According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the cu
2017-05-31 8:24 GMT+02:00 Zdenek Dohnal :
> On 05/30/2017 01:19 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Pavel Zhukov
>> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>> Due to many CVEs and low quality/security of these packages as well as
>>> Windows oriented upstream I'm going to orphan both jbi
368e68dfb9f1700534d9b391090e340172e3adde5fe15576f883e9341047fec35cea8660751883b27e128ad91dda363d513547368097a989457d669bbbdc8ce4
Inline-C-0.78.tar.gz
https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Inline-C/Inline-C-0.78.tar.gz/sha512/368e68dfb9f1700534d9b391090e340172e3adde5fe15576f88
On 05/30/2017 01:19 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Pavel Zhukov
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>> Due to many CVEs and low quality/security of these packages as well as
>> Windows oriented upstream I'm going to orphan both jbig2dec and mupdf
>> packages in Fedora/EPEL.
>> S
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 11:18, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 29/05/17 23:18, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> >> Does this qualify to be a system-wide change? To me this looks like
> >> a self-contained change, since I don't see any other packages or
> >> processes in nee
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 07:21:07PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Does this qualify to be a system-wide change? To me this looks like a
> self-contained change, since I don't see any other packages or processes in
> need for adjustment, but rsyslog itself.
>
> Please correct me, if I'm m
On 05/30/2017 03:47 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
>> I forwarded your post to the list owners... they are at least the first
>> line of folks to talk to about this.
>
> Thanks! I'll try to keep that in mind (no promises=)
>
>> If they can't clear things up, then an infrastructure ticket and we can
On 05/29/2017 04:41 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 26.5.2017 v 21:42 Ralph Bean napsal(a):
>> Any feedback before that would be
>> greatly appreciated.
>
> PkgDB handles Koschei and upstream monitoring settings too. How I can do that
> after the migration?
The wiki page needs updating but the i
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Pavel Zhukov
wrote:
> Hello.
> Due to many CVEs and low quality/security of these packages as well as
> Windows oriented upstream I'm going to orphan both jbig2dec and mupdf
> packages in Fedora/EPEL.
> Sometimes the build doesn't reach stable branch just becaus
Hello.
Due to many CVEs and low quality/security of these packages as well as Windows
oriented upstream I'm going to orphan both jbig2dec and mupdf packages in
Fedora/EPEL.
Sometimes the build doesn't reach stable branch just because it's deprecated by
new build with new CVE.
Feel free to take
> I forwarded your post to the list owners... they are at least the first
> line of folks to talk to about this.
Thanks! I'll try to keep that in mind (no promises=)
> If they can't clear things up, then an infrastructure ticket and we can
> see what we can do from there.
It's gone now.
Cheers
On 29/05/17 23:18, Björn Persson wrote:
> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>> Does this qualify to be a system-wide change? To me this looks like
>> a self-contained change, since I don't see any other packages or
>> processes in need for adjustment, but rsyslog itself.
>
> I'll be surprised if ther
Welcome to Fedora!
Charalampos Stratakis
Associate Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
- Original Message -
From: "Rémi Verschelde"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 9:10:51 PM
Subject: Introducing myself: Rémi Verschelde / Akien
Hi everyone,
13 matches
Mail list logo
