Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for s390x

2018-02-04 Thread Sinny Kumari
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 01/31/2018 06:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: >>> >>> On 01/30/2018 11:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic,

Re: Wyland is a disaster

2018-02-04 Thread David Airlie
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > On 1 February 2018 at 01:42, Peter Hutterer > wrote: > [..] > >> > So event4 it is in my case touch pad and event5 it is Logitech M185 >> mouse. >> > In other words: those "libinput

Re: Rawhide buildroot broken?

2018-02-04 Thread Doug Ledford
On Sun, 2018-02-04 at 14:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 02/04/2018 01:38 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 22:14:47 +0100, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > cc1: fatal error: inaccessible plugin file plugin/annobin.so expanded > > > from short plugin name annobin: No such file or

Re: gnome crashes after today upgrade

2018-02-04 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 4 February 2018 at 07:00, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 02/02/2018 12:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> Yeah I'm getting a bunch of clutter messages as well as many lines of >> gnome shell desktop related stack traces. But there is nothing listed >> by coredumpctl, or abrt. >> >> >>

Fedora Rawhide-20180204.n.0 compose check report

2018-02-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 10/129 (x86_64), 4/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 190720 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/190720 ID: 190750 Test: i386

Re: Rawhide buildroot broken?

2018-02-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 02/04/2018 01:38 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 22:14:47 +0100, Doug Ledford wrote: >> cc1: fatal error: inaccessible plugin file plugin/annobin.so expanded >> from short plugin name annobin: No such file or directory > ... >> So, where is the gcc plugin annobin? > > In

Re: Rawhide buildroot broken?

2018-02-04 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 22:14:47 +0100, Doug Ledford wrote: > cc1: fatal error: inaccessible plugin file plugin/annobin.so expanded > from short plugin name annobin: No such file or directory ... > So, where is the gcc plugin annobin? In my fresh Rawhide buildroot

Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-05 QA Devel Meeting

2018-02-04 Thread Tim Flink
I'm not aware of any topics that need urgent discussion this week, so I propose that we cancel the QA Devel meeting on 2018-02-05. If there are some topics that need discussing, please reply here and the meeting can happen. Tim pgpOa9Cero_lx.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Rawhide buildroot broken?

2018-02-04 Thread Doug Ledford
I'm having an issue, and as far as I can tell it's not in my package. The rdma-core package uses cmake and ninja-build to build itself, and the very first test in the CMakeLists.txt makefile is the TestCCompiler test that is shipped with CMake, not one of our own tests. And it's failing because

Re: F27 strange rpmbuild failure

2018-02-04 Thread Alec Leamas
On 04/02/18 21:36, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Sunday, February 4, 2018 2:29:26 PM EST Alec Leamas wrote: >> Many questions here, and a large package. Still, searching the logs I >> cannot see any python files - are there any such at all? > > None at all. Its all java, javascript, R, and ELF

Re: F27 strange rpmbuild failure

2018-02-04 Thread Steve Grubb
On Sunday, February 4, 2018 1:38:27 PM EST Antonio wrote: > On 04/02/2018 19:27, Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote: > >> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I am building a package locally and run across a failure

Re: F27 strange rpmbuild failure

2018-02-04 Thread Steve Grubb
On Sunday, February 4, 2018 2:29:26 PM EST Alec Leamas wrote: > On 04/02/18 19:30, Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote: > > > >> Not enough information to check signature validity.Show Details > >> > >> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2018-02-04 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 936 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 826 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 797

Re: F27 strange rpmbuild failure

2018-02-04 Thread Alec Leamas
On 04/02/18 19:30, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote: >> Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details >> >> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1

Re: F27 strange rpmbuild failure

2018-02-04 Thread Antonio
On 04/02/2018 19:27, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am building a package locally and run across a failure that seems to be >>> unexplained. It gets to the install phase and then

Re: F27 strange rpmbuild failure

2018-02-04 Thread Steve Grubb
On Sunday, February 4, 2018 12:42:56 PM EST Antonio Trande wrote: > Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details > > On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am building a package locally and run across a failure that seems to be > > unexplained. It gets

Re: F27 strange rpmbuild failure

2018-02-04 Thread Antonio Trande
On 04/02/2018 18:13, Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello, > > I am building a package locally and run across a failure that seems to be > unexplained. It gets to the install phase and then abruptly fails with the > following build log: > > -- Installing: /home/sgrubb/working/BUILDROOT/R-studio- >

F27 strange rpmbuild failure

2018-02-04 Thread Steve Grubb
Hello, I am building a package locally and run across a failure that seems to be unexplained. It gets to the install phase and then abruptly fails with the following build log: -- Installing: /home/sgrubb/working/BUILDROOT/R-studio-

Re: The New Hotness builds failing with py2_dist macros

2018-02-04 Thread Jeremy Cline
On 02/02/2018 11:39 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Actually comprehending your message, I see it's not you building this > package at all and it's not doing it in koji, either. So I wonder what > environment is present when hotness is trying to build the SRPM. If > somehow it doesn't have

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Removing ldconfig scriptlets

2018-02-04 Thread Rex Dieter
Thomas Haller wrote: > now, building network-manager-applet(fc28) on Fedora 27, it fails: > > Full log written to /data/src/fedpkg/network-manager-applet/network- > manager-applet-1.8.10/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/meson-logs/testlog.txt > + %ldconfig_scriptlets -n libnma > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YVXizL:

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Removing ldconfig scriptlets

2018-02-04 Thread Thomas Haller
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 10:04 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > For those who didn't check Change page since today's morning: Thanks > to Jason > Tibbits (tibbs) who proposed %ldconfig_scriptlets macro and its > implementation. > > Now we have 4 macros you could use: %ldconfig, %ldconfig_post, >

[Bug 1541736] New: perl-bignum-0.49 is available

2018-02-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541736 Bug ID: 1541736 Summary: perl-bignum-0.49 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-bignum Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1534885] perl-Dancer2-Plugin-DBIC-0.0100-1.fc28 FTBFS: Can' t call method "resultset" on an undefined value at /usr/share/perl5/ vendor_perl/DBIx/Class/Schema.pm line 547.

2018-02-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534885 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Now that we have DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader 0.07048, tests pass. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1517785] perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07047-3.fc28 FTBFS: tests crash

2018-02-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517785 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Version 0.07048 mitigates the change in behaviour in Hash::Merge and builds without error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1539954] perl-CSS-DOM-0.17 is available

2018-02-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539954 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1541680] perl-Mojolicious-7.62 is available

2018-02-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541680 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-04 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "Nicolas Mailhot" > It's a bit of a Lego guideline, you assemble the spec blocs you need, and > ignore those you don't need. The > example was chosen to include as many blocks as possible, with the > walkthrough explaining their respective > functions. All the