Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-10-20)

[Justin Forbes]

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto

or run:
  date -d '2017-10-20 16:00 UTC'


Links to all issues below can be found at:
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

= Followups =

#topic #1782 use of updates-testing for testing of non-update software
.fesco 1782
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1782

= New business =

#topic #1784 libsolv and dnf maintainers: failure to respond to critical bug
.fesco 1784
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1784

#topic #1785 Mesa/Nouveau maintainer(s) should be required to ship the
locking patches from the QtWebEngine Copr
.fesco 1785
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1785

#topic #1786 Non-responsive maintainer: jcapik
.fesco 1786
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1786

= Open Floor =

For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue.  The report of the agenda items can be found at
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: NIGHTLY #114

[mareynol]

See 


--
[...truncated 4699 lines...]
'\''objectclass'\'': '\''top extensibleObject'\''.split(),
'\''ou'\'': '\''level4'\''
})))
except ldap.ALREADY_EXISTS:
pass
except ldap.LDAPError as e:
log.error('\''Failed to add ou=people: error '\'' + 
e.message['\''desc'\''])
assert False

#
# Add a user to the branch
#
try:
topology_st.standalone.add_s(Entry((USER_DN, {
'\''objectclass'\'': '\''top extensibleObject'\''.split(),
'\''uid'\'': '\''user1'\''
})))
except ldap.LDAPError as e:
log.error('\''Failed to add user1: error '\'' + 
e.message['\''desc'\''])
assert False

#
# Enable password policy and add the subtree policy
#
try:
topology_st.standalone.modify_s(DN_CONFIG, [(ldap.MOD_REPLACE, 
'\''nsslapd-pwpolicy-local'\'', '\''on'\'')])
except ldap.LDAPError as e:
log.error('\''Failed to set pwpolicy-local: error '\'' + 
e.message['\''desc'\''])
assert False

addSubtreePwPolicy(topology_st.standalone)

#
# Now check the user has its expected passwordPolicy subentry
#
try:
entries = topology_st.standalone.search_s(USER_DN,
  ldap.SCOPE_BASE,
  '\''(objectclass=top)'\'',
  
['\''pwdpolicysubentry'\'', '\''dn'\''])
if not entries[0].hasAttr('\''pwdpolicysubentry'\''):
log.fatal('\''User does not have expected 
pwdpolicysubentry!'\'')
>   assert False
E   assert False

tickets/ticket47981_test.py:190: AssertionError
 Captured stdout setup -
OK group dirsrv exists
OK user dirsrv exists
 Captured stderr setup -
INFO:lib389.topologies:Instance with parameters {'\''ldap-port'\'': 38901, 
'\''suffix'\'': '\''dc=example,dc=com'\'', '\''krb5_realm'\'': None, 
'\''deployed-dir'\'': '\''/usr'\'', '\''inst-backupdir'\'': '\''/tmp'\'', 
'\''hostname'\'': '\''localhost'\'', '\''server-id'\'': '\''standalone1'\'', 
'\''root-pw'\'': '\''password'\'', '\''root-dn'\'': '\''cn=Directory 
Manager'\'', '\''group-id'\'': None, '\''InstScriptsEnabled'\'': None, 
'\''user-id'\'': None, '\''ldap-secureport'\'': None} was created.
- Captured stderr call -
INFO:dirsrvtests.tests.tickets.ticket47981_test:Testing Ticket 47981 - Test 
that COS def changes are correctly reflected in affected users
INFO:dirsrvtests.tests.tickets.ticket47981_test:Adding second suffix that will 
not contain any COS entries...

INFO:lib389:List backend with suffix=o=netscaperoot
INFO:lib389:Creating a local backend
INFO:lib389:List backend cn=netscaperoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config
INFO:lib389:Found entry dn: cn=netscaperoot,cn=ldbm 
database,cn=plugins,cn=config
cn: netscaperoot
nsslapd-cachememsize: 512000
nsslapd-cachesize: -1
nsslapd-directory: /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-standalone1/db/netscaperoot
nsslapd-dncachememsize: 16777216
nsslapd-readonly: off
nsslapd-require-index: off
nsslapd-suffix: o=netscaperoot
objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject
objectClass: nsBackendInstance


INFO:lib389:Entry dn: cn="o=netscaperoot",cn=mapping tree,cn=config
cn: o=netscaperoot
nsslapd-backend: netscaperoot
nsslapd-state: backend
objectclass: top
objectclass: extensibleObject
objectclass: nsMappingTree


INFO:lib389:Found entry dn: cn=o\3Dnetscaperoot,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
cn: o=netscaperoot
nsslapd-backend: netscaperoot
nsslapd-state: backend
objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject
objectClass: nsMappingTree


INFO:dirsrvtests.tests.tickets.ticket47981_test:Add our test entries to the 
default suffix, and proceed with the test...
CRITICAL:dirsrvtests.tests.tickets.ticket47981_test:User does not have expected 
pwdpolicysubentry!
__ test_basic_feature __

topology_st = 

def test_basic_feature(topology_st):
"""Check basic SASL functionality for PLAIN mechanism

:id: 75ddc6fa-aa5a-4025-9c71-1abad20c91fc
:setup: Standalone instance
:steps:
1. Stop the instance
2. Clean up confdir from previous cert and key files
3. Create RSA files: CA, key and cert
4. Start the instance
5. Create RSA entry
6. Set nsslapd-secureport to 636 and nsslapd-security to '\''on'\''
7. Restart the instance
8. Create a user
9. 

