Intent to orphan: trac-defaultcc-plugin , trac-condfieldsgenshi-plugin

I was maintaining these packages for use with fedorahosted trac instances. Since fedorahosted is being retired, I'm really not interested in them any more, so I'm planning to orphan them soon. Anyone who wants them is welcome to them. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twit

Re: F26 System Wide Change: GCC7

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: GCC7 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC7 > > Change owner(s): > * Jakub Jelínek > > Switch GCC in Fedora 26 to 7.x.y, rebuild all packages with it, or > optionally rebuild just some packages with it and rebuild

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 15 February 2017 at 09:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > A mockchain build of dbus-c++ libffado and sflphone works with this > patch. repoquery says nothing else depends on dbus-c++. > > Any objections to me committing the patch to dbus-c++ and rebuilding it? > > Somebody should also fork dbus-c++ to

Self Introduction: Nemanja Milosevic (nmilosev)

Hello everyone! My name is Nemanja and I would like to join the development team. My wiki page is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Nmilosev To keep it short: I'm currently a PhD Computer Science student, and I've been involved with Fedora for over a year now (all the details are in the

New list for ResultsDB users

Hi folks! So I've been floating an idea around recently to people who are currently using ResultsDB in some sense - either sending reports to it, or consuming reports from it - or plan to do so. The idea was to have a group where we can discuss (and hopefully co-ordinate) use of ResultsDB - a place

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-02-17)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-02-17 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below ca

[389-devel] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: 389-DS-NIGHTLY #165

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 08:16 -0500, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > On 02/15/2017 04:48 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > On (15/02/17 09:05), Jenkins wrote: > >> See > >> > >> > > Is there a reason why jenkins failures are igno

Re: What if you only want to package part of upstream?

Thanks for all the input! I went with the popular option of calling it qrcode-generator and inviting comaintainers to add subpackages in the future if they desire: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422344 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part __

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 04:33:19PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 14 February 2017 at 17:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:39:00PM +0100, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by Fedora

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On 14 February 2017 at 17:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:39:00PM +0100, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by Fedora >> Release Engineering failed in armv7hl and i686 architectures. I saw the logs

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

Thanks for the heads up on rsyslog. I've been using it for ages, yet I didn't know you could trigger commands directly from there. I see it has omprog, as well as :msg, regex, "hellothere" ^/usr/local/bin/hi.bash good to know. I'll see which path I take. I already have the spec file working f

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:23:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > GNU89 vs. C99 inlining, that code is really old and apparently nobody > > touched it since it has been written. Yes, it seems most of the code was written a long time ago... > > > > As

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Dan Horák wrote: > you are welcome, please file a gcc bug in Fedora bugzilla for this issue > Yep, I'll do it :) -- Francisco Javier Tsao Santín http://gattaca.es 1024D/71CF4D62 42 F1 53 35 EF 98 98 8A FC 6C 56 B3 4C A7 7D FB___

Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:44:13 -0600 > El 15/2/2017 1:28 a. m., "Sérgio Basto" escribió: > I though in one more simpler plan , query koji for the fails builds > and where error is in root.log and was did by user releng, list the > packages and submit a new build in rawhide just running: git check

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

On 02/15/2017 11:31 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: Probably most Fedora users will use a general purpose tool like rsyslog (already in Fedora) or fluentd/logstash to read events from journald and do custom triggers. thanks for the info! It se

Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild

El 15/2/2017 1:28 a. m., "Sérgio Basto" escribió: On Ter, 2017-02-14 at 19:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:42:58 + > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > JFTR , after receive from koschei messages like opencv's builds are > > back to normal in Fedora Rawhide > > > > I did git

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > Probably most Fedora users will use a general purpose tool like rsyslog > (already in Fedora) or fluentd/logstash to read events from journald and do > custom triggers. thanks for the info! It seems to me that journal-triggerd fits a diffe

! GSoC Ideas

Hi All, As you may know we have successfully submitted a Google Summer of Code application this year. While we won't know until 27 February if we are accepted, we still have work to do! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Summer_coding_ideas_for_2017 This page needs some ideas. A good idea includes

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:23:34AM -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: > My applications largely log to system loggers. Looking around for > something that triggers an email when certain log entries appear in > system logs (ie: python stacktraces), I got just one hit, > journal-triggerd. It is not in Fed

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

On 02/15/2017 07:23 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: My applications largely log to system loggers. Looking around for something that triggers an email when certain log entries appear in system logs (ie: python stacktraces), I got just one hit, journal-triggerd. It is not in Fedora. https://github

