[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 888 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 650 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 232

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 766 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 760 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 650

Re: Unable to bring new package to bodhi

If you're talking specifically about the Bodhi web UI, then I think I'm having the same problem: After I logged in, I clicked on Create > New Update, tried to search for my package, and got the message "unable to find any packages that match the current query". I had to start my updates from

[Bug 1479680] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479680 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.006-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1283764] Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/ perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-File-Tail-1.3-7.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-08-13)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On Saturday, 12 August 2017 at 23:30, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I have no particular affinity for Atlas. But if we're going to > > > replace it, is OpenBLAS a complete drop-in replacement for Atlas

Re: debuginfo/source improvements vs mass rebuild

On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:16:29 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > - Putting extra files under /usr/lib/debug causes: > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/__pycache__/libpython3.6dm.so.1.0.debug-gdb.cpython-36.opt-1.pyc > >

Re: glibc-headers no longer provides xlocale.h in 2.26 (rawhide)?

On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 14:00 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 03:28:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 08/12/2017 03:22 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > During one of the releng rebuilds my package OCE is failing to > > > build[1] > > > because it can't find

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 91 - Fix replication m1h1c1 topology

Hi team, https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/91 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/f9874b05dcab8b6e01517163218c9572b14373b8809cf93a1a38827c3db1873f-0001-Issue-91-Fix-replication-m1h1c1-topology.patch Thanks, Simon signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I have no particular affinity for Atlas. But if we're going to > > replace it, is OpenBLAS a complete drop-in replacement for Atlas that > > requires no or at least very minimal changes? In what ways is

Fedora Rawhide-20170812.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 41/137 (x86_64), 4/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170811.n.2):

Unable to bring new package to bodhi

For some odd reasons, I am unable to update via bodhi even though the package is already built[1]. Is it a bug from the infrastructure as the database failed to list new package [2]? Reference -- [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?type=package=glob=gimp-luminosity-masks

[EPEL-devel] Conflict between amavisd-new and nmh

Hi, FYI: I just submitted a bug in Bugzilla, something I actually found on CentOS 7 with EPEL 7, but is exists on all Fedora releases too, so I decided to file it on Fedora 26: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480861 Cheers, -- --Jos Vos --X/OS Experts in

Re: Fwd: Heads-up on rpm 4.14 coming to rawhide, incl. soname bump

On 08/10/2017 01:47 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: Resending to devel@, some mishap in earlier... Forwarded Message Subject: Heads-up on rpm 4.14 coming to rawhide, incl. soname bump Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:50:30 +0300 From: Panu Matilainen To:

[UPDATE] Re: Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

I've done mock rebuilds for all the packages I plan to change (results below), and I'm prepared to go through with the changes. dreampie and tiled have been dropped. (Those two packages are "applications". dreampie installs a python3 module, but no python3 binaries. For tiled the python module

[UPDATE] Re: Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

I've done mock rebuilds for all the packages I plan to change (results below), and I'm prepared to go through with the changes. dreampie and tiled have been dropped. (Those two packages are "applications". dreampie installs a python3 module, but no python3 binaries. For tiled the python module

Re: glibc-headers no longer provides xlocale.h in 2.26 (rawhide)?

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 03:28:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/12/2017 03:22 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > During one of the releng rebuilds my package OCE is failing to build[1] > > because it can't find /usr/include/xlocale.h > > > Was this intentional? > > Yes, it used to be installed

Fedora Rawhide-20170811.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 43/137 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170807.n.0): ID: 128370 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Re: glibc-headers no longer provides xlocale.h in 2.26 (rawhide)?

On 08/12/2017 03:22 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > During one of the releng rebuilds my package OCE is failing to build[1] > because it can't find /usr/include/xlocale.h > Was this intentional? Yes, it used to be installed by accident. The header itself clearly said that it was an internal-only

glibc-headers no longer provides xlocale.h in 2.26 (rawhide)?

During one of the releng rebuilds my package OCE is failing to build[1] because it can't find /usr/include/xlocale.h In both Fedora 24/25 it is provided by the glibc-headers package but it seems to have been dropped in 2.26 in rawhide. # dnf repoquery --whatprovides /usr/include/xlocale.h Fedora

[Bug 1480861] New: amavisd default conf conflicts with nmh (scan)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480861 Bug ID: 1480861 Summary: amavisd default conf conflicts with nmh (scan) Product: Fedora Version: 26 Component: amavisd-new Severity: medium Assignee:

Re: ENOTIME

On 07/21/2017 04:51 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > rpms/suitesparse -- A collection of sparse matrix libraries ( el6 ) Let me update suitesparse on el6 too, please. -- -- Antonio Trande sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org See my vCard. <> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: git push fails for new packages

> for f27: This is a known problem see: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6236 > They working on it right now. > > f26 works for me now with: > $ git checkout -b f26; git push --set-upstream origin f26; fedpkg build > --nowait Used your workaround, I can't build the package now

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I have no particular affinity for Atlas. But if we're going to > replace it, is OpenBLAS a complete drop-in replacement for Atlas that > requires no or at least very minimal changes? In what ways is it better > or worse? Proper support for runtime CPU feature

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 12:11:00AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 12:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Never mind. Something in the atlas build segfaults when building > > on ppc64le: > > > >

Re: seafile-client fails to build on ARM for f26

I have temporarily disabled armv7 to provide the update to all other architectures. On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 22:07 +0200, Julien Enselme wrote: > Hi, > > I have a strange build failure my package seafile-client on ARM for > f26 (rawhide and f25 are fine). From what I understand, this is a ld >

Re: koji-1.13 cannot be resolved as a dependency in f25

On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:45:29 +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > [root@e151b05870c7 pkgs]# dnf repoquery koji > Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:39 ago on Sat Aug 12 02:25:14 2017. > koji-0:1.10.1-13.fc25.noarch > koji-0:1.13.0-2.fc25.noarch > > and koji-1.13 is listed by resolving the dependencies