Fedora 27 Final blocker status mail #1

[Adam Williamson]

Hi folks! As we're now frozen for Final, here's an update on blocker
bug status.

tl;dr action summary


Accepted blockers
-

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164492
ACTION: desktop team to make change and submit update

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486002
ACTION: Konrad and pjones to continue collaborating and ship a fix

3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491320
ACTION: kernel team to ship official update with fix, QA to test it

4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494061
ACTION: desktop team to investigate and fix

5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498207
ACTION: dnf team to clarify need for second update

Proposed blockers
-

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503496
ACTION: pjones / anaconda team to review, merge and ship proposed fix

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489942
ACTION: pjones to continue trying to fix (but likely not blocker)

3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504059
ACTION: none specific needed (just blocker review to review bug)

4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497691
ACTION: none specific needed (update is tested and ready)

5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500834
ACTION: blocker review team to decide blocker/FE status, kernel team
to send out fix if accepted as blocker/FE

6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501762
ACTION: blocker review team to review, otherwise none needed

7. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501362
ACTION: anton to update microcode bundle (but likely not a blocker)

Bug-by-bug detail
=

Accepted blockers
-

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164492 - gnome-boxes - ASSIGNED
   Please drop libvirt 'default' network dependency for F27 GA, disrupts livecd 
networking

This is a 'greatest hit' we've had to deal with for several releases now.
Everyone involved more or less knows what the deal is, we just need to
make the change and send out an update.

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486002 - grub2 - NEW
   grub2-mkconfig does not work if xen.gz is installed.

This one seems to be well understood and being worked on by pjones and
Konrad (our Xen contact). We just need the proposed fix to be verified
by Konrad and then sent out as an update.

3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491320 - kernel - NEW
   heavy screen flicker with latest kernels in qxl+spice VM

We've been kicking this one around for a while, but as of today it seems
like a kernel-side fix for it may be possible. We now need folks to test
and confirm the proposed kernel fix, and kernel team to send out an
update containing it (assuming it works).

4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494061 - gnome-software - NEW
   gnome-software doesn't show F25->F27 upgrade even though it should

This one seems quite straightforward - Fedora 25 doesn't show F27 as
an option for upgrade, even when the gsettings setting to show development
releases is toggled. We need the devs to take a look at this and fix it.

5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498207 - libdnf - VERIFIED
   DNF crash during upgrade installation F26 -> F27

This one seems to be pretty much addressed; in fact an update which two
reporters claimed already fixed the issue went stable a week ago. There's
a newer update now marked as fixing the bug, so I am asking in the bug
for clarification as to whether the newer update is really required to
fully fix this bug.

Proposed blockers
-

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503496 - anaconda - POST
   FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'grub2-mkconfig'

This looks like a fairly clear-cut blocker (the bug entirely prevents
Mac installs from working, I think). I have proposed a fix for this; need
pjones / anaconda folks to review and apply it, and send out an update.

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489942 - dbxtool - MODIFIED
   dbxtool fails at boot 'Could not apply database update 
"DBXUpdate-2016-08-09-13-16-00.bin": Permission denied'

AFAICS this is aarch64-specific, so cannot be accepted as a blocker.
pjones keeps trying to fix it, but without any success so far.

3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504059 - distribution - NEW
   Include Firefox 57 at compose

This is basically a 'make a choice' bug, there's no difficult work needed
here as the package is already available (and tested and karmaed).

4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497691 - dnsmasq - ON_QA
   CVE-2017-14491 CVE-2017-14492 CVE-2017-14493 CVE-2017-14494 CVE-2017-14495 
CVE-2017-14496 dnsmasq: various flaws [fedora-all]

This is already accepted as an FE, and the update is available and
karma'ed, so there's no work needed here, it'll just get closed when we
do another stable push.

5. 

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504447] New: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.33 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504447

Bug ID: 1504447
   Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.33 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
xav...@bachelot.org



Latest upstream release: 1.33
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.32-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-CSV_XS/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3434/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504429] New: perl-Term-Table-0.012 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504429

Bug ID: 1504429
   Summary: perl-Term-Table-0.012 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Term-Table
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.012
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.011-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Term-Table/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/12715/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49408 - possible to change Replica ID to a invalid value

[Mark Reynolds]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49408

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/19e8a656064e14c0eeff89c3adcbe8b71aaa70aec3a339792b71be3004c7ada5-0001-Ticket-49408-Server-allows-to-set-any-nsds5replicaid.patch

___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bodhi CLI and USERNAME

[Cole Robinson]

