Re: Strange error trying to build blender

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 2018-01-13 10:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I'm trying to rebuild blender due to a new OpenImageIO build in >> rawhide but I'm getting a strage error[0] that doesn't appear to be >> transient (happening for several days now): >> >> from checkout.log: >> $ git clone -n

Re: Strange error trying to build blender

On 2018-01-13 10:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm trying to rebuild blender due to a new OpenImageIO build in > rawhide but I'm getting a strage error[0] that doesn't appear to be > transient (happening for several days now): > > from checkout.log: > $ git clone -n

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1042 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 804 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 386

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 914 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 804 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 776

[Bug 1534196] New: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534196 Bug ID: 1534196 Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.14 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: [Bug 1529276] New: findbugs-contrib-7.2.0.sb is available

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:13:24 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > I believe the script runs at least daily so if you see something wrong then do > report it :) Here's a recently opened ticket about package "aide": Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:17:42 +

Strange error trying to build blender

I'm trying to rebuild blender due to a new OpenImageIO build in rawhide but I'm getting a strage error[0] that doesn't appear to be transient (happening for several days now): from checkout.log: $ git clone -n https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender.git

Exploring the idea of CentOS/RHEL branches in dist-git [was Re: Python3 will be in next major RHEL release, please adjust %if statements accordingly]

On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:40:36AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > That's just all the more reason to publish the branched packages in CentOS > Git as soon as they're branched, or even maintain them in Fedora dist-git. > But I'm not holding my breath for it to happen any time soon. I wouldn't

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On 01/13/2018 08:50 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > So I guess the next question is what the current > nobody id (25) used for and why does it exist? Doing some research on this back in Aug 2001 nfsnobody was added to nfs-utils for the reasons stated in

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On 01/12/2018 07:32 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 07:20 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Instead of doing the blow by blow these threads >> always turn into I'm just going jump to the point. >> >> systemd wants to use uid 65534 and it can't because >> NFS is using it. So

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Rename "nobody" user

On 01/12/2018 05:11 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> Side Note: I have a ping out to a SUSE guy to see how they handle this >> but the guy lives on the other side of the earth so I probably >> will not get a response until tomorrow. > I can tell you what that is, as I run (open)SUSE systems. > > SUSE

Re: Re: Updates which are never pushed to stable

>> I don't think having them sit in testing hurts anything but my OCD... It's a PITA when creating other packages, you don't know if you can target testing state or if it will never be pushed to stable Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing

Re: Updates which are never pushed to stable

On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 5:28 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello, > > I noticed that for multiple release we have updates which stuck in bodhi > for > many months until distro goes EOL. > > I wonder if we

[Bug 1534130] perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534130 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.24-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1534130] New: perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534130 Bug ID: 1534130 Summary: perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.24 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Protocol-WebSocket Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1534130] perl-Protocol-WebSocket-0.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534130 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1380738 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1380738=edit [patch] Update to 0.24 (#1534130) -- You are

Updates which are never pushed to stable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, I noticed that for multiple release we have updates which stuck in bodhi for many months until distro goes EOL. I wonder if we should just auto-unpush updates which are in testing in 1(?) month? Thoughts? - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN

Re: Python3 will be in next major RHEL release, please adjust %if statements accordingly

Peter Robinson wrote: > Well given it's based on Fedora and most of the pre work happens in > Fedora (hence the request for ensuring the conditionals are correct) I > think that's relatively upstream. Also a lot of the packages actually > have the same specs in Fedora/RHEL/CentOS, a lot of the