Fedora 26-20170412.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/110 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170411.n.0): ID: 80301 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/80301 ID: 80302 Test: arm

YAST for Fedora?

Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very interesting, useful and beneficial for all users. * Why Fedora does not have such tool? * How much money is need to develop such tool from

Broken dependencies: biber

biber has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: biber-2.6-4.fc26.noarch requires perl(List::MoreUtils::XS) On armhfp: biber-2.6-4.fc26.noarch requires perl(List::MoreUtils::XS) On ppc64le: biber-2.6-4.fc26.noarch requires perl(List::MoreUtils::XS) On

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible.

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 766 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 528 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 230

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

12.04.2017 18:20 Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > [...] > if TTY it instantly uses libyui-ncurses > else it *tries* to load - and uses the first available - > GUI-backend in the following order: > > libyui-qt > libyui-gtk > libyui-ncurses Could it at least try to

[Bug 1441872] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441872 Bug ID: 1441872 Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.26 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-libwww-perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1441868] New: perl-Authen-OATH-2.0.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441868 Bug ID: 1441868 Summary: perl-Authen-OATH-2.0.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Authen-OATH Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1441866] New: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.86 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441866 Bug ID: 1441866 Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.86 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[389-devel] Re: Please review new Replication Diff Tool

On 04/12/2017 06:58 PM, William Brown wrote: > On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:02 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is a beta version of a replication diff tool written in python. >> >> Design page (this needs updating - I hope to get that done tonight) >> >>

[Bug 1441656] perl-Gearman-2.004.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441656 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1441437] perl-Gearman-2.004.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441437 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1441315] perl-Test-Assert-0.0504-18.fc27 FTBFS: rm: cannot remove '/ tmp/tmp.TSfaP5NJDu/S.gpg-agent.ssh': No such file or directory

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441315 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1435625] perl-Net-DNS-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435625 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[389-devel] Re: Please review new Replication Diff Tool

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:02 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote: > Hello, > > This is a beta version of a replication diff tool written in python. > > Design page (this needs updating - I hope to get that done tonight) > > http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/repl-diff-tool-design.html > > >

loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched

32-bit rawhide/f26 builds of perl-Cflow failed with: Cflow.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got handshake key 0x7e00080, needed 0x7f00080) other arches are okay. Why? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18953377 Thanks. -- Orion Poplawski Technical

[389-devel] Please review new Replication Diff Tool

Hello, This is a beta version of a replication diff tool written in python. Design page (this needs updating - I hope to get that done tonight) http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/repl-diff-tool-design.html Current usage: -v, --verbose Verbose output -o FILE, --outfile=FILE

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 644 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 638 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 528

Self introduction: Artur Iwicki

Good day, everyone. My name is Artur Iwicki. I am a hobbyist game developer (going by the nickname "suve") and I would like to bring some of my works to the official repositories. Currently I have submitted two review requests, one game and one command-line utility. -

[EPEL-devel] Re: python-mutagen treated as limited arch package?

Matej, it was agreed by EPSCO that the package should be allowed into the distribution using the same methods in the limited arch package. On 10 April 2017 at 18:05, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 04/10/2017 03:50 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On 04/12/2017 01:34 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Libyui is a well tested and since 15 years proven to work toolkit / abstraction-layer written by SUSE, even used in SLES… It's powering their installer and system-configuration tooling. FWIW, dnfdragora currently crashes on startup and it

Announce: DistGit namespace migration: docker -> container

Hello all, The migration of the docker namespace in DistGit, cgit, PackageDB and Container Guidelines is now complete. This migration is at the request of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] to highlight that Fedora is targeting all OCI[1] compliant container runtimes instead of any specific one. For

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

Am 12.04.2017 um 19:35 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: To throw in my 2c as gtk maintainer: I'd rather have a well-written qt app on my desktop than something that relies on fragile toolkit abstraction layers like this. Both gtk and qt are

orion pushed to perl-Cflow (f26). "Build properly with flow-tools support"

From dc6ec24d046d91fd726c3c121fc58b7f5a207e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Orion Poplawski Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:27:45 -0600 Subject: Build properly with flow-tools support --- perl-Cflow-flow-tools.patch | 26 ++ perl-Cflow.spec |

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > To throw in my 2c as gtk maintainer: I'd rather have a well-written > qt > app on my desktop than something that relies on fragile toolkit > abstraction layers like this. Both gtk and qt are already > abstractions. > Adding another one on

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

Am 12.04.2017 um 19:07 schrieb Matthias Clasen: On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 18:20 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: @Björn: Do you know how libyui chooses the toolkit? Yes. Libyui performs a check on init of ui whether it's running on a TTY or not: if TTY it instantly uses libyui-ncurses

orion pushed to perl-Cflow (master). "Build properly with flow-tools support"