On 10/19/2017 04:09 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Greetings fellow Fedorans,
> 
> We're about to release Bodhi 3.0.0[0] upstream, which has a backwards
> incompatible CLI change[1] that I am considering backporting to the
> stable Fedoras, but I wanted feedback first before I do that.
> 
> The Bodhi 2 CLI will use the USERNAME environment variable when
> authenticating you, if present, and the Bodhi 3 CLI[3] does not use any
> environment variable (yet) for authentication. Here's the reasoning:
> 
> * The Bodhi 2 CLI previously didn't have the ability to remember your
>   username, but it did have the environment variable, which kind of
>   acted like a bandaid. I believe this variable was in place before I
>   got involved.
> * The CLI got a lot of love earlier this year, and one of the big things
>   added was the ability for it to remember your username if you've ever
>   successfully authenticated before. This feature largely removed the
>   need for the environment variable, but keeping the variable seemed
>   harmless at the time.
> * I recently learned that the variable is painful for some users,
>   because GDM sets this variable to your local system's login username,
>   which is not necessarily the same as your FAS username.
> * When the username is present, Bodhi will not prompt the user for their
>   username, which leads to a very poor experience upon first login for
>   GDM users who have mismatching FAS account names (Bodhi prompts for
>   their password and then tells them it's wrong). Without the variable,
>   Bodhi will prompt users to enter their username upon first use.
> * Users can currently override the USERNAME environment variable with a
>   --user flag as a workaround.
> * Though it may seem that Kerberos addresses this problem, Bodhi does
>   not use Kerberos (it uses OpenID) and there are not plans to adjust
>   Bodhi to use Kerberos because we plan to convert it to use OpenID
>   Connect instead.
> 
> In order to address the above, and in the spirit of working quickly due
> to the other pressures to complete 3.0.0, it was easy enough to just
> drop support for this environment variable with 3.0.0, since 3.0.0
> already needed other backwards incompatible changes. However, I have a
> few questions for the list:
> 
> 0) Do you have a use case for an environment variable to set your
>username? If there is sufficient demand for this feature, we can add
>it back with a different name in a future Bodhi 3 release (perhaps
>BODHI_USER or FAS_USER would suffice).
> 
> 1) I'd like to make a backwards incompatible patch for the stable
>Fedoras so that GDM users get a better experience without having to
>wait for Fedora 28, but I don't want to do this if it is too
>disruptive. Normally I am quite against backwards incompatible
>changes in Fedora, but this can also be viewed as a painful bug and
>fixing the bug might alleviate more pain than the change would
>cause. Would such a change be a disruption to us developers, or does
>the good outweigh the bad?
> 
> A few options for F25-27:
> 
> 0) Do nothing, and let Rawhide be the only place this change happens.
> 1) Drop USERNAME.
> 2) s/USERNAME/BODHI_USER/ or similar.
> 
> Thoughts?

I don't think this change will affect my workflow at all. That said,
I've had this in my .bashrc for a while:

  # Used by /usr/bin/bodhi at least
  export FAS_USERNAME="crobinso"

And checking f25 dist-git bodhi code gives:

$ git grep USERNAME
bodhi-0.9.12.2/bodhi/tools/client.py:return
os.getenv('FAS_USERNAME', getuser())
bodhi-0.9.12.2/docs/bodhi.1:.IP "\fB\-u --username\fP USERNAME"

So indeed seems like the historical env name here is FAS_USERNAME, and
the switch to USERNAME is only in f26+ bodhi era code. I think that
changes a lot of the above dynamics. Maybe just switch the stable
branches back to FAS_USERNAME which avoids the GDM issue

Thanks,
Cole
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

bodhi CLI and USERNAME

[Randy Barlow]

Greetings fellow Fedorans,

We're about to release Bodhi 3.0.0[0] upstream, which has a backwards
incompatible CLI change[1] that I am considering backporting to the
stable Fedoras, but I wanted feedback first before I do that.

The Bodhi 2 CLI will use the USERNAME environment variable when
authenticating you, if present, and the Bodhi 3 CLI[3] does not use any
environment variable (yet) for authentication. Here's the reasoning:

* The Bodhi 2 CLI previously didn't have the ability to remember your
  username, but it did have the environment variable, which kind of
  acted like a bandaid. I believe this variable was in place before I
  got involved.
* The CLI got a lot of love earlier this year, and one of the big things
  added was the ability for it to remember your username if you've ever
  successfully authenticated before. This feature largely removed the
  need for the environment variable, but keeping the variable seemed
  harmless at the time.
* I recently learned that the variable is painful for some users,
  because GDM sets this variable to your local system's login username,
  which is not necessarily the same as your FAS username.
* When the username is present, Bodhi will not prompt the user for their
  username, which leads to a very poor experience upon first login for
  GDM users who have mismatching FAS account names (Bodhi prompts for
  their password and then tells them it's wrong). Without the variable,
  Bodhi will prompt users to enter their username upon first use.
* Users can currently override the USERNAME environment variable with a
  --user flag as a workaround.
* Though it may seem that Kerberos addresses this problem, Bodhi does
  not use Kerberos (it uses OpenID) and there are not plans to adjust
  Bodhi to use Kerberos because we plan to convert it to use OpenID
  Connect instead.

In order to address the above, and in the spirit of working quickly due
to the other pressures to complete 3.0.0, it was easy enough to just
drop support for this environment variable with 3.0.0, since 3.0.0
already needed other backwards incompatible changes. However, I have a
few questions for the list:

0) Do you have a use case for an environment variable to set your
   username? If there is sufficient demand for this feature, we can add
   it back with a different name in a future Bodhi 3 release (perhaps
   BODHI_USER or FAS_USER would suffice).

1) I'd like to make a backwards incompatible patch for the stable
   Fedoras so that GDM users get a better experience without having to
   wait for Fedora 28, but I don't want to do this if it is too
   disruptive. Normally I am quite against backwards incompatible
   changes in Fedora, but this can also be viewed as a painful bug and
   fixing the bug might alleviate more pain than the change would
   cause. Would such a change be a disruption to us developers, or does
   the good outweigh the bad?

