghmcfc uploaded MCE-1.807.tar.gz for perl-MCE

f4f49b3ab62ae9cb3167016de6704898 MCE-1.807.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MCE/MCE-1.807.tar.gz/md5/f4f49b3ab62ae9cb3167016de6704898/MCE-1.807.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 10:49 +, Christian Stadelmann wrote: > > On 10/30/2016 03:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Fedora updates so often that attempts to pre-download anything updates > > related are pointless. Chances are you > > a) waste gobs of bandwidth downloading that changing

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 08:50 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On a related note, why on earth is the main Fedora repo set to expire > every two weeks? (and its -source and -debuginfo every week??) It's not > supposed to change *ever* for a released distro version now is it? You know, this may be

Re: repoquery to get the complete set of dependencies

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 1:38:57 PM CET Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/02/2016 01:09 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On 11/02/2016 12:51 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries. > >> > >> How do I get all dependant packages (for

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:10:53PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > I drafted a process to cover the evaluation of "Important bugs" [1]. > It still needs some work on the wording, however it should be good > enough for review and comments. May I ask for a feedback and possibly > improvement proposals,

Re: repoquery to get the complete set of dependencies

On 11/02/2016 01:09 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/02/2016 12:51 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries. >> >> How do I get all dependant packages (for batch rebuild of dependencies after >> package update)? Something which takes soft

Re: repoquery to get the complete set of dependencies

On 11/02/2016 12:51 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries. > > How do I get all dependant packages (for batch rebuild of dependencies after > package update)? Something which takes soft dependencies into account, too. > > Some packages

Re: repoquery to get the complete set of dependant packages

Sorry for the typo in $Subject, s/dependencies/dependant packages/ probably, or "requiring" packages, according to "--whatrequires" syntax. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

On 02/11/16 17:49, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: I'm still curious if this elegant shell code could be used to enhance the current tests f-r has. As noted, they are extremely expensive, in a class of it's own besides the build and install tasks. I don't think so, f-r works on packages built from

repoquery to get the complete set of dependencies

Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries. How do I get all dependant packages (for batch rebuild of dependencies after package update)? Something which takes soft dependencies into account, too. Some packages might depend on 'foo-libs' explicitly, some depend on soname

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

> I'm still curious if this elegant shell code could be used to enhance the current tests f-r has. As noted, they are extremely expensive, in a class of it's own besides the build and install tasks. I don't think so, f-r works on packages built from a source rpm. This on the other hand is a

Fedora 25-20161102.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161101.n.0): ID: 45375 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/45375 ID: 45376 Test: x86_64

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

On 02/11/16 15:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 01 November 2016 at 13:05, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Actually, a check for this would be useful to have in both fedora-review Actually, f-r is testing this since long. However, the review approach is different: does this

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

Hi, I drafted a process to cover the evaluation of "Important bugs" [1]. It still needs some work on the wording, however it should be good enough for review and comments. May I ask for a feedback and possibly improvement proposals, please ? [1]

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 7:27:34 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Christian Stadelmann > > wrote: > > One good thing we would gain from using bodhi for rawhide is having all > > packages signed, especially in Rawhide. Since rawhide

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

On Tuesday, 01 November 2016 at 13:05, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hi, > > This is mass bug filing material, I have been under the weather > shortly after the first message on this thread but I have made more > progress now. Enough to CC the packaging list too. Actually, a check for this would be

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:27:34 -0400 Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Christian Stadelmann > wrote: > > One good thing we would gain from using bodhi for rawhide is having > > all packages signed, especially in Rawhide. Since

[Bug 1390797] perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390797 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1390777] perl-Archive-Tar-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390777 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On 10/31/2016 05:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 15:09 +, Richard Hughes wrote: >> >> I think this kind of issue is really fixed the hard way, i.e. fixing >> bugs and adding unimplemented features rather than just adding complex >> UI workarounds. > > I think making it

[EPEL-devel] Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

I see. Since MongoDB is under a GNU license, I assume you do not literally mean you have zero access to the changes being made to it in SCL. My assumption is that you actually mean there's no advanced or privileged access. So if some bad juju goes down, and we want to look to SCL For help,

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161102.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-25-20161101.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161102.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:626.80 KiB Size

[Bug 1391023] perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.031 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391023 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent (master). "0.031 bump"

From ca80abe1a3fb551f09f5b954ee8e08ff4422749c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:43:17 +0100 Subject: 0.031 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent.spec | 9 ++--- sources | 2 +- 3

jplesnik uploaded Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.031.tar.gz for perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent

b3ddf52c766e24aa068932ffcf0e55b9 Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.031.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent/Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.031.tar.gz/md5/b3ddf52c766e24aa068932ffcf0e55b9/Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.031.tar.gz ___

[Bug 1391023] New: perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.031 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391023 Bug ID: 1391023 Summary: perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.031 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Christian Stadelmann wrote: > One good thing we would gain from using bodhi for rawhide is having all > packages signed, especially in Rawhide. Since rawhide is used by developers, > this is a pretty important thing to do. That's

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Christian Stadelmann wrote: > 1. and 2.: Yes, it often takes at least 3 days for security critical updates > in important packages (e.g. kernel update to 4.8.3) to land. > > I think the real challenge here is to continue shipping

Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

One good thing we would gain from using bodhi for rawhide is having all packages signed, especially in Rawhide. Since rawhide is used by developers, this is a pretty important thing to do. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Intel Vulkan driver status

