[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : F27 Server Final Go/No-Go meeting
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: F27 Server Final Go/No-Go meeting on 2017-11-30 from 19:00:00 to 21:00:00 Europe/Prague At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the Go/No-Go Meeting. Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team. Release Candidate (RC) availability and good QA coverage are prerequisites for the Go/No-Go meeting. If you have any bug on the list, please help us with Beta release. If we won't be ready by Thursday, we will use this meeting to review blockers and decide what to do. More information available at: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting) Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/8677/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[review-swap] scribus-generator
Hello team, I am interested for a review swap with a simple add-on named scribus-generator, a mail-merge type template for Scribus useful for making business card for example. The link for the review is on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081 More info about the addon on https://github.com/berteh/ScribusGenerator -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Modular 27-20171130.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 21/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386) ID: 177144 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177144 ID: 177150 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177150 ID: 177151 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177151 ID: 177164 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177164 ID: 177168 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177168 ID: 177170 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177170 ID: 177171 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177171 ID: 177207 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177207 ID: 177210 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177210 ID: 177215 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177215 ID: 177216 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177216 ID: 177217 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177217 ID: 177218 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177218 ID: 177220 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177220 ID: 177221 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177221 ID: 177222 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177222 ID: 177223 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177223 ID: 177224 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177224 ID: 177225 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177225 ID: 177226 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177226 ID: 177230 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177230 ID: 177231 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177231 ID: 177239 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177239 ID: 177240 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177240 ID: 177253 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177253 Passed openQA tests: 63/94 (x86_64), 15/19 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 3 of 113 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171130.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171129.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171130.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20171129.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 83/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171128.n.0): ID: 177058 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177058 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171128.n.0): ID: 177012 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177012 ID: 177013 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177013 ID: 177015 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177015 ID: 177016 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177016 ID: 177018 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177018 ID: 177022 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177022 ID: 177023 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177023 ID: 177034 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177034 ID: 177038 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177038 ID: 177049 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177049 ID: 177050 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177050 ID: 177055 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177055 ID: 177057 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177057 ID: 177066 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177066 ID: 177068 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177068 ID: 177070 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177070 ID: 177071 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177071 ID: 177073 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177073 ID: 177074 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177074 ID: 177075 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177075 