A few options for F25-27:

0) Do nothing, and let Rawhide be the only place this change happens.
1) Drop USERNAME.
2) s/USERNAME/BODHI_USER/ or similar.

Thoughts?


P.S. The Bodhi 3.0 beta is also deployed to staging[2], though no user
visible changes will be apparent. It's main feature is the ability to
mash modules.


[0] https://bodhi.stg.fedoraproject.org/docs/release_notes.html
[1] https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/1789
[2] https://bodhi.stg.fedoraproject.org/
[3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bowlofeggs/bodhi-pre-release



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171017.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 955  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 718  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
 300  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-04bc9dd81d   
libbsd-0.8.3-1.el7
 197  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d241156dfe   
mod_cluster-1.3.3-10.el7
 195  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-7ecb12e378   
python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-1.el7
  29  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e27758bd23   
libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el7
  27  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-52b8147c68   
openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-15.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-17b77b3268   
botan-1.10.17-1.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-3c06a7eecf   
nagios-4.3.4-3.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-9e6a789af9   
check-mk-1.2.8p26-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-853d71e01b   
tnef-1.4.15-1.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f1c70fdfbd   
cacti-1.1.26-1.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-1e541e27e9   
nginx-1.12.2-1.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-288925280e   
suricata-3.2.4-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

ReviewBoard-2.5.14-2.el7
clustershell-1.7.91-1.el7
copr-cli-1.64-1.el7
kobo-0.7.0-3.el7
php-bacon-qr-code-1.0.3-1.el7
python-copr-1.82-1.el7
python-django-pipeline-1.3.27-1.el7
python-django16-1.6.11.6-6.el7
python-djblets-0.9.9-2.el7
rpkg-client-0.10-1.el7
suricata-3.2.4-1.el7

Details about builds:



 ReviewBoard-2.5.14-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-40b69d00b9)
 Web-based code review tool

Update Information:

Review Board will now depend on the python-django16 package, freeing the python-
django package to be updated to a recent stable release.

ChangeLog:


References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1487420 - None
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487420




 clustershell-1.7.91-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-8828ae46eb)
 Python framework for efficient cluster administration

Update Information:

1.8 RC1 for testing    ClusterShell 1.8 beta2 targeted for updates-testing
only.    ClusterShell 1.8 beta1 targeted for updates-testing only. Release
#4 removes the vim-clustershell subpackage as it was confusing for the users.
VIM extensions are just provided by the main clustershell subpackage, which now
requires vim-filesystem instead of vim-common if available (only not on el6).
  ClusterShell 1.8 beta1 targeted for updates-testing only.  
ClusterShell 1.8 beta1 targeted for updates-testing only. Release 3 should fix
some packaging issues reported by taskotron.    ClusterShell 1.8 beta1
targeted for updates-testing only. This is release 2 with added Python 3
support.




 copr-cli-1.64-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-bf42b6c4ac)
 Command line interface for COPR

Update Information:

- add SCM api - add deprecation warnings for tito and mockscm methods    -
fix unittests - run tests with python3 - pag#130 update requirements - pag#125
copr build copr pkgs [pkgs ...] builds only the first SRPM - pag#112 [RFE] copr-
cli whoami - Bug 1431035 - coprs should check credentials before uploading
source rpm - Spelling fixes

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1431035 - coprs should check credentials before uploading source 
rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431035




 kobo-0.7.0-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-aae46bec4f)
 Python modules for tools development

Update Information:

New upstream release 0.7.0; supports python 3

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX) returns -1 in f27 and f28/rawhide (glibc-2.26-8)

[Florian Weimer]

On 10/19/2017 05:11 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:

On 10/19/2017 04:45 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:


perusing the glibc source and headers it seems to come down to the
    #undef __IOV_MAX
line in bits/uio_lim.h.

The Changelog (2017-06-14) speaks rather obliquely to the issue, but I 
can't quite figure out if


   sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX);

now returning -1 (errno = 0) is an unintentional side effect of the 
changes or not. (I don't follow glibc development to know what the 
history is behind this change.) In f26, glibc-2.25-10 it returns 1024.
Off hand I don't see any way that glibc could be built now to make the 
call return anything but -1.


Anyone know more of the story? Or want to venture a guess?


Looks like a simple bug.  I'm investigating.

Do you know Linux actually has a limit?


It's still a real limit.  I've posted a fix upstream and will update 
rawhide and F27 once it's reviewed there.


Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 27 Server Beta status (2nd round) is NO-GO

[Jan Kurik]

Release status of the Fedora 27 Server Beta is NO-GO.

The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on Thursday, October 26th
together with F27 Final Go/No-Go meeting. The F27 Server Beta release
slips for one week. The slip also affects the F27 Server GA, it moves
to 2017-Dec-12 having Go/No-Go meeting on 2017-Nov-30. The rain date
for the F27 Server GA moves to 2017-Dec-19 having the Go/No-Go on
2017-Dec-14.

For more information please check the F27 Server Beta Go/No-Go meeting
minutes [1][2].

