On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 06:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/30/2018 11:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic,
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
>
> On 1 February 2018 at 01:42, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> [..]
>
>> > So event4 it is in my case touch pad and event5 it is Logitech M185
>> mouse.
>> > In other words: those "libinput
On Sun, 2018-02-04 at 14:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 02/04/2018 01:38 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 22:14:47 +0100, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > cc1: fatal error: inaccessible plugin file plugin/annobin.so expanded
> > > from short plugin name annobin: No such file or
On 4 February 2018 at 07:00, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 02/02/2018 12:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> Yeah I'm getting a bunch of clutter messages as well as many lines of
>> gnome shell desktop related stack traces. But there is nothing listed
>> by coredumpctl, or abrt.
>>
>>
>>
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 10/129 (x86_64), 4/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 190720 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/190720
ID: 190750 Test: i386
On 02/04/2018 01:38 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 22:14:47 +0100, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> cc1: fatal error: inaccessible plugin file plugin/annobin.so expanded
>> from short plugin name annobin: No such file or directory
> ...
>> So, where is the gcc plugin annobin?
>
> In
On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 22:14:47 +0100, Doug Ledford wrote:
> cc1: fatal error: inaccessible plugin file plugin/annobin.so expanded
> from short plugin name annobin: No such file or directory
...
> So, where is the gcc plugin annobin?
In my fresh Rawhide buildroot
I'm not aware of any topics that need urgent discussion this week, so I
propose that we cancel the QA Devel meeting on 2018-02-05.
If there are some topics that need discussing, please reply here and
the meeting can happen.
Tim
pgpOa9Cero_lx.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I'm having an issue, and as far as I can tell it's not in my package.
The rdma-core package uses cmake and ninja-build to build itself, and
the very first test in the CMakeLists.txt makefile is the TestCCompiler
test that is shipped with CMake, not one of our own tests. And it's
failing because
On 04/02/18 21:36, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday, February 4, 2018 2:29:26 PM EST Alec Leamas wrote:
>> Many questions here, and a large package. Still, searching the logs I
>> cannot see any python files - are there any such at all?
>
> None at all. Its all java, javascript, R, and ELF
On Sunday, February 4, 2018 1:38:27 PM EST Antonio wrote:
> On 04/02/2018 19:27, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote:
> >> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I am building a package locally and run across a failure
On Sunday, February 4, 2018 2:29:26 PM EST Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 04/02/18 19:30, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote:
> >
> >> Not enough information to check signature validity.Show Details
> >>
> >> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
936 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
826 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
797
On 04/02/18 19:30, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details
>>
>> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1
On 04/02/2018 19:27, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am building a package locally and run across a failure that seems to be
>>> unexplained. It gets to the install phase and then
On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote:
> Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details
>
> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am building a package locally and run across a failure that seems to be
> > unexplained. It gets
On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am building a package locally and run across a failure that seems to be
> unexplained. It gets to the install phase and then abruptly fails with the
> following build log:
>
> -- Installing: /home/sgrubb/working/BUILDROOT/R-studio-
>
Hello,
I am building a package locally and run across a failure that seems to be
unexplained. It gets to the install phase and then abruptly fails with the
following build log:
-- Installing: /home/sgrubb/working/BUILDROOT/R-studio-
On 02/02/2018 11:39 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Actually comprehending your message, I see it's not you building this
> package at all and it's not doing it in koji, either. So I wonder what
> environment is present when hotness is trying to build the SRPM. If
> somehow it doesn't have
Thomas Haller wrote:
> now, building network-manager-applet(fc28) on Fedora 27, it fails:
>
> Full log written to /data/src/fedpkg/network-manager-applet/network-
> manager-applet-1.8.10/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/meson-logs/testlog.txt
> + %ldconfig_scriptlets -n libnma
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YVXizL:
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 10:04 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> For those who didn't check Change page since today's morning: Thanks
> to Jason
> Tibbits (tibbs) who proposed %ldconfig_scriptlets macro and its
> implementation.
>
> Now we have 4 macros you could use: %ldconfig, %ldconfig_post,
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541736
Bug ID: 1541736
Summary: perl-bignum-0.49 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-bignum
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534885
--- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
Now that we have DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader 0.07048, tests pass.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517785
--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
Version 0.07048 mitigates the change in behaviour in Hash::Merge and builds
without error.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539954
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541680
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
- Mail original -
De: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> It's a bit of a Lego guideline, you assemble the spec blocs you need, and
> ignore those you don't need. The
> example was chosen to include as many blocks as possible, with the
> walkthrough explaining their respective
> functions. All the
27 matches
Mail list logo