ID: 177076 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177076 ID: 177077 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177077 ID: 177078 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177078 ID: 177079 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177079 ID: 177080 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177080 ID: 177081 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177081 ID: 177082 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177082 ID: 177083 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177083 ID: 177084 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177084 ID: 177085 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177085 ID: 177086 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177086 ID: 177087 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177087 ID: 177088 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177088 ID: 177089 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177089 ID: 177090 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177090 ID: 177091 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177091 ID: 177092 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177092 ID: 177093 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177093 ID: 177094 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177094 ID: 177095 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177095 ID: 177096
[Bug 1501402] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-95 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501402 Matt Newsomechanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1511555 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Introducing Suzanne Yeghiayan (aka Sly)
Welcome Sly! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Some wiki notes
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 14:49 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > That said, the search on the wiki has always been... not great, so many > people just use google and site:fedoraproject.org. You can use site:fedoraproject.org/wiki to search only the wiki. Google understands that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: compat-openssl10 and openssl conflict
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 23:51 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: > Il 29/11/2017 23:29, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > > Why do you need to have both -devel packages installed at once? > > libdigidoc needs compat-openssl10-devel > libdigidocpp needs openssl-devel and libdigidoc-devel > so IMHO this could trigger FWIW, I'd be asking myself "why is libdigidoc this way?" and trying to fix that, rather than "How can I get both -devel packages installed at once?". -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: compat-openssl10 and openssl conflict
Il 29/11/2017 23:29, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > Why do you need to have both -devel packages installed at once? libdigidoc needs compat-openssl10-devel libdigidocpp needs openssl-devel and libdigidoc-devel so IMHO this could trigger DEBUG util.py:478: Error: DEBUG util.py:478: Problem: package libdigidoc-devel-3.10.2-2.fc28.x86_64 requires compat-openssl10-devel, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:478:- package compat-openssl10-devel-1:1.0.2m-1.fc28.i686 conflicts with openssl-devel provided by openssl-devel-1:1.1.0g-1.fc28.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:478:- package compat-openssl10-devel-1:1.0.2m-1.fc28.x86_64 conflicts with openssl-devel provided by openssl-devel-1:1.1.0g-1.fc28.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:478:- cannot install the best candidate for the job DEBUG util.py:478:- conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:478: (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) DEBUG util.py:616: Child return code was: 1 DEBUG util.py:635: child environment: None DEBUG util.py:561: Executing command: /usr/bin/gzip -9 --force /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/root.log with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8'} and shell True In log https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00682275-libdigidocpp/root.log.gz *libdigidoc.spec* https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00682273-libdigidoc/libdigidoc.spec *libdigidocpp.spec* https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00682275-libdigidocpp/libdigidocpp.spec signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Some wiki notes
On 11/29/2017 02:44 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote: > I have some notes regarding the Fedora wiki: > > 1) A few days ago, the layout changed. Now, I can't find the "search" link. I > imagine that's a rather important feature. Yeah, it should be back soon. It was lost in the new theme re-write, but it's corrected in the next theme release out soon. That said, the search on the wiki has always been... not great, so many people just use google and site:fedoraproject.org. > > 2) The "What Happened to PkgDB" page says that, to unretire a package, you > should follow a Pague ticket... Which, while it explains the process, > requires some time to understand it properly. Could we rewrite it so the user > can get all the info from the wiki page? Yeah, that could use work. will poke at it. > Sorry if this is the wrong mailing list and I should post this elsewhere. Nope, this is just fine. :) You could also file a infrastructure ticket if you like. (In the future) kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Some wiki notes