[1] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-19/f27-server-beta-go-no-go-meeting.2017-10-19-17.00.html
[2] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-19/f27-server-beta-go-no-go-meeting.2017-10-19-17.00.log.html

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 27 Server Beta status (2nd round) is NO-GO

[Jan Kurik]

Release status of the Fedora 27 Server Beta is NO-GO.

The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on Thursday, October 26th
together with F27 Final Go/No-Go meeting. The F27 Server Beta release
slips for one week. The slip also affects the F27 Server GA, it moves
to 2017-Dec-12 having Go/No-Go meeting on 2017-Nov-30. The rain date
for the F27 Server GA moves to 2017-Dec-19 having the Go/No-Go on
2017-Dec-14.

For more information please check the F27 Server Beta Go/No-Go meeting
minutes [1][2].

[1] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-19/f27-server-beta-go-no-go-meeting.2017-10-19-17.00.html
[2] 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-10-19/f27-server-beta-go-no-go-meeting.2017-10-19-17.00.log.html

Regards,
Jan
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

[Alexander Ploumistos]

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Mátyás Selmeci  wrote:
> Where is the COPR? I searched for "firefox" on copr.fedorainfracloud.org but
> did not find it.

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jhogarth/firefox57/

Also, firefox-57.0-0.5 just finished building in koji:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=37
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

[Mátyás Selmeci]

On 10/18/17 07:21, James Hogarth wrote:



On 17 Oct 2017 17:40, "Gerald B. Cox" > wrote:




On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:33 AM, James Hogarth
> wrote:


And even if we hypothetically forked Firefox (as that is what
it would be) to add legacy extension capability back it would
mark a significant divergence with upstream and I'm not sure
if addons.mozilla.org  could even
be used then anyway as it'd detect FF57 and state that older
extensions are not supported. That doesn't even go into the
legal situation as to whether we could even call it Firefox
with such divergence (remember Iceweasel?) ... there's a
reason there's a whitelist on the Firefox packages for build
permissions after all.

And how long would you want FF packagers to maintain such a
patchset for? Even the next ESR will drop legacy extensions.



Yup!  It's a non-starter. Mozilla knows exactly what they are
doing - and have made their decision.


https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/04/05/compatibility-firefox-54/#comment-223852






To keep interested parties here in the loop...

The COPR is operational and a draft for review has been entered into 
the magazine with details for this preview on the magazine mailing list.


I'll keep the COPR updated as best I can with any changes to the the 
Fedora 27 package... may lag by a day or so but I'll do my best ;)


Note that although there are F25 builds in the COPR there will be no 
Firefox 57 builds going into the official F25 repos so that one really 
is no support and just there to ease testing.


I'll keep the COPR running and updated until the Firefox 57 packages 
eventually return to the F26 testing repo after it is released upstream.


The COPR will be removed at that point.


Where is the COPR? I searched for "firefox" on copr.fedorainfracloud.org 
but did not find it.


Thanks,
-Mat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems

[Florian Weimer]

On 10/19/2017 06:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:


There is long standing 8+ year old bugs we have never gotten around to
to ensure multilib is correct in all cases. It is unfortuantly expected
sometimes, it probably has happened a lot over the yearsm, but since
defaulting to turning off installing multilib by default we have not
had and issues filed in years, until you asked earlier this year. we
may be able to resolve the issues with the move to use pungi for
updates pushes rather than mashing the repos.


I'm not sure if it's the same bug.  Based on the reports, it feels like 
as if every other compose is broken.  Either we have been exceedingly 
unlucky the past week or so, or we're hitting some new issue.


Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

[James Hogarth]

On 19 Oct 2017 18:26, "James Hogarth"  wrote:



On 18 Oct 2017 13:21, "James Hogarth"  wrote:



On 17 Oct 2017 17:40, "Gerald B. Cox"  wrote:



On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:33 AM, James Hogarth 
wrote:

>
> And even if we hypothetically forked Firefox (as that is what it would be)
> to add legacy extension capability back it would mark a significant
> divergence with upstream and I'm not sure if addons.mozilla.org could
> even be used then anyway as it'd detect FF57 and state that older
> extensions are not supported. That doesn't even go into the legal situation
> as to whether we could even call it Firefox with such divergence (remember
> Iceweasel?) ... there's a reason there's a whitelist on the Firefox
> packages for build permissions after all.
>
> And how long would you want FF packagers to maintain such a patchset for?
> Even the next ESR will drop legacy extensions.
>
>
>
Yup!  It's a non-starter.  Mozilla knows exactly what they are doing - and
have made their decision.

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/04/05/compatibility-fir
efox-54/#comment-223852




To keep interested parties here in the loop...

The COPR is operational and a draft for review has been entered into the
magazine with details for this preview on the magazine mailing list.

I'll keep the COPR updated as best I can with any changes to the the Fedora
27 package... may lag by a day or so but I'll do my best ;)

Note that although there are F25 builds in the COPR there will be no
Firefox 57 builds going into the official F25 repos so that one really is
no support and just there to ease testing.

I'll keep the COPR running and updated until the Firefox 57 packages
eventually return to the F26 testing repo after it is released upstream.

The COPR will be removed at that point.


The Fedora Magazine article is going out tomorrow.

Thanks to everyone involved for the quick turn around on comments and
editorial review.

Matt are you going to merge that branch back to master and F27 and continue
from there?

Just want to make sure my scripts will point at your intended build source
for the automated COPR updates.


