Quack,
On 09/01/2017 01:28 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> But I think an off-line talk might be the best. Depends on you.
I can understand you don't want this thread to end-up in flames, and yes
sometimes it helps to have a live direct talk, but this also means the
rest of this list is kept out. I
Am 31.08.2017 um 21:36 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
It's been several hours since this entirely new package repo has been created,
but the koji build still fails. How long does it take for koji to learn
about this new package?
$ fedpkg build
Building ampache_browser-1.0.0-1.fc28 for rawhide
Created
It's been several hours since this entirely new package repo has been created,
but the koji build still fails. How long does it take for koji to learn
about this new package?
$ fedpkg build
Building ampache_browser-1.0.0-1.fc28 for rawhide
Created task: 21592583
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproje
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 81/126 (x86_64), 18/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170828.n.0):
ID: 135993 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fe
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, August 31, 2017 3:48:21 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > a) you need an additional db field. you need to have more inputs in SCM
> tabs
> > when one has a meaning only if 'custom' is selected in the srpm_generato
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 3:48:21 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> a) you need an additional db field. you need to have more inputs in SCM tabs
> when one has a meaning only if 'custom' is selected in the srpm_generator
> select (which means you should hide/unhide that by js in frontend to have
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:43:08 AM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Pavel Raiskup
> wrote:
> > > I'm curious why you insist on 'make srpm'; that sounds like you try
> to push
> > > the copr users somewh
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:11:56PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Yes, but our concern isn't with the Python module's dependencies on
> the Platform module, it's with *other* components that depend on the
> Python module: if stream expansion were to pick up all non-EOL
> branches as being "active", t
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:43:08 AM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > I'm curious why you insist on 'make srpm'; that sounds like you try to push
> > the copr users somewhere, to "standardize something".
>
> It's easier on implementation.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:06:16AM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:19:52PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > I would like to initiate the non-responsive maintainer process [1] for
> > Christopher Aillon [2]. A long time ago, he used to be part of the
> > Fedora and Red Hat desk
On 30 August 2017 at 21:56, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 07:43:21PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> As a concrete example, the upstream Python 3.7 alpha & beta cycle will
>> be running in parallel with the F28 development cycle. It would be
>> beneficial to be able to create the c
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 5:18:39 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > We are considering the options here and so far the most convenient
> method (at
> > least from the implementation point of view) seems to be to
> automatically call
> >
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 07:23:04PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> BTW, most of the packages that sit on top of coq have new versions
> available, so when this is fixed, I will want to update the other
> packages anyway. If you could let me know when a fix for this issue
> is available, I will take ca
Hello,
I'm using Jenkins for pOCCI testsuite tool [1] (COPR repository is
[2]).
I'm building everything in Jenkins using my own scripts for several OS
(Fedora/EPEL, Debian), but I've added also COPR as optional step in the
build workflow.
Source rpms are generated locally by Jenkins and then is
On Thursday, August 31, 2017 8:43:38 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 5:18:39 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > We are considering the options here and so far the most convenient method
> > (at
> > least from the implementation point of view) seems to be to automaticall
15 matches
Mail list logo