I have some notes regarding the Fedora wiki: 1) A few days ago, the layout changed. Now, I can't find the "search" link. I imagine that's a rather important feature. 2) The "What Happened to PkgDB" page says that, to unretire a package, you should follow a Pague ticket... Which, while it explains the process, requires some time to understand it properly. Could we rewrite it so the user can get all the info from the wiki page? Sorry if this is the wrong mailing list and I should post this elsewhere. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: compat-openssl10 and openssl conflict
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 23:09 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: > I am working on unretiring Estonia ID Card utilities[1] and I noticed > that compat-openssl10 conflicts with openssl. In my case I am speaking > about compat-openssl10-devel and openssl-devel. I noticed that while > compiling libdigidocpp [2] in my eeste-id-card-tools Copr repository [3]. > Yesterday I also experienced a similar problem with their respective > debuginfos [4]. > Isn't possible to fix this conflict? Well, this is normal for compat packages; naturally their devel packages will conflict because they contain the unversioned .so for the same library. Only the non-devel library packages are actually expected to be parallel installable. Why do you need to have both -devel packages installed at once? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
compat-openssl10 and openssl conflict
I am working on unretiring Estonia ID Card utilities[1] and I noticed that compat-openssl10 conflicts with openssl. In my case I am speaking about compat-openssl10-devel and openssl-devel. I noticed that while compiling libdigidocpp [2] in my eeste-id-card-tools Copr repository [3]. Yesterday I also experienced a similar problem with their respective debuginfos [4]. Isn't possible to fix this conflict? Best regards [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qdigidoc https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qesteidutil/ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdigidocpp https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libdigidoc https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/esteidcerts [2]: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00682275-libdigidocpp/root.log.gz https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00682275-libdigidocpp/ [3]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/builds/ [4]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518389 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Introducing Suzanne Yeghiayan (aka Sly)
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Suzanne Yeghiayanwrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to introduce myself since I am taking over Kate Carcia's role as the > Fedora DevOps Program Manager. I've been at Red Hat nearly 12 years and spent > the first 6.5 years as a RHEL Program Manager. I still work for a Red Hat > engineering manager as his Chief of Staff but wanted to help out here as > well. It's been 5.5 years since I've been in this type of role, so please be > patient with me. I'm excited for this opportunity and to work with you. Awesome to have you on board, Sly! Welcome. josh ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Introducing Suzanne Yeghiayan (aka Sly)
Hi, I wanted to introduce myself since I am taking over Kate Carcia's role as the Fedora DevOps Program Manager. I've been at Red Hat nearly 12 years and spent the first 6.5 years as a RHEL Program Manager. I still work for a Red Hat engineering manager as his Chief of Staff but wanted to help out here as well. It's been 5.5 years since I've been in this type of role, so please be patient with me. I'm excited for this opportunity and to work with you. Thanks, Sly s...@redhat.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to manage a fork
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:06:30AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Possibly. It's also worth noting that some people use a workflow like: > > * fork project > * make changes, submit PR > * delete fork > > that way the next time you can just refork it and be set. Yeah, that's fine too. Especially if you're just making one change. It's kind of a pain to clean up, though. Oooh: https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/2808 (Also I found https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/836) -- Matthew MillerFedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to manage a fork