Err... Martin I meant... blame autocorrect?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

[James Hogarth]

On 18 Oct 2017 13:21, "James Hogarth"  wrote:



On 17 Oct 2017 17:40, "Gerald B. Cox"  wrote:



On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:33 AM, James Hogarth 
wrote:

>
> And even if we hypothetically forked Firefox (as that is what it would be)
> to add legacy extension capability back it would mark a significant
> divergence with upstream and I'm not sure if addons.mozilla.org could
> even be used then anyway as it'd detect FF57 and state that older
> extensions are not supported. That doesn't even go into the legal situation
> as to whether we could even call it Firefox with such divergence (remember
> Iceweasel?) ... there's a reason there's a whitelist on the Firefox
> packages for build permissions after all.
>
> And how long would you want FF packagers to maintain such a patchset for?
> Even the next ESR will drop legacy extensions.
>
>
>
Yup!  It's a non-starter.  Mozilla knows exactly what they are doing - and
have made their decision.

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/04/05/compatibility-
firefox-54/#comment-223852




To keep interested parties here in the loop...

The COPR is operational and a draft for review has been entered into the
magazine with details for this preview on the magazine mailing list.

I'll keep the COPR updated as best I can with any changes to the the Fedora
27 package... may lag by a day or so but I'll do my best ;)

Note that although there are F25 builds in the COPR there will be no
Firefox 57 builds going into the official F25 repos so that one really is
no support and just there to ease testing.

I'll keep the COPR running and updated until the Firefox 57 packages
eventually return to the F26 testing repo after it is released upstream.

The COPR will be removed at that point.


The Fedora Magazine article is going out tomorrow.

Thanks to everyone involved for the quick turn around on comments and
editorial review.

Matt are you going to merge that branch back to master and F27 and continue
from there?

Just want to make sure my scripts will point at your intended build source
for the automated COPR updates.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: KRACK ATTACK updates planned for hostapd?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 10/19/2017 09:56 AM, Molly  Bault wrote:
> I'm not sure where to ask this question ... is the KRACK ATTACK updates for 
> hostapd on the radar to get fixed?
> 
> https://w1.fi/security/2017-1/
> 
> I don't see hostapd in the testing repo? 
> 
> If this is the wrong place to ask this question, could you redirect me to the 
> correct place?

There is already a bug on it.

Follow along at:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503874

kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] KRACK ATTACK updates planned for hostapd?

[Molly Bault]

I'm not sure where to ask this question ... is the KRACK ATTACK updates for 
hostapd on the radar to get fixed?

https://w1.fi/security/2017-1/

I don't see hostapd in the testing repo? 

If this is the wrong place to ask this question, could you redirect me to the 
correct place?
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems

[Dennis Gilmore]

El lun, 16-10-2017 a las 18:06 +0200, Florian Weimer escribió:
> Are there currently bugs in composes for x86-64 for F26/F27?  We had
> one 
> case for F27 where the compose was demonstrably broken because it
> lacked 
> a required multilib:
> 
>https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7071
> 
> We received a report on an issue which looks similar, this time on
> F26:
> 
>https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.25-12.fc26#comment
> -676598
> 
> This time, glibc-headers-2.25-12.fc26.i686.rpm seems to be missing.
> 
> Any ideas what is going on here?
> 
> I'm not aware of doing anything wrong in the glibc package.
> 
> Thanks,
> Florian

There is long standing 8+ year old bugs we have never gotten around to
to ensure multilib is correct in all cases. It is unfortuantly expected
sometimes, it probably has happened a lot over the yearsm, but since
defaulting to turning off installing multilib by default we have not
had and issues filed in years, until you asked earlier this year. we
may be able to resolve the issues with the move to use pungi for
updates pushes rather than mashing the repos.

Dennis

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49374 - server fails to start when log maxdisksize & maxlogsize are read "out of order" from the dse.ldif

[Mark Reynolds]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49374

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/98d8adb2064c95cf41b1d6b9cad78430d75d154fc224cb64e3fc92a837f26d60-0001-Ticket-49374-server-fails-to-start-because-maxdisksi.patch

___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fwd: Re: EXTERNAL: This morning's update & bluetooth

[Samuel Sieb]

On 10/19/2017 07:42 AM, Wells, Roger K. wrote:

It occurred to me that maybe this list should be aware of this

 Forwarded Message 
Subject:Re: EXTERNAL: This morning's update & bluetooth
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:10:11 -0400
From:   Wells, Roger K. 
Reply-To: 	Community support for Fedora users 


To: us...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Also just discovered:
Network drives (cifs) that were in use are no longer mountable on the
4.13.4-200 kernel.
Reverting back to 4.12.14-300 and all is well again.


Kernel 4.13 changed the default cifs mount version from 1 to 3.  You can 
either fix the reason that you need to mount with version 1 or you can 
add a parameter to the mount to force version 1.


I deleted the email that was sent out recently, so I can't give you 
exact references.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1503941] perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503941

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f956ef16ba

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171017.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0.00 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX) returns -1 in f27 and f28/rawhide (glibc-2.26-8)

[Florian Weimer]

On 10/19/2017 04:45 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:


perusing the glibc source and headers it seems to come down to the
    #undef __IOV_MAX
line in bits/uio_lim.h.