From dc6ec24d046d91fd726c3c121fc58b7f5a207e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Orion Poplawski Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:27:45 -0600 Subject: Build properly with flow-tools support --- perl-Cflow-flow-tools.patch | 26 ++ perl-Cflow.spec |

orion pushed to perl-Cflow (epel7). "Build properly with flow-tools support"

From dc6ec24d046d91fd726c3c121fc58b7f5a207e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Orion Poplawski Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:27:45 -0600 Subject: Build properly with flow-tools support --- perl-Cflow-flow-tools.patch | 26 ++ perl-Cflow.spec |

[Bug 1440386] perl-Contextual-Return-0.004011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440386 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Contextual-Return-0.004012-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-72d237f3a3 -- You are receiving

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Contextual-Return (f26). "Update to 0.004012 (..more)"

From 61a7e8bc98fbfbb0c50de60ca4c803352f85965a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:09:47 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.004012 - New upstream release 0.004012 - Optimized previous patch for memory leak - Added missing test plan to t/fail.t ---

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Contextual-Return (f26). "Revert t/fail.t test plan change as test is quite flaky"

From c3a2b336ac4b123b2d4e1b1d23dca9dfcf08a515 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:03:32 +0100 Subject: Revert t/fail.t test plan change as test is quite flaky --- Contextual-Return-0.004012-plan.patch | 11 +++

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 18:20 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > > > @Björn: Do you know how libyui chooses the toolkit? > > Yes.  Libyui performs a check on init of ui whether it's running on > a  > TTY or not: > >  if TTY it instantly uses libyui-ncurses >  else it *tries* to

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Contextual-Return (master). "Revert t/fail.t test plan change as test is quite flaky"

From c3a2b336ac4b123b2d4e1b1d23dca9dfcf08a515 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:03:32 +0100 Subject: Revert t/fail.t test plan change as test is quite flaky --- Contextual-Return-0.004012-plan.patch | 11 +++

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

Am 12.04.2017 um 18:05 schrieb Christian Dersch: On 04/12/2017 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On 04/12/2017 06:05 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: On 04/12/2017 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What happens

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On 04/12/2017 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What happens if both libyui-gtk and libyui-qt are installed,

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:41:52AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > It's not uncommon to have any or all of GTK, GNOME, and KDE installed > at the same time. What libyui-* does dnfdragora use? What happens if > both libyui-gtk and libyui-qt are installed, which one gets picked? I can answer that,

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 16:28 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' > > > > Esser wrote: > > > > > I hope someone can help

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Contextual-Return (master). "Update to 0.004012 (..more)"

From 61a7e8bc98fbfbb0c50de60ca4c803352f85965a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:09:47 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.004012 - New upstream release 0.004012 - Optimized previous patch for memory leak - Added missing test plan to t/fail.t ---

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On 04/12/2017 10:49 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller >>> wrote: On Wed,

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:49:53AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > The idea is to start with something that has a limited impact, I > > believe the idea is to build up the pipeline in such a way that it > > can scale to the entire distribution, but we need to start > > somewhere and Atomic Host is a

pghmcfc uploaded Contextual-Return-0.004012.tar.gz for perl-Contextual-Return

50742adf6744ff7c0d1e543b0130a73dcf8594a39ef5454d44c93251328cf404829e3364ba9c1a2ce22f176d2fa03e9bfb98ce57e35fd6c48419ab9c970f8c1e Contextual-Return-0.004012.tar.gz

[Bug 1439415] perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.90 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439415 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1439956] perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439956 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon

Conflicting gstreamer1-plugins packages in rawhide?

I tried to build a new version of jalv package and I got a conflict between gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.11.2-1.fc26.x86_64 and gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.11.90-1.fc27.x86_64 Local mockbuild for x86_64 had no errors. Partial output of root.log: DEBUG util.py:439:  Error: Transaction check error:

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14:39AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI > > I'd actually like to escalate this

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: > >>

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

Am 12.04.2017 um 16:28 schrieb Christian Dersch: On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-Vars (f26). "Update to 0.014 (..more)"

From 868fb7e2c6d0f976eac48e7c3c71b766bf1ac0d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:17:02 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.014 - New upstream release 0.014 - Fixed a bug where false positives were reported for some code constructs where a

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > >>I hope someone can help me with the following question: > >>Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: > >> Supplements: (pkg_a

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI > > I'd actually like

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-Vars (master). "Update to 0.014 (..more)"

From 868fb7e2c6d0f976eac48e7c3c71b766bf1ac0d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:17:02 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.014 - New upstream release 0.014 - Fixed a bug where false positives were reported for some code constructs where a

pghmcfc uploaded Test-Vars-0.014.tar.gz for perl-Test-Vars

25361ab010c5d991e3f955fbc2956fb52c5a31801fbc742b4d7eb02fd56d71eee4314cb515ece8c3fc76ab88bdee4304ccc0762d7f7360bdfd05b05c51ac6314 Test-Vars-0.014.tar.gz

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > I have put together a wiki page making this a change proposal: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraAtomicCI I'd actually like to escalate this from a Change proposal (which generally fit into Fedora releases) to a

co-owner wanted on wordpress and roundcubemail

Hi, I try to maintain Wordpress and Roundcubemail, but I will prefer to have some co-owner on these. Especially to allow (security) update when I'm offline, or busy with some important downstream work (PHP). Feel free to contact me, or request ACL on pkgdb. Remi.