On 11/29/2017 10:53 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 06:52:00PM +0100, Brian Exelbierd wrote: >> As as you have a fork, my understanding is that you should just use >> traditional gut commands. I’m not aware of a fork being used for much >> more than spec PRs. > > Or traditional _git_ commands -- whatever. :) > > Personally, I find that when working with forks of something where I'm > a casual contributor, I end up doing this a lot: > > git remote add upstream https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs > > git fetch upstream > git reset --hard upstream/master > > > (repeat last two steps) I'm sure places like github have docs on this too, but pagure also does: https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/forks.html There's one big gotcha to note with forks on src.fedoraproject.org: You have to be in the packager group to push changes to anything there (including forks) at least for now. We want to change this, but it will require a fair bit of shifting things around. You can still of course make a copy of the repo on any other public place (pagure.io, github, gitlab, etc) and file "remote pull requests" in the mean time. > Because I don't really want to keep a long-lived fork with local > changes and differences and merge. Possibly fedpkg could grow something > smart around this? Possibly. It's also worth noting that some people use a workflow like: * fork project * make changes, submit PR * delete fork that way the next time you can just refork it and be set. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to manage a fork
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 06:52:00PM +0100, Brian Exelbierd wrote: > As as you have a fork, my understanding is that you should just use > traditional gut commands. I’m not aware of a fork being used for much > more than spec PRs. Or traditional _git_ commands -- whatever. :) Personally, I find that when working with forks of something where I'm a casual contributor, I end up doing this a lot: git remote add upstream https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs git fetch upstream git reset --hard upstream/master (repeat last two steps) Because I don't really want to keep a long-lived fork with local changes and differences and merge. Possibly fedpkg could grow something smart around this? -- Matthew MillerFedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: changes
___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Modular 27-20171129.n.1 compose check report
Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 21/94 (x86_64), 5/19 (i386) ID: 176894 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176894 ID: 176900 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176900 ID: 176901 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176901 ID: 176914 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176914 ID: 176918 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176918 ID: 176920 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176920 ID: 176921 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176921 ID: 176943 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176943 ID: 176964 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176964 ID: 176965 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176965 ID: 176966 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176966 ID: 176967 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176967 ID: 176968 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176968 ID: 176970 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176970 ID: 176971 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176971 ID: 176972 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176972 ID: 176973 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176973 ID: 176974 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176974 ID: 176975 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176975 ID: 176976 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176976 ID: 176980 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176980 ID: 176981 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176981 ID: 176989 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176989 ID: 176990 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176990 ID: 176993 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/176993 ID: 177003 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177003 Passed openQA tests: 63/94 (x86_64), 14/19 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 2 of 113 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to manage a fork