The Changelog (2017-06-14) speaks rather obliquely to the issue, but I 
can't quite figure out if


   sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX);

now returning -1 (errno = 0) is an unintentional side effect of the 
changes or not. (I don't follow glibc development to know what the 
history is behind this change.) In f26, glibc-2.25-10 it returns 1024.
Off hand I don't see any way that glibc could be built now to make the 
call return anything but -1.


Anyone know more of the story? Or want to venture a guess?


Looks like a simple bug.  I'm investigating.

Do you know Linux actually has a limit?

Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX) returns -1 in f27 and f28/rawhide (glibc-2.26-8)

[Kaleb S. KEITHLEY]

perusing the glibc source and headers it seems to come down to the
   #undef __IOV_MAX
line in bits/uio_lim.h.

The Changelog (2017-06-14) speaks rather obliquely to the issue, but I 
can't quite figure out if


  sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX);

now returning -1 (errno = 0) is an unintentional side effect of the 
changes or not. (I don't follow glibc development to know what the 
history is behind this change.) In f26, glibc-2.25-10 it returns 1024.
Off hand I don't see any way that glibc could be built now to make the 
call return anything but -1.


Anyone know more of the story? Or want to venture a guess?

Thanks

--

Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fwd: Re: EXTERNAL: This morning's update & bluetooth

[Wells, Roger K.]

It occurred to me that maybe this list should be aware of this



 Forwarded Message 
Subject:Re: EXTERNAL: This morning's update & bluetooth
Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:10:11 -0400
From:   Wells, Roger K. 
Reply-To: 	Community support for Fedora users 


To: us...@lists.fedoraproject.org



On 10/06/2017 09:45 AM, Wells, Roger K. wrote:

Computer is Thinkpad x260
Uname -a:
Linux rwells-x260 4.13.4-200.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Sep 28 20:46:39 
UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Just updated from 4.12.14

I was using two Bluetooth devices, mouse & speaker, when I started the 
update.

After the update neither would connect.
Rebooting the previous kernel, both connect again
Same for Wayland & Xorg (no surprise)


Also just discovered:
Network drives (cifs) that were in use are no longer mountable on the
4.13.4-200 kernel.
Reverting back to 4.12.14-300 and all is well again.

--
Roger Wells, P.E.
leidos
221 Third St
Newport, RI 02840
401-847-4210 (voice)
401-849-1585 (fax)
roger.k.we...@leidos.com
___
users mailing list -- us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504136] New: Upgrade perl-Test-MockModule to 0.13

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504136

Bug ID: 1504136
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-MockModule to 0.13
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Test-MockModule
  Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcall...@redhat.com



Latest Fedora delivers 0.12 version. Upstream released 0.13. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504097] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0130 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504097



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-XML-LibXML-2.0130-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-34134a0e0b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504097] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0130 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504097

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-XML-LibXML-2.0130-1.fc
   ||28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: "New" developer here

[Athos Ribeiro]

Welcome :)

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 02:36:01PM +0100, Will Crawford wrote:

> Mainly I want to not duplicate effort if anyone else is working on the
> same things, but I don't see anything awaiting review.

I started looking into bringing ggplot2 and caret into Fedora, but when
I realized the number of dependencies I would need to package I got a
bit doscouraged (been a bit busy with some golang packages anyway).

Let me know if you need any help reviewing new packages or packaging
dependencies.

-- 
Athos Ribeiro

http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504094] New: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.427 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504094

Bug ID: 1504094
   Summary: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.427 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-ParseUtil-Domain
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 2.427
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.426-6.fc27
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ParseUtil-Domain/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7982/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504088] perl-Net-DNS-1.13 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504088



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
hotness's scratch build of perl-Net-DNS-1.13-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22549263

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504088] perl-Net-DNS-1.13 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504088



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1340769
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1340769=edit
[patch] Update to 1.13 (#1504088)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: "New" developer here

[Will Crawford]

On 19 October 2017 at 10:39, James Hogarth  wrote:
...
> This is the wiki page that is relevant to your query:

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R

> The current point-of-contact for R is Spot

> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/R

> Indeed he's the only committer for R itself:

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R

> Are you already a Fedora Packager? If not you might want to sync up
> with him and read through this:

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers

Thank you.

I'd started following the "Join ..." page - just got as far as «Note
that you can (and definitely should) test out builds ("scratch"
builds) ...». Reading the packaging and review guidelines now.

I sent an email to Tom although I suspected (and his Fedora user page
confirms) that he is “super busy” :)

Mainly I want to not duplicate effort if anyone else is working on the
same things, but I don't see anything awaiting review.

Will be trying to get in touch with upstream maintainers next ...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504088] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.13 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504088

Bug ID: 1504088
   Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.13 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Net-DNS
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: pwout...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: al...@redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com,
caol...@redhat.com, john.j5l...@gmail.com,
jples...@redhat.com, mbar...@fastmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com,
pwout...@redhat.com, rhug...@redhat.com,
rstr...@redhat.com, sandm...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 1.13
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.12-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3147/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1483779] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170821 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483779

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:19:24



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492094] CVE-2017-12837 CVE-2017-12883 perl: various flaws [ fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:16:31



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1489529] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0129-7.fc28 FTBFS: tests fail with libxml2-2.9.5

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489529

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:17:52



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1490658] perl-Net-SMTPS-0.08 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490658

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:11:48



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1490372] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000077 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490372

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:11:12



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1491270] perl-Net-POP3S-0.09 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491270

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:12:15



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494297] perl-libwww-perl-6.27 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494297

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:17:38



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492093] CVE-2017-12883 perl: Buffer over-read in regular expression parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492093
Bug 1492093 depends on bug 1492094, which changed state.