Re: Problem building LizardFS - hidden symbol is referenced by DSO

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 08:02 +0200, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 11/04/2017 20:34, Jonathan Dieter ha scritto: > > I would like to get the LizardFS distributed filesystem into > > Fedora, > > but I'm running into problems compiling it with Fedora's hardening > > flags enabled. > > I would greatly

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 07:11:33AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > A small team of people interested in working on a Continuous Integration has > > started looking into what it would take to add

Re: Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Dear all, > > A small team of people interested in working on a Continuous Integration has > started looking into what it would take to add Continous Integration (CI) to > our > current packaging and releasing

Re: Spam from postmaster

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:55:14AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > I'm sorry for the Chinese spam sent from a spoofed > address that passed into the list. > It looks like a bug in the Mailman3 > system . It turned out

[Bug 1441653] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9166 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441653 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On 04/12/2017 02:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > I hope someone can help me with the following question: > Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: > Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e)) > Is there any way to express a

ppisar pushed to perl-CPANPLUS (master). "0.9166 bump"

From 482f3331c4b4b6ededf1beffc562f7944c5deeda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:46:16 +0200 Subject: 0.9166 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-CPANPLUS.spec | 14 +++--- sources| 2 +- 3

ppisar uploaded CPANPLUS-0.9166.tar.gz for perl-CPANPLUS

381db2862be5ffd3da9a4c9a68b2beee7b1c83bdf35d7e34342a1e9b94feee48bafa8f1232c6913d72f7f2df00c6ac262c6d9b85504bbc6092e3c743d8cebe6e CPANPLUS-0.9166.tar.gz

[HEADS UP] F27: Desktop-Environments: replacing Yumex-DNF with DNFDragora, added weak-dependencies to libyui-$UI

Hello folks! For the transition from Yumex-DNF to DNFDragora, I have added the following weak-deps to the corresponding libyui-$UI packages: For GTK-based DEs (libyui-gtk): # For Cinnamon. Supplements: (libyui%{?_isa} and cinnamon%{?_isa}) # For LXDE. # For Cinnamon. Supplements:

[Bug 1441656] perl-Gearman-2.004.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441656 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.002-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ddc2007f0a -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1441437] perl-Gearman-2.004.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441437 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.002-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ddc2007f0a -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1441656] perl-Gearman-2.004.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441656 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Gearman (f26). "2.004.002 bump"

From 96b313e315cb11a1bd4ebe6996594af990f8cd42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:22:54 +0200 Subject: 2.004.002 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Gearman.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

Am 12.04.2017 um 13:58 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 12.04.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Hello folks, I hope

ppisar pushed to perl-Gearman (master). "2.004.002 bump"

From 96b313e315cb11a1bd4ebe6996594af990f8cd42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:22:54 +0200 Subject: 2.004.002 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Gearman.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

ppisar uploaded Gearman-2.004.002.tar.gz for perl-Gearman

9101582ffe3bc89bc842a57f5445e1dbf0f5459144c3979656768356a457a8b7d43a75057513909eb09b1590956959afc508f46734efd6cccfd701eabbec18dc Gearman-2.004.002.tar.gz

[Bug 1441656] New: perl-Gearman-2.004.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441656 Bug ID: 1441656 Summary: perl-Gearman-2.004.002 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gearman Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1441653] New: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9166 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441653 Bug ID: 1441653 Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9166 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CPANPLUS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 12.04.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Neal Gompa: >> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello folks, >>> >>> I hope someone can help me with

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

Am 12.04.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Hello folks, I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: Supplements: (pkg_a

phracek pushed to perl (master). "Add README file with dependencies (..more)"

phracek pushed to perl (master). "Add README file with dependencies (..more)" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl.git/commit/?h=master=1ea43c7e15c34f8ab5dd3436b05bf907d848b3ea ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

Dear all, A small team of people interested in working on a Continuous Integration has started looking into what it would take to add Continous Integration (CI) to our current packaging and releasing workflow. The current idea is to use fedora-atomic as a prototype product to port into this

Fedora CI effort/Interest Group

Dear all, A small team of people interested in working on a Continuous Integration has started looking into what it would take to add Continous Integration (CI) to our current packaging and releasing workflow. The current idea is to use fedora-atomic as a prototype product to port into this