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017, at 01:03 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > I have created a fork on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ but i > don't know> how to manage it. > Can i use 'fedpkg'? > Documentation? As as you have a fork, my understanding is that you should just use traditional gut commands. I’m not aware of a fork being used for much more than spec PRs. Regards, bex > > > -- > --- > Antonio Trande > Fedora Project > mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' > GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE > GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [ANNOUNCE] 7 applications written in Rust are available in Rawhide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 12:48 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > You missed Firefox*? > > Rich. > > * small parts of it so far, but there are nearly 3000 *.rs files > in version 56. Looking at what they have[0] - most of that is packaged, rest is pretty popular libraries which I'm going to package soon. [0] https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/third_party/rust - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAloe79IACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0yXORAAuxa/0nDPigjdSb7SVbsk/U7d03bAnHgMQynklxrKy8iA7zCBJV+Yai9E LoXr6JIeh4CvGVsT0/Qx9lcSm245LOGVCLl+2jAD4ykYUEvcqgE6Ajuoo+ESiYHZ H6h4haStMPDn2rVyXORltjhOYf7HSSBfVPfNIQNzirT+vChmRp5KlZjCeHSoaYdD nuofUY9SO8wAz57mnjlymtsLmaqFWrecHKk3CatFiJ+U2GEp7Jl6gG3xDokn1JZy gGbTmu4cjmAVrrJRZ2ArTXK4W+FXw2YrHXTffteT6cXYwf/9Ynj0oK6yqS59cbf/ IdM7MdJ0YxW4tu+TI9IiP+qTDzz9OtOoKWqY+fXqMYxAtR8O6vVKfNZ9G7NIkv5Y PzLJ+jFSW90G8e5B6/LZUqb8AZbELZqPdsg+6pyzfeNuBrFoGfgS480vqTsK/Ler bCiRaikd7LY3drJDgQXz6eF7c+Jip+QPJBeGE7J4bl6rq1F+jdDrCJZcNogb5WBv Fdzph64tkLQ3aGewH+vPDP8YnaFwBftGs8+sgDzPfP77bdetRbqpEoQLh7XpMtru 33O96hL2YLGtlHHaDdBtiAUjZm2lZwFrz1T3z0cvJwzeKhoCX26T0362Ccp26eQ2 WCPMPc/GY3DHjZ5nbLLMJ2PrBiWzT/lsxSh0qaGyOt29b/04tFE= =Ndhg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171129.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171129.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171129.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 1 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 44.59 MiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 38.93 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 364.46 KiB Size change of upgraded packages: 1021.43 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 976.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: hiredis-0.13.3-6.module_4f39fe2e Summary: Minimalistic C client library for Redis RPMs:hiredis hiredis-devel Size:462432 bytes Package: libdbi-0.9.0-9.module_4f39fe2e Summary: Database Independent Abstraction Layer for C RPMs:libdbi libdbi-devel libdbi-doc Size:1196956 bytes Package: libee-0.4.1-12.module_4f39fe2e Summary: Event expression library inspired by CEE RPMs:libee libee-devel libee-utils Size:576224 bytes Package: libestr-0.1.9-9.module_4f39fe2e Summary: String handling essentials library RPMs:libestr libestr-devel Size:282872 bytes Package: libfastjson-0.99.7-1.module_4f39fe2e Summary: A JSON implementation in C RPMs:libfastjson libfastjson-devel Size:421100 bytes Package: liblogging-1.0.6-3.module_4f39fe2e Summary: An easy to use logging library RPMs:liblogging-stdlog liblogging-stdlog-devel Size:277884 bytes Package: liblognorm-2.0.3-4.module_4f39fe2e Summary: Fast samples-based log normalization library RPMs:liblognorm liblognorm-devel liblognorm-doc liblognorm-utils Size:2980568 bytes Package: libmongo-client-0.1.8-8.module_4f39fe2e Summary: Alternative C driver for MongoDB RPMs:libmongo-client libmongo-client-devel libmongo-client-doc Size:897408 bytes Package: libnet-1.1.6-14.module_4f39fe2e Summary: C library for portable packet creation and injection RPMs:libnet libnet-devel Size:1727752 bytes Package: librabbitmq-0.8.0-4.module_4f39fe2e Summary: Client library for AMQP RPMs:librabbitmq librabbitmq-devel librabbitmq-tools Size:998608 bytes Package: librdkafka-0.11.1-1.module_4f39fe2e Summary: The Apache Kafka C library RPMs:librdkafka librdkafka-devel Size:2725820 bytes Package: librelp-1.2.14-3.module_4f39fe2e Summary: The Reliable Event Logging Protocol library RPMs:librelp librelp-devel Size:573212 bytes Package: qpid-proton-0.18.1-1.module_4f39fe2e Summary: A high performance, lightweight messaging library RPMs:perl-qpid-proton python-qpid-proton-docs python2-qpid-proton python3-qpid-proton qpid-proton-c qpid-proton-c-devel qpid-proton-c-docs qpid-proton-cpp qpid-proton-cpp-devel qpid-proton-cpp-docs Size:12607824 bytes Package: rsyslog-8.30.0-4.module_4f39fe2e Summary: Enhanced system logging and kernel message trapping daemon RPMs:rsyslog rsyslog-crypto rsyslog-doc rsyslog-elasticsearch rsyslog-gnutls rsyslog-gssapi rsyslog-hiredis rsyslog-kafka rsyslog-libdbi rsyslog-mmaudit rsyslog-mmjsonparse rsyslog-mmnormalize rsyslog-mmsnmptrapd rsyslog-mongodb rsyslog-mysql rsyslog-omamqp1 rsyslog-pgsql rsyslog-rabbitmq rsyslog-relp rsyslog-snmp rsyslog-udpspoof Size:21030980 bytes = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: sssd-1.16.0-4.module_1df4574f Old package: sssd-1.15.3-3.module_5bb98feb Summary: System Security Services Daemon RPMs: libipa_hbac libipa_hbac-devel libsss_autofs libsss_certmap libsss_certmap-devel libsss_idmap libsss_idmap-devel libsss_nss_idmap libsss_nss_idmap-devel libsss_simpleifp libsss_simpleifp-devel libsss_sudo python2-libipa_hbac python2-libsss_nss_idmap python2-sss python2-sss-murmur python2-sssdconfig python3-libipa_hbac python3-libsss_nss_idmap python3-sss python3-sss-murmur python3-sssdconfig sssd sssd-ad sssd-client sssd-common sssd-common-pac sssd-dbus sssd-ipa sssd-kcm sssd-krb5 sssd-krb5-common sssd-ldap sssd-libwbclient sssd-libwbclient-devel sssd-nfs-idmap sssd-proxy sssd-tools sssd-winbind-idmap Size: 40822368 bytes Size change: 1045940 bytes Changelog: * Mon Sep 11 2017 Lukas Slebodnik <lsleb...