Re: Please test Vagrant 1.9.1

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > First of all, I am still not fond of moving the plugins.json into /usr. Why is that? It's like the fontconfig one, which was discussed in FESCo: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1635#comment-51133 and approved: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/16

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 02/15/2017 11:21 AM, E.N. virgo wrote: Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile.” The problem is that one might want to use libstdc++ (GCC) and libc++ (LLVM) along with GCC ABI and LLVM ABI, respectively. Fedora currently enables

Re: Please test Vagrant 1.9.1

Hi Colin, First of all, I am still not fond of moving the plugins.json into /usr. Nevertheless, with the proposed Vagrant 1.9.1 package, things are different then they used to be. Up to now, we were re-configuring Vagrant to search for the plugins.json in /var/lib/vagrant. But this is not easily

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 14:32 +, James Hogarth wrote: > On 14 Feb 2017 11:24, "James Hogarth" > wrote: > > > > On 14 Feb 2017 09:28, "Tomas Tomecek" wrote: > > Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23) > > On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth > m> > > wrote: > > > On 13 February

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 15/02/17 13:48 -, E.N. virgo wrote: So what? Why is that a problem? Does the libc++abi have better performance for exception handling? Smaller footprint for RTTI? More new features, such as C++17's std::uncaight_exceptions()? Just because there's a different low-level C++ runtime library a

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

On 14 Feb 2017 11:24, "James Hogarth" wrote: On 14 Feb 2017 09:28, "Tomas Tomecek" wrote: Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23) > On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> am planning to update packa

journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

My applications largely log to system loggers. Looking around for something that triggers an email when certain log entries appear in system logs (ie: python stacktraces), I got just one hit, journal-triggerd. It is not in Fedora. https://github.com/jjk-jacky/journal-triggerd Have I missed any

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 15/02/17 13:50 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 15/02/17 12:32 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 15/02/17 11:30 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/02/17 21:42 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 15/02/17 12:32 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 15/02/17 11:30 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/02/17 21:42 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm error: no matching function for ca

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

> So what? Why is that a problem? > Does the libc++abi have better performance for exception handling? > Smaller footprint for RTTI? > More new features, such as C++17's std::uncaight_exceptions()? > Just because there's a different low-level C++ runtime library > available doesn't mean that using

Fedora Rawhide-20170215.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 19/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386) ID: 57041 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/57041 ID: 57042 Test:

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

> I'll take on the review, Thank you so much for stepping in, this is mostly appreciated. > but you really should consider becoming > involved in Fedora as a packager, as any packager can review another > packagers packages proposed for inclusion into Fedora. I am a slow learner, but there is some

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 15/02/17 10:21 -, E.N. virgo wrote: Alas, clang++ now needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile. what actual problem is caused by that? Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile.” The problem is that one might

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:21 AM, E.N. virgo wrote: >>> Alas, clang++ now needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile. >> what actual problem is caused by that? > Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC > ABI to successfully compile.” > The problem

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 15/02/17 11:30 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/02/17 21:42 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm error: no matching function for call to ... Invalid code. I am 99% sure t

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Replace Coolkey with OpenSC

On 02/10/2017 06:34 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: On 2017-02-02 06:49, Jan Kurik wrote: [...] == Scope == * Proposal owners: -- For Fedora 26, we want to switch all applications to OpenSC and leave Coolkey as a backup. We will unregister coolkey from NSS database and register OpenSC instead. Do

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 14/02/17 21:42 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm error: no matching function for call to ... Invalid code. I am 99% sure that these 2 errors are due to a bug in dbus-c++

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

>> Alas, clang++ now needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile. > what actual problem is caused by that? Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile.” The problem is that one might want to use libstdc++ (GCC) and libc++ (L

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:42:53PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: > > libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm > > sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm > > error: no matching function for call to ... > > Invalid code. > > I am 99% sure that these 2

Bug in reporting (was: Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild)

On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 14:56 -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Failures can be seen > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f26-failures.html >  > ... > > Please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > reporting. Hi, could you correct the reporting tool to write proper

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 15.02.2017 09:48, E.N. virgo wrote: >> I'm not sure if I follow. Supporting multiple C++ ABIs would make >> things more complicated for developers because they now have to figure >> out which ABI their project needs and if all the libraries they want to >

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

> I'm not sure if I follow. Supporting multiple C++ ABIs would make > things more complicated for developers because they now have to figure > out which ABI their project needs and if all the libraries they want to

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 02/15/2017 08:12 AM, E.N. virgo wrote: Greetings, The LLVM project has been providing a C++ ABI for a while [1]. A naive user like I'm would presume Fedora easily ships with that, as the saying goes: “Fedora is a developer-friendly distro.” Unfortunately, that isn't the case for this insta