Re: RPM boolean dependencies in Requires

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2017-04-06 at 14:20 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> > Isn't mash dead? >> Some people tell me it is, some other says no. And after some time, >> someone starts porting it to DNF. So it is hard to say. >> >> Anyhow,

[Bug 1440998] perl-Clone-PP-1.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440998 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Clone-PP (master). "1.07 bump"

From 6f4dd2d899b3252cab8183305bfd3aa28a8092dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:44:44 +0200 Subject: 1.07 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Clone-PP.spec | 13 - sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 10

Re: RPM boolean dependencies in Requires

On Qui, 2017-04-06 at 14:20 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Isn't mash dead? > Some people tell me it is, some other says no. And after some time, > someone starts porting it to DNF. So it is hard to say. > > Anyhow, it *is* used right now. Igor,  Do you understand that this sentence  doesn't

jplesnik uploaded Clone-PP-1.07.tar.gz for perl-Clone-PP

28faae5dc42ff5ae850fe9f664dca8b52ff77823c5f157c62c52254fa4f1e217d3344f6e79a2ddad169f934e7be262dc79f32e885cb1d25db182050800ac805a Clone-PP-1.07.tar.gz

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Hello folks, > > I hope someone can help me with the following question: > Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: > > Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or

[Bug 1441516] Upgrade perl-Devel-CheckLib to 1.10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441516 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Spam from postmaster

Hello, I'm sorry for the Chinese spam sent from a spoofed address that passed into the list. It looks like a bug in the Mailman3 system . I added the address to banned address list, but I don't believe it will

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-NoTabs (f26). "Update to 2.00 (..more)"

From 161c8ec2223e3c72a3a0cc193a009fd1a03c6f37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:16:05 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.00 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 2.00 -

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-NoTabs (master). "Update to 2.00 (..more)"

From 161c8ec2223e3c72a3a0cc193a009fd1a03c6f37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:16:05 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.00 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - New upstream release 2.00 -

pghmcfc uploaded Test-NoTabs-2.00.tar.gz for perl-Test-NoTabs

e776f5c12029376a7754492482f62385a391aec31b3dfd979a8eb20aa81dd66ef8c7d33435e67f8f1eb151cf5833e5bde33c09ceccef27ac6e20958f28ff83e8 Test-NoTabs-2.00.tar.gz

Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

Hello folks, I hope someone can help me with the following question: Does recent Fedora's rpm support nested rich-dependencies like: Supplements: (pkg_a and pkg_b and pkg_c and (pkg_d or pkg_e)) Is there any way to express a dependency like that? Cheers Björn

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Unicode-UTF8 (f26). "- Update to 0.62 (..more)"

From e124cd4e61f947ea88c17222d0842463c9051926 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:49:34 +0100 Subject: - Update to 0.62 - New upstream release 0.62 - Only check for missing Module::Install related modules in Makefile.PL ---

jplesnik pushed to perl-Devel-CheckLib (master). "Update to 1.10"

From 6dc3597310b9be5b4ed606c6eacd3988ef57ad79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:59:44 +0200 Subject: Update to 1.10 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Devel-CheckLib.spec | 7 ++- sources | 2 +- 3 files

Anyone to maintain python2-ipython?

Hi, IPython is dropping support for Python 2 in it's 6.0.0 release [1], while the 5.x version remains long term supported with Python 2 support [2]. In order to update the ipython package in Fedora to 6.x, we'd need to move the python2 bits to a separate package (python2-ipython). Is there

jplesnik uploaded Devel-CheckLib-1.10.tar.gz for perl-Devel-CheckLib

aab565df0b31a08b2dff3fb777bc208ff9b8322d9012fb2deaa5d27411e4915cdd2e48cd65eb55323c69f23975e08cee8cfa4a8221a4b2e39770bdeecfe3f127 Devel-CheckLib-1.10.tar.gz

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Unicode-UTF8 (master). "- Update to 0.62 (..more)"

From e124cd4e61f947ea88c17222d0842463c9051926 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:49:34 +0100 Subject: - Update to 0.62 - New upstream release 0.62 - Only check for missing Module::Install related modules in Makefile.PL ---

pghmcfc uploaded Unicode-UTF8-0.62.tar.gz for perl-Unicode-UTF8

056026ac2ee4c101de5ea6017db59f875121dba8fd23ab5c2ae525effb8cf864e8a1c24588bb2a027792e27568742fc75bd5765694027b110afef867a4b982e0 Unicode-UTF8-0.62.tar.gz

Re: switching libcurl back to OpenSSL and providing the libcurl-minimal subpackage

On 04/10/2017 03:52 PM, Kai Engert wrote: On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: Anyway, I guess we should move this discussion to some curl- or nss-related channel... The question remains, if it makes sense to switch back to openssl, if the consequence is a loss in

  1   2   >