Bug 1492094 Summary: CVE-2017-12837 CVE-2017-12883 perl: various flaws 
[fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492091] CVE-2017-12837 perl: Heap buffer overflow in regular expression compiler

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492091
Bug 1492091 depends on bug 1492094, which changed state.

Bug 1492094 Summary: CVE-2017-12837 CVE-2017-12883 perl: various flaws 
[fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1480227] Upgrade perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP to 0.20

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480227

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:09:09



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492322] perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-0.96 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492322

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:12:33



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1488159] Upgrade perl-HTTP-OAI to 4.06

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488159

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:10:57



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1497575] perl-Locale-MO-File-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497575

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:09:35



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1490146] perl-App-Cme-1.023 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490146

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-19 09:05:18



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1497575] perl-Locale-MO-File-0.07 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497575



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Locale-MO-File-0.07-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-10792d200f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1501363] perl-local-lib-2.000024 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501363

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:56:58



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1501321] perl-Gearman-2.004.009 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501321

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:56:41



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1501270] perl-Digest-SHA-5.98 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501270

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:56:18



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1501310] perl-Eval-WithLexicals-1.003006 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501310

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:56:27



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1500805] perl-MP3-Info-1.26 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500805

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:55:59



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1500439] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9172 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500439

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:55:23



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1500794] perl-Term-Table-0.011 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500794

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:55:38



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1500804] perl-Net-IPv6Addr-0.91 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500804

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:55:51



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1500438] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.69 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500438

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:55:07



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1497917] perl-Locale-MO-File-0.08 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497917

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:52:42



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1497368] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.68 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497368

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:52:02



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1497672] perl-MP3-Info-1.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497672

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:52:30



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1497441] perl-Net-IPv6Addr-0.9 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497441

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:52:15



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1497364] perl-App-cpm-0.914 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497364

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:51:50



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496793] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.033 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496793

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:51:39



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496627] perl-PAR-Packer-1.039 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496627

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:51:26



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1495028] perl-DBD-Pg-3.7.0 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495028

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:50:54



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1496616] perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-1.031 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496616

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:51:11



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494881] perl-PDF-Create-1.43 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494881

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:50:22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494820] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494820

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:50:08



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494774] perl-System-Info-0.056 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494774

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:49:48



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492503] perl-File-Slurper-0.010 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492503

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:47:55



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1492656] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.66 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492656

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:48:06



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493797] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493797

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:48:32



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1493202] perl-String-CamelCase-0.03 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493202

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:48:17



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1490371] perl-Test2-AsyncSubtest-0.000020 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490371

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:47:41



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1490147] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.34 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490147

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:47:32



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1490111] perl-Return-MultiLevel-0.05 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490111

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-19 08:45:53



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

FYI: ocaml-camomile-0.8.6-1.fc28 (in Rawhide) is broken

[Richard W.M. Jones]

ocaml-camomile-0.8.6-1.fc28 breaks ocaml-gettext which is required
to generate translations for some virt tools.

I'm trying to get it untagged to avoid having to do an Epoch:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7101

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504023] perl-Module-Runtime-0.016 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504023

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Runtime-0.016-1
   ||.fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-19 07:12:26



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Build done:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22545183

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504023] perl-Module-Runtime-0.016 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504023

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com   |p...@city-fan.org



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1504023] New: perl-Module-Runtime-0.016 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504023

Bug ID: 1504023
   Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.016 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Module-Runtime
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 0.016
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.015-2.fc27
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Runtime/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3111/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: "New" developer here

[James Hogarth]

On 19 October 2017 at 10:11, Will Crawford  wrote:
> I've actually been using Red Hat, then Fedora, for ~20 years now, but
> I'm signing up to package things, I'd like to put some more R packages
> in the repo, licences permitting.
>
> Please get in touch if you're already working in this area, I wasn't
> able to find a language SIG but "R" is a little hard to search for :)
> ___


This is the wiki page that is relevant to your query:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R

The current point-of-contact for R is Spot

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/R

Indeed he's the only committer for R itself:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R

Are you already a Fedora Packager? If not you might want to sync up
with him and read through this:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review 49386: Memberof should be ignore MODRDN when the pre/post entry are identical

[thierry bordaz]

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49386

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/05e1c4e50c1a24b304c37456a8e937475796e44cc16462c708d9042808a32301-0001-Ticket-49386-Memberof-should-be-ignore-MODRDN-when-t.patch 
___

389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

"New" developer here

[Will Crawford]

I've actually been using Red Hat, then Fedora, for ~20 years now, but
I'm signing up to package things, I'd like to put some more R packages
in the repo, licences permitting.

Please get in touch if you're already working in this area, I wasn't
able to find a language SIG but "R" is a little hard to search for :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1503941] perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503941



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f956ef16ba

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1503941] perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503941

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01-
   ||1.fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1503941] New: perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503941

Bug ID: 1503941
   Summary: perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Email-Address-XS
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com



Latest upstream release: 1.01
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.00-1.fc27
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Email-Address-XS/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/15740/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org