We need Vulkan loader which is now on review. I will take care of it ASAP. >>> >>> >>> I see it[1] now. Thanks, Igor. If there is anything I can do to help with >>> the review just let me know. >>> >>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308985 >> >> >> The vulkan loader has

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

> On 10/30/2016 03:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Fedora updates so often that attempts to pre-download anything updates > related are pointless. Chances are you > a) waste gobs of bandwidth downloading that changing data over and over > again without ever using it > b) when you actually

Re: Pondering security update time frames

1. and 2.: Yes, it often takes at least 3 days for security critical updates in important packages (e.g. kernel update to 4.8.3) to land. I think the real challenge here is to continue shipping quality software while reducing time to ship. Scratch builds and release-monitoring.org (Anitya) have

berrange pushed to perl-Sys-Virt (master). "Update to 2.4.0 release (..more)"

From 2c4d44e82dc993db1dd2b1d05501566a0a48d091 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:20:03 + Subject: Update to 2.4.0 release Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange --- perl-Sys-Virt.spec | 5 - sources

berrange uploaded Sys-Virt-2.4.0.tar.gz for perl-Sys-Virt

e266adfcae1eb6028e4da6fdc4e3113f Sys-Virt-2.4.0.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Sys-Virt/Sys-Virt-2.4.0.tar.gz/md5/e266adfcae1eb6028e4da6fdc4e3113f/Sys-Virt-2.4.0.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1390778] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390778 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1390797] perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390797 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b4900c0ceb -- You are receiving

[Bug 1390797] perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390797 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2f248f1820 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1390797] perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390797 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-933ba17af6 -- You are receiving

jplesnik pushed to perl-Code-TidyAll (master). "0.55 bump"

From ada8823b04a142bc6437f11bc06f53f03f987787 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:19:19 +0100 Subject: 0.55 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Code-TidyAll.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

jplesnik uploaded Code-TidyAll-0.55.tar.gz for perl-Code-TidyAll

46dc14552856f03d732dd1fe67e99658 Code-TidyAll-0.55.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Code-TidyAll/Code-TidyAll-0.55.tar.gz/md5/46dc14552856f03d732dd1fe67e99658/Code-TidyAll-0.55.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

ppisar pushed to perl-TAP-SimpleOutput (f23). "0.004 bump"

From dfcdb62e8c856e0c841ea3ad9f1f20963c6e7205 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:11:17 +0100 Subject: 0.004 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-TAP-SimpleOutput.spec | 14 +++--- sources

ppisar pushed to perl-TAP-SimpleOutput (f23). "Mandatory Perl build-requires added "

From 50a6d212c06a7059989424f05d8f709f59d3aeac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:02:41 +0200 Subject: Mandatory Perl build-requires added ---

ppisar pushed to perl-TAP-SimpleOutput (f24). "0.004 bump"

From 5cc2b96a943428562db3bb2ebfa531c5417aa9c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:11:17 +0100 Subject: 0.004 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-TAP-SimpleOutput.spec | 14 +++--- sources

ppisar pushed to perl-TAP-SimpleOutput (f24). "Mandatory Perl build-requires added "

From 555048d9dcb8652eba2c617a7d7440d29ba448a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:02:41 +0200 Subject: Mandatory Perl build-requires added ---

ppisar pushed to perl-TAP-SimpleOutput (f25). "0.004 bump"

From 1243a003fbbf7936315d75867b3c504434eb4a2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:11:17 +0100 Subject: 0.004 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-TAP-SimpleOutput.spec | 14 +++--- sources

[Bug 1390797] perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390797 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-TAP-SimpleOutput (master). "0.004 bump"

From 1243a003fbbf7936315d75867b3c504434eb4a2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:11:17 +0100 Subject: 0.004 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-TAP-SimpleOutput.spec | 14 +++--- sources

ppisar uploaded TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004.tar.gz for perl-TAP-SimpleOutput

47122754014f29981a5e6b923d0d491b TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-TAP-SimpleOutput/TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004.tar.gz/md5/47122754014f29981a5e6b923d0d491b/TAP-SimpleOutput-0.004.tar.gz ___ perl-devel

[Bug 1390777] perl-Archive-Tar-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390777 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Archive-Tar-2.16-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-aab987f981 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1390777] perl-Archive-Tar-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390777 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Archive-Tar (f25). "2.16 bump"

From 94117722579478b7e38fb9c60b4338b4a88e3153 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:59:04 +0100 Subject: 2.16 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Archive-Tar.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-TAP-SimpleOutput to nobuild

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-TAP-SimpleOutput to nobuild ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik pushed to perl-Archive-Tar (master). "2.16 bump"

From c23a551f7392bcd86b9d53bbfadbda32ce338a05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:59:04 +0100 Subject: 2.16 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Archive-Tar.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

jplesnik uploaded Archive-Tar-2.16.tar.gz for perl-Archive-Tar

d21daeca37b160e9171ca44e47669ce0 Archive-Tar-2.16.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Archive-Tar/Archive-Tar-2.16.tar.gz/md5/d21daeca37b160e9171ca44e47669ce0/Archive-Tar-2.16.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Please review 397, pbkdf2 in Ds

Now thanks to a better review from NSS team, and some other back and forth, we have a patch! https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/397 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/397/0001-Ticket-397-Add-PBKDF2-to-Directory-Server-password-s.2.patch -- Sincerely, William Brown Software