@redhat.com> - 1.15.3-4 - Resolves: rhbz#1488327 - SELinux is preventing selinux_child from write access on the sock_file system_bus_socket - Resolves: rhbz#1490402 - SSSD does not create /var/lib/sss/deskprofile and fails to download desktop profile data - Resolves: upstream#3485 - getsidbyid does not work with 1.15.3 - Resolves: upstream#3488 - SUDO doesn't work for IPA users on IPA clients after applying ID Views for them in IPA server - Resolves: upstream#3501 - Accessing IdM kerberos ticket fails while id mapping is applied * Wed Oct 11 2017 Lukas Slebodnik <lsleb...@redhat.com> - 1.15.3-5 - Resolves: rhbz#1499354 - CVE-2017-12173 sssd: unsanitize
Re: missing f27 images from createhdds for PowerPC on openqa.stg
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 09:21 +0100, Normand wrote: > > On 27/11/2017 18:01, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 09:32 +0100, Normand wrote: > > > Hello Adam, > > > As per openQA output failure (1) it seems the createhdds was not > > > executed for PowerPC on openqa.stg. > > > > > > I do not know how it is done for x86-64, but we would probably need to > > > do something similar for PowerPC. > > > > We already do. If the image isn't there, it means creation of it is > > failing and we need to figure out why... > > > > I do not know how I could help to investigate that. > But what I already verified is that createhdds is correctly generating > the f27 images the local Power8 host we are using for our openQA tests. Hum, OK. I'll check into it soon. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
Sorry for late bringing up this topic, for whose do not know, Tom answered on Solomon question about new CUPS licensing in: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TYGLR34XR6L6MAXMVSDNYT3ZYXUKY7FX/ To sum it up (from what I understood): Projects under GPLv2+ are compatible, LGPL, LGPLv2 and LGPLv3 too. In case of GPLv2 only upstream opinion matters and Mike as upstream said CUPS falls under "OS-supplied library", so SWs, which have CUPS dynamically linked, are license compatible. So project under GPLv2+ and compatible are okay, GPLv2 only should change license or add into license file sentence mentioning about that's okay to link against CUPS, because it is OS-supplied library. -- Zdenek Dohnal Associate Software Engineer Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501402] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-95 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501402 Nick Cliftonchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1511555 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [ANNOUNCE] 7 applications written in Rust are available in Rawhide
You missed Firefox*? Rich. * small parts of it so far, but there are nearly 3000 *.rs files in version 56. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
How to manage a fork
Hi all. I have created a fork on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ but i don't know how to manage it. Can i use 'fedpkg'? Documentation? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[HEADS UP] Annobin Change is implemented
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello everyone, as of now, Annobin[0] has been enabled in Rawhide. This is special plugin for gcc so something might break due to it (but not expected). Don't hesitate to open a bug in that case. Just small heads up. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAloeoVEACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0x25g//bFysdA6I1EXKKJ8xJ40rm4VhWDFamzBgRq1xkcWAGnp556y2I6YqKgIt bH7sUL/ZtHOUHketypf1JeCBmWGnrKJG7jd/E7GWmBpQnPk+KlN0B6/wWMeAP98d XvGXO5ooANkuSRkg3IVogeK/3q/Poqf4IsaJmdeuCHujStzKKNUT44r3H20KmQ51 ErnQDA24WveGXLVNWAR3aqsp8sROwJNJ2bkB16VhVk5efMYt5VAP2AolUnA6u461 W5FcKr9IloD7vT/2jlzVRWlUKp6nKTXUZGvMt4SY4ZoARfKFPBRwke48jS0dZebP a1RgypmsdGXVTdrlowAKEqtNAyGSQNeEjL9eus95LLEg+Kuts5jDMJTu3sKkO4+9 wn1CQStfAx0+PKSfUlXizvUL3Q5YFAxfhG6yaqn8C/LWnrGgOSgN+fUSjOlayIqy ssXDpXwcTzLhv8KrK19SsTVb/wnf8S7U02pPs3DnOgObXNLfddZpYLx/PgZqaAne rsCqC///vFYPclQHiCfNdc2vPBmvCubvSz+GontawkqP7RwPkEpIM51bwq7zABil ZXtfJrmALvmp+Q2SD+0Z/4cTOur4bcwAqTnZTQmZIIwCGYxQ7gKqFxrl8Wwfhdg4 trluvfwJRyfapBUmNS++qvvwMYZcjpWqsLR+6WxN+JZyvW0eCFg= =Xq/Y -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: missing f27 images from createhdds for PowerPC on openqa.stg
On 27/11/2017 18:01, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 09:32 +0100, Normand wrote: Hello Adam, As per openQA output failure (1) it seems the createhdds was not executed for PowerPC on openqa.stg. I do not know how it is done for x86-64, but we would probably need to do something similar for PowerPC. We already do. If the image isn't there, it means creation of it is failing and we need to figure out why... I do not know how I could help to investigate that. But what I already verified is that createhdds is correctly generating the f27 images the local Power8 host we are using for our openQA tests. -- Michel Normand ___ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org